Is Trump now guilty of "witness tampering" Fox news Bret Baier thinks so

[Howard]

https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-bret-baier-suggests-160600331.html?hl=1&noRedirect=1

[Straw Man]

https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-bret-baier-suggests-160600331.html?hl=1&noRedirect=1

Politics aside, why would any sitting US President harass a testifying witness via tweet in real time?

He's done this many times

Apparently Republicans are just fine with witness tampering and witness intimidation

Just add it to the long list of crimes that Republicans don't seem to object to any more

[SOMEPARTS]

Things must not be going well today. Getbig even has its own lefty spin room. 

[Coach is Back!]

She would have never known unless Schiff said so. It’s a moot point.

[Thin Lizzy]

Things must not be going well today. Getbig even has its own lefty spin room. 

It went horribly as predicted. The new keyword was bribery. They asked her if she ever witnessed any bribery or anything that be could be considered illegal and she said no.

Essentially, the most egregious  act committed by the President was to hurt her feelings.

This sham becomes a bigger joke by the day.

[Grape Ape]

Only a moron thinks that's tampering.

[Primemuscle]

She would have never known unless Schiff said so. It’s a moot point.

Does she live in absolute seclusion?  She would know what Trump tweeted regardless of Schiff spilling the beans.

[Primemuscle]

Only a moron thinks that's tampering.

Thank you Judge Grape for your esteemed legal opinion.

[TacoBell]

Does she live in absolute seclusion?  She would know what Trump tweeted regardless of Schiff spilling the beans.

Idiot, you can't 'tamper' with a witness after they've testified.  As per usual.... Over your head.

[Dos Equis]

Only a moron thinks that's tampering.

Yep.  And the only reason she even knew about the tweet was because Schiff read it to her. 

[Primemuscle]

Idiot, you can't 'tamper' with a witness after they've testified.  As per usual.... Over your head.

She would have never known unless Schiff said so. It’s a moot point.

Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.

[TacoBell]

Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.

No, idiot... How about you come back to this when any of that happens.
This is going no where, and nothing will come of it.

[Primemuscle]

No, idiot... How about you come back to this when any of that happens.
This is going no where, and nothing will come of it.

You wish.

[Irongrip400]

You wish.

You do. It will go nowhere, just like the Hilary email scandal.

[TacoBell]

You wish.

Actually, I wish I was wrong and you were going to be right (you won't).
This would really get interesting in the Senate where the Republicans control the flow of traffic.
But dumbascraps don't actually want that to happen, hence it will go know where.

[chaos]

He's done this many times

Apparently Republicans are just fine with witness tampering and witness intimidation

Just add it to the long list of crimes that Republicans don't seem to object to any more

Yes, fair play, democrats did it for 8 years under Osama, might as well take advantage of it now that a republican is in office.

[Coach is Back!]

Does she live in absolute seclusion?  She would know what Trump tweeted regardless of Schiff spilling the beans.

You’re not that stupid. Think and have a little intellectual honesty

[Coach is Back!]

Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.

Dumbass, I meant during the hearing. Schiff purposely exploited it for theatrics for his clown show. Fuckers can’t come up with one impeachable offense so let’s play on the public’s sympathy. But at the end of the day no one gave a shit (DOW going above 28k is a pretty good indicator).

As we all (except the left) the Dems are collapsing

[Primemuscle]

Actually, I wish I was wrong and you were going to be right (you won't).
This would really get interesting in the Senate where the Republicans control the flow of traffic.
But dumbascraps don't actually want that to happen, hence it will go know where.

I think you meant nowhere and not know where. Then again, you may know something the rest of us don't. 

[Thin Lizzy]

After watching her testimony, I don’t believe she’s even a witness. She didn’t witness anything. I have no idea why they even called her up there.

[Primemuscle]

After watching her testimony, I don’t believe she’s even a witness. She didn’t witness anything. I have no idea why they even called her up there.

I believe what the committee chair is trying to do is build a complete picture of everything that went on during that time period related to the issue. Despite how the media presents it, not every witness is going to present some earth shattering and incriminating revelation.

The question is (I think), why did Trump fire her? Was it because she wasn't producing what Trump wanted, which was dirt on Biden and his son and having Volodymyr Zelensky go public with it? Did it have anything to do with pushing her aside and bringing in his own people, such as Giuliani and Sondland?

There may or may not be some ah ha moment in committee's arsenal. But if enough witnesses say the same thing even if it is hearsay, it makes Trump look pretty bad. Here's another thought, since Trump has difficulty controlling what he says and tweets they could be baiting him. In which case, it is working.

Lastly, this is not a trial, it is an inquiry meant to deteremine if the house wants to impeach Trump. The trial comes after that's happened and it goes to the Senate. There is probably a long road ahead before anything is decided....just my guess.

[TacoBell]

I think you meant nowhere and not know where. Then again, you may know something the rest of us don't. 

Wow prime, you spotted a typo.... Is that your gotcha moment? 
Played like a true democratic.

[avxo]

Trump’s tweet was typically Trumpian (take that as you will) but it ain’t witness tampering or intimidation.

[Princess L]

After watching her testimony, I don’t believe she’s even a witness. She didn’t witness anything. I have no idea why they even called her up there.

They wanted her "feelings"  probably hoping they'd get a few tears for the cameras.

[Thin Lizzy]

They wanted her "feelings"  probably hoping they'd get a few tears for the cameras.

The saddest she looked was when she was asked whether she had any evidence of presidential wrongdoing and she had to respond “No.”