Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Irongrip400 on February 13, 2016, 02:15:48 PM
-
How old was he? PIP
-
I'm sure it was just "hereditary". ::)
-
79. Why couldn't he have just held on for a year or two longer :(.
-
79. Why couldn't he have just held on for a year or two longer :(.
He`s always been a quitter. :D
-
PIP
ONe of the greatest constitutional minds ever.
-
PIP
ONe of the greatest constitutional minds ever.
Yes but he was clouded by religion as well
-
Yes but he was clouded by religion as well
x2. Yes, last thing I want is a supreme court judge who thinks there is a magical being in the sky who cares if you masturbate-and if you masturbate, your damned to hell or all eternity.
-
PIP
ONe of the greatest constitutional minds ever.
He was great in Django Unchained
-
Yes but he was clouded by religion as well
The country has gone to crap because of the lack of faith (not religion) in this administration. Don't confuse faith (God) with religion.
-
x2. Yes, last thing I want is a supreme court judge who thinks there is a magical being in the sky who cares if you masturbate-and if you masturbate, your damned to hell or all eternity.
You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
-
TRULY A GREAT DAY IN AMERICAN HISTORY! ;D
Oh, and my condolences to the family for their loss. :'( ::)
-
so does Obama have enough time to get his handpicked appointee on the bench?
-
You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
Listen, can it, bible boy.
We don't need any religion in politics.
-
so does Obama have enough time to get his handpicked appointee on the bench?
Republicans can and might block it, but still the prospect of him being able to pick 3 Justices.... :-\.
-
are the investigators hinting at foul play ???
-
are the investigators hinting at foul play ???
This guys on the case
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_KEArRUZspiA/TNvvsY2GQhI/AAAAAAAAFP0/gzGJgN_cuOE/s400/conspiracy.jpg)
-
We have some highly educated dumbasses on here.
-
Republicans can and might block it, but still the prospect of him being able to pick 3 Justices..... :-\.
maybe God is a liberal?
-
We have some highly educated dumbasses on here.
You would prefer more UN-educated dumb asses like yourself to post here?
-
The country has gone to crap because of the lack of faith (not religion) in this administration. Don't confuse faith (God) with religion.
Do you have faith in the congress? they won both houses and promptly gave obama his 1.4 trillion spending spree in order to undercut the new class of congressman.
Just say you have no faith in politicians in general. Cause that'd be accurate.
-
The country has gone to crap because of the lack of faith (not religion) in this administration. Don't confuse faith (God) with religion.
what is faith
-
JIP.
-
so does Obama have enough time to get his handpicked appointee on the bench?
Most definitely. He doesn't need more than a few months.
It's going to be pretty interesting.
-
maybe God is a liberal?
There are also 4 others, besides the now passed Scalia that will be into there 70's - 80's by the next president's term, so the next couple of elections will be interesting in the shaping of the country.
-
so does Obama have enough time to get his handpicked appointee on the bench?
what other kind of nominee is there other than hand picked by the current POTUS
-
BTW - RIP and good riddance
-
Most definitely. He doesn't need more than a few months.
It's going to be pretty interesting.
Yup, it took two months for Elena Kagan to get to the bench.
Now he gets to nominate another single woman, maybe an Asian this time. (Gotta have the SCOTUS representative of our nation, right? Oh, wait - Asians are much less than 1/9 of the population. ;))
He will nominate a liberal with NO chance of being approved by this senate, and Republicans will be accused of racism, sexism, etc. He might actually have to offer a second nominee, and then it'll be Election Day - this would create drama and tension thus occupying the media, and distract us from last 11 months as POTUS.
-
Maybe we can do a "Weekend at Bernies" until Obama is out of office. 8)
(http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/CA558A2C-B882-4AFF-A299-47F4C4EED3F0_zps8stxbuuk.png) (http://s95.photobucket.com/user/thinlizzy21/media/CA558A2C-B882-4AFF-A299-47F4C4EED3F0_zps8stxbuuk.png.html)
-
Weekend at Tony's
-
x2. Yes, last thing I want is a supreme court judge who thinks there is a magical being in the sky who cares if you masturbate-and if you masturbate, your damned to hell or all eternity.
Come on brah-cephus, you're smarter than that.
-
His lack of will power sickened me
-
I just pray that Brother Thomas is hitting that treadmill every morning.
We can't afford to lose another quality Justice.
-
I just pray that Brother Thomas is hitting that treadmill every morning.
We can't afford to lose another quality Justice.
Face it. We're all Vince Goodrum, now :'(
(http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/985D87A0-1A38-4702-B702-D1EEE04EA2D5_zpsxkklptgi.jpg) (http://s95.photobucket.com/user/thinlizzy21/media/985D87A0-1A38-4702-B702-D1EEE04EA2D5_zpsxkklptgi.jpg.html)
-
I just pray that Brother Thomas is hitting that treadmill every morning.
We can't afford to lose another quality Justice.
Mrs. Thomas must have confounded Julianne Malveaux's hope that she "feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early, like many black men do, of heart disease."
-
:o
-
Mrs. Thomas must have confounded Julianne Malveaux's hope that she "feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early, like many black men do, of heart disease."
Ha! ;D
If Ms. Malveaux actually said that, major props to my sister! She is even more cold-blooded than me [in public]!
-
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=604716.0
-
what is faith
Belief without evidence.
-
I met him in person and hosted him as a guest of our law society. Good man, very conservative and strong believer that people who wrote constitution meant what they said (ie constitution is not a living document)...Also looked like one of the Munsters which made him cooler.
-
Right after President Lincoln...
-
[/quote]http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=604716.0
Thats not what I wanted.
Someone will give me what I want, but you are not smart enough.
-
rip,,,great italian -american as well...
-
Thats not what I wanted.
Someone will give me what I want, but you are not smart enough.
I know what you want.
But you won't get it.
-
Belief without evidence.
Yup. Only words, written by men I have never met. I've never met you in person. I've only read your words here and still I have faith that you exist. Does that make you a "god" and me a mindless believer?
Not hardly, my friend. ;D
-
Yup. Only words, written by men I have never met. I've never met you in person. I've only read your words here and still I have faith that you exist. Does that make you a "god" and me a mindless believer?
Not hardly, my friend. ;D
LOL!
-
The President's reaction:
(http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/A349AAA0-3083-4050-81FC-7171FBEB5A9A_zpsyteem94d.jpg) (http://s95.photobucket.com/user/thinlizzy21/media/A349AAA0-3083-4050-81FC-7171FBEB5A9A_zpsyteem94d.jpg.html)
-
Yup. Only words, written by men I have never met. I've never met you in person. I've only read your words here and still I have faith that you exist. Does that make you a "god" and me a mindless believer?
Not hardly, my friend. ;D
I can prove that I exist. Jesus and God cannot. So there is that.
-
I can prove that I exist.
How can you prove that you exist?
-
How can you prove that you exist?
Give me your address. I will come over and smack the shit out of you.
-
I can prove that I exist. Jesus and God cannot. So there is that.
We will most likely never meet. By your standards, I should not believe in your existence. You could be anybody form anywhere, just mindlessly typing away. If I don't meet you, I cannot believe in you nor your existence. I don't care about pictures. I don't care about film or audio recordings. This isn't about a poor man's version of the Lazarus Bowl, you know.
But again, I believe you to exist without real proof and that being by your own standards. In the coming centuries you will not exist to anyone at all and will not be remembered nor cared about nor thought well or ill of. You will be just another ibid in the book of names. To paraphrase a mutual friend, we are all destined to be nothing new under the sun and the same old shit six feet under the soil.
But Jesus of Nazareth? Wisdom for the ages. Past, present and future.
Again, I believe you to be you and that being without ever meeting you. Faith comes in many forms and at many levels. This is but one. You cannot make a leap of faith in two jumps unless you have someone there to catch you.
For many, that would be the Christ.
I don't care that you don't believe in Jesus for that is not a pre-requisite for friendship. However, good manners are. ;D We shall "talk" again, my invisible, imaginary friend! ;D
-
Give me your address. I will come over and smack the shit out of you.
LOL!
I doubt you are able to do any serious harm.
Anyway...
That proves nothing.
-
We will most likely never meet. By your standards, I should not believe in your existence. You could be anybody form anywhere, just mindlessly typing away. If I don't meet you, I cannot believe in you nor your existence. I don't care about pictures. I don't care about film or audio recordings. This isn't about a poor man's version of the Lazarus Bowl, you know.
But again, I believe you to exist without real proof and that being by your own standards. In the coming centuries you will not exist to anyone at all and will not be remembered nor cared about nor thought well or ill of. You will be just another ibid in the book of names. To paraphrase a mutual friend, we are all destined to be nothing new under the sun and the same old shit six feet under the soil.
But Jesus of Nazareth? Wisdom for the ages. Past, present and future.
Again, I believe you to be you and that being without ever meeting you. Faith comes in many forms and at many levels. This is but one. You cannot make a leap of faith in two jumps unless you have someone there to catch you.
For many, that would be the Christ.
I don't care that you don't believe in Jesus for that is not a pre-requisite for friendship. However, good manners are. ;D We shall "talk" again, my invisible, imaginary friend! ;D
Your whole argument is a false equivalency.
-
Yup. Only words, written by men I have never met. I've never met you in person. I've only read your words here and still I have faith that you exist. Does that make you a "god" and me a mindless believer?
Not hardly, my friend. ;D
Great point
The men who wrote the many things that were compiled to make the bible likely did exist.
That doesn't lend any credence to what they wrote
-
Your whole argument is a false equivalency.
Who is arguing? Oh...You. I merely state what I hold true and this time I used your standards but given who I am, I disagree and still believe that you really are, that you do exist.
Stop arguing and start accepting that neither of us is the other and this in defiance of the fact that we are more alike than disparate. I don't want to save you from anything, least of all yourself.
-
Yup, it took two months for Elena Kagan to get to the bench.
Now he gets to nominate another single woman, maybe an Asian this time. (Gotta have the SCOTUS representative of our nation, right? Oh, wait - Asians are much less than 1/9 of the population. ;))
He will nominate a liberal with NO chance of being approved by this senate, and Republicans will be accused of racism, sexism, etc. He might actually have to offer a second nominee, and then it'll be Election Day - this would create drama and tension thus occupying the media, and distract us from last 11 months as POTUS.
If Obama was really smart he'd nominate a moderate Republican who he knows isn't really a republican but playing one. That would put a lot of pressure on the Republican's not to bloke it through. But lets be real. Obama can barely read of Teleprompter. He'll be told who to nominate.
No tie and can barely fucking read what was written for him. Why the fuck wouldn't you at least put a tie on? This is a Supreme Court Justice who lost his life and you're talking to the Country. I know he was coming from the golf course but Jesus that was odd...
-
Great point
The men who wrote the many things that were compiled to make the bible likely did exist.
That doesn't lend any credence to what they wrote
Wisdom can be for the moment or the millennia but rarely is it by chance.
-
Give me your address. I will come over and smack the shit out of you.
With what? Your spatula? How about I give you my address? I already know where you live you sissy.
-
Wisdom can be for the moment or the millennia but rarely is it by chance.
nice jibberish
any actual reply to what I wrote
-
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/02/GettyImages-783442-420x315.jpg)
-
Scalia was worthless. Fundamentalist religious wack job. Glad hes gone.
-
Thomas Jefferson would have rolled over in his grave at someone like Scalia as a Supreme Court judge. What a piece of shit.
On questions of separation of church and state, Scalia was a consistent voice for accommodation between the two, and against erecting a high wall of separation. When the court, by a 7-to-2 vote, struck down a Louisiana law that mandated the teaching of creationism in school if evolution is taught, Scalia was dismissive of evolution, calling it merely a "guess, and a very bad guess at that."
-
nice jibberish
any actual reply to what I wrote
Where did I make light of your words?
As you have done, so shall I. If my words went over your head it is only because it was so far up your own ass and not because you were too ignorant to understand their meaning.
Or are you? Why is it that instead of an exchange of thought you simply wish to trade sophomoric insults? For the record, yours are feeble as a Wiggsian treatise on Nibiru.
I try to be nice and this is what I get, but then what should I expect from an infant playing at being a juvenile? Typist.
-
A voice of reason in the Supreme court who followed the Constitution instead of trying to create laws through decisions. When the Supreme courts acts like a branch of Congress it becomes dangerous. He protected against that.
-
A voice of reason in the Supreme court who followed the Constitution instead of trying to create laws through decisions. When the Supreme courts acts like a branch of Congress it becomes dangerous. He protected against that.
He fully realized the role of the Supreme Court.
Understood that the Constitution is NOT a living document.
-
Kind of funny how the political wheel has to keep turning.
-
Thomas Jefferson would have rolled over in his grave at someone like Scalia as a Supreme Court judge. What a piece of shit.
On questions of separation of church and state, Scalia was a consistent voice for accommodation between the two, and against erecting a high wall of separation. When the court, by a 7-to-2 vote, struck down a Louisiana law that mandated the teaching of creationism in school if evolution is taught, Scalia was dismissive of evolution, calling it merely a "guess, and a very bad guess at that."
Evolution a "guess" ::)
I guess all the evidence in natural museums must be faked.
-
His being dismissive of evolution is irrelevant.
-
Scalia was worthless. Fundamentalist religious wack job. Glad hes gone.
This. He is a hero to fundies and wackos of the right wing. Noted for both his errors in properly understanding the Constitution and his arrogance in confidently defending those errors.
The next SCJ won't be one that thinks there is a King James Version of the Constitution.
-
His being dismissive of evolution is irrelevant.
Irrelevant to what? It indicates dismissal of evidence. It's a massive error of judgement.
-
Irrelevant to what? It indicates dismissal of evidence. It's a massive error of judgement.
People are dismissive of religion. Things balance out; It's not nearly as big of a deal as people pretend it to be for the purpose of political argument.
Generally speaking: I believe the original goal of lifetime appointments was to keep interpretation of Constitutional rights relatively consistent over time. It was intended to prevent the political process from using it as an opportunity to initiate social change. We've gone mentally soft enough to allow litmus tests on a few issues and don't care about what happens to the rights of Americans over time.
-
People are dismissive of religion. Things balance out; It's not nearly as big of a deal as people pretend it to be for the purpose of political argument.
Generally speaking: I believe the original goal of lifetime appointments was to keep interpretation of Constitutional rights relatively consistent over time. It was intended to prevent the political process from using it as an opportunity to initiate social change. We've gone mentally soft enough to allow litmus tests on a few issues and don't care about what happens to the rights of Americans over time.
Non sequitur, but I'll give it another shot...
If you have a judge on a top position who is dismissive of evidence, isn't it a cause for worry?
-
x2. Yes, last thing I want is a supreme court judge who thinks there is a magical being in the sky who cares if you masturbate-and if you masturbate, your damned to hell or all eternity.
You don't vote so it doesn't really matter what you think..... Lol, at someone who comments on political issues yet doesn't even care/too lazy to vote. Your arguments/point of view is basically worthless.
-
Non sequitur, but I'll give it another shot...
If you have a judge on a top position who is dismissive of evidence, isn't it a cause for worry?
Evidence changes all the time. Also, let's be brutally honest with ourselves about the extent evidence affects people's thought process. Many keep looking until finding evidence that agrees with whatever their opinion happens to be.
If someone proved Creationism (tomorrow), would you go all Bible-thumping? Of course not. :)
The argument against/for justices is 100% based upon the extent their interpretation of laws agrees with the prevailing political will.
-
I know what you want.
But you won't get it.
Lmao
;D
-
Evidence changes all the time. Also, let's be brutally honest with ourselves about the extent evidence affects people's thought process. Many keep looking until finding evidence that agrees with whatever their opinion happens to be.
If someone proved Creationism (tomorrow), would you go all Bible-thumping? Of course not. :)
The argument against/for justices is 100% based upon the extent their interpretation of laws agrees with the prevailing political will.
So it doesn't matter if Scalia brushed aside scientific evidence, because evidence changes all the time.
Right.
If Scalia was presiding over a trial of a traditionalist Roman Catholic and the prosecution presented forensic evidence (which is scientific) that the defendnant was guilty, would Scalia get away with saying "evidence changes all the time"?
-
So it doesn't matter if Scalia brushed aside scientific evidence, because evidence changes all the time.
Right.
If Scalia was presiding over a trial of a traditionalist Roman Catholic and the prosecution presented forensic evidence (which is scientific) that the defendnant was guilty, would Scalia get away with saying "evidence changes all the time"?
You mean something like this:
-
PIP
ONe of the greatest constitutional minds ever.
X2. Just a giant.
This is truly a shock and couldn't come at a worse time. Obama is going to be all over this to establish his legacy and change our culture for generations to come.
-
Maybe we can do a "Weekend at Bernies" until Obama is out of office. 8)
(http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/CA558A2C-B882-4AFF-A299-47F4C4EED3F0_zps8stxbuuk.png) (http://s95.photobucket.com/user/thinlizzy21/media/CA558A2C-B882-4AFF-A299-47F4C4EED3F0_zps8stxbuuk.png.html)
Look at that zombie bastard go, Rich!
-
x2. Yes, last thing I want is a supreme court judge who thinks there is a magical being in the sky who cares if you masturbate-and if you masturbate, your damned to hell or all eternity.
::)
Always comes down to religion.
The vast majority of religious people will care far more about a judge's positions on issues and not their religion. But for the atheist it immediately disqualifies you.
Whether one agreed or disagreed with Scalia, it was unanimous that he was a singularly brilliant man. Intellectually you're an ant in comparison. Light years out of his league.
And you claim to be the tolerant one.
And you don't go to hell for masturbating. Quit commenting on things you know nothing about.
-
You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
He really doesn't. And it will always remain that way because one thing you can say about SF, he is very self-satisfied in his own intellectual superiority although there is nothing he has done in life, or doing in life (virtually all his waking hours is spent on forum boards and social media), to suggest this.
-
Listen, can it, bible boy.
We don't need any religion in politics.
When has any of Scalia decisions had to do with his religion? He follows the Constitution to the letter and was the leader in dismissing the Liberal notion that the Constitution is an "evolving" document.
-
Belief without evidence.
More precisely, "Belief without proof."
Conor McGregor, believes, i.e. has faith that he will defeat Rafael. He has that faith based on available evidence: comparing his past performance with Rafael's past performance. Only after their contest will he have proof that his belief was correct.
This, of course, does not mean there isn't such a thing as blind faith.
-
I met him in person and hosted him as a guest of our law society. Good man, very conservative and strong believer that people who wrote constitution meant what they said (ie constitution is not a living document)...Also looked like one of the Munsters which made him cooler.
WHAT? WOW!
Who the heck are you? Didn't know we had a legit celeb in our midst.
-
I can prove that I exist. Jesus and God cannot. So there is that.
Can you prove Socrates existed?
-
Change is coming
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/22/2d/61/222d61d849ed98d280cb1d793056dc12.jpg)
;D
-
Give me your address. I will come over and smack the shit out of you.
LMAO!
"I smack, therefore, I am."
-
Scalia was worthless. Fundamentalist religious wack job. Glad hes gone.
You lose credibility when you say things like that.
Even his colleagues disagreed with that. He was university respected and his brilliance universally acknowledged.
Whether one likes him, hates him. agreed or disagreed, his legacy is secure.
Often you respond and react not with logic and reason but with emotion -- like a girl.
-
You don't vote so it doesn't really matter what you think..... Lol, at someone who comments on political issues yet doesn't even care/too lazy to vote. Your arguments/point of view and EXISTENCE is basically worthless.
Fixed.
-
A dark day for Italian-American Roman Catholics. Shirts buttoned at half mast across the nation.
-
This will not play out well for Republicans, which is either good or bad depending on your point of view. Obama will probably nominate a middle-of-the-road high-credentials type of person whom Cruz and others like him on the Judiciary Committee will go after in a mean-spirited way on national television. Just like the government shut-down a couple of years ago, this will read to the public as: "Republicans don't believe in ongoing smooth functioning of government." It could possibly play out differently but this scenario is a logical prediction based on the key players and current makeup of the legislative branch. Plus abortion and gay rights and Planned Parenthood, etc. will come front and center again, which Republicans always are better off pushing under the rug, given how the majority of Americans feel about these social issues.
-
Rubio thinks no SCOTUS should be appointed in the last year of a presidency, vows to fight obama no matter who is chosen.
I wonder if he'll feel the same way, should he be president?
-
Where did I make light of your words?
As you have done, so shall I. If my words went over your head it is only because it was so far up your own ass and not because you were too ignorant to understand their meaning.
Or are you? Why is it that instead of an exchange of thought you simply wish to trade sophomoric insults? For the record, yours are feeble as a Wiggsian treatise on Nibiru.
I try to be nice and this is what I get, but then what should I expect from an infant playing at being a juvenile? Typist.
what are you blathering about now?
the bible is a compilation of writings (quite of bit of which is plagiarized), compiled, edited,redacted, mistranslated,etc..
All done by men (with their own individual beliefs/superstitions ,prejudices, ignorance and agenda's)
If you choose to have faith in something in absence of evidence or even worse, contrary to evidence that's your business.
If you want to believe a certain version of these compiled writings of men is the "word" or your god that's fine
lots of people believe in lots of nutty things
-
what are you blathering about now?
the bible is a compilation of writings (quite of bit of which is plagiarized), compiled, edited,redacted, mistranslated,etc..
All done by men (with their own individual beliefs/superstitions ,prejudices, ignorance and agenda's)
If you choose to have faith in something in absence of evidence or even worse, contrary to evidence that's your business.
If you want to believe a certain version of these compiled writings of men is the "word" or your god that's fine
lots of people believe in lots of nutty things
Sheesh...My first remark when quoting your words was a compliment. "Blathering"? I was wrong. You are a typist and a poor one at that. How Genovan.
Be certain to use the Getbig standard of "meltdown" as often as you can, not only in any reply to my thoughts but to those whom you hold in high esteem because of their low IQ. I suppose it was wrong to think better of you than you do yourself.
-
Sheesh...My first remark when quoting your words was a compliment. "Blathering"? I was wrong. You are a typist and a poor one at that. How Genovan.
Be certain to use the Getbig standard of "meltdown" as often as you can, not only in any reply to my thoughts but to those whom you hold in high esteem because of their low IQ. I suppose it was wrong to think better of you than you do yourself.
what part was a quote or a compliment?
how about trying to address what I've actually written rather than talking in gibberish
let's go back to your statement on page 2 and see if we can attempt to decipher it again
Yup. Only words, written by men I have never met. I've never met you in person. I've only read your words here and still I have faith that you exist. Does that make you a "god" and me a mindless believer?
Not hardly, my friend. ;D
so the bible was written by men (many different and mostly all anonymous men)
thus you have faith they actually existed? (we'll ignore the fact that many of the called authors likely weren't the person attributed with authorship)
you believe the writers existed
so what?
for now we'll also ignore your obviously false conclusion that you believe TA exists because someone is posting using his account. For all you or I know it's somebody other than him writing his posts (just like most of the bible)
again, so what?
-
Look at that zombie bastard go, Rich!
Haha, classic movie!! ;D
-
Thomas Jefferson would have rolled over in his grave at someone like Scalia as a Supreme Court judge. What a piece of shit.
On questions of separation of church and state, Scalia was a consistent voice for accommodation between the two, and against erecting a high wall of separation. When the court, by a 7-to-2 vote, struck down a Louisiana law that mandated the teaching of creationism in school if evolution is taught, Scalia was dismissive of evolution, calling it merely a "guess, and a very bad guess at that."
Jefferson was a slaveowner and elitist prick at times. He would have spat on the Gettysburg address for the lack of floral English by a Kentucky man.
Scalia had his viewpoints, and believed that the people who wrote constitution meant what they said. If they didn't specify no torture, they meant it is allowed. That is a legal stance, not a political or personal one. Go study jurisprudence and come back to me. I disagree with him, but I respected his intelligence and stance. He would make you look like a comatose spastic if you debated him.
-
His being dismissive of evolution is irrelevant.
Irrelevant? Moron, the mandatory teaching of Creationism was brought before the Supreme Court. I can't think of how more relevant it could be.
-
Jefferson was a slaveowner and elitist prick at times. He would have spat on the Gettysburg address for the lack of floral English by a Kentucky man.
Scalia had his viewpoints, and believed that the people who wrote constitution meant what they said. If they didn't specify no torture, they meant it is allowed. That is a legal stance, not a political or personal one. Go study jurisprudence and come back to me. I disagree with him, but I respected his intelligence and stance. He would make you look like a comatose spastic if you debated him.
HAHHHA I would have murdered him in a debate on religion or evolution.
His only response would be, "The bible", "Jesus was real", "god did it".
Guy was a moron.
-
Talk about a shot from out of nowhere.
Worst news of the year by far.
-
Talk about a shot from out of nowhere.
Worst news of the year by far.
Why? What good has he ever done? Name one thing.
-
what part was a quote or a compliment?
how about trying to address what I've actually written rather than talking in gibberish
let's go back to your statement on page 2 and see if we can attempt to decipher it again
so the bible was written by men (many different and mostly all anonymous men)
thus you have faith they actually existed? (we'll ignore the fact that many of the called authors likely weren't the person attributed with authorship)
you believe the writers existed
so what?
for now we'll also ignore your obviously false conclusion that you believe TA exists because someone is posting using his account. For all you or I know it's somebody other than him writing his posts (just like most of the bible)
again, so what?
Your words (you know, the ones I quoted typed by you) contained wisdom albeit more for the moment than the millennia. Yeah...I know "so what". Typical of a typist to be so ignorant, so retarded that they fail to see what is right before their eyes. Maybe it's because your head is still up your ass.
Having said that you are also a pompous little man with a buffalo chip on your narrow shoulders. But again, so what, eh kid?
-
Why? What good has he ever done? Name one thing.
Still fuming over his support of the Boy Scouts right to ban gay scout leaders?
-
You words (you know, the ones I quoted typed by you) contained wisdom albeit more for the moment than the millennia. Yeah...I know "so what". Typical of a typist to be so ignorant, so retarded that they fail to see what is right before their eyes. Maybe it's because your head is still up your ass.
Having said that you are also a pompous little man with a buffalo chip on your narrow shoulders. But again, so what, eh kid?
More gibberish
I can see you're incapable of supporting your own idiotic claims or even conversing like a normal human being.
The only thing on my shoulders today was a barbell while doing squats.
How about you Pops? Did you hit the gym before or after church today?
-
More gibberish
I can see you're incapable of supporting your own idiotic claims or even conversing like a normal human being.
The only thing on my shoulders today was a barbell while doing squats.
How about you Pops? Did you hit the gym before or after church today?
Don't be a total buffoon, little man. It must hurt to be so patently stupid that you fall back upon trying to be a man of the people, i.e., begging that I speak your "language".
I speak retard. Here. You be a dumbass. Wait! Too many syllables? Let me separatize it for you.
You are stu pid. You are rude. You are a men tal mid get. This is not a con test. It is not a test of your man hood. It is re al it ee.
How's that, champ?
Run along now as I am tiring of having to type instead of write.
-
Don't be a total buffon, little man. It must hurt to be so patently stupid that you fall back upon trying to be a man of the people, i.e., begging that I speak your "language".
I speak retard. Here. You be a dumbass. Wait! Too many syllables? Let me separatize it for you.
You are stu pid. You are rude. You are a men tal mid get. This is not a con test. It is not a test of your man hood. It is re al it ee.
How's that, champ?
Run along now as I am tiring of having to type instead of write.
LOL - I'm not beggin you to do anything other than provide a coherent reply (assuming you actually want to have a conversation)
Have you noticed you're the one calling me names in this thread
Why is that?
-
A dark day for Italian-American Roman Catholics. Shirts buttoned at half mast across the nation.
LOL classic
-
I actually smiled like a kid in a candy store when I saw it pop up on the CNN ticker last night. Wish that weren't the case. With that being said, GOOD RIDDANCE!
-
LOL - I'm not beggin you to do anything other than provide a coherent reply (assuming you actually want to have a conversation)
Have you noticed you're the one calling me names in this thread
Why is that?
To state that you are a mental midget, that you are stupid and a dumbass is not calling you names, it's simply stating the truth about you as evidenced by your typing here. I would say that a monkey could do better but the last time one was put to writing something the Koran was foisted upon the civilized world.
You are a rude little boy. Run along now and have your mommy change the diaper that surrounds that pathetic excuse for a mind you've so wondrously put on display here for all the world to see and marvel at.
"Pops"...How creative of you. And no, I don't consider that calling me a "name". Even my own children have never called me "Pops" but then they have a vocabulary above that of an innershity high scrooler. ;D
Have a nice evening, kiddo.
-
HAHHHA I would have murdered him in a debate on religion or evolution.
His only response would be, "The bible", "Jesus was real", "god did it".
Guy was a moron.
LOL....oh boy. You've been nipping at the cooking sherry again haven't you Alice? lmao
-
If Obama was really smart he'd nominate a moderate Republican who he knows isn't really a republican but playing one. That would put a lot of pressure on the Republican's not to bloke it through. But lets be real. Obama can barely read of Teleprompter. He'll be told who to nominate.
No tie and can barely fucking read what was written for him. Why the fuck wouldn't you at least put a tie on? This is a Supreme Court Justice who lost his life and you're talking to the Country. I know he was coming from the golf course but Jesus that was odd...
Here's my prediction:
(http://pics.wikifeet.com/Kamala-Harris-Feet-976595.jpg) (http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20150328_USP002_0.jpg)
(https://timeswampland.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rtr37jkt.jpg?w=260) (http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/12/75/76/2875266/11/920x920.jpg)
(http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/20120416_HA_mortgage0207.JPG) (http://images2.laweekly.com/imager/u/blog/5450712/org.png)
She'll still have time to pursue Boxer's senate seat if not confirmed.
-
Lol at the shocked getbiggers. Given a fucking break. I agree that Obama should nominate a a new one. You know he'll squeeze another brew in. Maybe a transgendered brew.
-
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/flashback-in-2007-schumer-called-for-blocking-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/ (http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/flashback-in-2007-schumer-called-for-blocking-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/)
-
In some more sad news, justice Clarence Thomas found alive and completely responsive.
-
In some more sad news, justice Clarence Thomas found alive and completely responsive.
I'd say the same thing about Ginsburg, but it's hard to tell:
(http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/32B0A6B0-AD89-4A07-9907-7D2111785734_zps31sc4bm9.jpg) (http://s95.photobucket.com/user/thinlizzy21/media/32B0A6B0-AD89-4A07-9907-7D2111785734_zps31sc4bm9.jpg.html)
-
You lose credibility when you say things like that.
Even his colleagues disagreed with that. He was university respected and his brilliance universally acknowledged.
Whether one likes him, hates him. agreed or disagreed, his legacy is secure.
Often you respond and react not with logic and reason but with emotion -- like a girl.
With other religious whack jobs...
This dude was a Dick... plain and simple... his religious beliefs came into play in many decisions.... dumb ass decisions.... yeah he was smart and knew the constitution but he didn't apply it all the time... which is what he was appointed to do.
-
With other religious whack jobs...
This dude was a Dick... plain and simple... his religious beliefs came into play in many decisions.... dumb ass decisions.... yeah he was smart and new the constitution but he didn't apply it all the time... which is what he was appointed to do.
lol...
-
I'd say the same thing about Ginsburg, but it's hard to tell:
(http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/32B0A6B0-AD89-4A07-9907-7D2111785734_zps31sc4bm9.jpg) (http://s95.photobucket.com/user/thinlizzy21/media/32B0A6B0-AD89-4A07-9907-7D2111785734_zps31sc4bm9.jpg.html)
Wraith Brooder Ginsberg
-
To state that you are a mental midget, that you are stupid and a dumbass is not calling you names, it's simply stating the truth about you as evidenced by your typing here. I would say that a monkey could do better but the last time one was put to writing something the Koran was foisted upon the civilized world.
You are a rude little boy. Run along now and have your mommy change the diaper that surrounds that pathetic excuse for a mind you've so wondrously put on display here for all the world to see and marvel at.
"Pops"...How creative of you. And no, I don't consider that calling me a "name". Even my own children have never called me "Pops" but then they have a vocabulary above that of an innershity high scrooler. ;D
Have a nice evening, kiddo.
so clearly simply being asked to explain your ridiculous statements causes you frustration and makes you angry
-
With other religious whack jobs...
This dude was a Dick... plain and simple... his religious beliefs came into play in many decisions.... dumb ass decisions.... yeah he was smart and knew the constitution but he didn't apply it all the time... which is what he was appointed to do.
arrogant fat piece of shit as well.
-
Wraith Brooder Ginsberg
Haha
-
In some more sad news, justice Clarence Thomas found alive and completely responsive.
Wonder if he still fancies the pornography.
-
so clearly simply being asked to explain your ridiculous statements causes you frustration and makes you angry
Not hardly, kid. Run along now, simpleton. And you are a simpleton. I tried genuinely complimenting you on your first reply and again it went over your head.
I apologize for using big words right now as I know your mom must tire of having to translate for you.
Keep in touch with yourself.
-
Not hardly, kid. Run along now, simpleton. And you are a simpleton. I tried genuinely complimenting you on your first reply and again it went over your head.
I apologize for using big words right now as I know your mom must tire of having to translate for you.
Keep in touch with yourself.
What a surprise. The Scott convincing himself that he's too smart to get his point across again. ::) A true genius? Or just a poor typist?
Feel free to respond by posting some belabored, pseudo-intellectual mumbo-jumbo to make you feel like an internet tough guy/genius. No one else will be buying it.
-
Not hardly, kid. Run along now, simpleton. And you are a simpleton. I tried genuinely complimenting you on your first reply and again it went over your head.
I apologize for using big words right now as I know your mom must tire of having to translate for you.
Keep in touch with yourself.
Maybe your communication skills fucking suck and when you try to pay a compliment it comes out the wrong way. Have you considered the possibility?
-
Maybe your communication skills fucking suck and when you try to pay a compliment it comes out the wrong way. Have you considered the possibility?
Not hardly and you know this. Why do you even go there? Really. You are not stupid so don't play at it as it is beneath you.
-
Not hardly and you know this. Why do you even go there? Really. You are not stupid so don't play at it as it is beneath you.
Sometimes when you see an opportunity you just have to go for it :D
Anyway, I take it back. Apologies.
-
Sometimes when you see an opportunity you just have to go for it :D
Anyway, I take it back. Apologies.
Not a problem, brother! I can be quite an ass more than I would care to admit. ;D Being human is tough, ergo we all tend to sometimes behave inhuman(e) toward others. I am more than guilty on all counts.
My apologies as well to any I offend, including you. I sometimes erase posts I think went too far and while you cannot take back words like a shirt that doesn't fit, you can make it right.
Thanks!
-
arrogant fat piece of shit as well.
Awww... he just enjoyed the 1940s so much that he wanted everyone to enjoy them as well. Forever.