Author Topic: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting (Read 216278 times)

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #875 on:** June 29, 2013, 07:55:11 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on June 29, 2013, 07:53:56 PM

So what the hell is your point then?

That's EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON EARTH who has a CCW.

What's "EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON EARTH who has a CCW"?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #876 on:** June 29, 2013, 07:55:47 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 07:55:11 PM

What's "EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON EARTH who has a CCW"?

If you don't know what that means, then you have no business even worrying about the gun.

YOU ARE OWNED.

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #877 on:** June 29, 2013, 07:57:55 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on June 29, 2013, 07:55:47 PM

If you don't know what that means, then you have no business even worrying about the gun.

YOU ARE OWNED.

Tu, I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say.

Is it possible for you to explain yourself, or is that out of the question?

tonymctones · « **Reply #878 on:** June 29, 2013, 07:59:15 PM »

hahhah what a fucking tard

tu_holmes · « **Reply #879 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:00:49 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 07:57:55 PM

Tu, I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say.

Is it possible for you to explain yourself, or is that out of the question?

The fact you don't understand what I said means you know NOTHING about guns in the first place.

Every person who has a CCW (Carrying a Concealed Weapon) permit could hold someone at gunpoint and have to worry about their permit being revoked if they use it to hold a person against their will if they have no done something illegal.

Nothing you are saying makes any sense to be honest.

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #880 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:02:06 PM »

I don't know how you're trying to link this with the particular situation at hand, Tu. Can you explain?

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #881 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:03:58 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on June 29, 2013, 08:00:49 PM

Every person who has a CCW (Carrying a Concealed Weapon) permit could hold someone at gunpoint and have to worry about their permit being revoked if they use it to hold a person against their will if they have no done something illegal.

Tu, please clean your glasses and look back at the thread to see THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING.

Holy fucking shit - is there something in the water?

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #882 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:05:23 PM »

Hahaha..damn! lol

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #883 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:06:31 PM »

Never a dull moment

tu_holmes · « **Reply #884 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:07:18 PM »

You need to follow your own statements.

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 07:39:01 PM

So we have a situation where he wants to have Martin questioned, but he knows he will pay dearly if he tries to hold Martin at safe gunpoint.

Who will say otherwise?

Quote from: tu_holmes on June 29, 2013, 07:53:56 PM

So what the hell is your point then?

That's EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON EARTH who has a CCW.

Anyone can question anyone. It's not illegal to ask a question.

You have ZERO proof that he pulled his gun before he was fighting... as a matter of fact you agree that he doesn't want to lose his permit, so he doesn't just pull his gun.

So what are you trying to ask?

Every person on earth can ask a question... It's not illegal to do so.

You have no proof he pulled his gun before being attacked.

Look... Zimmerman is a jackass and a fool and should have been charged with Manslaughter.

That's what SHOULD have happened.

But none of this has anything to do with asking anyone a question. It's not illegal.

Shockwave · « **Reply #885 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:10:01 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 08:03:58 PM

Tu, please clean your glasses and look back at the thread to see THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING.

Holy fucking shit - is there something in the water?

Newsflash - its not everyone else. It's you. You are the problem, either you can't communicate worth a shit or you're just fucking dumb.

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #886 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:12:24 PM »

I'll admit to having absolutely no idea of what you're saying, Tu.

But what causes you to believe this:

"Look... Zimmerman is a jackass and a fool and should have been charged with Manslaughter."

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #887 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:13:18 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on June 29, 2013, 08:10:01 PM

Newsflash - its not everyone else. It's you. You are the problem, either you can't communicate worth a shit or you're just fucking dumb.

Settle down, Cockslave.

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #888 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:14:15 PM »

tu_holmes · « **Reply #889 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:15:26 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 08:12:24 PM

I'll admit to having absolutely no idea of what you're saying, Tu.

But what causes you to believe this:

"Look... Zimmerman is a jackass and a fool and should have been charged with Manslaughter."

Because the definition of Murder doesn't fit the crime, but the definition of Manslaughter does.

Very simple.

Shockwave · « **Reply #890 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:16:02 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 08:13:18 PM

Settle down, Cockslave.

It's not that serious, Jack T(rayvons) Cock

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #891 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:17:03 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on June 29, 2013, 08:16:02 PM

It's not that serious, Jack T(rayvons) Cock

Archer77 · « **Reply #892 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:18:19 PM »

Is Jack, Tbombz?

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #893 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:23:09 PM »

BTW, Tony, do you believe Jeantel's testimony?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #894 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:26:46 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 08:23:09 PM

BTW, Tony, do you believe Jeantel's testimony?

Well, you have a letter than she claims she wrote that she can't read... So she lied about writing it.

So you tell me if you find her credible after that.

I do not.

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #895 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:29:15 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on June 29, 2013, 08:26:46 PM

Well, you have a letter than she claims she wrote that she can't read... So she lied about writing it.

So you tell me if you find her credible after that.

I do not.

How about the 'cracker' comment?

tonymctones · « **Reply #896 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:33:01 PM »

Quote from: Jack T. Cross on June 29, 2013, 08:29:15 PM

How about the 'cracker' comment?

what about it?

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #897 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:43:56 PM »

What are your comments on her testimony, Tony?

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #898 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:46:00 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on June 29, 2013, 08:15:26 PM

Because the definition of Murder doesn't fit the crime, but the definition of Manslaughter does.

Very simple.

Tu, I'm about to call it a day. But if you could give a bit of further detail on this, I'd appreciate it, and will look for it next time around.

Jack T. Cross · « **Reply #899 on:** June 29, 2013, 08:48:11 PM »

I'll see you emotional ladies soon.