Author Topic: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004  (Read 545 times)

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
« on: February 16, 2013, 09:58:16 PM »
.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1800-1990
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2013, 10:35:17 PM »
first graph is not adjusted for inflation

second graph looks like obama is finally getting things turned around and back under control

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1800-1990
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2013, 10:48:14 PM »
first graph is not adjusted for inflation

Real
1. Describing a variable that takes inflation into account. For example, when considering GDP growth, if GDP has grown 10% in dollar terms, and the inflation rate is 3%, real GDP growth is only 7%. See also: Nominal.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2013, 04:58:57 AM »
.

Wow Bush fucked up even more than we thought.


tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2013, 07:51:45 AM »
first graph is not adjusted for inflation

second graph looks like obama is finally getting things turned around and back under control
cumdrizzle showing his economic prowess once again.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2013, 08:11:23 AM »
Second graph is federal, state and local.  The latter 2 skew the graph.