"Gen. David Petraeus has weighed in, saying that the planned burnings by the Rev. Terry Jones' congregation in Florida will endanger U.S. soldiers fighting in Afghanistan".
What about the additional danger Petraeus has put U.S. soldiers in by restricting their "Rules of Engagement" in Afghanistan?
"In his first tactical directive since assuming command of international forces in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus doubled down on the orders imposed by his predecessor that put a premium on protecting civilians first to win their support. For months those rules of engagement, formulated by General Stanley McChrystal, have led to rank-and-file grumblings by U.S. soldiers. The servicemen say that the strict rules put them in greater danger, even as they aim to avoid civilian casualties. The grumbling is unlikely to diminish with the new directives that Petraeus issued on Wednesday August 4, 2010.
The call for a disciplined use of force, plus added restrictions, were not what most troops were hoping for. U.S. soldiers contend the current policies have handicapped their ability to effectively take on the Taliban, a guerrilla force that doesn't have to play by the same rules. Now, rather than loosen the rules of engagement as many would have preferred, General Petraeus has tightened them. General Petraeus has expanded the ban on air strikes and artillery fire to all types of buildings, tree-lined areas and hillsides where it is difficult to distinguish who is on the ground.
I can't see where 50 people in a congregation burning a book are going to put U.S. soldiers more at risk than General Petraeus' new tightened Rules of Engagement" in Afghanistan?