Interesting read E-Kul, I like how you just pour your heart out in these posts... 
That's just what I believe in ! Contrary to popular belief, survival of the fittest doesn't mean the strong dominating the weak, people have misinterpreted Darwins Theory of Evolution, who by the way, never coined the term survival of the fittest. People have twisted Darwins theories to suggest we live in some unavoidable anarchy based on the powerful dominating the weak. Darwin suggested humanities strength and dominance lied in humans ability to co-operate and work together, bullying actually weakens humanity as a whole and compromises humanities progress. Even if an individual is born stronger and more powerful than the average person, he would derive no joy from dominating those weaker. Strong individuals want to be tested and fight those they consider peers, not the easy pickings, the very fact people seek out those that are weaker to pick on is the truest indication of their lack of strength and deeply held insecurities.
Stronger individuals actually have a moral obligation to protect the weak, use a boxers career as an analogy, at some point the boxer is a beginner, he lacks the experience and the refinement of skills to take on the champion, so they manage him, giving him opposition that is comparable to his ability and experience and bring him along slowly in this fashion. If, in the boxers rise to the top, you give him a fight were the opposition will easily dominate him, he may lose heart and faith and simply stop the sport altogether. Essentially, the management of making someone a weaker opponent into a strong opponent is a precarious one, and if not managed correctly will be the ruination of the fighter and often times the man.
So if someone finds them-self in a dominant position, they didn't start out like that, they had to have been brought along slowly by those who were stronger, smarter and more resourceful than them. To abuse such strength by bullying those that are not as far along in their journey of becoming strong, is an insult to those who brought you to the strong position you now find yourself in. And just like a boxer, the dominant position is only held for a short amount of time, and if you abused that dominance, you can rest assure that those you abused on your way up, will seek revenge on your way down.
Essentially, if you study the philosophy of Martial Arts, this is the principle behind it, TO BECOME RESPONSIBLY STRONG, to use what you have learnt and achieved to help others and not hurt them. This is easier said than done, as POWER corrupts, this is why the martial arts focuses so much on developing ones mind, to avoid the inherent corruption associated with developing Power.
Your theory of actually helping those by bullying them is incorrect, you are more likely to damage and weaken them. Any form of aggression against others must be tempered with compassion and wisdom and the motivation of sincerely helping them and not just using them as a whipping boy to release ones own frustrations and aggression.
