lets take a step back and assess the situation tard boy.
youre arguing over neighborhood watch guidelines, legally what would it matter even if his neighborhood was apart of the organization that created them(EVEN THOUGH THEY ARENT) and if zimmerman was a part of the organization(EVEN THOUGH HE WASNT)?
so a 4th argument now.
Tony, you're saying "even if I'm not right about my initial statement that zimm was not supposed to pack heat under the rules of his twin trees neighborhood watch organization, um um, LEGALLY it's cool".
Um, i said earlier that he likely broke no law. You're spinning cause you aren't so sure about your earlier statement
Now you want to change it to a 4th thing - no matter what, it was legal. I agree with you there.
So it took a while, but you changed the argument enough times until we reached something we agree upon. I applaud you. Common ground is terrific.