Repost because a "smart" mod merged it with an unrelated thread:
1) Obama and Romney both stress that they will work with Muslims/Arabs to reduce anger towards the US and extremist activity.
2) Obama and Romney both insist they will blindly stand by Israel as their strongest ally.
How come no one comments on the fact that #2 is in direct conflict with #1, because US support for Israel is probalby the single most significant item which fuels anger towards the US in the middle east?
Can't have it both ways, can't have your cake and eat it too. The cost of #2 is a failure to achieve #1.