« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: No legs=not a bodybuilder  (Read 10953 times)

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #50 on: October 21, 2014, 05:36:06 PM »
Quote from: che on October 21, 2014, 05:34:51 PM
Thank you Gigantic Event.

your welcome

gigantic schlong  ;D

people could crush their legs, run cycles and get them huge..but they won't LOOK like your legs. they are beautiful
Logged

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #51 on: October 21, 2014, 05:37:55 PM »
Quote from: TheShape. on October 21, 2014, 12:04:55 PM
Woman aren't too concerned about legs but you should have a thick (as a cock) ass.

Slow down, we do notice legs and a nice HARD ass is a must.
Logged
7

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #52 on: October 21, 2014, 05:41:28 PM »
Quote from: Gigantic Event on October 21, 2014, 05:36:06 PM
your welcome

gigantic schlong  ;D

people could crush their legs, run cycles and get them huge..but they won't LOOK like your legs. they are beautiful

Haha , thank you beautiful man , if I only have arms like yours .
Logged

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15782
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #53 on: October 21, 2014, 05:42:01 PM »
Quote from: Simple Simon on October 21, 2014, 09:11:05 AM
lol, like that has anything to do with legs size.
THIS ;D
Logged

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #54 on: October 21, 2014, 05:42:04 PM »
Quote from: EastCoastChick on October 21, 2014, 05:37:55 PM
Slow down, we do notice legs and a nice HARD ass is a must.

I've always thought that women notice shoulders, arms, tight abs and waist, butt and calves.

Close ?
Logged

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #55 on: October 21, 2014, 06:00:28 PM »
Quote from: Gigantic Event on October 21, 2014, 05:42:04 PM
I've always thought that women notice shoulders, arms, tight abs and waist, butt and calves.

Close ?

The first thing we'll see is arms and chest, then I look for a tight midsection. If he passes by and the front was was nice *I* actually look at shoulder development, see I like muscular men. Then I look at ass, admittedly its to see if his thighs and ass are thick and developed for thrusting purposes. Real talk. As I stated earlier, nice calves are a def plus.
Logged
7

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #56 on: October 21, 2014, 06:02:11 PM »
Quote from: EastCoastChick on October 21, 2014, 06:00:28 PM
The first thing we'll see is arms and chest, then I look for a tight midsection. If he passes by and the front was was nice *I* actually look at shoulder development, see I like muscular men. Then I look at ass, admittedly its to see if his thighs and ass are thick and developed for thrusting purposes. Real talk. As I stated earlier, nice calves are a def plus.

Ha   real talk indeed.
Logged

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #57 on: October 21, 2014, 06:05:45 PM »
Logged
7

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #58 on: October 21, 2014, 06:09:39 PM »
Quote from: Cholo4Life on October 21, 2014, 06:07:40 PM
Yeah, from a dude.

Sorry colon, I've been seen by several on here, even talking on video. All woman.
Logged
7

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #59 on: October 21, 2014, 06:12:47 PM »
Women notice the peaks first and foremost.
Logged

_aj_

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17641
  • The Return of the OG
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #60 on: October 21, 2014, 06:46:30 PM »
Quote from: EastCoastChick on October 21, 2014, 05:30:38 PM
Can't speak for all women but I love well developed calves. Quite sexy.

Well shit. There goes that theory.
Logged

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31503
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #61 on: October 21, 2014, 07:29:46 PM »
i look foward to leg day...
Logged

Wolfox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6471
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #62 on: October 21, 2014, 07:33:01 PM »
Logged
A

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #63 on: October 21, 2014, 07:42:39 PM »
Logged
7

King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34273
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #64 on: October 21, 2014, 07:44:53 PM »
Quote from: Wolfox on October 21, 2014, 07:33:01 PM
this
I actually think its Lobstah  ;D

Could be wrong though.
Logged

Wolfox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6471
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #65 on: October 21, 2014, 07:54:04 PM »
Logged
A

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #66 on: October 21, 2014, 07:55:34 PM »
Quote from: Wolfox on October 21, 2014, 07:54:04 PM
You're a dude.

hth

You're not a dude

Hth

 ;)
Logged
7

visualizeperfection

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10645
  • Getbig sponsored athlete.
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #67 on: October 21, 2014, 08:01:22 PM »
Quote from: EastCoastChick on October 21, 2014, 07:55:34 PM
You're not a dude

Hth

 ;)

Haha.

I enjoy this maybe woman.
Logged

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15782
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #68 on: October 22, 2014, 03:14:46 AM »
Quote from: njflex on October 21, 2014, 07:29:46 PM
i look foward to leg day...
QUAD...Z i lla.... ;D
Logged

_aj_

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17641
  • The Return of the OG
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #69 on: October 22, 2014, 03:30:26 AM »
Quote from: visualizeperfection on October 21, 2014, 08:01:22 PM
Haha.

I enjoy this maybe woman.

x2

Remember: no cock pics until proof of not-Joon provided.
Logged

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #70 on: October 22, 2014, 03:55:47 AM »
Quote from: Gigantic Event on October 21, 2014, 06:02:11 PM
Ha   real talk indeed.
Groinks morals getting mixed up in this thread.
Logged

phil mcgroin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 524
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #71 on: October 22, 2014, 04:03:18 AM »
Quote from: the trainer on October 21, 2014, 09:18:33 AM
If you are able to complete this workout I guarantee you massive quads.

ass to grass squats 5 sets 25 to 30 reps
walking lunges  5 sets 20 reps
leg press   5 sets 20 reps ( go all the way down on the dam legpress)
stiff legged deadlifts  5 sets 15 reps
leg curls 5 sets 15 reps







A good woekout but i dont find ass to grass squats any more effective even deteimental.paralel will do there is no measurable difference in leg development
Logged

heenok

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1434
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #72 on: October 22, 2014, 04:10:51 AM »
if you have the flexibility, ass to grass is great
while keeping your torso as straight as possible

deep front squat is the GOAT exercise for quad imo
no need to go heavy too
Logged

jephrius

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
  • PayDay
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #73 on: October 22, 2014, 06:20:42 AM »
A lot of dudes on this thread with no legs trying to explain to the world why it's alright to have no legs.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »