I would like some insight please on this.

I know doctors always rant about how you need to fast before blood work.

Well I think it’s a load of nonsense. I had blood work recently and I drank and had a small snack prior and my results were absolutely fine.

What is the point of fasting prior? If blood work is supposed to tell us the condition of our blood sugar, cholesterol, lipids, etc, etc…why wouldn’t we get blood work under normal conditions of when we have just eaten and drank a bit before? The world doesn’t walk around fasted all day. We have food in our stomachs. So why when we are giving blood, why are we testing and doing this when we’re in an abnormal state? And what about the days and weeks and months prior to this little pre blood work fasting?? You’re telling me just not eating for a few hours will take care of the months and days prior?? I’m not buying it.

Wouldn’t we want food and drink in our system so the doctors can see how our body processes food/carbs/sugars? If we’re healthy, and we eat a big meal, our body should be able to handle it. Shouldn’t the pre test instructions be to eat a small meal of high glycemic carbs and drink juice to see how our body processes the sugars?

And what about the nonsense of not stopping blood pressure meds cold turkey? That you have to gradually stop them? So what happens if a shortage happens and there is no more blood pressure medicine available? What is the blood pressure medicine factory’s production machines break and all the pills can’t be obtained anymore? Will all the people on blood pressure meds suddenly drop dead? Why haven’t I ever heard of anyone having horrifying results from stopping the blood pressure meds? How do we even know there is actually medicine on those capsules?

The shitter is desperate for drug-addict votes.

People who use marijuana are not drug addicts. Its funny you guys call me a junky because I use cannabis a plant then start confessing to a dozen different weird lab created drugs you guys all take for anxiety depression sleep etc etc

This fight looks like it could be a bettor's trap.

The 2 minute rounds has to help the 58 year old fighter you would think. A lot of people are going to punt on Tyson and yeah logic says he should get beat up by a 27 year old boxer. But at +350 or whatever Tyson is currently people are going to feel nostalgic. I will say Tyson is in a lot better shape and taking this more seriously he has already quit marijuana and sex for 6 weeks says he isnt doing either again until after the fight. But on the flip side Jake Paul is 230lbs on the juice right now

Apparently about 45 min from me was. Murder suicide sat morning. Man shoots his wife and daughter and kill’s himself.

The reporter on the news says “92% of the time these incidents involve guns,most of the time it is a white male who is involved in murder suicides and 90% of the time these incidents are preceded by domestic violence calls”

Ok I’m fine with you saying that but why is it when we have on camera black men commiting crime daily they can’t say they are looking for a black male? It’s always slim build male in his 20s, wouldn’t it make more sense to say black male?

Can we say 99.999% of the time in murders it’s a black man,99.9999% of time if a woman is raped,killed and set on fire it’s a black man, 99.9999% of the time if someone is killed by a stray bullet it’s a black man,99.999% of the time if there is a loud obnoxious asshole it’s a black man.

Mainstream Lib Media really angers me and has angered me for 20 years

Here in Swe, when whites do crimes (even when they're just a suspect and not guilty), their faces are shown, but when a blackie or mussie commits a crime, they're blurred out

Statutory-raping, drugging, corrupting   

the poor doggy on the bed...