Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Pollux on December 14, 2007, 04:16:09 AM
-
I'm not saying the best arms, but the pair you would love to have swing by your side...
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/167/images/Sergio_Oliva_201.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/43/images/Arnold_Schwarzenegger_77.jpg)
-
Arnold's. Can't beat that peak.
-
I'd be happy with either. If i had to pick, probably Arnies. I'd prefer Sergio's tri's and forearms with Arnie's bi's, now that would be an arm.
-
Sergio's. He had much better tris and a better bi/delt tie-in.
-
100% Arnolds!!!...
I would get sick of trying to explain why my arms are black...
-
I'd take Sergios arms all day everyday, the origional freak!
-
defenately Sergio's,,,Arnolds triceps r too small for his Bis
-
defenately Sergio's,,,Arnolds triceps r too small for his Bis
It's a common fallacy that Arnold had weak tris, not true it's just that the bis were outrageous and overshadowed them, not the same thing. Same with Coleman; both guys had good triceps size & just lacked the sharpness that would've made them more noticable.
Arnold all the way, because Oliva never had the arm definition.
-
Arnold! Who wants to get lynched, not me?
-
It's a common fallacy that Arnold had weak tris, not true it's just that the bis were outrageous and overshadowed them, not the same thing. Same with Coleman; both guys had good triceps size & just lacked the sharpness that would've made them more noticable.
Arnold all the way, because Oliva never had the arm definition.
No, Arnies tris were over shadowed by his bis- lack of balance and noooooo forearms
-
"but the pair you would love to have swing by your side..."
oh brother ::)
-
i would take arnold, because sergios are shopped and not white. ;)
-
I'm not saying the best arms, but the pair you would love to have swing by your side...
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/167/images/Sergio_Oliva_201.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/43/images/Arnold_Schwarzenegger_77.jpg)
Arnold's. Thats easy.
-
100% Arnolds!!!...
I would get sick of trying to explain why my arms are black...
::)
-
8) 8) 8) ;D
-
No, Arnies tris were over shadowed by his bis- lack of balance and noooooo forearms
Wrong; as i said they were overshadowed but bis as with Coleman, but in both cases were not lacking in size or balance much, as you claim.
Owned by these pics. Understand anatomy better and you won't be fooled by common perceptions in future. ;)
Forearms ya both guys were lacking, which only proves that forearms really aren't nearly as important as upper arm development.
-
Wrong; as i said they were overshadowed but the tris were not lacking as you claim.
Owned by these pics. Understand anatomy better and you won't be fooled by common perceptions in future. ;)
How is he owned ???
-
I'd be happy with either. If i had to pick, probably Arnies. I'd prefer Sergio's tri's and forearms with Arnie's bi's, now that would be an arm.
And I thought you had great genetics?! >:(
-
"but the pair you would love to have swing by your side..."
oh brother ::)
Sorry. Didn't know you were content with your brutal 13'' pythons! :D
-
I don't like big peaks, rather have an arm like kevin levrone. Big ass triceps with round non peaked biceps.
(http://img464.imageshack.us/img464/8803/indexphp9qm.jpg)
-
Sergio's.
-
Well Arnolds, cos being a white guy it would look odd if i had black arms
-
Arnold's :o :o :o
-
Well Arnolds, cos being a white guy it would look odd if i had black arms
We are talking about the shape and size of their arm.
not the color of their skin ::)
-
I would have Arnold's arms.
-
this thread need more pics of sergio
-
Thats awesome:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=189504.0;attach=220507;image)