Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Matt C on June 13, 2007, 01:38:14 PM

Title: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Matt C on June 13, 2007, 01:38:14 PM
Do you guys think Phil would have turned pro without his standout arms and shoulders?

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/philheaththegiftdvd/mattandphil.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: gordiano on June 13, 2007, 01:39:45 PM
Matt, did you fart while this shot was taken?


The look on Phil's face leads me to believe you did.... ;)
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: wisconsinBB on June 13, 2007, 01:40:09 PM
Hard to say.  It would be difficult for him to do the majority of the mandatory poses if he didnt have any arms.  ;D That fitness chick doesnt have any arms, I dont think she's a pro though.  
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Disgusted on June 13, 2007, 01:41:03 PM
Of course not, but that's what makes Phil Heath freaky.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: affeman on June 13, 2007, 01:41:39 PM
What a stupid question... ::)

Take away the 2 best bodyparts of every single pro and start a thread for everyone of them ::) (would Coleman have turned pro without his back and biceps; would Cutler have turned pro without his quads and tris; would Priest have turned pro without his arms;............)
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 01:41:54 PM
What the hell kinda question is that?
Matt - put the pipe down.

Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: jaejonna on June 13, 2007, 01:42:25 PM
He does have world class Quads and a ripped mid section.....

that arm pic is sick as hell though!!!
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Rearden Metal on June 13, 2007, 01:43:06 PM
Actually, his delts are a bit undersized, which is why his front relaxed and front lat spread poses fall short of the top guys.

His strengths are his arms (obv), quads and overall symmetry/conditioning.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: jaejonna on June 13, 2007, 01:43:28 PM
What a stupid question... ::)

Take away the 2 best bodyparts of every single pro and start a thread for everyone of them ::) (would Coleman have turned pro without his back and biceps; would Cutler have turned pro without his quads and tris; would Priest have turned pro without his arms;............)


How bout someone like Cormier who doesnt have any standout body parts ? All equally top tier ?

oh yeah they get screwed over ...i forgot ...carry on
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Rearden Metal on June 13, 2007, 01:45:21 PM


How bout someone like Cormier who doesnt have any standout body parts ? All equally top tier ?

oh yeah they get screwed over ...i forgot ...carry on

CC's been screwed over maybe twice. Whenever he's in shape he's top 3, every time.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Disgusted on June 13, 2007, 01:45:36 PM
I don't think it's a stupid question at all since like I said that is what makes Phil, Phil. Lets not forget about his conditioning which has been spot on so far as a pro.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Matt C on June 13, 2007, 01:46:05 PM
What a stupid question... ::)

Take away the 2 best bodyparts of every single pro and start a thread for everyone of them ::) (would Coleman have turned pro without his back and biceps; would Cutler have turned pro without his quads and tris; would Priest have turned pro without his arms;............)

Actually, it's quite possible they still would be pro.  That's my point.  Compare Phil's weak points to other top NPC guys and they are comparable.  Even Ronnie, Jay, and Lee's "weak points" are still stronger than the average top amateur competitor.

Isaac is just as biased and in bed with Phil as I am with the guys from bodybuilding.com.  :-\
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: benchmstr on June 13, 2007, 01:50:01 PM
Do you guys think Phil would have turned pro without his standout arms and shoulders?

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/philheaththegiftdvd/mattandphil.jpg)
is that a "members only" jacket ;D

monster digging thru the bargain pile at the salvation army ;D j/k

bench
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: sgt. d on June 13, 2007, 01:50:58 PM
Is Phil 5'9? Matt C just loves men that are 5'9 :)
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: jaejonna on June 13, 2007, 01:53:14 PM
if you go to flexonline.com right now , they just put up some day in the life of Phil Heath during back day...

like phil, i do bent over rows on smith machine as well...he looks better there than at the Arnold...ala dennis james b4 the O...
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 01:53:35 PM
I don't think it's a stupid question at all since like I said that is what makes Phil, Phil. Lets not forget about his conditioning which has been spot on so far as a pro.
What makes Shari, King?

Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Matt C on June 13, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
What the hell kinda question is that?
Matt - put the pipe down.



Do you smoke salvia extract?  ???

Actually, better question: if Phil's arms were average to you think he would be pro?

Is Phil 5'9? Matt C just loves men that are 5'9 :)

Damn right!!  Phil has one of the greatest builds around, but you should see the difference between Phil in a tracksuit and Victor in a tracksuit - Phil looks "ordinary" (as far as bodybuilders go), whereas Victor still looked liked a tank.  Phil is still able to hide his muscles somewhat, relative to the mass monsters at least.

But I think Phil is actually 5'10.  When I came to the Classic I was wearing thicker shoes because the weather was pretty frigid in Columbus and Phil was in sneakers (yes, I pay attention to these things.  ;D). 5'10 and around 220 I think!  Isaac is like 6'2 I think.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: bigdumbbell on June 13, 2007, 01:56:41 PM
wouldn't he be in the special olympics without his arms and shoulders?
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Matt C on June 13, 2007, 01:57:58 PM

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/philheaththegiftdvd/mattandphil.jpg)

is that a "members only" jacket ;D

monster digging thru the bargain pile at the salvation army ;D j/k

bench

Epic old man jacket.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 01:58:08 PM
if you go to flexonline.com right now , they just put up some day in the life of Phil Heath during back day...

like phil, i do bent over rows on smith machine as well...he looks better there than at the Arnold...ala dennis james b4 the O...
http://www.flexonline.com/news/221

You can see what Heath looked like 1 week out from the Arnold Classic.

Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: benchmstr on June 13, 2007, 01:58:35 PM
Epic old man jacket.
no argument there ;D

bench
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Disgusted on June 13, 2007, 01:59:25 PM
What makes Shari, King?



Issac, what makes you gay.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 02:00:59 PM
Actually, it's quite possible they still would be pro.  That's my point.  Compare Phil's weak points to other top NPC guys and they are comparable.  Even Ronnie, Jay, and Lee's "weak points" are still stronger than the average top amateur competitor.

Isaac is just as biased and in bed with Phil as I am with the guys from bodybuilding.com.  :-\
Not biased, it's a stupid question, in my opinion. How are you in bed with bodybuilding.com? Because you run an affiliate program with them?

Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 02:03:22 PM
Issac, what makes you gay.
Shaking your hand in Canada.  ;D

Monster dodge of original question. ;)

Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: davidpaul on June 13, 2007, 02:07:35 PM
SICK FUCKGIN ARMS. :o
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Disgusted on June 13, 2007, 02:11:05 PM
Shaking your hand in Canada.  ;D

Monster dodge of original question. ;)



Not dodging anything, it is obviously a smartass remark that has nothing to do with what I posted. You sit at your computer in waiting just hoping for someone to make a comment about Phil that is contrary to how you "feel" about him. As soon as they do you pounce and make childish comments about either them or someone that they know, in this case with me you mention King.

On the other hand I have not made any kind of slanderous remarks about Phil. It would benifit Phil more to have people by his side who can judge him honestly rather than surrounding himself with people like you who are always going to tell him that he is the greatest no matter what.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 02:20:53 PM
Not dodging anything, it is obviously a smartass remark that has nothing to do with what I posted. You sit at your computer in waiting just hoping for someone to make a comment about Phil that is contrary to how you "feel" about him. As soon as they do you pounce and make childish comments about either them or someone that they know, in this case with me you mention King.

On the other hand I have not made any kind of slanderous remarks about Phil. It would benifit Phil more to have people by his side who can judge him honestly rather than surrounding himself with people like you who are always going to tell him that he is the greatest no matter what.
WHOA easy brotha, it was a legit question. If you state that Phil's arms and conditioning make him, him. I ask you, the proud nutritionist and supporter of King, the same question and you get defensive. It is a stupid question as if someone said, Tom Platz without his legs. No shit he wouldn't be the same bodybuilder, hence making it a stupid question, has nothing to do with Phil.

If you actually knew me and the relationship I have with Phil, you'd know I am anything but a fanboy to him. Are we friends? yes. Do I have a business relationship with him? yes. Do I kiss his ass and tell him how great he looks? No, Far from it.

Again, why so defensive about me turning the tables and asking you the same question?
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Disgusted on June 13, 2007, 02:24:53 PM
WHOA easy brotha, it was a legit question. If you state that Phil's arms and conditioning make him, him. I ask you, the proud nutritionist and supporter of King, the same question and you get defensive. It is a stupid question as if someone said, Tom Platz without his legs. No shit he wouldn't be the same bodybuilder, hence making it a stupid question, has nothing to do with Phil.

If you actually knew me and the relationship I have with Phil, you'd know I am anything but a fanboy to him. Are we friends? yes. Do I have a business relationship with him? yes. Do I kiss his ass and tell him how great he looks? No, Far from it.

Again, why so defensive about me turning the tables and asking you the same question?

Issac, at least be man enough and admit that you got defensive and could not resist making a smartass comment. Stop back peddling and trying to make it seem like it was a legit question.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Lift Studios on June 13, 2007, 02:30:37 PM
Issac, at least be man enough and admit that you got defensive and could not resist making a smartass comment. Stop back peddling and trying to make it seem like it was a legit question.
Not defensive at all, say something that I have a vested interest in and yeah, I'd admit to being defensive. Say his website sucks or his video is a piece of shit and I'd get defensive. Asking what he'd be like with no arms and shoulders is as stupid as it gets, in my opinion. No shit he wouldn't be the same bodybuilder.

My question was legit to you, you my friend, are the defensive one regarding my smart ass comment (yes it was smart ass however still honest).  :-*
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: vinnyvee on June 13, 2007, 03:27:59 PM
My question is can the brother have a wider nose? God Dayum!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :o
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: bigdumbbell on June 13, 2007, 03:31:56 PM
it's in proportion bro.  to the width of his penis.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: phyxsius on June 13, 2007, 03:33:55 PM
Is Phil's arm more define than Ronnie in that pose?
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: XXXII/LX on June 13, 2007, 04:24:19 PM
http://www.flexonline.com/news/221

You can see what Heath looked like 1 week out from the Arnold Classic.



Big Heath fan, but GotDymn he looks thin from the side it that vid. Weird. Would murder folk for his physique.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: RagingBull on June 13, 2007, 04:41:24 PM


If you actually knew me and the relationship I have with Phil, you'd know I am anything but a fanboy to him. Are we friends? yes. Do I have a business relationship with him? yes. Do I kiss his ass and tell him how great he looks? No, Far from it.

Again, why so defensive about me turning the tables and asking you the same question?

Let's hope he is timely with paying your bills...otherwise his lack of payment will be all over the internet.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Spicy Shushi on June 13, 2007, 06:44:04 PM
Would Ron Jeremy be a pornstar without his penis?

Would Ron Avidan be able to post for a month without using the word "interesting"?

Would Ron Harris be a writer if he didn't have fingers?

Since this must be the dumbest question thread, I thought I'd offer a few suggestions.

OK, none of mine are anywhere near as dumb as Matt's question. I lose, I admit it.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Bast000 on June 13, 2007, 06:56:55 PM
Nose Switch!

Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: gh15 on June 13, 2007, 07:25:52 PM
um 5'10 215-220 on stage,,,with smaller arms and delts he would be about 205-210 on stage

i think he would still win a pro card with smaller arms and delts,,not 16 inch small but 19-20 inch small on stage,,

would take him longer time but he would

he got to stand next to dex which is the best bodybuilder in the world now days quality wize as i keep saying,, and was comparable! this brother is no joke
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: G o a t b o y on June 13, 2007, 07:36:16 PM


(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/philheaththegiftdvd/mattandphil.jpg)


Whu fuccked up his nose and gave him a fat lip??   Was that you matt?  :o
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Matt C on June 14, 2007, 12:57:52 AM
Not biased, it's a stupid question, in my opinion. How are you in bed with bodybuilding.com? Because you run an affiliate program with them?



No...because I worship the ground they walk on.  ;D

Nose Switch!



LOL!!!  Yeah Phil does have a big nose which even looks big compared to mine which is pretty big itself.  :o
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: Faust on June 14, 2007, 01:53:18 AM
LOL!!!  Yeah Phil does have a big nose which even looks big compared to mine which is pretty big itself.  :o
How many inches long and wide are we talking about here?

Matt, when considering Phil's height you should see that he's wearing a cap with a little bubble on top, creating the illusion that Phil is half an inch taller than he really is.
Title: Re: Phil Heath without his arms and shoulders...
Post by: bigkahuna on June 14, 2007, 02:13:48 AM
who has better arms lee or phil?

i would still go with lee for best arms