Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: grab an umbrella on January 01, 2009, 01:20:52 AM

Title: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: grab an umbrella on January 01, 2009, 01:20:52 AM
Just to preface, I wrestled for 6 years, 2 in middle school and all four in high school.  I believe wrestling is the truest test of functional strength there is.  That being said, very few guys were strong in the weightroom and strong on the mat.

A.  Why is that?

B.  Which would you rather have?
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: io856 on January 01, 2009, 01:32:04 AM
weightroom strength

why?

because I don't care about "functional" strength

I have no use for it
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Cleanest Natural on January 01, 2009, 01:48:30 AM
Just to preface, I wrestled for 6 years, 2 in middle school and all four in high school.  I believe wrestling is the truest test of functional strength there is.  That being said, very few guys were strong in the weightroom and strong on the mat.

A.  Why is that?

B.  Which would you rather have?
:D

another formes highschool level ninja turned bodybuilder.

Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Get Rowdy on January 01, 2009, 01:50:53 AM
I have both, and a huge cock.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Cleanest Natural on January 01, 2009, 01:58:36 AM
Epic reliving the good old highschool days  ::)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: The Coach on January 01, 2009, 02:11:51 AM
Just think how much stronger you would have been if you trained for functional strength in the weight room.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Reign Down on January 01, 2009, 05:27:47 AM
Just think how much stronger you would have been if you trained for functional strength in the weight room.

And if we join your website there will be a whole host of experts to tell us how to achieve this, right Coach?
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Mars on January 01, 2009, 05:58:23 AM
(http://bestofepicfail.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/wedding_fail.jpg)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Marty Champions on January 01, 2009, 06:22:59 AM
(http://bestofepicfail.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/wedding_fail.jpg)

you can tell the woman on the right got a real fat ass!
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: JasonH on January 01, 2009, 06:26:16 AM
Weightroom strength automatically gives you functional strength.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: JOCKTHEGLIDE on January 01, 2009, 06:43:50 AM
you can tell the woman on the right got a real fat ass!
MORE TO SLAP,,,,
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Man of Steel on January 01, 2009, 06:54:49 AM
In one of the gyms I've trained at there are a few guys I've come to know that have amazing functional strength and train exclusively to develop it.  They can peform all kinds of gymnastic style strength movements and press themselves on their fingertips and what not....it's amazing to watch the things they can do and I have a ton of respect for them.

I'm still 2 times stronger than them though LOL.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: 240 is Back on January 01, 2009, 06:57:31 AM
I train for weightroom strangth, but practice functional strength all the time.  Carrying lots of heavy speakers, furniture, etc, every chance I get.  It keeps you strong in ways that weights cannot. 
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Man of Steel on January 01, 2009, 07:02:05 AM
In college I used to do some work moving furniture and also did some construction work....my weightroom strength made me a million times more efficient than those I worked with.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 08:23:35 AM
:D

another formes highschool level ninja turned bodybuilder.


;D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: BFP on January 01, 2009, 08:58:14 AM
Just think how much stronger you would have been if you trained for functional strength in the weight room.

EXACTLY. Sorry to hear you dont get any athletic carryover from your "curls"

Jason
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: grab an umbrella on January 01, 2009, 09:08:09 AM
EXACTLY. Sorry to hear you dont get any athletic carryover from your "curls"

Jason

I guess functional strength was the incorrect term.  I don't know how to describe it.  When you wrestled someone, some people were easy to move around the matt, while others weren't.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 09:11:15 AM
it's all relative.  people lift weights to help develop more functional strength and to look better.  When are you ever going to need to benchpress more than your bodyweight out in the world though?  You will never be in that position at any job where you will be laying down and pressing something up.  Sure you will use many pulling and squatting and curling movements, but chest presses?  Manual labor is for suckers anyways.


Wrestling is technique, position, and leverage and has very little to do with actual strength.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 09:12:45 AM
it's all relative.  people lift weights to help develop more functional strength and to look better.  When are you ever going to need to benchpress more than your bodyweight out in the world though?  You will never be in that position at any job where you will be laying down and pressing something up.  Sure you will use many pulling and squatting and curling movements, but chest presses?  Manual labor is for suckers anyways.


Wrestling is technique, position, and leverage and has very little to do with actual strength.

yes the people who buiild houses and buildings, build roads, schools, etc. are "suckers". ::)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: www.BrinkZone.com on January 01, 2009, 09:19:14 AM
Just to preface, I wrestled for 6 years, 2 in middle school and all four in high school.  I believe wrestling is the truest test of functional strength there is.  That being said, very few guys were strong in the weightroom and strong on the mat.

A.  Why is that?

B.  Which would you rather have?

Both, which can be had if you train for it. In my younger days  I was much more focused on the gym strength. The last few years I have focused on functional strength and have found that is has actually had additive effects on my in gym movements.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: JOCKTHEGLIDE on January 01, 2009, 09:22:49 AM
it's all relative.  people lift weights to help develop more functional strength and to look better.  When are you ever going to need to benchpress more than your bodyweight out in the world though?  You will never be in that position at any job where you will be laying down and pressing something up.  Sure you will use many pulling and squatting and curling movements, but chest presses?  Manual labor is for suckers anyways.


Wrestling is technique, position, and leverage and has very little to do with actual strength.


OBVIOUSLY YOU ARE NOT IN THE PORN BUSIESS,,,
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Sexual Mustard on January 01, 2009, 09:29:20 AM
why would I want to train for "functional" strength?  So that I can walk up and down stairs more efficiently or turn around in my swivel chair effortlessly with minimal risk for injury?  Perhaps slice through a tough part of steak that I just cooked?

 ::)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Cap on January 01, 2009, 09:50:14 AM
The average person should probably lift for both but athletes should be functional.  The only thing I have seen football players do extra were curls and pushdowns, other than that it is just functional or compound exercises.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 01, 2009, 11:19:57 AM
I was watching WSM heats last night.

Seen Brian Siders get raped in all events bar squat (came 3rd i believe) and overhead axle press (2nd) Last in everything else

Felt sorry for him. Such a strong man respected in his field moves horizontally and got fucked over
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Zach Trowbridge on January 01, 2009, 11:27:49 AM
I was watching WSM heats last night.

Seen Brian Siders get raped in all events bar squat (came 3rd i believe) and overhead axle press (2nd) Last in everything else

Felt sorry for him. Such a strong man respected in his field moves horizontally and got fucked over

Shows that the word "strong" is pretty relative, there are at least a dozen different types of strength, and it's pretty much impossible to be good at them all.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 11:28:43 AM
yes the people who buiild houses and buildings, build roads, schools, etc. are "suckers". ::)

Yes, they are.  With a little education they can earn more money, provide better for their family, and not destroy their body in the process of slaving away for 12 hours a day for mediocre wages.  I make twice as much as my buddy who is a stone mason foreman, and work 20 hours a week less than him.  I also don't have to work outside in shit weather, or spend 1/4 of my pay on tools and gas for my work truck.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on January 01, 2009, 11:33:56 AM
Yes, they are.  With a little education they can earn more money, provide better for their family, and not destroy their body in the process of slaving away for 12 hours a day for mediocre wages.  I make twice as much as my buddy who is a stone mason foreman, and work 20 hours a week less than him.  I also don't have to work outside in shit weather, or spend 1/4 of my pay on tools and gas for my work truck.

Dude wtf are you talking about?  ::)

We NEED people who do those kinds of jobs. And stop acting like you're better than them.

Fucking douchebag.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Swedish Viking on January 01, 2009, 11:35:29 AM
   Functional training has become very dysfunctional in the last few years.  The most functional exercises are the exercises focused on movements applicable to daily life.  Squatting on Swiss ball on one leg with someone poking you with a sharp stick in the eye is not functional.  Squats, deads, lunges, shoulder presses, chins, trunk rotations, even curls...these are more functional than what is being called functional today.  Having said that, there are plenty of people stuck in the 70-80s doing dysfunctional training from back then as well-all bench press all the time, underhand tricep pressdowns, preacher curls, leg extensions and curls constituting a whole leg workout, 1000 rep ab days(which means 1000 rep crunch day), 90 degree leg raises...all equally as dysfunctional.
  
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 01, 2009, 11:35:59 AM
Yes, they are.  With a little education they can earn more money, provide better for their family, and not destroy their body in the process of slaving away for 12 hours a day for mediocre wages.  I make twice as much as my buddy who is a stone mason foreman, and work 20 hours a week less than him.  I also don't have to work outside in shit weather, or spend 1/4 of my pay on tools and gas for my work truck.

with your carrying of 600lb stones you would be a foremans dream. Buildings bould be built in minutes, no need for cranes or forklifts, you can do twice what WSM can do. Doing the work of 6 men means 6x their wages

The world is your oyster.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: JasonH on January 01, 2009, 11:38:09 AM
with your carrying of 600lb stones you would be a foremans dream. Buildings bould be built in minutes, no need for cranes or forklifts, you can do twice what WSM can do. Doing the work of 6 men means 6x their wages

The world is your oyster.

 ;D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on January 01, 2009, 11:40:51 AM
Damn that guy is a bullshit artist.

"I picked a 600 pound stone of my truck and walked 40 yards with it" haha ok Derek Poundstone.  ::)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 11:44:08 AM
we need people to make french fries too.  We need people to clean toilets.  We need people to do all kinds of menial bullshit.  My mason friend is a foreman and makes more money than the laborers on his crew, and does less physical work than they do.  He is in a higher position and therefore better, and more valuable than they are.  He is less expendable to the company than some 10 buck an hour brick hauler.

I know these concepts are difficult for some people to understand, but there is a socioeconomic ladder that we all live on.  There are people above me and people below me.  It's important to know where your place is, and perfectly acceptable to want more for yourself and others.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: 240 is Back on January 01, 2009, 11:46:10 AM
i'd like to see who dies of heart attacks at younger ages - people who smile and drive a lawn mower all day, or those highly paid execs making a killing doing stressful deals.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 01, 2009, 11:48:08 AM
I know some people happy as hell in their relaxed jobs.

Everyone wanst to earn a little more money but not everyone is happy in their jobs

fair point 240
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 11:48:34 AM
with your carrying of 600lb stones you would be a foremans dream. Buildings bould be built in minutes, no need for cranes or forklifts, you can do twice what WSM can do. Doing the work of 6 men means 6x their wages

The world is your oyster.

moving a heavy rock 30 feet is not something anyone could do for an 8 hour work day.  
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 01, 2009, 11:49:34 AM
moving a 600lb rock is not something anyone in the world can do.

How do you know it was 600lbs? did you weigh it?
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 11:52:01 AM
receipt from the landscaping company they bought the rock from said 590 lbs, they use a truck scale.


Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 01, 2009, 11:53:08 AM
i seriously doubt you carried it.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Tapeworm on January 01, 2009, 11:58:29 AM
we need people to make french fries too.  We need people to clean toilets.  We need people to do all kinds of menial bullshit.  My mason friend is a foreman and makes more money than the laborers on his crew, and does less physical work than they do.  He is in a higher position and therefore better, and more valuable than they are.  He is less expendable to the company than some 10 buck an hour brick hauler.

I know these concepts are difficult for some people to understand, but there is a socioeconomic ladder that we all live on.  There are people above me and people below me.  It's important to know where your place is, and perfectly acceptable to want more for yourself and others.

I'm in construction and it's just like any other industry.  There are suckers and non suckers, exploiters and the exploited.  Contracting is commonplace in building however, so there's a much broader scattering of earnings than you see in employment for wages.  It's very Wild West.  Some guys are making an absolute killing and others are barely scraping by.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 12:15:51 PM
I'm in construction and it's just like any other industry.  There are suckers and non suckers, exploiters and the exploited.  Contracting is commonplace in building however, so there's a much broader scattering of earnings than you see in employment for wages.  It's very Wild West.  Some guys are making an absolute killing and others are barely scraping by.

so you understand what I mean when I say that manual labor is for suckers.  There's a difference between the guy that busted his ass for a couple years and worked his way up to the guys that are stuck in the labor aspect for their life, living paycheck to paycheck. 

Those people are suckers.  My buddy started at the bottom, but in another 4-5 years he will likely own his own company and really make some good money.

Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Tapeworm on January 01, 2009, 12:32:39 PM
so you understand what I mean when I say that manual labor is for suckers.  There's a difference between the guy that busted his ass for a couple years and worked his way up to the guys that are stuck in the labor aspect for their life, living paycheck to paycheck. 

Those people are suckers.  My buddy started at the bottom, but in another 4-5 years he will likely own his own company and really make some good money.



Running a company isn't all peaches 'n cream tho.  Your risk, outlay, and headaches all increase.  Hopefully earnings will too but the sad fact is that a lot of guys new to running a business make less than they did when they were still on the tools.  If the economy is still limping along, I'd advise him to think twice about starting a business.  Also, the US is a weird place for building contractors because of all the illegal labor.  My perception is that you can either try to compete with them (and lose unless you serve a niche market) or hire them and run an illegal company.  If I lived in the US I wouldn't be in construction.

At any rate, I know a lot of guys who do pretty well.  A drywall hanger, who I hire (but who makes more than I do), busts his ass every day and grosses about $400,000 a year.  We can debate about whether what he does is 'manual labor' or if it's skilled labor because he is exceptionally good at what he does, but either way the guy is no sucker.

Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 12:44:56 PM
receipt from the landscaping company they bought the rock from said 590 lbs, they use a truck scale.



hahahahaa, dude you're so full of shit it's hilarious, fat bastard with no education trying to come off like a CEO. ;D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 12:58:42 PM
hahahahaa, dude you're so full of shit it's hilarious, fat bastard with no education trying to come off like a CEO. ;D

right... AAS in automotive technology, GM certified master tech, ASE certified master tech, BS in applied mathematics, CCNA and CWNA certified.

And you're a squad gimmick account.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 01:01:42 PM
right... AAS in automotive technology, GM certified master tech, ASE certified master tech, BS in applied mathematics, CCNA and CWNA certified.

And you're a squad gimmick account.

i could claim over the net that i graduated from Johns Hopkins school of medicine but it doesn't mean shit if i don't prove it. ::)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 01:04:51 PM
i could claim over the net that i graduated from Johns Hopkins school of medicine but it doesn't mean shit if i don't prove it. ::)


How's your girlfriend's mom's trailer squad?


Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Disgusted on January 01, 2009, 01:05:17 PM
i could claim over the net that i graduated from Johns Hopkins school of medicine but it doesn't mean shit if i don't prove it. ::)

You too? What year?
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Disgusted on January 01, 2009, 01:06:04 PM
I masterbated today and used my functional strength.  ::)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 01:06:43 PM

How's your girlfriend's mom's trailer squad?



i'll take that as a no on you posting proof. :D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Disgusted on January 01, 2009, 01:07:48 PM
What the Hell is functional strength??
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: tbombz on January 01, 2009, 01:08:23 PM
I masterbated today and used my functional strength.  ::)
the only muscle i got with "functional strength" is my cock  8)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 01:13:36 PM
i'll take that as a no on you posting proof. :D

I do not seek your approval manual laborer.   I am above you and do not answer to message board trolls.


Tell me how my ass tastes.

Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 01:15:21 PM
I do not seek your approval manual laborer.   I am above you and do not answer to message board trolls.


Tell me how my ass tastes.


haahahahaa, translation= you don't have the degrees you say you have and work the 3-11 shift at Burger King. :D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 01, 2009, 01:19:37 PM
the only muscle i got with "functional strength" is my cock  8)

and with ur steroid induced floppy dick i am sure that is hardly gonna have lexington steel quaking in his boots
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 01:25:27 PM
haahahahaa, translation= you don't have the degrees you say you have and work the 3-11 shift at Burger King. :D

No, I do have those degrees and work for a major telecom... today i sat on my ass for 7 1/2 hours of my 8 hour shift and made triple pay while you will be burning cardboard and chunks of tires in a metal barrel to stay warm after they kick you out of the library.  In 6 mins I am off the clock and have a squat rack to go abuse.
 
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 01:28:07 PM
No, I do have those degrees and work for a major telecom... today i sat on my ass for 7 1/2 hours of my 8 hour shift and made triple pay while you will be burning cardboard and chunks of tires in a metal barrel to stay warm after they kick you out of the library.  In 6 mins I am off the clock and have a squat rack to go abuse.
 

yet i'm still not seeing any proof. :D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Kegdrainer on January 01, 2009, 01:30:33 PM
yet i'm still not seeing any proof. :D

pay me troll
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: QuakerOats on January 01, 2009, 01:31:03 PM
pay me troll

hahahahaaa, so that's a no on the pics of the degrees? :D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on January 02, 2009, 03:05:37 AM
Better watch out QO, kegdrainer spends his time online bragging about his degrees and carries a 600 pound stone for 40 yars off his truck, aren't you terrified?

What a winner haha.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Man of Steel on January 02, 2009, 06:02:58 AM
What the Hell is functional strength??

Functional strength is another excuse smaller guys pull outta their ass to once again help compensate for their bruised egos.  Much like telling bigger guys that all their size is fat...same premise.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: HUGEPECS on January 02, 2009, 08:04:45 AM
you can tell the woman on the right got a real fat ass!




hahahhahahha......not just a PHAT Ass. she got some great legs too. this marriage will last thru eternity....hahahahah
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: onlyme on January 02, 2009, 10:13:08 AM
I have both
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: tbombz on January 02, 2009, 11:47:25 AM
and with ur steroid induced floppy dick i am sure that is hardly gonna have lexington steel quaking in his boots
thats hella funny you leprauchan bitch, you ghave know idea what steroids do to your cock, hahaha,
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: The Master on January 02, 2009, 11:50:20 AM
I have both


Being 1000 pounds must have its advantages.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: grab an umbrella on January 02, 2009, 11:53:12 AM
So back on topic, we had two wrestling coaches in high school.  One was 240, 10% bf, benched 455.  The other was 195, 15% bf, benched maybe 185.  The coach that weighed 195 felt much stronger than the one that weighed 240.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: mass 04 on January 02, 2009, 11:57:11 AM

Being 1000 pounds must have its advantages.
LMAO ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: rccs on January 02, 2009, 12:35:24 PM
The best example that I can remember about functional strength is Mariusz Pudzianowski.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Parker on January 02, 2009, 12:52:04 PM
i'd like to see who dies of heart attacks at younger ages - people who smile and drive a lawn mower all day, or those highly paid execs making a killing doing stressful deals.

I can tell you who gets arrested more and the longer criminal record ;)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Heywood on January 02, 2009, 04:57:57 PM
carpentry for 8 hours a day = functional strength

Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Man of Steel on January 02, 2009, 05:13:50 PM
shoveling truckloads of cowshit for 8 hours a day = functional strength (and the lack of a high school diploma)
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: MisterMagoo on January 02, 2009, 05:16:16 PM
"functional strength" is a complete misnomer because the "function" isn't specified. the training a wrestler does won't help him climb a cliff face, and the training a gymnast does won't help him on the football field.

your training is as "functional" as it applies to the activities of your life. if you sit at a computer during the day to work and hit up powerlifting meets on the weekend, weightroom strength is VERY functional. if you wrestle for college, that training is functional.

if you really don't do ANYTHING physically intensive in your day to day life and exercise is a recreation for you, ALL exercise is functional because it leaves you stronger and more fit than not doing it.

you dig?
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: _bruce_ on January 02, 2009, 05:17:09 PM

Being 1000 pounds must have its advantages.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: onlyme on January 02, 2009, 11:33:53 PM

Being 1000 pounds must have its advantages.

No not really little boy.  I was way stronger at 300.  When you hit 200 pounds then you can start popping off.  Till then you are an outsider trying to fit in.  Must suck.
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: oldtimer1 on January 03, 2009, 08:26:57 AM
If you're a bench and curl guy you won't get to much of an athletic transfer to any athletic endeavor.  If you sit in a machine and isolate body parts that also won't give you the so called athletic transfer.  Using the Olympic lifts and whole body core exercises like squats, deadlifts and others will give you power that's transferable to athletics.  The simpleton response of just getting stronger is functional isn't true.  Getting stronger sitting in a lateral delt machine isn't going to help you do anything on the athletic field.  The same applies to doing four different bicep exercises in one training day that is typical in many bodybuilding routines.

Most real sports like football, wrestling, throwing, sprinting or boxing takes explosive power.  Of course specificity of training comes to play.  All can be improved with a proper weight training routine. That weight training will not look like a typical bodybuilding routine. 
Title: Re: Functional strength vs. weightroom strength
Post by: Ursus on January 03, 2009, 08:38:43 AM
thats hella funny you leprauchan bitch, you ghave know idea what steroids do to your cock, hahaha,

Does it affect the cock on your head also?