Author Topic: Police State - Official Thread  (Read 995450 times)

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2750 on: February 12, 2016, 09:25:53 AM »
Coward Cop Convicted for Killing Unarmed Innocent Father of Two as He Walked Home

Brooklyn, NY – After fatally shooting an unarmed innocent man in a dimly lit stairwell, NYPD Officer Peter Liang was convicted of manslaughter and official misconduct after killing the man for no reason and making no attempt to help the dying father of two young girls. Instead of administering CPR or requesting an ambulance, Liang bickered with his partner and whined about possibly losing his job.

On November 20, 2014, NYPD officers Peter Liang and Shaun Landau were conducting patrols on the upper floors of the Louis H. Pink housing project in Brooklyn even though Deputy Inspector Miguel Iglesias had ordered them not to conduct vertical patrols inside the building. Liang initially reported opening the door to the stairwell with the same hand holding his Glock .9mm pistol. Instead of opening the door with his right hand, which held his flashlight, Liang claimed he accidentally fired a shot that ricocheted off the wall and into Akai Gurley’s chest.

“They didn’t identify themselves,” recalled Gurley’s girlfriend, Melissa Butler. “No nothing. They didn’t give no explanation. They just pulled a gun and shot him in the chest.”

Standing on the floor below them, Gurley staggered down to the fifth floor where he collapsed. Melissa Butler ran to an apartment to ask for help and called 911. As the operator instructed Butler to administer first aid until the paramedics arrived, Liang and Landau remained in the stairwell texting their union rep instead of immediately calling in the shooting or requesting an ambulance.

“It was an accident,” Liang whimpered to his partner. “I’m gonna get fired.”

Gurley was transported to Brookdale Hospital where he was pronounced dead. Officers Liang and Landau were taken to a separate hospital for treatment of tinnitus. Liang was placed on administrative duty following the incident.

“There was absolutely no threat to him, his partner or any resident,” stated Assistant District Attorney Mark Fliedner. “He mishandled his weapon, and as a result Akai Gurley is dead.”

Last year, a grand jury indicted Liang on charges of second-degree manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, second-degree assault, reckless endangerment, and two counts of official misconduct. During Liang’s trial, Fliedner told jurors, “Instead of doing all that he could to help Akai Gurley, he wasted precious time arguing with his partner about calling for help. In fact, instead of calling for help, he just stood there and whined and moaned about how he would get fired.”

Changing his original story, Liang stated that his finger was not on the trigger when he entered the stairwell. Instead, he now claims his finger was resting on the side of his gun before the shooting. In his defense, Liang testified, “I heard something on my left side… It startled me (then) the gun just went off.”

Shortly after the jury convicted Liang of second-degree manslaughter and official misconduct, the NYPD fired him. Liang is the first NYPD cop convicted in an officer-involved shooting in at least a decade. His sentencing is scheduled for April 14, and he faces up to 15 years in prison.

Akai Gurley did not deserve to die because the NYPD handed a badge and gun over to an incompetent coward. Besides locking Liang away to prevent further deaths, the NYPD must also be held responsible for failing to weed out killer cops including Peter Liang, Daniel Pantaleo, Paul Headley, Michael Carey, Marc Cooper, Gescard Isnora, Michael Oliver, Richard Neri Jr., Bryan Conroy, Edward McMellon, Sean Carroll, Kenneth Boss, Richard Murphy, etc.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/coward-cop-fired-convicted-killing-unarmed-innocent-man/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2751 on: February 12, 2016, 09:39:32 AM »
California Cop Who Killed DUI Suspect Charged with Manslaughter Two Months After D.A. Declined to File Charges (Update)

On Tuesday it was noted the Paradise police officer Patrick Feaster, who shot an unarmed DUI suspect in November, is no longer employed at the Paradise Police Department.

By Wednesday morning, Feaster was charged with involuntary manslaughter.

According to the Paradise Post:

Feaster was arraigned in Judge James Reilley’s court at 8:30 a.m. after Butte County District Attorney Mike Ramsey decided to bring manslaughter charges against Feaster. The former officer was charged with a single felony count of involuntary manslaughter while armed. Feaster did not enter a plea.

The charges come two days after Paradise Police Chief Gabriela Tazzari-Dineen announced Feaster was no longer on the payroll. The chief said she couldn’t say whether Feaster was fired because of state law outlined by the “Police Officer’s Bill of Rights.”

When asked by a reporter whether Feaster quit or was fired, Ramsey said only that Feaster did not resign.

The California “Officers’ Bill of Rights” cites no protection from disclosing personnel information upon departure, citing only that cops under interrogation will not be subjected to being paraded in front of the media without the officer’s consent.

However, California public records law may still protect police officers’ personnel records from being released other than basic dates of hiring and firing.


But now that Feaster has been criminally charged, we can see why he is no longer working for the department, which ends a long career where he was renowned for cracking down on DUI suspects.

In a 2012 news interview, Feaster said his uncle, who is his namesake, was killed by a drunk driver before he was born, which made it a personal quest for him to arrest all DUI suspects, which led to him receiving an award from MADD.

As many of us can see in the viral video, Feaster followed the suspected DUI driver who had left a local bar without his headlights on.

The driver,  Andrew Thomas, struck the median, causing the vehicle to roll and ejecting the passenger, Thomas’ wife, who died at the scene.

Thomas was seen climbing from the wreckage of the vehicle, disoriented  and dazed, with his hands visible.

As Feaster approached, he drew his service weapon and fired, striking Thomas in the neck and severing his spinal cord, causing him to fall back into the vehicle.

Feaster later stated he thought Thomas was going to run, which is why he drew his service weapon.

Under close examination of the video, you can see what looks like two muzzle flashes as he rocks back on the heels of his feet towards his right.

At first, Butte County District Attorney Mike Ramsey said Feaster fired his weapon in a negligent manner but not in a “criminally negligent manner”, exonerating him in the shooting.

Ramsey’s basis for this argument is that officers are taught to draw their weapon and fire twice at a target, claiming Feaster only fired once, before holstering his gun and acting as if nothing had happened.

However, there is a discrepancy between what the video shows and what prosecutors claim.

The video shows what looks to be two shots, while prosecutors claim it is an optical illusion by the flashing lights.

Even then, the gun did not fire itself.

No shell casings were found but Feaster can be seen searching the ground as Thomas was communicating with other officers, perhaps searching for shell casings to remove them from the scene.

After the shooting, Feaster can be seen attempting to coax Thomas out of the vehicle, then claiming on the radio that he was refusing to come out of the vehicle.

Thomas is heard on the dash cam saying “you shot me”.

When Thomas told another officer that he could not move because he had been shot by the officer, that officer stated, “he didn’t shoot you.”

It was only after Thomas died from his injuries that prosecutors re-opened the case, looking into possible manslaughter charges, which hinge on the fact that Feaster failed to render aid to the victim.

And it was only when medics arrived several minutes later did they realize Thomas was shot and told the commanding officer about it.

Feaster also failed to radio into dispatch that shots were fired nor did he tell responding medics and officers that he shot the Thomas or discharged his weapon.

After 11 minutes had passed, the senior officer on scene told Feaster and other officers to go back to the bar to see if somebody may have shot him there.

And that was when Feaster finally admitted that he had fired his service weapon.

However, Feaster and other officers failed to provide aid to Thomas or his wife, who laid there taking her dying breaths as Feaster kept his mouth shut about the shooting.


UPDATE: According to Action News reporter Cecile Juliette, Feaster if facing up to five years in prison if convicted.

However, there was no separate charge for the fact that he waited 11 minutes to admit he shot Thomas because “California does not have a negligence of performance official duty criminal charge.”

“They say his failure to report the shot did not delay the medical response Thomas received. However, it did (partially) lead to Feaster’s termination from the Paradise Police force,” she reported on her Facebook page.

The autopsy shows Thomas died from septic shock stemming from the gunshot wound that severed his spine.

There is also a video of the arraignment on her page.


Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2752 on: February 12, 2016, 09:54:44 AM »
Ohio Man Sentenced to 240 Days for Recording Cops and Holding Up Sign Warning Drivers of DUI Checkpoint

An Ohio man was sentenced to 240 days in jail Thursday for First Amendment-related activities, including attempting to video record police in public and warning drivers of an upcoming DUI checkpoint by holding up a sign.

Douglas “Deo” Odolecki of Cleveland Cop Block was whisked away to jail immediately after the trial.

His attorney, John Gold, plans to appeal.

“The judge far exceeded her authority today,” he said in a telephone interview with Photography is Not a Crime.

“It’s clear she had her mind made up to sentence Doug to the maximum sentence possible, but she actually went overboard.”

It’s not surprising considering Parma Municipal Judge Deanna O’Donnell was accused by the ACLU in 2013 of running a “debtor’s” prison, one of several judges in the state who would spend hundreds of tax dollars to jail poor people for not paying fines of less than $100.

Odolecki, who was on trial for two incidents involving the Parma Police Department, was convicted of one count of misconduct at the scene of an emergency, two counts of obstruction of official business and one count of disorderly conduct. Videos of the incidents are posted below.

She then gave him the maximum sentence for each charge and ordered that they be served consecutively instead of concurrently, which Gold says goes against Ohio law.

“She knows better but she doesn’t care,” he said.

She also made very pro-police statements during his sentencing, describing how hard they work and how she is doing her part in making their job easier to by jailing the local Cop Blocker.

She also has four plaques awarded to her by the Parma Police Department in the jury room, the only plaques on display there as if to send a message to deliberating jurors.

We’ve seen these judges before. They are the ones whose decisions are reversed upon appeal. Read Cop Block’s account of the trial here.

The incidents
The first incident took place on June 13, 2014 where Odolecki was standing on a sidewalk, holding up a sign reading “Checkpoint Ahead. Turn Now!” to warn motorists of an upcoming DUI checkpoint.

He was approached by two cops, one who told them he had the right to stand there with the sign, but he needed to remove the phrase “Turn Now!” from the sign.

“This is coming directly from our law department,” claimed Parma police officer James Manzo, who beat a 16-year-old boy, costing the city a $40,000 settlement.

Police cited Odolecki for obstructing and had his sign confiscated.

Then on July 29, 2015, in an incident which we covered here, Odolecki came across a group of cops gathering around a teenager near a bridge off a busy thoroughfare.

Thinking the teen may have been getting unlawfully harassed, he began recording from across the street before crossing the street to get a better angle.

He stood about 40 feet away with a railing separating himself from the cops when the cops told him to get lost because the teen was having “a real bad day.”

When Odolecki refused to go away, Parma Police Sergeant Ken Gillissie stormed up to him and assaulted him.

“First of all, he’s a juvenile so you can’t film him without his parent’s permission,” Gillissie said, taking a swipe at the camera.

“Take a walk!” Gillissie ordered as Odolecki told him, “don’t touch my shit again.”

“Take a walk or you’re going to jail,” Gillissie continued.

“For what?” Odolecki asked.

“For obstructing,” Gillissie responded.

“For obstructing what, I’m on public property,” Odolecki asked.

Gillissie assaulted him again, so Odolecki complied with his order to “take a walk.”

Odolecki walked across the street and continued recording.

“Public property, arrest me now,” he said. “This guy likes to violate people’s fucking rights over here.”

“Say hello to YouTube, guy!”

One cop started yelling at him that he was “offending small children.”

Less than a minute later, Gillissie and another cop cross the street and place him under arrest.

He was charged with misconduct at the scene of an emergency, accused of adding distress to an autistic suicidal teen by recording when he never knew the teen was suicidal.

They also charged him with obstructing even though they were the ones who hurdled over the guard railing to attack him.

And the disorderly conduct charge stems from the fact that he cursed at them after they had assaulted him and forced him across the street.

But the First Amendment allows citizens to curse at police as long as they are not threats or fighting words.

The maximum sentence for those charges are 90 days for the obstructing charges and 30 days each for the other two charges.

Both incidents were violations of his First Amendment rights, which obviously not recognized in O’Donnell’s courtroom.

“It was very clear as the trial progressed that she did not think very highly of our case,” Gold said. “She was very aggressive towards myself and my co-counsel.

“During sentencing, she went into a diatribe about how cops are abused for trying to do their job.

“She said, ‘I don’t have the power to make it end, but I have the power to make it stop for a little while.'”

And with that, Odolecki was whisked away to serve his 240-day sentence.

So perhaps it’s time for the ACLU of Ohio to revisit the Parma Municipal Court. Below is an excerpt of the letter it sent to O’Donnell in 2013.

https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/12/ohio-man-sentenced-to-240-days-for-recording-cops-and-holding-up-sign-warning-drivers-of-dui-checkpoint/

Deacon Jeschin

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1351
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2753 on: February 12, 2016, 01:52:42 PM »
Finally, some good news.........

Close your eyes, piggy san......that's not soy sauce on your back..... Hahahahahaha.....

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-peter-liang-guilty-fatal-shooting-akai-gurley-article-1.2528827


Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2754 on: February 12, 2016, 02:16:48 PM »
Finally, some good news.........

Close your eyes, piggy san......that's not soy sauce on your back..... Hahahahahaha.....

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-peter-liang-guilty-fatal-shooting-akai-gurley-article-1.2528827



Posted on top of page. And look at how some criminal goons reacted:

Quote
“We are very disappointed in the verdict and believe that the jury came to an absolutely wrong decision,” Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch said. “This bad verdict will have a chilling effect on police officers across the city because it criminalizes a tragic accident.”

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20798
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2755 on: February 12, 2016, 02:37:55 PM »

Quote from: Deacon Jeschin on Today at 22:52:42
Finally, some good news.........

Close your eyes, piggy san......that's not soy sauce on your back..... Hahahahahaha.....

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-peter-liang-guilty-fatal-shooting-akai-gurley-article-1.2528827



Posted on top of page. And look at how some criminal goons reacted:

Quote
“We are very disappointed in the verdict and believe that the jury came to an absolutely wrong decision,” Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch said. “This bad verdict will have a chilling effect on police officers across the city because it criminalizes a tragic accident.”








Ahha at last the jury's are starting to come to there senses
Regarding these Scumbag Cops & there Contiual Shooting of
Innocent Unarmed People.
Clearly by the Reaction of the Cop He Thought It was a Forgone
Conclusion He would be Found Not Guilty just as so many before him.
No Doubt 'The He Was In Fear Of His Life ' Get out of Jail Free
Card Didn't Work This Time.

Maybe just maybe with a few more Scumbag Killer Cops Being Jailed
The Rest Of Them Might Behave as though they are part of the Law
& Not Above It.

As for the quote from the patrol mans association  ::)   Really are some
Sick People in Jobs They shouldn't be in.
Exactly Why There is So Much Annimosity & Distrust to do with all
Thing Police.

See No Evil
Hear No Evil
Speak No Evil

When it comes to the Police.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2756 on: February 13, 2016, 02:22:18 AM »
Memphis Police Abuse Man; Local Media Blind to Abuse

The local media in Memphis captured a video of police chasing a man who surrendered, only for the Memphis police officer to strike him with a baton and kick him twice before planting his foot on the suspect’s back and handcuffing him.

It was a clear case of police brutality because the man had surrendered.

But Local Memphis was still not certain, so they had to turn to their “experts” to educate them.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the problem with corporate media these days.

Rather than state the obvious, they had to turn to their so-called experts in order to appear “objective.”

This station is so objective that it blurred the faces of the cops involved as well as the face of the  suspect (but only because they wanted to protect the cops.)

And who were these experts?

The head of the Memphis police union, of course.

And can you guess what Michael Williams, president of the Memphis Police Association, said?

Mike Williams said it is important to consider the incident from the officer’s point of view.

“Yes they were they were rough because he has already had indications that he did not want to comply with authority so until he is in custody he is going to be treated as such. Period,” Williams said.

In a later article, they were able to contact more experts, who had varying opinions.

State Representative G.A. Hardaway watched the video and said he was outraged by what he saw.

“There’s obviously some abuse going on here, excessive force. When I’m looking at a young man that’s on the ground and supporting himself with one arm laying down, that is not a position where he’s a threat to anybody standing,” said Hardaway.

Steve Mulroy, a former federal prosecutor and civil rights lawyer for the Department of Justice, agrees.

“When the suspect was already down on the ground with his arms indicating that he was going to comply, offering no resistance and not failing to obey any commands from the officer, it was not justified for the officer to strike him with the nightstick or to kick him,” said Mulroy.

Not everyone agrees. Out for a walk with his wife and son, James Richey witnessed the arrest. He was pleased with the officer’s response.

“They pretty much followed standard procedures that an MPD officer would follow, took him down. You had the other officers detain him,” said Richey.

According to the police report, the suspect in this case hit a woman and in the process hit his child. The report says he fought with police.

So there you have it. A split decision between the experts with the police union president and some random guy in the neighborhood saying it was justified and a state representative and a former prosecutor saying it was not justified.

But the real problem is that Local Memphis was unable to come out and state the obvious.



https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/12/memphis-police-abuse-man-local-media-blind-to-abuse/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2757 on: February 13, 2016, 03:36:41 PM »
State Supreme Court Rules Cops No Longer Need a Warrant to Enter Homes and Seize Evidence

Wisconsin Just Lost its 4th Amendment Rights by the Single Vote of a Judge Appointed by Scott Walker

The Wisconsin Supreme Court just dealt a death blow to the Fourth Amendment, which is supposed to protect a citizen against unreasonable search and seizure. What’s more, the decision was made by a single, newly-appointed judge who was not even present when arguments were made in court.

In a 4-3 decision, the state’s highest court ruled that evidence seized in a person’s private home during a warrantless search can be used against the person under an expanded view of the “community caretaker” clause.

Police went to Charles Matalonis’ house after his brother was found bloodied at a nearby residence. Matalonis, admitting he fought with his brother, let the cops in, where they saw blood in the apartment and some cannabis. They wanted to look inside a locked room, and when Matalonis refused to unlock it, the cops broke in. There they found a cannabis growing setup, whereupon Matalonis was arrested and charged with manufacture of cannabis.

The Court of Appeals had previously ruled this to be an unreasonable search. However, in the majority opinion of the Supreme Court, “Justice Annette Ziegler found that police were not investigating a crime but exercising their “community caretaker” function by checking to make sure no other injured people were in the house.”

This was challenged by three other Justices, who argued that “by the time officers entered the locked room, some 20 minutes or more after they had been in the house, there was little reason to suspect someone else was in the bedroom, but plenty of reason to suspect it might house marijuana.”

If the case had remained deadlocked at 3-3, then the Court of Appeals ruling that the evidence should be suppressed would have stood. But in a move that is without precedent in the U.S. or the Wisconsin Supreme Courts, newly-appointed Justice Rebecca Bradley cast the deciding vote without participating in oral arguments.

“No precedent appears to exist in the United States Supreme Court or in this court for a new justice who did not participate in oral argument to participate in the case without re-argument,” said Justice Shirley Abrahamson.
Bradley was appointed by Governor Scott Walker after Justice Patrick Crooks passed away on Sept. 21, and is now running for election. Bradley had not participated in five earlier cases since her appointment, but decided to chime in on this one. She believed that listening to taped recordings of the arguments, instead of being there in person and involved, was sufficient for her to make the call.

So, an unelected judge appointed by a partisan politician cast a single vote, without being present during arguments, which effectively nullified the Fourth Amendment in that state. Now in Wisconsin, cops can enter a person’s home without a warrant, seize evidence and use it against the person.
The irony is that this attack on the Fourth Amendment is being carried out under the guise of cops being “community caretakers.” In other words, the state presumes that it is doing what’s best for the common good by violating the rights of the individual.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/wisconsin-lost-4th-amendment-rights-single-vote-justice-appointed-scott-walker/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2758 on: February 13, 2016, 03:40:42 PM »
Watch Free Speech Die: Cop Tickets Man Because It’s Now “Illegal to Offend Someone”

Austin, TX — A video uploaded to Youtube this week shows an ominous precedent being set in America. Offending someone is now grounds for police action.

A preacher near the University of Texas at Austin documented this death blow to the freedom of speech. The preacher was voicing his opinion on anal sex, just outside of the campus when students became ‘offended’ and sought out state force to punish the man for his speech.

When the officer came up to the preacher, he essentially explained to him that the 1st Amendment is irrelevant, “The law says if you offend someone, and they wanna press charges.”

“It’s against the law to offend someone?” the preacher asked in complete surprise.

“Yes,” the cop repeated.

The officer then proceeded to repeat the words that hurt the oh-so-sensitive ears of the passersby, prompting them to sic the cops on a man for his words. “Dirty penis. Genital warts. You can’t keep your legs closed. It’s a war on the anus. Homosexuals at UT,” repeated the officer, as if he was exhibiting evidence of an actual crime.

While the Free Thought Project certainly doesn’t agree with the preacher’s views, we will stand up for his right to voice them.

Even the vilest, most repugnant, and hateful speech must be defended with our lives. For if we ever give the state the ability to silence one of us, they will silence all of us.

In the video, the officers actually admit that they write “so many of these tickets” that it is hard to keep track of them. So, this is hardly an isolated incident.

When the Free Thought Project called the campus police department for a statement, we were told that the citation was voided. But this was most likely due the outpouring of calls from the tens of thousands of viewers who watched the video on Youtube, with the department’s phone number in the title.

Had the man in the video attempted to ‘resist’ his unlawful citation and detainment, the officer could have killed him and this would have been justified — in the land of the free.



http://thefreethoughtproject.com/watch-free-speech-die-cop-tickets-man-illegal-offend-someone/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2759 on: February 14, 2016, 02:28:32 PM »
“Sickening” Video Shows Cops Attack a Peaceful Old Man and Break His Arm for No Reason

Burlington City, NJ — In February 2014, Steven S. Kahn, 60, was peacefully sitting in his car, had not harmed anyone and was not suspected of committing any crime. However, these facts would prove to be no defense against Burlington City police officers and their tendency that night to escalate a peaceful situation into a violent one.

The entire interaction was captured on police dashcam.

According to the Courier-Post, Michael J. McKenna, a Cherry Hill attorney representing Kahn, said the video “demonstrates a use of force by police against a 60-year-old man so excessive that it can only be called sickening.”

According to a lawsuit filed on behalf of Kahn, police went to the Wawa gas station where he was parked in response to Kahn’s passenger being involved in a dispute over a clerk’s refusal to sell her tobacco products without an ID.

As shown on the dashcam, the situation looks peaceful enough as three officers surround the car. However, the scene quickly turns violent as the female passenger, the alleged subject of the police investigation, becomes the target of cops.

In the video, the officers are seen shouting at the woman, who is then yanked from the car and slammed on the hood of the patrol car as she is placed in handcuffs.

While this was going on, Kahn sat peacefully and calmly in his car, until he became the subject of the officers’ “swift, severe and unprovoked violence,” according to the suit

The Courier-Post reports,

The suit alleges Patrolman Jeremy Bright then approached Kahn and believed he saw the man “nudge” the remnants of a marijuana cigarette into a Wawa coffee cup.
Bright ordered Kahn to step out of his vehicle, then pulled him out “without giving Mr. Kahn time to unbuckle his seat belt,” says the suit.
It says Bright repeatedly ordered Kahn to “stop resisting,” while the Philadelphia man shouted, ““I’m not doing nothing.”
After the officers had slammed the 60-year-old man face down on the concrete, they knelt on him while placing him in an arm lock. Wanting to join in on the assault, officer William Lancenese, jumped in and also “applied weight and force on top of Mr. Kahn,” the suit says.

As multiple cops applied their weight and force to the 60-year-old, Kahn noted that he couldn’t comply with giving the officers his right arm because it was pinned underneath him by the officers’ weight.

According to the lawsuit, it was at this point that Bright “suddenly and with great force” bent Kahn’s left arm until it snapped.

The brutalized and tormented Kahn was then placed in handcuffs which “caused further agony and suffering,” according to the suit. Then, instead of bringing him to a hospital, the injured man was brought to jail.

The ‘charges’ against Kahn, which apparently required such brutal force to arrest him, were all dropped as a part of a conditional plea. The entire violent interaction in the video below was carried out by these officers for no reason at all.


http://thefreethoughtproject.com/sickening-video-shows-cops-attack-peaceful-man-break-arm/

http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/news/2016/02/11/steven-kahn-burlington-city/80231962/


Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2760 on: February 14, 2016, 02:31:43 PM »
Something like that would be perfect for Harley to jam it up their wazoos.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2761 on: February 14, 2016, 02:32:26 PM »
Elderly Woman Tasered, Her Arm Broken, for Not Removing Her Earrings Fast Enough

Chattanooga, TN — When 60-year-old Nancy Mason was in the process of being booked into the Hamilton County, Tennessee, jail on theft charges she refused to remove her earrings quickly enough setting off a violent chain of events. For not complying fast enough, Sheriff’s Sergeant Rodney Terrell tased her — sending the woman crashing to the ground, landing on and breaking her arm in the fall.

Before being booked, Mason is ordered to remove her jewelry but refuses to do so. “I will report you,” she says to Terrell. Terrell, can be heard saying, “Report all you want, I will not keep telling you.”

Then he fires his taser.

“You broke my arm,” Mason says in video footage, clutching her wrist in disbelief, after recovering from the fall.

“I didn’t break your arm, you broke it,” the officer retorts.

Meanwhile, despite Mason’s complaints of pain, a group of officers stands around and makes no move even to offer medical assistance.

This exchange is now the subject of a $1.75 million lawsuit for the ‘alleged’ use of excessive force by Terrell, and the failure by him and four other sheriff’s deputies, as well as the arresting Chattanooga police officer, to adequately protect her from harm. Mason had, in fact, suffered a fracture of her wrist — which she is still recovering from.

According to local ABC affiliate News Channel 9, Mason’s attorney, Robin Flores, said, “She was deprived of due process in that she was in a helpless position, or was in the care and control of the government actors, and they failed to protect her.”

The lawsuit names the City of Chattanooga and Hamilton County for failure to “properly train its officers and agents to intervene and prevent injury.”

Despite the suit — and an internal affairs investigation by Hamilton County of the incident — all officers involved remain on the job in their same roles.

The Hamilton County Sheriff declined to comment due to the pending legal case and the City of Chattanooga. only saying that “their officer did nothing wrong,” reported Channel 9.

“Whenever there’s a constitutional wrong done to one person, it’s going to be done to everybody and someone needs to step in to help,” said Flores, according to WRCBtv. “Lawyers are usually in the best position to do that.”

After this unjustifiable exchange, Mason now feels about cops the way many across the United States have unfortunately concluded after experiencing excessive force. According to Flores,

“She fears police, she fears being around them and she fears seeing them.”

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/elderly-woman-tasered-removing-earings-fast/

http://newschannel9.com/news/local/accusation-of-excessive-force-against-a-hamilton-county-deputy


Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2762 on: February 16, 2016, 10:18:39 PM »
North Carolina Police Department Sued for Probing Man’s Anus for Non-Existing Drugs

After forcing a man to strip naked in a cheap motel room, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department is being sued for compensatory and punitive damages under state and federal law. No dollar amount has been set.

Two men have filed a lawsuit against Charlotte police, claiming police assaulted and kidnapped them while violating their civil rights by subjecting them to illegal searches in April 2014 at a west Charlotte motel.

The lawsuit was filed in January 2016. Defendants in the lawsuit include the city of Charlotte, former Police Chief Rodney Monroe, Sergeant John Gorrod, and officers Michael Bodenstein and Michael Wallin, .

The plaintiffs Jeramie Barideaux and Jonathan Harris claim they were sitting in a vehicle at the Rodeway Inn in west Charlotte listening to music and discussing future endeavors when officer Michael Wallin parked his patrol car in front of their car.

Officer Wallin said he was responding to a suspicious vehicle 911 call.

Sergeant John Gorrod and officer Michael Bodenstein arrived seconds later. Officer Wallin said he wanted to search the vehicle, but they refused.

Wallin ordered the two men out of the vehicle and began searching them for drugs without consent, which happens to be a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Officer Bodenstein began to search Harris, that search included his genitalia and buttocks. Upon the first search, Bodenstein searched Harris a second time, telling Harris that he believed he was hiding crack cocaine in his anus.

Even though the first two illegal searches yielded no drugs, Bodenstein stated, “I can either squeeze your ass for crack now, or arrest you and check your ass for crack downtown.”

Harris was then taken inside of a motel room where he was ordered to strip search down to bare nudity. It was then that Harris was ordered to bend over while Bodenstein and Wallin searched Harris’s buttocks.

But still no drugs were found in the third search.

The two plaintiffs were released on the scene.

The attorney for the plaintiffs Morris McAdoo said the lawsuit is designed “to bring justice for these young men by revealing the details of this painful night.”

The lawsuit, which can be read here states:

“Plantiffs were improperly seized without probable cause or reasonable suspicions. Plantiffs were denied liberty without justification in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The seizure was unreasonable and undertaken in malice, willfulness, and reckless indifference.”

The officers’ conduct was extreme and outrageous exceeding all bounds of human decency

The suit alleges that Sergeant Gorrod gave Bodenstein and Wallin the green light to perform multiple body cavity searches, and was aware of the probable consequences in doing so.

In fact, police records show that Gorrod was suspended in February 2010. The department would not detail the reason as to why Gorrod was suspended.

The suit also claims former Chief Monroe, “Adopted and encouraged a policy and approach in conducting warrantless search and seizures including body cavity searches that violate the constitutional and privacy rights of citizens”

Oddly enough, Chief Monroe retired shortly after the department and city settled a $2.25 million settlement with the family of a unarmed man that was shot and killed by Charlotte police.

The lawsuit describes Officer Wallin’s actions as corrupt, intentional and illegal.

It’s interesting to note that Wallin’s wife also works for the police department. Although officer Jessica Wallin was not named in the suit, she is the Public Information Officer, meaning her job is to speak to the media.

In a one-on-one interview with PINAC News, she said, “I look forward to my husband being cleared of any wrong doing once the truth comes out.”

https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/16/north-carolina-police-department-sued-for-probing-mans-anus-for-non-existing-drugs/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2763 on: February 18, 2016, 12:29:17 AM »
Los Angeles police officers accused of raping women while on duty

LOS ANGELES –  While one Los Angeles police officer acted as a lookout in the front seat of a departmental car, a 19-year-old woman working as a drug informant was forced to perform oral sex on his partner in the back seat after being told, "You have to do what the police tell you to do," the teenager said in a federal court filing.

Another woman, also working as a drug informant, said the same two officers each forced her to have sex with them twice after threatening her with jail time.

Two other women told similar stories.

On Wednesday, prosecutors announced that veteran Officers James Nichols and Luis Valenzuela had been arrested and charged with repeatedly raping the four women over a three-year period, mostly while they were on duty.

The charges against Nichols, 44, and Valenzuela, 43, include rape under color of authority and oral copulation by force. Valenzuela also is charged with pointing a gun at one of the women.

They could face life in prison if convicted.

Attorneys representing the officers in civil litigation filed by the women did not return messages seeking comment Wednesday. The officers, who have denied all the claims in court records, were set to be arraigned on Thursday.

Prosecutors are asking that they each be held on bail of more than $3.5 million.

Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck said at a news conference Wednesday that both officers have been suspended without pay since 2013. Their employment status is pending an administrative hearing that would follow their criminal case, he said.

"These two officers have disgraced themselves, they disgraced this badge, they disgraced their oaths of office," Beck said. "It's a violation of public trust."

He said investigators are actively seeking other potential victims.

Prosecutors said the rapes began in December 2008 after Nichols and Valenzuela became partners in the department's Hollywood Division. They were working as narcotics investigators.

Prosecutors say all four women assaulted had been arrested on drug-related charges at various times by the officers, and court records show at least two had been recruited by the officers to work as drug informants.

Those women have filed civil rights lawsuits against the officers. The Los Angeles City Council settled one case last year after agreeing to pay one woman $575,000, while the other case is still being litigated.

A third lawsuit is expected to be filed.

Beck said the department's internal affairs bureau began investigating the officers after the first woman complained of being raped in 2010. In 2014, the department's elite Robbery Homicide Division took over.

Asked why it took so long for the charges to filed against the officers, Beck said the investigation was complicated and involved reluctant witnesses who were difficult to find.

Dennis Chang, an attorney who represents two of the women in the case, said the officers took advantage of the women's positions and threatened them with jail time or outing them as informants.

"These women were drug users, they're primarily arrested and in custody, in an extremely vulnerable state," Chang said. "They were afraid."

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/18/los-angeles-police-officers-accused-raping-women-while-on-duty.html

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20798
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2764 on: February 18, 2016, 02:21:07 PM »
I just don't know Why There is So Much Outcry
Against The Police....

It Is Only A Very Very Few That are Rotten Scumbags.
And it only Very Very Rarely Covered up By Other
Police...  ::) ::)  ::)


And I Have Some Prime Location Real Estate,
Sea side Location on The Moon For Sale.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2765 on: February 21, 2016, 02:54:08 PM »
Disturbing Video Catches Cop Plotting to Shoot an Unconscious Man in Need of Medical Help

Meriden, CT — Responding to reports of an intoxicated man asleep in the middle of the road, a Meriden, Connecticut police officer said, flatly, “I think we oughta just f***ing pop him.”

If by now you still have any lingering doubts about the widening disconnect between police and civilians — or the culture of violence and contempt rampant in police culture — this footage could tip your opinion. Though the incident was captured on video by dash camera and audio by body cam, it was only released on Thursday following a Freedom of Information Act request by the Record-Journal.

Officer John Slepski arrived on the scene on September 19, 2015, and approached the sleeping man — whom he immediately referred to as a “f***ing a**hole.” Officer John Slezak, already standing over the clearly intoxicated individual, seems as if he’s attempting to mitigate the potential that Slepski might go overboard in the interaction.

“He’s fine,” Slezak says to Slepski, “he just wants a ride to the hospital.”

“I know … f***ing douchebag,” Slepski responds, obviously annoyed he’s been summoned to help a citizen in need. “I think we oughta pepper spray this f***ing douche.”

“Alright. You gonna pepper spray him to get him up?” Slezak asks.

Though the video appears to show Slepski following through on that plan with a brief burst of spray, and his statement, “Whoa. That’ll wake you up,” Lt. Sal Nesci somehow determined, after an investigation, no pepper spray had been deployed.

In repeated attempts by the two officers to stir the man, Slepski continues to use vulgarities and is alarmingly disrespectful — particularly considering the man likely needed medical aid. Fortunately, this attitude and behavior didn’t escape his superiors’ attention.

“Your conduct while acting as a Meriden Police Officer is disgraceful,” Police Chief Jeffry Cossette wrote to Officer Slepski in a disciplinary letter, according to the Record-Journal. “Your dehumanizing and demoralizing treatment of this citizen in need of medical attention sickens me. Your actions did not perpetuate the mission of the Meriden Police Department.”

Slepski received a 60-day suspension as a result of the interaction and subsequent Internal Affairs investigation.

“If a fellow officer is behaving in a demeaning and demoralizing way toward a citizen, you have a Duty to Act,” Cossette wrote to Officer Slezak. “You said nothing to Officer Slepski as he directed the derogatory comments toward the citizen. When the citizen was directed to ‘crawl on the ground if he had to,’ you offered no assistance to this citizen. You allowed for this citizen to be treated in this matter.”

Slezak received a five-day suspension, though Detective John Williams, president of the police union, said Slezak had filed a grievance over the disciplinary action. Williams noted that Slezak “did not swear at the individual, did not cuss, did not call him any names, he even walked alongside of him when the individual stumbled to the roadway to catch him if he fell.” Williams added Slezak “cannot control what comes out of Slepski’s mouth.”

Slepski’s suspension began February 2 and Slezak’s on February 5.

The unidentified man appears lucky to have escaped the encounter unharmed.



http://thefreethoughtproject.com/i-pop-him-damning-video-shows-mentality-police-claim-serve

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2766 on: February 21, 2016, 02:59:37 PM »
In the Land of the Free, A Cop Can Kill 2 Girls, Face No Charges, then Be Elected to Office

Carroll County, GA — In September, on a rainy Saturday night, Georgia state trooper Anthony Scott was flexing his above the law privilege and driving at dangerously high speeds for no reason.

Scott was not on his way to a call, nor did he have any official reason for driving fast, when he slammed into a Nissan Sentra carrying four kids. Kylie Hope Lindsey, 17, and Isabella Alise Chinchilla, 16, who were in the back seat of the Nissan, were killed.

Dillon Lewis Wall, 18, who was driving, and front-seat passenger Benjamin Alan Finken, 17, were critically injured and taken to Grady Memorial Hospital.

Five months later, and Dillon is still recovering from a brain injury, paralysis, hearing loss and multiple broken teeth from the crash. However, according to Dillon, it’s his heart that hurts the most as this young man was crazy about Kylie.

After the crash, Capt. Mark Perry of the Georgia Department of Public Safety released a statement noting that Scott had no reason to be travelling that fast.

“Turns out he was running at a high rate of speed through this intersection in a territory that’s he’s familiar with and should have known the dangers that potentially exist,” Perry said speaking about the 10 crashes that had occurred at this intersection in the last 3 years.

An internal ‘investigation’ said that Scott’s speed only ‘contributed to the crash,’ but that Dillon’s failure to yield was to blame. However, according to Dillon’s aunt, he could not see the trooper.

Recently released dashcam video of the crash backs up Dillon’s claim of not being able to see Scott approaching. As Scott sped up the hill on that dark highway, Dillon had no way of seeing or reacting fast enough to the trooper’s car travelling at such a high speed.

After watching the dashcam footage, you can clearly see who was at fault in this scenario. However, Anthony Scott is a privileged member of law enforcement, and, therefore, he is entitled to a privileged form of justice — or injustice rather.

According to the Atlanta-Journal-Constitution,

This week, that former trooper went before a grand jury, which was investigating why he was driving 91 mph on a dark highway in Carroll County seconds before his car collided with that of the teenagers. Anthony Scott made use of a privilege that Georgia extends to law enforcement officers: the officer may choose to make a statement to a grand jury that is deciding whether to indict him for a crime. The statement comes at the end of the proceeding, and no one may challenge it or cross-examine the officer.
Scott took advantage of that privilege and was the concluding witness before the grand jury, District Attorney Pete Skandalakis said.

The grand jury chose not to indict Scott.
“There are no winners here,” Scott’s attorney, Max Pilgrim, said. “This has been harder on him than anything he ever did in the Marine Corps.” Scott saw combat during four years in the Marines.
Scott’s attorney is wrong. There is a clear “winner” here, and it’s the man who is alive and who gets to go home to his family in spite of his criminal negligence.

Because Scott was a cop — he will not face any consequences for killing two kids and paralyzing another — and we call this the ‘justice system.’

“The officer chose to speed. The officer chose to do this,” Lena Wall, Dillon’s aunt, said Thursday. “And his choice killed two people.”

Imagine for a moment that this was your nephew or son, or these two beautiful girls were your daughters. The emptiness and hopeless feeling from watching the man responsible for killing your child get off scot-free would be overwhelming.

To add insult to death, Scott was elected to city council three months after killing young Kylie and Isabella. Now, after the lack of charges, he can even return to law enforcement.

His attorney said that Scott is eager to move on, but will never be able to fully get over his remorse.

“When his daughter starts driving, he’s going to remember it, and he’s going to have to live with it,” Pilgrim said.

Well, he should have to live with it. Had he not been negligently driving nearly 40 mph over the speed limit, on a rainy night, those kids would be alive today.



http://thefreethoughtproject.com/land-free-cop-kill-2-girls-face-charges-elected-office/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2767 on: February 21, 2016, 03:02:23 PM »
Cops Caught Forcing Scientists to Falsify DNA Tests To Get More Prosecutions — Now They’re Furious

New York, NY – A group of scientists who worked at a crime lab for the New York State police are now suing the department, claiming that the agency encouraged them to overlook false test results so they could get more prosecutions. The three scientists who filed the lawsuit said that they attempted to correct some of the errors that were taking place in the crime lab, and they were silenced and retaliated against because the errors were working out in the department’s favor, and ensuring them more prosecutions.

Scientists Shannon Morris, Melissa Lee and Kevin Rafferty are seeking monetary damages in the lawsuit, but it has not been revealed how much. The group says that they wanted to implement the computerized DNA analysis system called TrueAllele in their crime lab, to ensure that the results of their tests were correct. The crime lab was working with the program for a short period of time before it was ultimately canceled by the department. However, the state police rejected the suggestion and they began to put more pressure on the scientists to secure convictions.

According to lawyer John Bailey, who will be representing the scientists, the crime lab in question had a culture of corruption.

“There are people that are very pro-prosecution. They were putting pressure on scientists to reach conclusions that were not scientifically valid. That’s what my clients were objecting to,” Bailey said.

All three of the scientists are now facing disciplinary proceedings at work for speaking out against the “pro-prosecution” culture at the lab, and one of the scientists, Shannon Morris has already been fired. Each of the researchers have worked with the state police for over 20 years and have not had any disciplinary issues until now.

As expected, State Police spokeswoman Kristin Lowman has denied the allegations and said that they canceled the program due to an investigation, but that they are not opposed to it.

“The program was not progressing because of the internal investigation. The State Police is committed to the technology and is seeking a new request for proposals to move forward. We were audited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation on all aspects of our forensic biology (DNA) operation and are in full compliance with all of our accrediting and oversight body requirements,” Lowman said.

In a similar but totally unrelated case in New York City this week, a doctor has filed a lawsuit alleging that she was forced out of her job at the medical examiner’s office because she spoke out about how the city was using a disputed method of analyzing DNA to gather evidence.

According to CBS, Dr. Marina Stajic was working for the medical examiner until she was confronted and she could either retire or be fired from her job as a laboratory director. This all came after she questioned the use of the DNA profiling technique known as low copy number, which critics have argued is unreliable and should not be used in court.

In the lawsuit from that case, Stajic says that her superiors were “displeased that [she] appeared to be aligned with the criminal defense lawyers on the commission.”

In both of these labs, there was obviously a culture of corruption where doctors and scientists were forced to go against their values and against their own research and professional opinions, for the sake of securing convictions.

Both lawsuits have yet to be taken to court.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/scientists-sue-ny-state-police-forced-falsify-dna-results-prosecutions/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2768 on: February 23, 2016, 08:37:31 AM »
U.S. Marshals Kill Wrong Man in Wrong Trailer While Trying to Serve Arrest Warrant in New Mexico

United States Marshals shot and killed the wrong man in the wrong trailer before turning their attention to the right trailer and arresting the right man early Saturday morning in New Mexico.

But now they are not admitting any wrongdoing.

However, 23-year-old Edgar Alvarado was shot dead before they eventually nabbed 25-year-old murder suspect George Bond.

Alvarado lived in trailer number 26 in the West Central trailer park in Albuquerque.

Bond was hiding out in trailer number 29, which was three trailers down.

SWAT team members were seen fist bumping each other after Bond had been arrested, so at least somebody found cause to celebrate.

According to the Albuquerque Journal:

“The United States Marshal Service was in the process of serving an arrest warrant when an incident occurred and shots were fired,” Pierce wrote in a news release.

The Marshals Service said that George Bond, 25, and six others were arrested at the trailer park. Bond was wanted in connection with a 2014 murder in Los Lunas. He had managed to flee from authorities at Albuquerque’s main post office, near Broadway and Mountain NE, on Friday afternoon.

Ben Segotta, a spokesman for the Marshals Service, said the arrests were made near where the shooting took place, but he declined to comment on the shooting.

Pierce didn’t say if the marshals opened fire or if it was officers from another law enforcement agency.

As the scene came to a close, SWAT officers were seen fist-bumping one another.

Alvarado was described as a small and outgoing man. He was a graduate of the Academy of Trades and Technology and was planning to propose to his girlfriend, his family said.


Although law enforcement is not publicly commenting on the shooting, Alvarado’s family is outraged.

On Friday, Bond had eluded authorities when he ran into a post office and ran out the back door.

Last week U.S. Marshals made national news by arresting a Texas man over a 29-year-old student loan debt.

https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/21/u-s-marshals-kill-wrong-man-in-wrong-trailer-while-trying-to-serve-arrest-warrant-in-new-mexico/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2769 on: February 23, 2016, 08:39:27 AM »
New Mexico Cops Confiscate Phone from Witness After Shooting Innocent Man in Botched Raid

Law enforcement officers are still not saying much about shooting the wrong man during a botched raid on the wrong mobile home over the weekend, but now we’re learning they confiscated a phone from the victim’s little brother who witnessed the shooting.

It is unclear if Edgar Camacho-Alvarado’s 11-year-old brother recorded the shooting or just the aftermath or if he recorded anything, but generally that is the reason cops confiscate phones after killing citizens.

And it’s far from legal, but so is shooting the wrong man dead, then asking family members for his name indicating they had no clue who they had just killed.

Their real target, George Bond, was actually inside another mobile home about 200 feet away, according to the Albuquerque Journal, which said the raid consisted U.S. Marshals, FBI Agents, New Mexico State Police, Albuquerque police, Bernalillo County sheriff’s deputies and Rio Rancho police,

After killing Camacho-Alvarado and confiscating his brother’s phone, the cops then moved on to the next trailer and began throwing flash bombs through its windows, eventually forcing its occupants outside.

Meanwhile, Camaco-Alvarado’s body lay dead in front of his mobile home for 14 hours.

And cops refused to answer any questions from family members as you can see in the video below.

Bond, 25, was wanted for a 2014 murder in which charges had been dropped in 2015, only for the case to be reopened in January 2016.

In fact, Bond had already been in custody in September 2015 for the murder of 21-year-old Charles Davlin before they dismissed the charges and released him.

On Friday, law enforcement officers were about to arrest him, but he ran into a post office and somehow managed to escape, even though they had set up a perimeter.

But they then tracked him down to the West Central mobile home park where they gathered their troops and proceeded to arrest him before dawn Saturday morning.

Bond was hiding out in trailer #29.

Camacho-Alvarado was working on his truck’s engine in front of trailer #26.

Police say “a confrontation” took place and “shots were fired,” which is police talk for they confronted Camacho-Alvarado before killing him.

He did not have a gun nor did he have a warrant. All he had was the misfortune to have been working on his truck while authorities swarmed the mobile park with multiple agencies and armored vehicles, looking for any excuse to use violence in the name of officer safety.

And now they’re probably looking for an excuse to pin his death on Bond, who should have been in custody all along.

https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/22/new-mexico-cops-confiscated-phone-from-witness-after-shooting-innocent-man-in-botched-raid/

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20798
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2770 on: February 23, 2016, 12:06:38 PM »
Where's agnostic??
He's not posted on here for awhile.

We need that expert cop view of why a
Innocent unarmed man was shot dead
& left lying outside for 14hrs.

And these are law enforcement people
Or low down murdering scumbags
Shooting & killing who they feel like
& leaving their bodies lying around.

It's good it wasn't some bunch of dindu nuffinks
Then it be all over news.
How they have no respect or regard for life.

Cops ---- oh !! That's okay Then.  ::)

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2771 on: February 24, 2016, 12:19:51 AM »
Award-Winning Texas Cop Indicted for Unlawfully Searching PINAC Correspondent’s Car While He Was Incarcerated for Recording

The Texas cop who unlawfully searched the car of a PINAC correspondent while he was incarcerated for recording a police memorial last year was indicted on a misdemeanor criminal trespass charge Thursday.

Galveston Police Sergeant Archie Chapman faces up to 180 days in jail and a $2,000 fine, according to the Houston Chronicle.

As of Monday, the award-winning officer who has a history of abuse has yet to be arrested for the incident captured on Phillip Turner’s dash cam.

However, he remains on paid administrative leave for the incident that took place in November where he and other cops arrested Turner outside the Galveston Police Department while Turner video recorded a police memorial.

Police claim they arrested him for not identifying himself, but Turner was under no legal obligation to identify himself unless they articulated a reasonable suspicion that he was involved in a crime.

Video recording a police memorial in front of the department – or even the license plates of cars leaving the police parking lot as they accused him of doing – did not meet that burden.

After all, the whole point of license plates is that they remain visible to the public eye to allow police and the public to read them.

Video of the arrest was captured by David Worden, who incidentally was not arrested for video recording. At least not that time.

Once Turner was arrested, he continued to refuse to identify himself, saying he would be more than happy to do so, if only they could provide a legitimate reason to arrest him.

But they were unable to do so, which prompted the infuriated cops to take his keys and use them to enter his car that was parked at a nearby parking lot.

“This is what happens when you question authority,” Galveston police officer Gilbert Villareal told Turner after they had found his wallet in his car and were able to identify him.

Charges were dismissed against Turner within a week.

Turner, who operates the YouTube channel, The Battousai, has two pending lawsuits against the Forth Worth and Round Rock police departments.

Chapman’s lawyer told the Houston Chronicle that the officer was only trying to keep the community safe by entering Turner’s car without permission or a warrant.

“Sgt. Chapman was trying to do his job as a police officer,” Greg Cagle said. “He had no motive other than to protect the public and the officers.”

But that was not enough to convince the grand jury, who went ahead with the indictment anyway.

In 2013, Chapman was one of several Galveston police officers captured on a dash cam kicking, punching and submerging a man’s head under water after the man was found sleeping in his car by a seawall.


“As of 2005, there were more than fifty-four such complaints pending against the Galveston Police Department. The complaints of excessive force since 2005 have continued and have been numerous and well publicized,” the complaint stated.

Videos of Turner’s arrest by Galveston police as well as the one of police unlawfully entering his car are posted below.



https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/23/award-winning-texas-cop-indicted-for-unlawfully-searching-pinac-correspondents-car-while-he-was-incarcerated-for-recording/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2772 on: February 24, 2016, 10:56:19 PM »
Elderly Grandma Defends Herself Against Cops Raiding Wrong the Home – She’s the One Arrested

Conroe, TX — 70-year-old grandmother, and teacher Judy Cox was recently assaulted by police after they wrongfully invaded her home, and at the end of the encounter, she was the one taken to jail for assault.

“I have never experienced anything so terrible and all the days of my life,” Judy Cox said.

According to Cox, the police came to her door without a warrant, demanding to search her home because the GPS signal from a stolen Ipad had directed the officers to her home.

“At least four or five cops came there and they told me that they were there looking for an iPad and the trace came back to my address,” family member Ysonji Lundy said.

“They destroyed my home and left without any explanation,” she added.

At first, the family denied the police entry to their home and said that they would have to get a warrant if they wanted to search the house.

“I told them, no, to get a search warrant and I shut the door,” Lundy said.

Moments later, more police returned and said that they had spoken with the district attorney who ruled that they had probable cause to search the home since the GPS signal was traced there. The owner of the stolen Ipad, who was from another town, was standing there with police and was a total stranger to the family.

Reluctantly, the family allowed the police in the home and they searched it thoroughly, tearing the entire house apart and throwing their property everywhere.

Things took a turn for the worse when the police attempted to rummage through 70-year-old Cox’s purse, which was obviously far too small to fit an Ipad.

“I asked what are you doing? Everything that was in my purse I earned,” Cox said.

Next the officer became physical with her.

“He slammed me against the wall so hard that my hair fell off, my wig,” she said.

In the scuffle to keep her purse from the officer, she inadvertently scratched the officer’s face.

“Then they tell me oh you assaulted a police officer. I said I’m sorry I was reaching for my purse. They arrested me and handcuffed me in front of my grandchildren and my children and took me to jail,” she said.

She was then taken to jail for assaulting a police officer after her home was invaded and after she was assaulted by armed men much larger than she is.

“I was humiliated. But being placed under arrest and put in jail by people who weren’t supposed to be there in the first place. And they want to make me out to be some monster. I’m not a violent person. I’ve been an educator for over 40 years. I even told the police officers I was just going for my purse,” she said.

After searching the home, the police found nothing.

Cox and her family have contacted local activists to learn how they can fight back, and they plan on filing a complaint with internal affairs.

Police oftent hurt or kill innocent people during raids on the wrong house. Just yesterday we reported on the story of a young man who was shot and killed by police as he fixed his truck in his driveway because US Marshalls got the address wrong.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cops-storm-wrong-home-warrant-assault-70-year-old-woman-arrest-assault/

http://abc13.com/news/grandmother-70-accused-of-assaulting-officer/1213724/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2773 on: February 25, 2016, 09:19:16 AM »
Remember this case?

Cop Awarded $230K After Punting an Innocent Man’s Head Like a Football on Video

Dover, DE – Caught on dash cam video kicking a compliant man in the face and breaking his jaw, a police corporal announced his resignation from the department after the city agreed to pay him $230,000 over the next six years. Although the ex-cop is prohibited from returning to work at the Dover Police Department, the agreement does not prevent him from seeking employment with other law enforcement agencies.

In August 2013, Cpl. Thomas Webster of the Dover Police Department was captured on police dash cam video appearing behind Lateef Dickerson and kicking the back of his legs. Ordered to get on the ground, Dickerson began complying with the officers’ orders when Cpl. Webster suddenly kicked him in the head without provocation, fracturing his jaw and knocking him unconscious. Initially charged with resisting arrest, the charges against Dickerson were later dropped after reviewing the dash cam footage.



Charged with felony and misdemeanor assault, Webster was found not guilty in December after testifying that he had intended to kick Dickerson in the body, not his face. On Tuesday, the Dover Police Department accepted Webster’s resignation following weeks of secret negotiations.

In a statement released on Tuesday, the Dover Police Department announced, “Following his acquittal, the City and then Cpl. Webster entered into discussions concerning the continued employment of Cpl. Webster. Those discussions resulted in an amicable end to Cpl. Webster’s employment relationship with the City, and he submitted his voluntary resignation to the Dover Police Department. While the resignation was immediately accepted such that former officer Webster is no longer a Dover Police Officer, his official date of separation from service will be June 30, 2016.”

According to the terms of Webster’s separation agreement, which was released on Wednesday, the former police corporal is barred from seeking employment with the Dover Police Department or any other job with the Dover city government. But the agreement does not prohibit Webster from getting hired at another police department or law enforcement agency.

Besides contributing to Webster’s pension, salary, and benefits through June 30, 2016, the city also agreed to pay him $230,000 delivered in six payments between 2017 and 2022. Although Webster and the city refuse to discuss how they reached the terms of their agreement, one of the stipulations does release both parties of “all claims, demands, and liabilities.”

“I do have a concern because of the fact that he’s voluntarily resigning, whether or not he’ll be able to serve in other municipalities. I’m hoping he will not. I was really hoping he would be terminated,” the Rev. Rita Page, pastor at Star Hill AME Church, recently told The News Journal. “We’re not settling for injustices. We’re going to keep the pressure on until justice is served.”

Despite the fact that the police corporal was caught on video using excessive force to subdue a compliant person, Webster was not only acquitted of the assault charges but also received $230,000 to prevent him from suing the city. Although he can no longer work for the Dover Police Department, Webster is still eligible for a job at any other police department across the nation. Instead of discouraging cops from using unnecessary force, Webster has become a prime example of the two-tiered justice system operating within this country.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cop-receives-230k-kicking-compliant-man-face/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15708
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Police State - Official Thread
« Reply #2774 on: February 25, 2016, 11:08:00 AM »
Multiple Florida Deputies from Marion County Fired and Indicted Within One Year

An internal affairs and state attorney’s investigation has prompted several more Marion County sheriff’s deputies to resign last Friday, continuing a pattern that began last year.

Marion County State Attorney Brad King investigated 400 dash cam videos of deputy Eduardo Bustamante, who said:

“Beyond the use of force issues, we found a pattern of behavior in many of the other videos. That pattern involved some, or all, of the following:

-Traffic stops based on trivial, or non-existent, traffic violation;
-Searches based on either a questionable claim that Deputy Bustamante smelled marijuana or “consent” that was illegally obtained;
-Admissions that were obtained after illegal coercion or inducements;
-Police reports that, were either false as to a material fact; or failed to include the pertinent details about the search or admission which would show they were unlawfully obtained.
The most frequent outcome of these cases was an arrest for misdemeanor marijuana charges.”

Bustamante is an award-winning deputy who received the “Sheriff’s Star” because he was “involved in 3 separate incidents where his life was in jeopardy,” according to a 2014 press release.

The report has since been forwarded to the FBI.

The Marion County sheriff’s spokesman Lieutenant Ryan Robbins confirmed that Bustamante resigned after being confronted with the state attorney’s report.

Now all the court cases that Bustamante is scheduled to testify in will not be accepted by the prosecutor’s office.

Not to mention, there were two more Marion County Sheriff’s Deputies that resigned following a report issued by the sheriff’s internal affairs division. Deputies Kimberly Bray and Beth Billings both resigned after internal affairs determined that Bray brought drugs at a party that Billings was hosting.

Apparently, cocaine was the drug of choice for Bray as she successfully brought the drug from Billings’ nephew. Internal affairs got involved after a unidentified deputy notified the department that Bray used drugs at the party.

Following the investigation, Bray refused to take a drug test ordered by the sheriff’s office.

Police parties have been known to get crazy as PINAC reported in December.

In a potent statement, Marion County Sheriff Chris Blair said:

“This type of behavior is completely unacceptable from individuals who [have] sworn to uphold the law and to serve and protect the citizens of Marion County. However, we want to make sure that our employees know that if they are struggling with any kind of personal or emotional issues, we encourage you to seek help before your integrity becomes compromised. Our citizens deserve to be served by deputies who have high integrity and values.”

In a statement, State Attorney King noted:

“We cannot ignore the fact that there have now been over a dozen Marion County deputy sheriffs who have been convicted, indicted, fired, demoted, suspended, or are currently under investigation. There’s been a spell of mistakes by the officers that need to be held accountable, and the sheriff has held them accountable.”

Just last year, several Marion County sheriff’s deputies were fired and indicted for unlawfully beating Derrick Price during an arrest.

Derrick Price was a ringleader sought out in a drug raid. As police centered in on Price’s house, he saw them on his surveillance system and fled on foot.  It was not until an hour later, that deputies spotted Price and arrested him.

Price was fully compliant with his hands up, but as outlined by prosecutors, the deputies used unnecessary and unreasonable force. The video is posted below.

Even more alarming, Adam Crawford, who was one of the deputies involved in the beating, deliberately lied on a police report regarding the situation. In his report, deputy Crawford wrote that Price resisted arrest and refused to comply with deputies orders to put his hands behind his back. The video refutes all of those claims.

Regarding the excessive force charges, Sheriff Blair said in a statement:

“The abusive and unprofessional actions they displayed shocked me to my core, and there was absolutely no hesitation for me to immediately inform the Florida Department of Law Enforcement of their actions, to immediately suspend those former deputies without pay and, ultimately, to request their resignation and/or termination.”

https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/24/multiple-florida-deputies-from-marion-county-fired-and-indicted-within-one-year/