Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: kyomu on November 26, 2006, 10:01:46 AM
-
Since many people said Jay is worse than Yates,i created this thread.
I saw with my own eye Nasser owned Dorian compretely from the front and glutes and hams.
Only bodyparts of dorian better than nasser was his lat and back detail.
Discuss.
-
These kind of threads SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:(
-
These kind of threads SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:(
why?
-
These kind of threads SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:(
He has getbig "standards". hahaahahahahahahaha
-
Since many people said Jay is worse than Yates,i created this thread.
I saw with my own eye Nasser owned Dorian compretely from the front and glutes and hams.
Only bodyparts of dorian better than nasser was his lat and back detail.
Discuss.
Ya, it was close enough that there's no way Yates should've always won.
Except for lat width and detail, it's all Nasser. Pics continue to confirm it, even back double-bi. Yates was very lucky & to this day doesn't seem to know it.
-
Ya, it was close enough that there's no way Yates should've always won.
ha ha ha !!
-
ha ha ha !!
Not paying attention; the lat difference, the only real Yates advantage, was already covered. Otherwise it's all Nasser. :o
-
Not even close. Nasser looks like a soggy towel.
-
Well then anybody think this nasser is better than present Jay cutler????
-
Not even close. Nasser looks like a soggy towel.
True he's waterlogged and the genius failed the diuretics test that year !! he's very soft compared to Yates then agin so is everyone else.
-
ha ha ha !!
dude nassers back is equally thick as dorians.dorian only had the upper hand on detail..nasser had all the size he needed to beat yates in the back poses but sucked on overall back conditioning
-
dude nassers back is equally thick as dorians.dorian only had the upper hand on detail..nasser had all the size he needed to beat yates in the back poses but sucked on overall back conditioning
good point
-
Well then anybody think this nasser is better than present Jay cutler????
It's actually quite close - both very big guys and have some outstanding bodyparts. Nasser did have a good back but his other bodyparts were so freaky that it made his back look ordinary - his hams are amazing in those photos and probably better than Jay's. Jay is probably wider and carries more quality mass but Nasser has achieved better conditioning in his prime than Jay has done so far - it's hard to tell with Jay though because he isn't very vascular and people mark him down for that for some reason even though something like that is strictly genetic. In answer to your question - Nasser has been bettter than Jay but look for Jay to keep improving. :)
-
i would prefer nassers physique... i mean everyone knocks his back but it was actually pretty good.
-
I much prefer Jay before he started trying to look like Jean Pierre Fux.
(http://www.smart-weight-training.fr/divers/mensurations-ideales/jay-cutler-big.jpg)
SERGIO!!!!!
-
It's actually quite close - both very big guys and have some outstanding bodyparts. Nasser did have a good back but his other bodyparts were so freaky that it made his back look ordinary - his hams are amazing in those photos and probably better than Jay's. Jay is probably wider and carries more quality mass but Nasser has achieved better conditioning in his prime than Jay has done so far - it's hard to tell with Jay though because he isn't very vascular and people mark him down for that for some reason even though something like that is strictly genetic. In answer to your question - Nasser has been bettter than Jay but look for Jay to keep improving. :)
mmmmm....thanx for very good perspection. this makes me think a lot.
-
I much prefer Jay before he started trying to look like Jean Pierre Fux.
Exactly. He does look like Fux now. And its bad.
Nasser at his best would have crushed todays Jay.