Author Topic: Who Had the Best Biceps Ever??.. (Read 56829 times)

Saxon · « **Reply #2 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:07:40 AM »

No contest

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #3 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:07:46 AM »

d0nny2600 · « **Reply #4 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:08:16 AM »

Arnie and Lee.

#1 Klaus fan · « **Reply #5 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:09:14 AM »

Quote from: Saxon on April 09, 2009, 03:07:40 AM

No contest

Can you see a little bit of a split in his left arm there?

Fatpanda · « **Reply #6 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:10:54 AM »

i have to go with ronnie on this one.

he had it all - mass, thickness, peaks, and definition.

also he had massive tri's, although they lost their way a little towards the end of his career. they were still big, but lost shape.

a complete arm.

for complete arms you have to mention lee priest too

oh and another great thread by sherief - are you watching ron ?

lovemonkey · « **Reply #7 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:14:38 AM »

Sigh what a relief that Nasser is not in this thread. Props to Sherief on that one. Take note team Assbags.

clued-up · « **Reply #8 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:16:33 AM »

great structure.. incredible biceps.

dogbowl · « **Reply #9 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:17:26 AM »

Arnold

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #10 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:18:23 AM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on April 09, 2009, 03:10:54 AM

i have to go with ronnie on this one.

he had it all - mass, thickness, peaks, and definition.

also he had massive tri's, although they lost their way a little towards the end of his career. they were still big, but lost shape.

a complete arm.

for complete arms you have to mention lee priest too

oh and another great thread by sherief - are you watching ron ?

thx bud.

didn't ronnie injure his left tri in 2006??..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #11 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:21:06 AM »

Quote from: lovemonkey on April 09, 2009, 03:14:38 AM

Sigh what a relief that Nasser is not in this thread. Props to Sherief on that one. Take note team Assbags.

the wizard of truth had a better overall body than all these guys.. he had only one weak point (lacked definitions in his back).. but all these guys had more than one clear weakness..

Meso_z · « **Reply #12 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:24:07 AM »

lovemonkey · « **Reply #13 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:24:40 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on April 09, 2009, 03:18:23 AM

thx bud.

didn't ronnie injure his left tri in 2006??..

No I believe he had some sort of nerve damage that goes way back. Small signs had been there for a while, just in 2006 it got a lot worse.

TRIX · « **Reply #14 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:28:16 AM »

the scary thing is ronnie is standing a bit behind gunther

Wiggs · « **Reply #15 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:30:00 AM »

Quote from: TRIX on April 09, 2009, 03:28:16 AM

the scary thing is ronnie is standing a bit behind gunther

I was gonna use that pic for Ronnie...Ronnie at his peak...no pun intended.

clued-up · « **Reply #16 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:30:19 AM »

Quote from: TRIX on April 09, 2009, 03:28:16 AM

the scary thing is ronnie is standing a bit behind gunther

why is that scary?

Saxon · « **Reply #17 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:31:50 AM »

Quote from: james001 on April 09, 2009, 03:16:33 AM

great structure.. incredible biceps.

Very underrated, imo.

kiwiol · « **Reply #18 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:35:48 AM »

Wiggs · « **Reply #19 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:36:12 AM »

Quote from: Saxon on April 09, 2009, 03:31:50 AM

Very underrated, imo.

QFT

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #20 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:37:13 AM »

Quote from: lovemonkey on April 09, 2009, 03:24:40 AM

No I believe he had some sort of nerve damage that goes way back. Small signs had been there for a while, just in 2006 it got a lot worse.

thx for the info. but it really looked bad by then!!..

Fatpanda · « **Reply #21 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:39:25 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on April 09, 2009, 03:18:23 AM

thx bud.

didn't ronnie injure his left tri in 2006??..

i think so, although he never admitted any injuries $:-\$

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #22 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:39:39 AM »

Quote from: Saxon on April 09, 2009, 03:31:50 AM

Very underrated, imo.

very true.. same as aron baker and roland cziurlok and many more...

Saxon · « **Reply #23 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:45:00 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on April 09, 2009, 03:39:39 AM

very true.. same as aron baker and roland cziurlok and many more...

Yes, these guys were awesome. Pavol Jablonicky and Porter Cottrell were another two favourites of mine too.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #24 on:** April 09, 2009, 03:47:46 AM »

Quote from: Saxon on April 09, 2009, 03:45:00 AM

Yes, these guys were awesome. Pavol Jablonicky and Porter Cottrell were another two favourites of mine too.

oh!!.. i too was going to mention pavol when i mentioned aron and Cziurlo but man come one how to consider potrell underrated??.. for me he was overrated.. he won a lot of an undeserved titles and placed 4th at mr. O. 94 over chris cormier!!..