What's nonsense? That's its still not an attempt to get rid of gender differences? Or that opposition to this sort of thing is populated by the conservative right? Or that the article is yet another attempt to rally the right wing retards?
Its a bathroom, FFS. lol
You calling this "BS drama and fear propaganda from the religious/conservative right" is nonsense.
So is failing to read and understand the definition of "gender identity." I challenge you to read it and tell me exactly what all of that definition means.
And so is failing to recognize the broader agenda of indoctrination on this whole subject. I'm not necessarily talking about the article that is the subject of this thread. As I said, when I see articles like this it looks like part of the overall agenda to eliminate gender differences and to redefine gender--not biologically, but by statute. Go read the definition.
I posted a few articles in a thread on here about the "Pono Choices" program in Hawaii, where among things, they are trying to teach little kids that the anus is a genital just like a vagina. That is twisted.
You guys in California (along with some other states) have also gotten rid of references to "husband" and "wife," and made the references gender neutral. I'm telling you the next thing you might see over there is eliminating references to "boys" and "girls." No, that isn't going to actually change someone's gender, but it's just like the statutory creation of a new gender classification, and like letting kids choose which gender they want to act like, what gender specific sports they want to play, the bathroom situation, etc.
All of this stuff is happening, so calling it "fear propaganda" is silly. What it all means at the end of the day is a legitimate question. I really don't know. Maybe nothing. But I doubt there are no consequences for our quest to normalize abnormality.