Your belief goes against what the vast majority of nutritionists, scientists, sports medicine, etc believe.
Why should we believe you, and not the vast scientific base of knowledge that PhDs have spent their life researching?
(remember, we're not talking the protein-pushing supp industry - we're talking nutritionists who have no dog in this fight, nothing to gain from whey sales!)
hey, hang on there bud.
in actual fact there is
no scientific evidence that prove your protein recommendations (apart from the ones funded by supplement companies). in fact, if i wanted to be disingenuous like you i could say that it definitely doesn't work and use you as exhibit a. i can guarantee that it would be less deceitful than the supplement companies using steroid using bbers as evidence, because we both know it's not the supplements (natural) that make them look/perform that way.
nutritionists have no idea how to use nutrition to build muscle tissue on a natural healthy individual eating a balanced diet. they are simply not trained to use nutrition specifically to build muscle and the fact is, you're more likely to get state of the art nutrition advice for bbing purposes on the internet because by the time nutritionists come out of university the information they had learned has become outdated. that's not to say that such information will actually help you build more muscle than you can with a balanced diet. those propogating this misinformation may very well not have a dog in the fight, they are just brainwashed like you and sincerely believe they are helping or are looking for reaffirmation.
chad nichols? ronnie and others don't go to chad to get nutritional advice to gain muscle. they're already doing fine in that dept. they go to chad for drug advice and how to use nutrition in combination with drugs to create the massive shredded physique you see on stage. a whole different animal here and if you're planning on bbing natural, you don't need chad nichols. save your money.
