Author Topic: Impeachment  (Read 277200 times)

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22255
  • SC è un asino
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1125 on: December 31, 2019, 12:22:16 PM »
So......impeaching quickly was so important, but now they've sat on the articles for three weeks.
Y

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57652
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1126 on: December 31, 2019, 04:29:38 PM »
So......impeaching quickly was so important, but now they've sat on the articles for three weeks.
Because they have no facts to back up their claims and they know if it goes to the senate they'll be laughed out. Dems should disband and call it quits.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1127 on: December 31, 2019, 04:33:38 PM »
How come they never show any anti-trumper pics of guys like me?

How about a pic of me, wearing my old USMC cap, holding my AR-15 and NRA card with a caption saying;
" Surprise ? I didn't vote for Trump! I think he's a con man" :o


The public always feel uncomfortable seeing a photo of someone with Downs Syndrome.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1128 on: December 31, 2019, 05:14:58 PM »
So......impeaching quickly was so important, but now they've sat on the articles for three weeks.

This thing will blow up in their faces in spectacular fashion. 

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1129 on: December 31, 2019, 06:18:00 PM »
So......impeaching quickly was so important, but now they've sat on the articles for three weeks.


yes.. because it was never about impeachment.. it was 100% getting Epstein out of the news cycle for good

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1130 on: December 31, 2019, 07:06:38 PM »
GOP Sen. Susan Collins Sides With Mitch McConnell On Impeachment Trial
The Maine senator said she’s “open” to calling witnesses at President Trump’s trial, but argued it’s too early to decide definitely.
By Ryan Grenoble and Igor Bobic
POLITICS 12/31/2019

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she is “open” to calling witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. However, she added that it is too early to determine which witnesses should appear and that the Senate ought to decide after opening arguments and initial questioning of both sides.

“I am open to witnesses. I think it’s premature to decide who should be called until we see the evidence that is presented and get the answers to the questions that we senators can submit through the chief justice to both sides,” Collins told Maine Public Radio on Monday.

Collins’ stance on the parameters of the impeachment trial aligns her with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has all but promised a swift acquittal of Trump. McConnell has argued for following the framework of the 1999 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, which punted a decision on witness testimony until after the initial arguments and senatorial questioning.

“We haven’t ruled out witnesses,” McConnell said last week in a “Fox & Friends” interview. “We’ve said let’s handle this case just like we did with President Clinton. Fair is fair.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), meanwhile, is demanding the Senate agree upfront to hear from witnesses who refused to appear during House committee hearings, including acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton. The Democratic leader argued that witnesses with firsthand knowledge about Trump’s decision to block military assistance to Ukraine could provide crucial information.

“President Trump, if you are so confident you did nothing wrong, why won’t you let your men testify?” Schumer said at a press conference in New York City on Monday. “What are Senator McConnell and President Trump afraid of if all the facts come out?”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has delayed sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate, reportedly to give Schumer more leverage in talks with McConnell over procedures for a “fair” trial. The Senate cannot begin the trial until the House formally transmits the articles to the upper chamber. But just days before senators are due to return to Washington from their holiday break, there are no signs the impasse between the two Senate leaders is easing.

In her interview with Maine Public Radio, Collins also called McConnell’s vow of “total coordination” with the White House on the trial process “inappropriate,” while chiding some Senate Democrats for rushing to judgment.

“It is inappropriate, in my judgment, for senators on either side of the aisle to prejudge the evidence before they have heard what is presented to us because each of us will take an oath, an oath that I take very seriously, to render impartial justice,” she said.

“And I have heard Democrats like Elizabeth Warren, saying that the president should be impeached, found guilty and removed from office,” Collins added. “I’ve heard the Senate majority leader saying that he’s taking his cues from the White House. There are senators on both sides of the aisle who, to me, are not giving the appearance of and the reality of judging this in an impartial way.”

McConnell told reporters earlier this month that he didn’t view himself as an impartial juror. “I would anticipate we will have a largely partisan outcome in the Senate,” he said. “I’m not impartial about this at all.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) was the first Republican to publicly voice concern over the Senate majority leader’s handling of the proceedings, telling KTUU last week that she was “disturbed” by McConnell’s comments.

Democrats in the Senate want to hear from White House officials who, at Trump’s urging, defied House subpoenas and didn’t testify. The list includes Mulvaney; Bolton; Robert Blair, senior adviser to Mulvaney; and Michael Duffey, associate director for national security at the Office of Management and Budget.

To subpoena their desired witnesses, Democrats will need to convince at least four Republican senators to vote with them. Moderates like Collins and Murkowski will be their top targets.

Collins is seeking reelection in 2020 in what is shaping up to be a fierce contest.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/susan-collins-mcconnell-impeachment-trial-witnesses_n_5e0b6f03e4b0b2520d1b6293

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19094
  • loco like a fox
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1131 on: January 03, 2020, 10:31:05 AM »
Democratic lawmaker admits efforts to impeach Trump began before he was elected

Running for office is now an impeachable offence.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-lawmaker-admits-efforts-impeach-004403587.html

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1132 on: January 03, 2020, 11:28:42 AM »
Impeachment = Nancy Pelosi has a gun to her head and she is running around yelling, “stop or I’ll shoot.”

IRON CROSS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1133 on: January 07, 2020, 12:30:19 PM »



How is Impeachment 'progressing' ?.


              ;D ;D ;D

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1134 on: January 07, 2020, 11:22:28 PM »
McConnell has the votes to block Democrats' witness demands in Trump impeachment trial
BY ALEXANDER BOLTON - 01/06/20
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/477045-mcconnell-has-the-votes-to-block-democrats-witness-demands-in-trump

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22255
  • SC è un asino
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1135 on: January 09, 2020, 10:47:04 AM »
This is an example I'm seeing of a  bizarre cycle of back and forth convos:

Left "We need the senate to allow witnesses!"

Right "You just had a whole inquiry where you disallowed every republican witness request"

Left "We need a fair trial!"

Right "You just had a whole inquiry where you disallowed every republican witness request"

Left "We need witnesses!"
Y

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1136 on: January 09, 2020, 11:15:19 AM »
This is an example I'm seeing of a  bizarre cycle of back and forth convos:

Left "We need the senate to allow witnesses!"

Right "You just had a whole inquiry where you disallowed every republican witness request"

Left "We need a fair trial!"

Right "You just had a whole inquiry where you disallowed every republican witness request"

Left "We need witnesses!"

Has Nancy Pelosi or Adam Schiff told they public why they didn’t subpoena Bolton in the House inquiry?

Seems like quite the senile senior moment to forget to do that.


Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22255
  • SC è un asino
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1137 on: January 09, 2020, 11:28:56 AM »
Has Nancy Pelosi or Adam Schiff told they public why they didn’t subpoena Bolton in the House inquiry?

Seems like quite the senile senior moment to forget to do that.



Not sure on that one.

But it looks like a lot of Democrats are starting to needle her to send in the articles.
Y

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57652
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1138 on: January 09, 2020, 06:40:53 PM »
Not sure on that one.

But it looks like a lot of Democrats are starting to needle her to send in the articles.
They'll be laughed out of the house.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1139 on: January 09, 2020, 09:33:01 PM »
I may be wrong, but I think it had something to do with his only agreeing to testify if he was subpoenaed. It would have required a Supreme court decision, This would have seriously delayed the process in the house. Some would say timing is everything

Bullshit.

The only delay in this entire sham has been manufactured by Nancy Pelosi. She lied to the country about urgency and the libidiots ate it up.

Bolton could call a press conference tomorrow and say whatever he wanted.

Pelosi and Schiff are obviously senile and retarded respectively. But not calling Bolton is a fuck up of a major degree. Unless of course Schiff’s coordination with the whistleblower would have obviously have been exposed.

Eat shit and suck another dick, you aids infested soggy old queer.

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1140 on: January 09, 2020, 09:52:38 PM »

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15877
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1141 on: January 09, 2020, 10:25:14 PM »
I may be wrong, but I think it had something to do with his only agreeing to testify if he was subpoenaed. It would have required a Supreme court decision, This would have seriously delayed the process in the house. Some would say timing is everything


Bolton is getting his neo-con wet dream in Iran, he's back on board the Trump train.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1142 on: January 16, 2020, 10:26:02 AM »

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1143 on: January 16, 2020, 12:35:38 PM »


For some strange Reason The Laurel & Hardy Theme Tune Springs To Mind
When Looking at That Pic... 😂🤣😂


illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1144 on: January 16, 2020, 01:22:31 PM »
I take it you didn't watch the video then. Laurel and Hardy were funny. This group was anything but funny unless you think a funeral procession is funny.

Opinions vary - We’ll See where this goes.
Personally I think it’s all Hilarious & complete sham / waste of Time
They should concentrate their efforts on having one unified Candidate & Focus on Uniting
Behind that person.

Forget this silly pathetic crap.

Montague

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14614
  • The black degelation does not know this nig - V.G.
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1145 on: January 16, 2020, 03:14:37 PM »
Watching this was just weird.


So is reading the majority of your posts.

IRON CROSS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1146 on: January 16, 2020, 03:26:25 PM »



Naive question from a distance: WHY is 9 people needed to carry 2-3 pages of paper ,  ??? ::) .

JustPlaneJane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1147 on: January 16, 2020, 05:56:09 PM »

Naive question from a distance: WHY is 9 people needed to carry 2-3 pages of paper ,  ??? ::) .

Congressional short bus seats 9...

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10977
  • Getbig!
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1148 on: January 16, 2020, 06:29:53 PM »
Congressional short bus seats 9...
Exactly

IRON CROSS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
Re: Impeachment
« Reply #1149 on: January 16, 2020, 10:49:30 PM »
Congressional short bus seats 9...


Oh, so much happines on those 9 faces ..................... ;D