Author Topic: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?  (Read 2246 times)

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21157
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« on: March 22, 2018, 02:40:52 PM »
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43489246

The origins of a six inch mummy with a cone shaped head and less than normal amount of ribs has been identified as a fetus. DNA shows it was 6-8 years old but now they're saying it's because of genetic anomalies that it tested older than it was. Is this a government coverup or just another crackpot CT?

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2018, 02:43:32 PM »
Wiggs himself could be an alien..

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15981
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2018, 02:48:42 PM »
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43489246

The origins of a six inch mummy with a cone shaped head and less than normal amount of ribs has been identified as a fetus. DNA shows it was 6-8 years old but now they're saying it's because of genetic anomalies that it tested older than it was. Is this a government coverup or just another crackpot CT?

They're changing the science to fit the narrative.

When Christians do this they're called crackpots.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2018, 03:01:26 PM »
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43489246

The origins of a six inch mummy with a cone shaped head and less than normal amount of ribs has been identified as a fetus. DNA shows it was 6-8 years old but now they're saying it's because of genetic anomalies that it tested older than it was. Is this a government coverup or just another crackpot CT?
Which government? The thing isn't even that old.
Furthermore, greys---those big headed, big eyed aliens, if they did leave a skeleton, it would have very large eye orbits. This mummy from South America doesn't. So there goes your "proof of aliens".

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2018, 10:33:42 PM »
Wiggs himself could be an alien..

At least he has extraterrestrial amount of stupidity in his tin foil covered enormous cone shaped head..

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12947
  • What you!
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2018, 10:42:04 PM »
At least he has extraterrestrial amount of stupidity in his tin foil covered enormous cone shaped head..

As requested!

TonyAlva

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1538
  • Posts:420
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2018, 10:46:34 PM »
Prime himself could be a geriatric, homo alien

Possibly

IRON CROSS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2018, 01:12:51 AM »
Wiggs himself could be an alien..


Definitely Nabirian E.T.  8)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2018, 05:31:30 AM »
Aliens as you think they are don't exist. There are no little green men (or grey) from outer space.

As I've said dozens of times before. "Aliens" are interdimensional beings otherwise known as fallen angels. And there is no outerspace as you know it because the earth is flat and we live under a firmament. I understand this is difficult for you pea brains to accept with all your programming , brainwashing and wilfull ignorance but it's the truth and you need to accept

The truth hurts.
7

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2018, 05:34:50 AM »
As requested!

Look at the arms on this stud! Wow!!!! And this was as his worst!!!  No bicep supinator needed there.
7

IRON CROSS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2018, 05:38:15 AM »
Aliens as you think they are don't exist. There are no little green men (or grey) from outer space.

As I've said dozens of times before. "Aliens" are interdimensional beings otherwise known as fallen angels. And there is no outerspace as you know it because the earth is flat and we live under a firmament. I understand this is difficult for you pea brains to accept with all your programming , brainwashing and wilfull ignorance but it's the truth and you need to accept

The truth hurts.


Yeah , right  ::) ::) ::)

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2018, 08:02:18 AM »
They're changing the science to fit the narrative.

When Christians do this they're called crackpots.
No, they are not.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15981
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2018, 08:06:23 AM »
No, they are not.

My comment was based on op's comment.

If what he said was correct my point is valid.


Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2018, 08:16:22 AM »
My comment was based on op's comment.

If what he said was correct my point is valid.


No. They didn't change the science to fit the narrative. Further tests were done.
And what is the "narrative" to begin with? There is no cover up, no sexy "narrative" of conspiracy.
Again, this skeleton is no more alien than a baby with harlequin ichthyosis.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15981
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2018, 08:38:02 AM »
No. They didn't change the science to fit the narrative. Further tests were done.
And what is the "narrative" to begin with? There is no cover up, no sexy "narrative" of conspiracy.
Again, this skeleton is no more alien than a baby with harlequin ichthyosis.

Bro read what the op said. I did not read anything else.

I took his comment as true. He said
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43489246

The origins of a six inch mummy with a cone shaped head and less than normal amount of ribs has been identified as a fetus. DNA shows it was 6-8 years old but now they're saying it's because of genetic anomalies that it tested older than it was. Is this a government coverup or just another crackpot CT?

If what he said was incorrect then what I said was incorrect. If what he said is true, that a mummy that was identified as a fetus but DNA test determine it was a 6-8 year old but genetic anomalies are skewing the results to test older.

The narrative was DNA testing is foolproof until it isn't.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2018, 08:53:06 AM »
Bro read what the op said. I did not read anything else.

I took his comment as true. He said
If what he said was incorrect then what I said was incorrect. If what he said is true, that a mummy that was identified as a fetus but DNA test determine it was a 6-8 year old but genetic anomalies are skewing the results to test older.

The narrative was DNA testing is foolproof until it isn't.

When reading the article there was no suggestion that DNA evidence concluded that the child was older. The states that early speculation made them think that the child was older
Quote
"What was striking and caused us to speculate early on that there was something strange about the bones was the apparent maturity of the bones (density and shape)," said Garry Nolan, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

It was the use of DNA that showed that the child was a newborn with genetic anomalies.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15981
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2018, 08:54:35 AM »
When reading the article there was no suggestion that DNA evidence concluded that the child was older. The states that early speculation made them think that the child was older
It was the use of DNA that showed that the child was a newborn with genetic anomalies.

I got it.

I didn't read the article. I was only playing along with op.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2018, 08:59:14 AM »
I got it.

I didn't read the article. I was only playing along with op.
;D
That's why I was like "what's the big deal"?

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15981
Re: Wiggs et al, proof of aliens?
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2018, 09:15:38 AM »
;D
That's why I was like "what's the big deal"?

Lol that is why I love getbig.

We will support and promote every theory as truthful and accurate with zero facts and research.

While frustrating and Infuriating those who rely on the facts to find out the truth.