So it wasn't a matter of you scrambling for facts that you'd been unaware of?
No. I wad aware that Zinmermad had stated in one of his multiple, conflicting statements that Trayvon had gone for the gun DURING the fight. As I said, that is irrelevant, as the conflict had already begun and both men were probably fearing for their lives.
I don't know why you're trying so hard to convict Zimmerman, you loom for every convoluted, illogical argument you can possibly find. The man is a shitbag and a liar, yes, but that doesn't mean a spade isn't a spade.
Two men got into a fight, both men were trying to do what was necessary to continue living. One man succeeded, on man failed. End of story. Everything else is people trying to find an answer using their own experiences, bias' and feelings as the evidence to justify whatever outcome they feel is right on the inside.
I don't particularly care at this point, but the reality is on man was on his back herring his head smashed into the concrete and he did what was necessary to keep living.
Could he have avoided the conflict? Yes.
Could Trayvpn have avoided the conflict? Yes.
Both men chose go into that situation. One men lived, one died.
