Did Bill Ayeres, Rev. Wright, & George Soros visit the White House?

[Soul Crusher]

[

[James]

White House Releases Visitors List...Ayers, Wright, Soros, ACORN/SEIU and others
White House/The Lid ^ | 10/30/09 | The Lid

Posted on Friday, October 30, 2009 6:37:59 PM by Shellybenoit

________________________ ________________________ ___________-


The White House has been barraged with requests to release the names of its visitors. Today they release the first 500 visits, all from the period of Jan 20-July 31. Some of the Names you can find on the list are Bill Ayers 2x, George Soros 4x, Michael Moore 8X, the head of the ACORN affiliated Union the SEIU Andrew Stern 20x,Jeremiah Wright, GE/NBC head Jeff Immelt 5x, Jesse Jackson 6x, John Edwards2x, Al Sharpton 2x, and of course television goddess Oprah Winfrey.

Strangely each party's house leader Pelosi, and Boehner were only at the WH once. The Senate leadership weren't there even once. I will be spending some time investigating the list, but in the meantime, an embeddable version of the list is below. If you have any knowledge of some of these names, please contact me and let me know:


(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...

________________________ ________________

Nice job Obama - NOW GO FUCK YOURSELF! 

Is this shit for real ?

unbeleivable

[Montague]

Yeah right - like there are more bill ayeres and jeremiah wrights out there who also visited the WH.

 

[Straw Man]

was this guy on the list too?

[Soul Crusher]

I have no idea Straw, but it is plainly clear to me who runs this WH. 

[The ChemistV2]

I have no idea Straw, but it is plainly clear to me who runs this WH. 

Getting pretty hard for anyone to refute that Obama consistently surrounds himself with Far-left radicals. Amazing that this could happen to America.

[Straw Man]

I have no idea Straw, but it is plainly clear to me who runs this WH. 

who would that be?

[Straw Man]

Getting pretty hard for anyone to refute that Obama consistently surrounds himself with Far-left radicals. Amazing that this could happen to America.

which ones are the far left radicals?

[Soul Crusher]

who would that be?

Go read the list, I posted it.  

GE
GS
Soros
Citi
BOA
Acorn/SEIU

and a nice little splash of Rev. Wright and Ayeres.  

[OzmO]

Getting pretty hard for anyone to refute that Obama consistently surrounds himself with Far-left radicals. Amazing that this could happen to America.

Not really.  You had a former president who abused the power given to him after 9/11.  It caused a swing opening the door for the extreme opposite side to come in.

[Straw Man]

Go read the list, I posted it.  

GE
GS
Soros
Citi
BOA
Acorn/SEIU

and a nice little splash of Rev. Wright and Ayeres.  

I read the list and the article.  Did you?

You might recall that Obama has been dealing with a banking crisis and a collapse of the auto industry - hence the visits from CEO's of banks and car makers.

I'm guessing you missed this paragraph from the artcle you posted:

 The White House warns that many names that may appear familiar — and controversial —do not in fact refer to the most famous people to carry those names. Jeremiah Wright is on the list, but it's not the president's former pastor. Michael Jordan is not the basketball player. This Michael Moore is not a filmmaker. William Ayers, who took a group tour of the White House, isn't the former radical from Chicago. And the Angela Davis on the list has a different middle initial than the activist and former fugitive.

[OzmO]

I read the list and the article.  Did you?

You might recall that Obama has been dealing with a banking crisis and a collapse of the auto industry - hence the visits from CEO's of banks and car makers.

I'm guessing you missed this paragraph from the artcle you posted:

 The White House warns that many names that may appear familiar — and controversial —do not in fact refer to the most famous people to carry those names. Jeremiah Wright is on the list, but it's not the president's former pastor. Michael Jordan is not the basketball player. This Michael Moore is not a filmmaker. William Ayers, who took a group tour of the White House, isn't the former radical from Chicago. And the Angela Davis on the list has a different middle initial than the activist and former fugitive.

This might be true.  I would think bringing some of these people to the white house might cause a political brush fire.

[Straw Man]

This might be true.  I would think bringing some of these people to the white house might cause a political brush fire.

what might be true?

[blacken700]

I read the list and the article.  Did you?

You might recall that Obama has been dealing with a banking crisis and a collapse of the auto industry - hence the visits from CEO's of banks and car makers.

I'm guessing you missed this paragraph from the artcle you posted:

 The White House warns that many names that may appear familiar — and controversial —do not in fact refer to the most famous people to carry those names. Jeremiah Wright is on the list, but it's not the president's former pastor. Michael Jordan is not the basketball player. This Michael Moore is not a filmmaker. William Ayers, who took a group tour of the White House, isn't the former radical from Chicago. And the Angela Davis on the list has a different middle initial than the activist and former fugitive.

he copies and paste the article and conveniently misses that paragraph in the middle of the other two. here's how it was printed on the page 333386 got his article from

The White House has been barraged with requests to release the names of its visitors. Today they release the first 500 visits, all from the period of Jan 20-July 31. Some of the Names you can find on the list are, George Soros 4x, the head of the ACORN affiliated Union the SEIU Andrew Stern 20x, Scott Levenson (ACORN's spokesman who was thrown off of the Glenn Beck Show), GE/NBC head Jeff Immelt 5x, Jesse Jackson 6x,  John Edwards 2x, Al Sharpton 2x, and of course television goddess Oprah Winfrey.

Note: According to the White House In September, requests were submitted for the names of some famous or controversial figures (for example Michael Jordan, William Ayers, Michael Moore, Jeremiah Wright, Robert Kelly ("R. Kelly"), and Malik Shabazz).  The well-known individuals with those names never actually came to the White House.  Nevertheless, we were asked for those names and so we have included records for those individuals who were here and share the same name

Strangely each party's house leader Pelosi, and Boehner were only at the WH once. The Senate leadership weren't there even once.  I will be spending some time investigating the list, but in the meantime, an embeddable version of the list is below.  If you have any knowledge of some of these names, please contact me and let me know:

[OzmO]

what might be true?

When some one reads the article they might think, "yeah sure i bet those people really were the actual people".  But it's probably true that they weren't.

[Straw Man]

When some one reads the article they might think, "yeah sure i bet those people really were the actual people".  But it's probably true that they weren't.

I think anyone who reads the article can understand the information in that paragraph

and unless the author is being misled by the White House or just lying then the "Ayers" "Moore" etc..  are not the same people

[The ChemistV2]

Not really.  You had a former president who abused the power given to him after 9/11.  It caused a swing opening the door for the extreme opposite side to come in.

I don't see anything in the Patriot act that would disturb the average American citizen who isn't a suspected terrorist or Islamic radical sympathizer (or ACLU type). No, it was the economic meltdown that caused the extreme reaction and wanting anything but republicans. Of course, the average person isn't aware of Clinton's policies that forced banks, mortgage companies to lower their lending standards and extend loans to the worst and most uncreditworthy factions of society. A major part of the sub-prime crisis that is seldom mentioned. Much more convenient to place 100% blame for the economy on Bush.

[OzmO]

I don't see anything in the Patriot act that would disturb the average American citizen who isn't a suspected terrorist or Islamic radical sympathizer (or ACLU type). No, it was the economic meltdown that caused the extreme reaction and wanting anything but republicans. Of course, the average person isn't aware of Clinton's policies that forced banks, mortgage companies to lower their lending standards and extend loans to the worst and most uncreditworthy factions of society. A major part of the sub-prime crisis that is seldom mentioned. Much more convenient to place 100% blame for the economy on Bush.

Bush abused the power given to him in war time by the preemptive invasion of Iraq based on WMD Propaganda.  That combined with a irresponsible after invasion plan that embroiled us in a insurgency, billions in war debt, thousands of US soldiers dead, more thousands wounded, and negative world standing, opened the door for a diplomacy leaning lefty president to get elected.

You can blame Clinton for the housing debacle all you want, but the republican controlled white house and congress had no problem dipping their beaks into the soup for 4 or more years.  If what Clinton did was such a bad thing why didn't BUSH and company put a stop to it?  I'll tell you why.  Money, power and votes.  Blaming Clinton for it is stupid.  Instead Blame all the whore politicians, dem and repub because they all have dirty hands.

Had the republican party (when they had the power to do so) had the integrity to reverse Clinton's flawed policies and the wisdom not get caught up in war fever, there wouldn't be a socialist in the WH now.

[The ChemistV2]

Bush abused the power given to him in war time by the preemptive invasion of Iraq based on WMD Propaganda.  That combined with a irresponsible after invasion plan that embroiled us in a insurgency, billions in war debt, thousands of US soldiers dead, more thousands wounded, and negative world standing, opened the door for a diplomacy leaning lefty president to get elected.

You can blame Clinton for the housing debacle all you want, but the republican controlled white house and congress had no problem dipping their beaks into the soup for 4 or more years.  If what Clinton did was such a bad thing why didn't BUSH and company put a stop to it?  I'll tell you why.  Money, power and votes.  Blaming Clinton for it is stupid.  Instead Blame all the whore politicians, dem and repub because they all have dirty hands.

Had the republican party (when they had the power to do so) had the integrity to reverse Clinton's flawed policies and the wisdom not get caught up in war fever, there wouldn't be a socialist in the WH now.

You make some good points. The fact is I don't put 100% blame on Clinton or Bush. You have to read between the political spin to get to some of the truth.

[tonymctones]

Bush abused the power given to him in war time by the preemptive invasion of Iraq based on WMD Propaganda.  That combined with a irresponsible after invasion plan that embroiled us in a insurgency, billions in war debt, thousands of US soldiers dead, more thousands wounded, and negative world standing, opened the door for a diplomacy leaning lefty president to get elected.

You can blame Clinton for the housing debacle all you want, but the republican controlled white house and congress had no problem dipping their beaks into the soup for 4 or more years.  If what Clinton did was such a bad thing why didn't BUSH and company put a stop to it?  I'll tell you why.  Money, power and votes.  Blaming Clinton for it is stupid.  Instead Blame all the whore politicians, dem and repub because they all have dirty hands.

Had the republican party (when they had the power to do so) had the integrity to reverse Clinton's flawed policies and the wisdom not get caught up in war fever, there wouldn't be a socialist in the WH now.

I love how ppl come on here and slam bush for listening to intel about iraq yet slam him for not listening to intel about 9/11...very hindsight is 20/20 of you 

[Straw Man]

I don't see anything in the Patriot act that would disturb the average American citizen who isn't a suspected terrorist or Islamic radical sympathizer (or ACLU type). No, it was the economic meltdown that caused the extreme reaction and wanting anything but republicans. Of course, the average person isn't aware of Clinton's policies that forced banks, mortgage companies to lower their lending standards and extend loans to the worst and most uncreditworthy factions of society. A major part of the sub-prime crisis that is seldom mentioned. Much more convenient to place 100% blame for the economy on Bush.

How did Clinton force banks to lower their lending standards.  If you're talking about the Community Reinvestment Act (not sure that you are) those loans have actually performed quite well in comparison to subprime/Alt-A stuff.  

The reason we have a problem in the credit markets is because we deregulated the commodities market (thanks to Clinton and some key Repubs) and allowed banks to get involved the securities biz.  That's caused 95% of the problem

Bush's only culpability in the subprime crisis was not doing something about it early on, but then he had his venerated Fed Chairman who thought everything was peachy and Bush is not exactly a deep thinker

The undeniable fact is that Bush came into office with a surplus and left office with 2 wars (not even included in the regular budget) which continue to be black holes of out tax dollars.   Obama has to live with the horrible choices made by the Bush Administration while also having to try to do something to address the worst financial crisis in our country and also trying to achieve some of the goals of his own party.  

[Straw Man]

I love how ppl come on here and slam bush for listening to intel about iraq yet slam him for not listening to intel about 9/11...very hindsight is 20/20 of you 

he didn't "listen" to the Intel. 

One part of his administration made it up and he pretended it was real and ever since has tried to make us all believe it was raining when he was actually pissing on our shoes

Ignoring all that, the same people who made up the (Rummy and Wolfie) were also the ones who ignored the recommendations of the generals for a much larger ground force.   

He's also the one who diverted troops from Afghanistan to go into Iraq

[tonymctones]

he didn't "listen" to the Intel. 

One part of his administration made it up and he pretended it was real and ever since has tried to make us all believe it was raining when he was actually pissing on our shoes

Ignoring all that, the same people who made up the (Rummy and Wolfie) were also the ones who ignored the recommendations of the generals for a much larger ground force.   

He's also the one who diverted troops from Afghanistan to go into Iraq

right i guess he made up intel from other countries too huh? face it bro there was conflicting intel, im not arguing which was right or which was wrong. The fact stands though you condemn him for ignoring it in one situation and following it in another...hind sights 20/20 i guess 

[OzmO]

I love how ppl come on here and slam bush for listening to intel about Iraq yet slam him for not listening to intel about 9/11...very hindsight is 20/20 of you  

I don't know that I have ever slammed bush for not listening to intel before 9/11.  In fact, I believe I've defended him in that regard on the basis of the thousands of bits of vague intel agencies have to process each day and the trouble of not knowing which are valid threats or not.

The WMD intel was indeed crap, And even if Saddam had WMD's it didn't warrant a preemptive invasion.  It was simply a golden opportunity for BUSH to justify invading Iraq in the mists of fear hysteria brought about by 9/11.  I was against the war before it happened for a number of reasons and very critical of it in the aftermath.

[tonymctones]

I don't know that I have ever slammed bush for not listening to intel before 9/11.  In fact, I believe I've defended him in that regard on the basis of the thousands of bits of vague intel agencies have to process each day and the trouble of not knowing which are valid threats or not.

The WMD intel was indeed crap, And even if Saddam had WMD's it didn't warrant a preemptive invasion.  It was simply a golden opportunity for BUSH to justify invading Iraq in the mists of fear hysteria brought about by 9/11.  I was against the war before it happened for a number of reasons and very critical of it in the aftermath.

you may not have but many on here certainly have, Like i said im not arguing which intel was correct or not but to say that there was no intel lending itself to iraq possesing wmd is ignorant. I agree about the justifying I think it was probably more to gain a foothold in the region and closer to iran but the reason doesnt really matter.

I am critical of the aftermath as well even though i wasnt opposed to it at the start. It was an obvious mistake no doubt about it but lets be clear there was conflicting intel.