Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Tre on May 05, 2006, 12:42:56 PM

Title: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Tre on May 05, 2006, 12:42:56 PM

As many of the more sensible people have said here, what happens at GetBig should remain in the realm of GetBig.  This is the internet, people. 

More importantly, Rob runs an internet business of his own.  I don't know who all his customers are, but based on his actions, some of them *could* be thinking, 'Gee, this guy is crazy.  What if he goes nuts and decides to start harrassing me at MY job next??'

The trust requirements for online commerce are greater than those for brick-and-mortar businesses. 

And it doesn't stop with Rob's business.  Every individual who commits an act like that has the potential to make other customers that much more wary of doing business online.  This impacts not only Rob, but also anyone else involved in legitimate e-commerce, no matter the size of the operation. 

No one can change 240's personality, but I do hope he'll stop and think next time before going off half-cocked on another witch hunt.   
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 12:45:13 PM
 I have to agree with this. This site is its own self-contained universe and should be kept that way.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 12:46:29 PM
My customers know their info is 1000% safe.  I keep my business and the 240 persona completely separated.

Bob Chick tried to intimidate us by saying he would look up our personal info from customer records.

Additionally, Bob Chick has crossed business lines by publicly dissing my business, and insulting the quality of my work.

Everyone who knows me, knows that I am a cool cat in real life, and that I work hard, fast, and discreet.  Bob Chick tried to intimidate us, and made his firm look REALLY bad by doing so.

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: jaejonna on May 05, 2006, 12:47:21 PM
I have to agree with this. This site is its own self-contained universe and should be kept that way.


True, thats what makes this place soo cool is that I can be on Get Big all saturday then say the sermon on Sunday at church without having parishioners know that the good Father is actually Jaejonna 'The Hater'

alllelluia
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: thisiskeith12 on May 05, 2006, 12:50:04 PM

True, thats what makes this place soo cool is that I can be on Get Big all saturday then say the sermon on Sunday at church without having parishioners know that the good Father is actually Jaejonna 'The Hater'

alllelluia

I knew it!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: emn1964 on May 05, 2006, 12:54:12 PM
Has 240 ever said or intimated that his cutomers' information was not secure?  I know Chick has insinuated that he could get cutomer information from bb.com customers but I haven't seen 240 do it.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: IFBBwannaB on May 05, 2006, 12:56:48 PM
Can someone bitch slap the fat guy and make him stop moan on the board?  ::)
Ohh ohh Bob yelled at me..damn nancy boy.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: body88 on May 05, 2006, 12:58:25 PM
Bob Chick brought it all on himself









He can thank one person for this whole thing






















himself
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: ToxicAvenger on May 05, 2006, 01:00:42 PM
Bob chick once went hindu tipping!    >:(


..get it..hindu tipping..cow tipping..ahh fuck..i'm bored..  >:(
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Tre on May 05, 2006, 01:00:54 PM
Has 240 ever said or intimated that his cutomers' information was not secure? 

By contacting someone's REAL LIFE employer, yes.  

He runs an internet business and he took an internet feud into real life.  I feel that 240 can be trusted, but what if he gets pissed at me someday??  

In one-upping Bob, he may have cost himself potential business.  I'm not saying I hope this is true, because I don't, but it *is* a very real possibility.  He might also have cost me and other online retailers potential business.  Whether he wants to accept any responsibility for his role or not, that's why he's being reprimanded.  

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 01:02:56 PM
Besides, BBing.com was alerted to it before I wrote them.  And all I did was ask them about the security of their information.  As a customer, it is a fair question.  Some guy who represents you is threatening to, presumably, post my credit card info or worse on the web, cause he disagrees with me on BBing issues.  

Of course I wish it hadn't happened, and if I could undo it, I would.  I am sure Bob would too.  It was a pissing match- him trying to intimidate us, and us trying to get him to put his foot in his mouth.

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: jaejonna on May 05, 2006, 01:05:25 PM
Besides, BBing.com was alerted to it before I wrote them.  And all I did was ask them about the security of their information.  As a customer, it is a fair question.  Some guy who represents you is threatening to, presumably, post my credit card info or worse on the web, cause he disagrees with me on BBing issues.  

Of course I wish it hadn't happened, and if I could undo it, I would.  I am sure Bob would too.  It was a pissing match- him trying to intimidate us, and us trying to get him to put his foot in his mouth.



He always try to intimidate ppl here...

"You trolls with no lives..."
"Not real fans but a handful of morons..."

Too many to post...he thinks that his visibility in the industry makes him immune to bad judgment... oh wait did I say bad judgement ?? ( ***cough cough --rusty-- cough cough***)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 01:06:42 PM
Fear not, Tre.  Customer info is very safe with me.  Not in a million years would I post anything about my clients.  I have worked with maybe 40 people from getbig in the past 6 months- some of them bitter enemies on the boards- and they've never had anything leak.  Just not good business.  But as I am an affilate with BBing.com and win/lose based upon their reputation, Bob Chick was endangering my, and many others', income by hoisting dirt on the sanctity of their info.

And I apologize if I've offended anyone, and you can rest assured I will avoid sticky situations like this in the future.  But in the end, all I did was let a company know a man was threatening to post MY info, that they hold safe.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bigdumbbell on May 05, 2006, 01:11:16 PM
bob shouldnt have claimed that shit then
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Dingleberry on May 05, 2006, 01:14:49 PM
I see what you're saying Tre but I think 240 can be trusted. The one thing he's not is stupid, and posting people's personal shit would be stupid. As far as I've ever seen, he's only posted stuff that was public information.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MindSpin on May 05, 2006, 01:17:24 PM
can someone give me the cliff notes on the WTF happened?  240...you got Chick in trouble ???
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: jaejonna on May 05, 2006, 01:22:38 PM
can someone give me the cliff notes on the WTF happened?  240...you got Chick in trouble ???
Chick was like ... 240 you dont buy supplements and believe me I can check the records to see if you did...
240 was like , well Im going to ask your boss if you can check my personal buyig info
Then the boss was like , No he can look at that info
Then Bob had a m3ltdown
Then I watched the Real world Key West...
And that was Tuesday!!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 01:27:49 PM

True, thats what makes this place soo cool is that I can be on Get Big all saturday then say the sermon on Sunday at church without having parishioners know that the good Father is actually Jaejonna 'The Hater'

alllelluia


  Yes, that is the glory of the internet!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: body88 on May 05, 2006, 01:31:20 PM
can someone give me the cliff notes on the WTF happened?  240...you got Chick in trouble ???

Bob was talking smack about the ability to check credit card and buying records on BB.com

Rob called bullshit


Chick got cocky

Rob and others emailed BB.com

BB.com contacted Rob....Rob owned chick


Chick was talking shit and was told to stop posting nonsense

Chick m*lted

Rob caught Chick in several lies

Chick m*lted

Rob drank a Powerade
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bigdumbbell on May 05, 2006, 01:33:04 PM
Chick was like ... 240 you dont buy supplements and believe me I can check the records to see if you did...
240 was like , well Im going to ask your boss if you can check my personal buyig info
Then the boss was like , No he can look at that info
Then Bob had a m3ltdown
Then I watched the Real world Key West...
And that was Tuesday!!
that about sums it up without bobs name calling 240
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: jaejonna on May 05, 2006, 01:33:41 PM
Bob was talking smack about the ability to check credit card and buying records on BB.com

Rob called bullshit


Chick got cocky

Rob and others emailed BB.com

BB.com contacted Rob....Rob owned chick


Chick was talking shit and was told to stop posting nonsense

Chick m*lted

Rob caught Chick in several lies

Chick m*lted

Rob drank a Powerade

Somewhere in the mix, they released Alexxx from GetBig Prison
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 01:34:45 PM
Here is the kicker though- I asked Bob if BBing.com KNEW he was making those claims.  He told me to go ahead and asked. Bob invited me to check.

He said that BBing.com thinks that I'm a jerk-off too.  I think the line was "knock yourself out, fool".
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 01:35:19 PM
Besides, BBing.com was alerted to it before I wrote them.  And all I did was ask them about the security of their information.  As a customer, it is a fair question.  Some guy who represents you is threatening to, presumably, post my credit card info or worse on the web, cause he disagrees with me on BBing issues.  

Of course I wish it hadn't happened, and if I could undo it, I would.  I am sure Bob would too.  It was a pissing match- him trying to intimidate us, and us trying to get him to put his foot in his mouth.



    This is a very honest post.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: sarcasm on May 05, 2006, 01:36:13 PM
Here is the kicker though- I asked Bob if BBing.com KNEW he was making those claims.  He told me to go ahead and asked. Bob invited me to check.

He said that BBing.com thinks that I'm a jerk-off too.  I think the line was "knock yourself out, fool".

hahahaha, that has to be the most brutal owning i've ever seen on here.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: jaejonna on May 05, 2006, 01:38:08 PM
hahahaha, that has to be the most brutal owning i've ever seen on here.
Well when Natty Matty Brought the GetBig  Forum to Rob's home then that was pretty brutal in itself...a lil overboard
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 01:40:38 PM
Tre-

Seriously though, I had no intention of emailing them.  Then Bob Chick TOLD me to!

I asked "Bob, do the owners of BBing.com KNOW that you're claiming to have access to our personal information?  Should we ask them?"

Bob's response? "Go ahead. They think you're a jerkoff too!"
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 01:41:28 PM
Tre-

Seriously though, I had no intention of emailing them.  Then Bob Chick TOLD me to!

I asked "Bob, do the owners of BBing.com KNOW that you're claiming to have access to our personal information?  Should we ask them?"

Bob's response? "Go ahead. They think you're a jerkoff too!"

 Self-invited ownings are the most brutal ;D
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 01:44:57 PM
Even Lucius, thisiskeith, and NiceRacq asked Bob to stop it, during the thread, I think.  They're big Bob supporters- but I think all 3 of them even agreed Bob was out of place and causing it.

Must have been 90 minutes of him daring us to contact Ryan to verify it.  "I'm not just a paid endorser, I'm a decision maker.  I have access to sales data, AND MORE!  Check for yourself, they'll tell you.  They think you're a jerkoff too!"

Chick gave himself a self-owning, period.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: sarcasm on May 05, 2006, 01:45:59 PM
Even Lucius, thisiskeith, and NiceRacq asked Bob to stop it, during the thread.

Must have been 90 minutes of him daring us to contact Ryan to verify it.  "I'm not just a paid endorser, I'm a decision maker.  I have access to sales data, AND MORE!  Check for yourself, they'll tell you.  They think you're a jerkoff too!"

Chick gave himself a self-owning, period.
that must be why he retreated to the VIP board like a little bitch.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: weedoutheweak on May 05, 2006, 01:54:19 PM
My customers know their info is 1000% safe.  I keep my business and the 240 persona completely separated.

Bob Chick tried to intimidate us by saying he would look up our personal info from customer records.

Additionally, Bob Chick has crossed business lines by publicly dissing my business, and insulting the quality of my work.

Everyone who knows me, knows that I am a cool cat in real life, and that I work hard, fast, and discreet.  Bob Chick tried to intimidate us, and made his firm look REALLY bad by doing so.




Just like Mike and Laura?  hey didn't you make a thread on getbig with all of Laura's personal info and post a naked pic of her.  Yeah, you're not crazy.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 05, 2006, 02:00:42 PM

And I apologize if I've offended anyone, and you can rest assured I will avoid sticky situations like this in the future.  But in the end, all I did was let a company know a man was threatening to post MY info, that they hold safe.

Yeah right.

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LifterChick on May 05, 2006, 02:13:39 PM
Even Lucius, thisiskeith, and NiceRacq asked Bob to stop it, during the thread, I think.  They're big Bob supporters- but I think all 3 of them even agreed Bob was out of place and causing it.

Must have been 90 minutes of him daring us to contact Ryan to verify it.  "I'm not just a paid endorser, I'm a decision maker.  I have access to sales data, AND MORE!  Check for yourself, they'll tell you.  They think you're a jerkoff too!"

Chick gave himself a self-owning, period.

yeah Bob was out of line on this one.  The peanut gallery comment totaly pissed me off,  but he apolgized to everybody so I am still his chicklet.  Just peanut flavoured now.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MindSpin on May 05, 2006, 02:18:19 PM
No doubt, one of the most brutal all-time ownings...ha ha ha!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 05, 2006, 02:25:12 PM
That right there is why no one on either side of this can say with a straight face that 240 did anything wrong.

Bob told him to do it!  If Bob didn't think his bluff would get called, that's on him.




But why would someone actually do that?

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MindSpin on May 05, 2006, 02:32:10 PM
But why would someone actually do that?

Lisa

If someone who doesn't like me threatened to get access my personal credicard info, I would be pissed and would definitely call to do something about it.  240 may do a lot of dumb shit around here, but this was not one of them...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LifterChick on May 05, 2006, 02:34:24 PM
But why would someone actually do that?

Lisa

To understand that you would understand the psyche of 240. Doing that would take you into dark recess no sane person would dare venture.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: wordy on May 05, 2006, 02:48:29 PM
If someone who doesn't like me threatened to get access my personal credicard info, I would be pissed and would definitely call to do something about it.  240 may do a lot of dumb shit around here, but this was not one of them...

Actually he has, he posted one of the members college address and other personal information, inviting getbig members to get in touch with the guy's sister. he also tried to rat Matt out to Musscle Mania about Matt allegedly taking gear. Basically Bob pulled the same shit on him and he didn't like it.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 02:52:15 PM
Um, Bast doesn't have a sister, dude. 

And Matt is a straight up punk who came on getbig and told everyone to go to his friend X, who builds website, and that my work is blah, blah.  I asked matt not to mess with a man's livelihood, and he did.  So yes, I reminded him that he admitted using gear. 

He messed with my income, so I played the same card.

Then, he posted my wife's info, so I had no prob emailing the judges.  Would you?

Mindspin said it correctly:

If someone who doesn't like me threatened to get access my personal credicard info, I would be pissed and would definitely call to do something about it.  240 may do a lot of dumb shit around here, but this was not one of them...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: WOOO on May 05, 2006, 02:53:49 PM
FACTS:

1. Bob Chick has access to nothing.
2. What has 240 done wrong: nothing.

Bob Chick is nothing.  He is an over-rated, never was... I don't think anyone has any respect for him at this point...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LifterChick on May 05, 2006, 02:54:23 PM
FACTS:

1. Bob Chick has access to nothing.
2. What has 240 done wrong: nothing.

Bob Chick is nothing.  He is an over-rated, never was... I don't think anyone has any respect for him at this point...

I do
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 02:55:00 PM
But why would someone actually do that?

Lisa

Lisa,

Grow up.  Bob Chick tried to scare us, and made a statment that could have gotten him fired, and could have cost BBing.com a LOT of money.  You think he was RIGHT to make that threat and use their possession of our info as a weapon?

Chick was threatening our bank accounts. Then, he told us to contact them to verify it.  We did.  What part of it was incorrect?  If I hadn't contacted them (along with many others here), Bob would still be gloating about how he has access to our financial records.  Not cool.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Cavalier22 on May 05, 2006, 03:05:32 PM
bob was not gonna post your credit card information on the web, stop whining.

yes, he came off like a boorish moron which he is, and you proved it. but the original argument was as childish as you get
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 03:09:02 PM
bob was not gonna post your credit card information on the web, stop whining.

yes, he came off like a boorish moron which he is, and you proved it. but the original argument was as childish as you get

Cav,

I honestly, don't know.  If Bob is immature enough to verify a purchase that I made there (which he was raring to do that night), he could very easily have dropped proof of it, which could have been something like my shipping address or a credit card number. 

I was just playing the antagonist role.  Bob is paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to be the public face of BBing.com.  All I did was get him to prove himself as a liar, a bluffer, and unscrupulous. 

Everyone knows what I do.  I push buttons, I spark debates, and I get ppl to sometimes show their true colors.  I won't lie, I'm a prick sometimes.  But Bob was the one who told me to contact BBing.com. 
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: WOOO on May 05, 2006, 03:19:59 PM
I do

yay!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Slippedisc on May 05, 2006, 03:26:31 PM


 I work hard, fast, and discreet




what's yer hourly  :-*
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: The Master on May 05, 2006, 03:27:48 PM
Good ol' sloppy Richard,looking for some fu0n
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: WOOO on May 05, 2006, 03:30:24 PM

what's yer hourly  :-*

depends if he's working sitting down or on his knees...   :-*
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: HRDCOR on May 05, 2006, 03:32:16 PM
Wether or not you like 240 or not , he does call it like he see,s it and believe it or not he does get it right most times , and he does have a good understanding of the good the bad and the ugly of this industry.

The reason most dislike him is because of the above , no one likes to called out and proved wrong , especially in a public domain !!!

Remember its not the size of the dog in the fight , its the size of the fight in the dog that counts !
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: WOOO on May 05, 2006, 03:34:13 PM
Until you take the mutt out to the barn and blow it's head off with a shotgum paw...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Stavios on May 05, 2006, 03:35:49 PM
Ok I hate to say it but 240 was right in all this.

Minspin said it: 240 does a lot of stupid things but this wasn't one of them.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: HRDCOR on May 05, 2006, 03:36:59 PM
Quote
Until you take the mutt out to the barn and blow it's head off with a shotgum paw...                                                                                    

Why would you shoot a perfectly good fighting/hunting dog ?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: WOOO on May 05, 2006, 03:38:20 PM
It tasted blood? ;D      Seriously though I like 240, he shells it out but takes it like a man too.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: disco_stu on May 05, 2006, 03:38:26 PM
Bob was talking smack about the ability to check credit card and buying records on BB.com

Rob called bullshit


Chick got cocky

Rob and others emailed BB.com

BB.com contacted Rob....Rob owned chick


Chick was talking shit and was told to stop posting nonsense

Chick m*lted

Rob caught Chick in several lies

Chick m*lted

Rob drank a Powerade


Why does this story sound so right?...and likely...(?)

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bigdumbbell on May 05, 2006, 04:38:59 PM
240 this time it wasnt your fault
but in every other instance it was
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: pkaz on May 05, 2006, 04:45:29 PM
Cav,

I honestly, don't know.  If Bob is immature enough to verify a purchase that I made there (which he was raring to do that night), he could very easily have dropped proof of it, which could have been something like my shipping address or a credit card number. 

I was just playing the antagonist role.  Bob is paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to be the public face of BBing.com.  All I did was get him to prove himself as a liar, a bluffer, and unscrupulous. 

Everyone knows what I do.  I push buttons, I spark debates, and I get ppl to sometimes show their true colors.  I won't lie, I'm a prick sometimes.  But Bob was the one who told me to contact BBing.com. 

Lets be honest 240. You’re a prick period!!! And if anyone is immature and should grow up-Well hey, look in the mirror..
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: hillbilly on May 05, 2006, 04:48:51 PM
As many of the more sensible people have said here, what happens at GetBig should remain in the realm of GetBig.  This is the internet, people. 

More importantly, Rob runs an internet business of his own.  I don't know who all his customers are, but based on his actions, some of them *could* be thinking, 'Gee, this guy is crazy.  What if he goes nuts and decides to start harrassing me at MY job next??'

The trust requirements for online commerce are greater than those for brick-and-mortar businesses. 

And it doesn't stop with Rob's business.  Every individual who commits an act like that has the potential to make other customers that much more wary of doing business online.  This impacts not only Rob, but also anyone else involved in legitimate e-commerce, no matter the size of the operation. 

No one can change 240's personality, but I do hope he'll stop and think next time before going off half-cocked on another witch hunt.   


good point!

However at least everyone has heard of him and anyone who has taken the time to read his posts of late will think he's a bit crazy but still a nice enough guy and because he's made some pretty cool websites for other ppl i think wat he posts will hurt him at all at this point
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 04:54:10 PM
My clients know what they get with me.  Yeah, I do have some outspoken moments and I'm not a company man.  I'm by no means a politician.  And that's why some people have me work anonymously on their site, so they don't piss off the higher ups.  Which is fine :)

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: hillbilly on May 05, 2006, 04:57:51 PM
good point!

However at least everyone has heard of him and anyone who has taken the time to read his posts of late will think he's a bit crazy but still a nice enough guy and because he's made some pretty cool websites for other ppl i think wat he posts will hurt him at all at this point

spot the error in my last post!

i meant to say "i dont think wat he posts will hurt him" (its gettin kinda late here in England)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: The Ugly on May 05, 2006, 05:29:24 PM
spot the error in my last post!

i meant to say "i dont think wat he posts will hurt him" (its gettin kinda late here in England)

Spotted it in this one.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 07:05:12 PM
 240, has Bob apologized to you yet?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 08:58:49 PM
Lets get a few things straight.

The point/ argument between me and 240 was based on whether or not he ever ACTUALLY ordered or even used supplements from BB.com...as he indicated to everyone that he was a customer and would no longer buy from BB.com...and he suggested to everyone else that they should follow suit.

I asked him if he EVER bought supps from BB.com...he wouldn't answer. I indicated that I could find out if he did. There was never any threat of credit card info being displayed, and it had NOTHING to do with anyone Else's personal info.

Just what would I do with 240's CC info, anyway? As for his "personal info"...whats the secret?? His address, hiss wife's work, and anything else has been posted here 100 times...by someone else.

This is the last I'll address this ridiculous subject.

Everything else was formulated and assumed by 240...twisting things to suit himself as usual. I never said I was an owner of BB.com, never said I would post peoples personal info, never said I would look up peoples CC information. Anyone can feel free to look at the thread for themselves...see who's lying. If 240 actually was a customer of BB.com as he claimed...all he would've had to do was supply me with a shipping label, or say he was in the database...I could very easily get that info confirmed...it has nothing to do with CC info...theres a big difference between SALES records, and FINANCIAL information.

NOTHING to this date has been said to me by anyone at BB.com concerning this, as I can assure you all...they could give a shit about bullshit like this. We all have WAY more important things to focus our efforts on.





Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 09:03:20 PM
We could look it up, if those 5 pages of the thread weren't missing ;)

And if you would have just explained this 2 days ago- instead of leading us all to believe you had some magical powers- you could have avoided embarassing BBing.com
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: ManBearPig... on May 05, 2006, 09:06:33 PM
...... embarassing BBing.com

and Tom Prince!!!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 09:07:58 PM
"Anyone can feel free to look at the thread for themselves...see who's lying."

I did - and it looked like that either (a) you were lying, or (b) you were intentionally being misleading to appear more important than you are.

240 is consistent + fairly open - he KNOWS he's an annoying guy who LOVES needling pros online.'

But at least he's consistent.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 09:15:55 PM
"Anyone can feel free to look at the thread for themselves...see who's lying."

I did - and it looked like that either (a) you were lying, or (b) you were intentionally being misleading to appear more important than you are.

240 is consistent + fairly open - he KNOWS he's an annoying guy who LOVES needling pros online.'

But at least he's consistent.

 Hi, 240! ;D
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 09:22:00 PM
I took screenshots of the deleted posts, which I could post, but it's pretty pointless, as we're beating a dead horse at this point. 

Bob, ya tried to bully people.  Period.  It backfired when your internet balls outweighed your brains, and it blew up in your face.  Now, instead of just letting it go, you're still playing wordgames to try to win something that ended yesterday.

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 09:40:05 PM
I took screenshots of the deleted posts, which I could post, but it's pretty pointless, as we're beating a dead horse at this point. 

Bob, ya tried to bully people.  Period.  It backfired when your internet balls outweighed your brains, and it blew up in your face.  Now, instead of just letting it go, you're still playing wordgames to try to win something that ended yesterday.



  Why isn't Bob just admitting that he was wrong? Everyone else can see it :-\
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: body88 on May 05, 2006, 09:50:09 PM
and Tom Prince!!!


He almost died for bitches like me and you!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: pkaz on May 05, 2006, 09:51:56 PM
I took screenshots of the deleted posts, which I could post, but it's pretty pointless, as we're beating a dead horse at this point. 

Bob, ya tried to bully people.  Period.  It backfired when your internet balls outweighed your brains, and it blew up in your face.  Now, instead of just letting it go, you're still playing wordgames to try to win something that ended yesterday.



As I said before..... A prick!! Just has to get the last word in... Talk about word games. If it ended yesterday, why are you still posting about it!!!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:02:44 PM
V. funny, Luciusfox, but I aint 240!

240 really has to be given props here for making Bob Chick look foolish.

Why a fairly successful IFBB pro would want to engage in a public internet snizzle-fest is beyond me.


But thank you 2 both, 240 and Chick, for the amusement.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 10:07:50 PM
V. funny, Luciusfox, but I aint 240!

240 really has to be given props here for making Bob Chick look foolish.

Why a fairly successful IFBB pro would want to engage in a public internet snizzle-fest is beyond me.


But thank you 2 both, 240 and Chick, for the amusement.

  I agree with you here. 240 was clever because he let Bob stick his foot in his mouth. Instead of coming out with guns blazing, he patiently waited, knowing that Bob would eventually hang himself with his own rope. Like watching an animal walk into a trap ;D
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:11:08 PM
Yep!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 10:11:11 PM
V. funny, Luciusfox, but I aint 240!

240 really has to be given props here for making Bob Chick look foolish.

Why a fairly successful IFBB pro would want to engage in a public internet snizzle-fest is beyond me.


But thank you 2 both, 240 and Chick, for the amusement.

They are like Bert & Ernie (Bob & Rob) ;D
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 10:11:21 PM
Where did I stick my foot in my mouth?

I never said I could do the things 240 alledgedly emailed BB.com about.

Everything he wrote was bullshit...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 10:11:45 PM
I don't do it cause I hate Bob.  While I do enjoy a few shots (since he's taken shots at my business), the bigger goal was to expose him to the world as an irrational, lying man under pressure.

I think that happened, and I'm hoping the athletes will use this in their decision making process when it comes time to choose a new Athlete's Rep.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 10:14:05 PM
Where did I stick my foot in my mouth?

I never said I could do the things 240 alledgedly emailed BB.com about.

Everything he wrote was bullshit...

 You said you had access to sales records and "so much more". In the context of the conversation it was obvious to everyone that you were implying you had access to personal information.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 10:14:43 PM
Can't you two just be friends ::)

(http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/berternie.gif)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:17:44 PM
Bob-

You never outright said "Dear Getbig readers, I have access to all bb.com customer order files and credit card #s", but your emails were full of implied messages, along with the infamous "....."'s for further implied intent.

I've already cut + pasted what you wrote before, so no need to do so again - you know what you wrote.

Perhaps this is intentional on your part - the whole "Aint no such thing as bad publicity" thing.

Regardless of these pointless but amusing debates, you still have your Masters title, bb.com contract, and of course a pro physique - whether it's a 2nd tier, 3rd tier, or 4th tier pro physique, it's still obviously better than almost anyone else's on here.

As for 240 - well at least in my mind, he's definitely "won" this round with you Chick, and possible getting more interest for his websites.


Hmm, maybe this is all a secret alliance between 240 and Chick to further BOTH of their careers!!!!

Ha!

Tx again you 2.

bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 10:18:36 PM
You said you had access to sales records and "so much more". In the context of the conversation it was obvious to everyone that you were implying you had access to personal information.

Was it obvious? I do have access to sales records as backed up by the CEO himself...and I do have access to "much more" and have more responsibility than any other athlete in reguards to business within the company.

Are we talking about what I said..or 240's interpertation?

Some of you are easily duped, if thats the case...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 10:19:55 PM
Bob-

You never outright said "Dear Getbig readers, I have access to all bb.com customer order files and credit card #s", but your emails were full of implied messages, along with the infamous "....."'s for further implied intent.

I've already cut + pasted what you wrote before, so no need to do so again - you know what you wrote.

Perhaps this is intentional on your part - the whole "Aint no such thing as bad publicity" thing.

Regardless of these pointless but amusing debates, you still have your Masters title, bb.com contract, and of course a pro physique - whether it's a 2nd tier, 3rd tier, or 4th tier pro physique, it's still obviously better than almost anyone else's on here.

As for 240 - well at least in my mind, he's definitely "won" this round with you Chick, and possible getting more interest for his websites.


Hmm, maybe this is all a secret alliance between 240 and Chick to further BOTH of their careers!!!!

Ha!

Tx again you 2.

bb doc

Could be...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 10:21:09 PM
Was it obvious? I do have access to sales records as backed up by the CEO himself...and I do have access to "much more" and have more responsibility than any other athlete in reguards to business within the company.

Are we talking about what I said..or 240's interpertation?

Some of you are easily duped, if thats the case...

 It seemed pretty clear that you were talking about personal information. That's what I and everyone else thought and it made sense in the context of the conversation.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 10:22:45 PM
Was it obvious? I do have access to sales records as backed up by the CEO himself...and I do have access to "much more" and have more responsibility than any other athlete in reguards to business within the company.

Are we talking about what I said..or 240's interpertation?

Some of you are easily duped, if thats the case...

For the record if you havn't already read.................. I am actually on your side :o
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 10:24:40 PM
As I said before..... A prick!!

Um, I think we see who won't let this die...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:25:03 PM
It does amaze me Chick that you've managed to make a living off of lifting weights even though you turned pro VERY late + were never/are not in the Jackson/Levrone/Cutler/James league.

Smart of you to market yourself + "work the system" (w/o doing gay-for-pay) to make $$$ off of basically a hobby.

What are your plans for when you retire?  Or do you plan on being like Vince Taylor (kinda sad - seems he's not doing too well finanically), and competing in your late 40's, early 50s?

-bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2006, 10:26:44 PM
Bob's getting a job as a debate team coach.  Should take him 13 years to get his first win, juuuust like BBing ;)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 10:27:55 PM
It does amaze me Chick that you've managed to make a living off of lifting weights even though you turned pro VERY late + were never/are not in the Jackson/Levrone/Cutler/James league.

Smart of you to market yourself + "work the system" (w/o doing gay-for-pay) to make $$$ off of basically a hobby.

What are your plans for when you retire?  Or do you plan on being like Vince Taylor (kinda sad - seems he's not doing too well finanically), and competing in your late 40's, early 50s?

-bb doc

Dude shut the fuck up >:( Seriously he doesn't even need to compete and he could be more sucessful in life then you ever could be ::)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 10:34:31 PM
Thats a fair and legit question....

I'll never retire from Bodybuilding...just the competing portion of it. No, I won't be donning th trunks into my late 40's/ 50's...not sure you can hide a pair of Depends under posing trunks...they're the size of slingshots for cripessake!!

I'll be getting more involved behind the scenes, and into the business sense of BB, and more specifically, working in the business capacity at BB.com, where I split time now as a Pro Athlete, and take care of certain parts of the company.

I also have other business ventures like being an owner/ V.P. of Eggwhites International, and a few other investment-type companies...





Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:38:48 PM
Mike-Machine-

Actually I wasnt trying to bash Chick w that post - as you can tell, Chick didnt take offense.

Peace,

bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:44:15 PM
Chick-

Your plans make sense.  Will you be getting a MBA, or taking some select basic finance classes (like the way Arnold did) so you can be an effective businessman?

Why do you think other pro bb of similar age/experience as you, never planned for the future as you (and Shawn Ray, Strydom, and other older, financially OK guys) seem to be doing?

Not talking about the 24yo top-level NPC guy who only lives, eats, breathes bb, but folks like Vince Taylor, who going by his interview on bb.com, seemingly never looked past their bb career.

Taylor reminds me sorta of ex-boxing greats like Riddick Bowe, who just flounder in life past their athletic prime.

BB is such a weird sport, but something I've loved since high school.

-bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 10:44:38 PM
Mike-Machine-

Actually I wasnt trying to bash Chick w that post - as you can tell, Chick didnt take offense.

Peace,

bb doc

Well allright....... i don't see where i said you were "bashing" him but i guess the  >:( made you think that :)

Basically i just meant he doesn't even need to compete and he could still be known in the BBing industry :) and i respect pros who do things other then just competing.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 10:48:48 PM
You hit the nail on the head...most athletes never look past the competing part of their career.

They also don't work on/ perfect anything outside of their physique...like people skills, or representing a company properly.

Others that were very successful on stage and made a shitload of money...thought the gravyutrain would never stop...and blew money on superficial things like cars/ stereos/ jewelry, etc....things that had no return, like a house, or stocks, or investments...

 I've said it for years now....theres more to being a pro bodybuilder than just competing (or should be)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 10:50:55 PM
You hit the nail on the head...most athletes never look past the competing part of their career.

They also don't work on/ perfect anything outside of their physique...like people skills, or representing a company properly.

Others that were very successful on stage and made a shitload of money...thought the gravyutrain would never stop...and blew money on superficial things like cars/ stereos/ jewelry, etc....things that had no return, like a house, or stocks, or investments...

 I've said it for years now....theres more to being a pro bodybuilder than just competing (or should be)

 Great post, Bob!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 10:54:16 PM
chick-

Doesnt the NBA have a "How to handle your Finances 101" class that all rookies have to take?

That would be a great thing for all new IFBB pros straight out of their NPC win - maybe you could set this up for the future?

It's such a recurrent theme in ALL pro sports - young pro blows $ on women, wine, and wheels, and then has nothing to show for it at age 45.

But in pro bb, where the $'s much less, it's even sadder.


- bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 10:57:14 PM
chick-

Doesnt the NBA have a "How to handle your Finances 101" class that all rookies have to take?

That would be a great thing for all new IFBB pros straight out of their NPC win - maybe you could set this up for the future?

It's such a recurrent theme in ALL pro sports - young pro blows $ on women, wine, and wheels, and then has nothing to show for it at age 45.

But in pro bb, where the $'s much less, it's even sadder.


- bb doc


 This is a great idea, bb doc!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 10:58:38 PM
Of all "sports" BBing should have a class for personal finances :-\
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 11:00:10 PM
Of all "sports" BBing should have a class for personal finances :-\


  The first lesson would be not to become a bodybuilder :-\
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 11:04:00 PM
8 years ago, after I finished my schooling, I read a great, simple book called "Personal Finance For Dummies".

Like a lot of stuff in the "For Dummies" line, it was really simple + to the point.  Obviously, if you're looking to be a hedge fund manager, this aint the book for you, but the point is that for the majority of people, you DON'T need such complexity in your financial life.

It's like bb basics - K.I.S.S. principle is best (Keep It Simple Stupid).

For example, w/ mutual funds, investing in ONLY Vanguard and TIAA-CREF products (lowest expense ratios in the industry) should be good enough for 95% of people.

-bb doc (not a personal advisor, or employee/owner of any of the products mentioned above!)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Chick on May 05, 2006, 11:07:27 PM
Funny you should mention that...It's an idea already in the works as a collaboration piece from different people in the industry.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 11:09:46 PM
Lucius-

Heh, sad, but funny + somewhat true.

Still, if a child of mine told me he wanted to be a pro bodybuilder (low $, dangerous), my reaction would be the same as if he told me he wanted to be a painter (low $), social worker (low $), Marine (low $, dangerous), or biology PhD(very low $ despite YEARS of higher education):

1.  Why do you want to do this?

(1a.  Have you considered a different career that's easier/more financially lucrative/more widely respected?)

2.  Do you realize your chance of financial comfort is low?
3.  Do you realize this career could hurt your body?
4.  What will you do after you're done competing/working?

So I think that if some young teen bb has the genetics to be a great pro, REALLY KNOWS the pros+cons of pro bb, and STILL wants to do it, then this bb should be supported by the organization(s) he pays dues to - and 1 simple way is to teach this young bb the basics of personal finance.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 11:12:30 PM
Lucius-

Heh, sad, but funny + somewhat true.

Still, if a child of mine told me he wanted to be a pro bodybuilder (low $, dangerous), my reaction would be the same as if he told me he wanted to be a painter (low $), social worker (low $), Marine (low $, dangerous), or biology PhD(very low $ despite YEARS of higher education):

1.  Why do you want to do this?

(1a.  Have you considered a different career that's easier/more financially lucrative/more widely respected?)

2.  Do you realize your chance of financial comfort is low?
3.  Do you realize this career could hurt your body?
4.  What will you do after you're done competing/working?

So I think that if some young teen bb has the genetics to be a great pro, REALLY KNOWS the pros+cons of pro bb, and STILL wants to do it, then this bb should be supported by the organization(s) he pays dues to - and 1 simple way is to teach this young bb the basics of personal finance.

Sorry to tell you but Marines are the most hardcore people in the world and if it wasn't for my low amount of credits in highschool i would be one. SEMPER FIDELIS 8)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 05, 2006, 11:12:54 PM
Lucius-

Heh, sad, but funny + somewhat true.

Still, if a child of mine told me he wanted to be a pro bodybuilder (low $, dangerous), my reaction would be the same as if he told me he wanted to be a painter (low $), social worker (low $), Marine (low $, dangerous), or biology PhD(very low $ despite YEARS of higher education):

1.  Why do you want to do this?

(1a.  Have you considered a different career that's easier/more financially lucrative/more widely respected?)

2.  Do you realize your chance of financial comfort is low?
3.  Do you realize this career could hurt your body?
4.  What will you do after you're done competing/working?

So I think that if some young teen bb has the genetics to be a great pro, REALLY KNOWS the pros+cons of pro bb, and STILL wants to do it, then this bb should be supported by the organization(s) he pays dues to - and 1 simple way is to teach this young bb the basics of personal finance.

 Certain guys do have great potential, but for the ones who don't...
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 11:15:36 PM
Chick-

Word of warning - please dont take advantage of young, naive bb, the way companies like First Command seemed to have done to young, naive soldiers.

If you or your colleagues hawk some BS fund with a 4% expense ratio, of which the seller gets 1%, when a cheaper fund would have been better, then that would be rather bad.

There's a lotta sketchy "financial advisors" out there - sorta like the sketchy "personal trainers" - hope this dont happen in the NPC/IFBB under your watch.

-bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 11:19:14 PM
MikeMachine-

"Sorry to tell you but Marines are the most hardcore people in the world and if it wasn't for my low amount of credits in highschool i would be one. SEMPER FIDELIS"

I'm sorry, what part of my email prompted this post?

Absolutely agree that Marines are very tough + hardcore, but it's definitely true their pay is low + the danger (especially nowadays, sadly) is real.

From a "Mom" point of view, I'd rather see my son join the police force (safer) than the Marines, but safety is not an inspiring reason to choose a career!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 11:20:54 PM
MikeMachine-

HS credits?  A friend of mine had a lot of trouble w high school, and ended up jsut getting a GED, but he had no problem joining the Marines.

?

-bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 11:26:36 PM
MikeMachine-

"Sorry to tell you but Marines are the most hardcore people in the world and if it wasn't for my low amount of credits in highschool i would be one. SEMPER FIDELIS"

I'm sorry, what part of my email prompted this post?

Absolutely agree that Marines are very tough + hardcore, but it's definitely true their pay is low + the danger (especially nowadays, sadly) is real.

From a "Mom" point of view, I'd rather see my son join the police force (safer) than the Marines, but safety is not an inspiring reason to choose a career!

Well what i was getting at is that i think being a marine is a great honor and whatever the risk it's worth it. I was at a juvenile bootcamp run mostly by ex-marines and they had a big influence on my life, if i had a choice i would have went to the marines and never gotten into BBing :( I would not trade BBing for the marines now but thats the direction i wanted to go :(
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 11:27:54 PM
MikeMachine-

HS credits?  A friend of mine had a lot of trouble w high school, and ended up jsut getting a GED, but he had no problem joining the Marines.

?

-bb doc

Ahhhhhhhh............ see i was told even if you have your GED you still need so many HS credits which i didn't have :(
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: bb doc on May 05, 2006, 11:29:52 PM
Mike,

well I could be wrong (HS was a long time ago!) - I'm sure if the Marine recruiter told you that, then it was true.

Tx for sharing the bit about the boot camp - those camps are somewhat controversial, but they always seemed like a good idea to me.

I take it your experience was an overall positive one?

-bb doc
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: MikeThaMachine on May 05, 2006, 11:34:21 PM
I met some of the most respectful men in the world there, they were truly dedicated to us no matter how much of an asshole they may have come off as and i swear my camp commander was a true life G.I. JOE (27 years as a active marine and then runs a juvenile bootcamp as top ranking officer on camp).
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Hedgehog on May 06, 2006, 09:36:39 AM
My customers know their info is 1000% safe.  I keep my business and the 240 persona completely separated.

Bob Chick tried to intimidate us by saying he would look up our personal info from customer records.

Additionally, Bob Chick has crossed business lines by publicly dissing my business, and insulting the quality of my work.

Everyone who knows me, knows that I am a cool cat in real life, and that I work hard, fast, and discreet.  Bob Chick tried to intimidate us, and made his firm look REALLY bad by doing so.



What do you mean "us"?


And what do you mean "1000" percent?  There can only be 100% percent or less.

Again, who are "us"?

Please specify who you are refering to. If not, some could make a case for it starting to look like you having imaginary friends.

And WTF is Tre referring to?
As many of the more sensible people have said here, what happens at GetBig should remain in the realm of GetBig.  This is the internet, people. 

More importantly, Rob runs an internet business of his own.  I don't know who all his customers are, but based on his actions, some of them *could* be thinking, 'Gee, this guy is crazy.  What if he goes nuts and decides to start harrassing me at MY job next??'

The trust requirements for online commerce are greater than those for brick-and-mortar businesses. 

And it doesn't stop with Rob's business. Every individual who commits an act like that has the potential to make other customers that much more wary of doing business online.  This impacts not only Rob, but also anyone else involved in legitimate e-commerce, no matter the size of the operation. 

No one can change 240's personality, but I do hope he'll stop and think next time before going off half-cocked on another witch hunt.   


I doubt 240 has done anything seriously fcuked up.

But what the hellz is going on?

YIP
Zack
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 06, 2006, 08:54:04 PM
Lisa,

Grow up.  Bob Chick tried to scare us, and made a statment that could have gotten him fired, and could have cost BBing.com a LOT of money.  You think he was RIGHT to make that threat and use their possession of our info as a weapon?

Chick was threatening our bank accounts. Then, he told us to contact them to verify it.  We did.  What part of it was incorrect?  If I hadn't contacted them (along with many others here), Bob would still be gloating about how he has access to our financial records.  Not cool.

240, love, if i "grow-up" i'll be 41...i apologize for my ignorance when it comes to this kind of trash. I do not think i have the whole "discussion board forum mentality", although i have enjoyed learning here and there from all of this. If you came into the bar i work at, i could be the bestest friend, the NASTIEST friend and meanest/rudest friend you've ever had...when I'm here, I'm just not always sure why people are so rude behind a screen-name...that's all.

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 06, 2006, 08:54:58 PM
ummm

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 06, 2006, 08:57:37 PM
ummm



ummm????????

Lisa

PS. GET ME THAT LOGIN NAME!!!!!! :-*
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LifterChick on May 06, 2006, 09:52:23 PM
240, love, if i "grow-up" i'll be 41...i apologize for my ignorance when it comes to this kind of trash. I do not think i have the whole "discussion board forum mentality", although i have enjoyed learning here and there from all of this. If you came into the bar i work at, i could be the bestest friend, the NASTIEST friend and meanest/rudest friend you've ever had...when I'm here, I'm just not always sure why people are so rude behind a screen-name...that's all.

Lisa

I drink a lot, 240 makes sense, Onlyme is good looking and everything Bob says is pure gold.
Try it, it only hurts in the AM  ;D
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: ALI G on May 06, 2006, 09:55:53 PM
Yo i as been keepin up wif dis chat hea and i was laughin me azz off at the owning of chick HAHAHAAAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAH AHAHAHHAAHHAHAAHHAH Yo 240 wif busts you is a cool cat!

Yo dis was almost as wicked as da time i fingered this bitch called Ruth Jones on da school bus den let me mates sniff me fingas for 10 cents a piece. Yo i was like rollin in dough from dat innit.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 06, 2006, 11:24:17 PM
Yo i as been keepin up wif dis chat hea and i was laughin me azz off at the owning of chick HAHAHAAAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAH AHAHAHHAAHHAHAAHHAH Yo 240 wif busts you is a cool cat!

Yo dis was almost as wicked as da time i fingered this bitch called Ruth Jones on da school bus den let me mates sniff me fingas for 10 cents a piece. Yo i was like rollin in dough from dat innit.

Nice...very nice.

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 06, 2006, 11:43:12 PM
"Being wrong" is 240's business.   8) 


....and in time....


                          ....he's gonna make a killin'.

"I am a sniper
Always hit the mark
Paid assassin
Working after dark
Looking through the night
Using infra-red
My target on you
Aimed at your head

Ten thousand up front,
Ten thousand when I'm through
And I know just what to do,
And you know I'll do it too
Then I'm coming back for you,
Back for you!

I do the getting rid of,
Don't tell me why
Don't need to hear the truth,
Don't need the lies
Now pay me quickly
Nnd now we're through
It brings me great pleasure to say
My next job is you

Don't you know that killing is my business...
And business is good
You better believe it


Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 06, 2006, 11:46:38 PM
300 BUCKS BITCHES
[/b]
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 06, 2006, 11:47:49 PM
"Being wrong" is 240's business.   8) 
....and in time....
                         ....he's gonna make a killin'.


thats the plan---  While they sleep, Rob creeps.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 06, 2006, 11:49:51 PM

thats the plan---  While they sleep, Rob creeps.


So you respond to him and not me.  :'( :'( :'( :'(

Lisa

PS. the address, please.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 06, 2006, 11:50:19 PM
PM me again with it.

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 06, 2006, 11:50:46 PM

thats the plan---  While they sleep, Rob creeps.


Rob, You don't SLEEP...!   ;D  YOUR ASS WAITS!

"No Rest For the Wicked"
Godsmack

Walk to find line slip the edge, I'm not me
Rise above a suicide, taking it out of me
Got a feeling, it's going far away, yeah
Looking at wounds from yesterday

Gonna fly, taken my time, strip down to nothing
Gonna try, but there's no rest for the wicked

Been through the skin of a dragon a thousand times
In every day I live for you, still I'm not alive
Got a feeling, I'm gonna fall away
Gimme a sign what reason that I should stay

Gonna fly, taken my time, strip down to nothing
Gonna try, but there's no rest for the wicked
Gonna fly, take my time, strip down to nothing
Gonna try, but there's no rest for the wicked

Are you ready to go just to hide in?
Do you think you can make me a better man?
Crack me open, expose me to your ways
Ignorance and arrogance on my way
Oh yea
No rest for the wicked baby!

Gonna fly, take my time, strip down to nothing
Gonna try, but there's no rest for the wicked
Gonna fly, take my time, strip down to nothing
Gonna try, but there's no rest for the wicked
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 06, 2006, 11:51:35 PM
So you respond to him and not me.  :'( :'( :'( :'(

Lisa

PS. the address, please.

That's how it works there, honey.   >:(
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 06, 2006, 11:54:07 PM
That's how it works there, honey.   >:(

Wahhhhh!!! Are you guys  gay???













Just kidding.







You guys are both fine...



and i mean FINE!!!

Lisa


PS. the login and password, 240?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 12:00:37 AM
    Well I think all the Chick haters got it wrong.  I work out at Gold's Gym in Venice, Ca.  I see Chick working out with Jerome (HELPING him get ready for the U.S.A.'s) and with Kenny (HELPING him get ready for NPC).  He has been nothing but cool and HELPFUL with me whenever I ask him questions.  Even when he was getting ready for the Worlds, he still finds time to talk to the fans.  Some of you on this board arent competitive bodybuilders, you wouldnt know talking to strangers when getting ready for a contest is the last thing you want to do (especially when your working out on low carbs day).
    Me personally, I would have ignored a tool like 240 who probably in real life is a woman or a big fat lazy ding dong eatin', kool-aid drinkin, golobulus pig!  or I would sue the jerk for defimation of character.
    Anyway Chick is cool in real life folks, he's always willing to answer questions you may have, and he's approachable.  
                           This I've experienced in real life at the Mecca on more then one occasion!!!

P.S:  Spell check this reply yourself!!!! (Thank you)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 12:04:42 AM
   Well I think all the Chick haters got it wrong.  I work out at Gold's Gym in Venice, Ca.  I see Chick working out with Jerome (HELPING him get ready for the U.S.A.'s) and with Kenny (HELPING him get ready for NPC).  He has been nothing but cool and HELPFUL with me whenever I ask him questions.  Even when he was getting ready for the Worlds, he still finds time to talk to the fans.  Some of you on this board arent competitive bodybuilders, you wouldnt know talking to strangers when getting ready for a contest is the last thing you want to do (especially when your working out on low carbs day).
    Me personally, I would have ignored a tool like 240 who probably in real life is a woman or a big fat lazy ding dong eatin', kool-aid drinkin, golobulus pig!  or I would sue the jerk for defimation of character.
    Anyway Chick is cool in real life folks, he's always willing to answer questions you may have, and he's approachable.  
                           This I've experienced in real life at the Mecca on more then one occasion!!!

P.S:  Spell check this reply yourself!!!! (Thank you)

OH MY GOD! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU'D SPEAK OF 240 LIKE THIS!!!! IT'S SUNDAY FOR CHRIST'S SAKE. BE NICE!!!!

love, Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 07, 2006, 12:05:27 AM
   Well I think all the Chick haters got it wrong.  I work out at Gold's Gym in Venice, Ca.  I see Chick working out with Jerome (HELPING him get ready for the U.S.A.'s) and with Kenny (HELPING him get ready for NPC).  He has been nothing but cool and HELPFUL with me whenever I ask him questions.  Even when he was getting ready for the Worlds, he still finds time to talk to the fans.  Some of you on this board arent competitive bodybuilders, you wouldnt know talking to strangers when getting ready for a contest is the last thing you want to do (especially when your working out on low carbs day).
    Me personally, I would have ignored a tool like 240 who probably in real life is a woman or a big fat lazy ding dong eatin', kool-aid drinkin, golobulus pig!  or I would sue the jerk for defimation of character.
    Anyway Chick is cool in real life folks, he's always willing to answer questions you may have, and he's approachable.  
                           This I've experienced in real life at the Mecca on more then one occasion!!!

P.S:  Spell check this reply yourself!!!! (Thank you)

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 12:07:58 AM


BE NICE, 240...and get me that login already...how hard can it be?

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 12:09:29 AM
I'll say for the record that not all of my transgressions"encounters" with Bob have been what I would necessarily describe as "pleasant."  It couldn't have been more than 4 weeks ago that I got Bob to pause his iPod while in the middle of his cardio long enough for him to deny my request for him to "eyeball-approximate" the guy I was training with.  Bob went into a relatively lengthy diatribe elaborating on more than one way that my wish was impossible for him to oblige.  (namely, stupid shit like, 1) "he's wearing a shirt," 2) "I don't know him," 3) "240's really making my presence on Getbig lately 'not such a good idea,' 3) whatever, 4) whatever else...etc.)  

But at least you guys "get the point."  
"Bob kiss my ass he was no less than 14% and I didn't even ask him to lift his shirt."
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 12:12:43 AM
I'll say for the record that not all of my transgressions"encounters" with Bob have been what I would necessarily describe as "pleasant."  It couldn't have been more than 4 weeks ago that I got Bob to pause his iPod while in the middle of his cardio long enough for him to deny my request for him to "eyeball-approximate" the guy I was training with.  Bob went into a relatively lengthy diatribe elaborating on more than one way that my wish was impossible for him to oblige.  (namely, stupid shit like, 1) "he's wearing a shirt," 2) "I don't know him," 3) "240's really making my presence on Getbig lately 'not such a good idea,' 3) whatever, 4) whatever else...etc.)  

But at least you guys "get the point."  
"Bob kiss my ass he was no less than 14% and I didn't even ask him to lift his shirt."[/b]

Are you drinking right now?

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 12:13:37 AM
Are you drinking right now?

Lisa

Why do you ask, my dear? 
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 12:15:46 AM
Why do you ask, my dear? 

Just curious.

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 12:18:36 AM
Whatever McNasty..I mean..Farland,

   If someone asked me to look at their physique with a shirt on, I'd say the same thing.  Why would you ask someone to look at your physique and keep your shirt on????  If its not appropriate to take your shirt off at the time, WHY ASK someone to check you out???  Bodybuilding is a thinking mans game folks!!!  
   240 why are you on a computer at 12a.m. on a Saturday??? I'm at work, whats your exuse???  Get a girlfriend dude!!!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 07, 2006, 12:19:01 AM
Bob does fine when there is no pressure.  He should choose a job with consistency and little conflict.

That would be the furthest thing from athletes rep.  He is not quick on his feet, he is transparent as hell when a little discretion is required, and he just isn't seen as HONEST.  Without honesty, what do ya have?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 07, 2006, 12:20:24 AM
  240 why are you on a computer at 12a.m. on a Saturday??? I'm at work, whats your exuse???  Get a girlfriend dude!!!

What kinda job you working at 12 am?



Look man, I'm building websites at 3:19 am EST.  Why hassle me at work anyway? I don't go to your job and kick the cock outta your mouth. So why mess with me?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 12:20:32 AM
Just curious.

Lisa

Yeah it kinda has a way of "generating interest," doesn't it?   ;)  
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 12:23:20 AM
Yeah it kinda has a way of "generating interest," doesn't it?   ;)  

 8)

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 12:27:04 AM
8)

Lisa

 8)

I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Watch you weave
Then breathe your story lines
And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Keep track of the visions in my eyes

While she's deceiving me
It cuts my security
Has she got control of me
I turn to her and say

Don't switch the blade
On the guy in shades, oh-no
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
I can't believe it
'Cause you got it made
With the guy in shades, oh-no

And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Forget my name while you collect your claim
And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
See the light that's right before my eyes

While she's deceiving me
She cuts my security
Has she got control of me
I turn to her and say

Don't switch the blade
On the guy in shades, oh-no
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
I can't believe it
Don't be afraid
Of the guy in shades, oh-no
It kinda scared you
'Cause you got it made
With the guy in shades, oh-no

Oh, I say I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I say it to you now
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I cry to you
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 12:27:09 AM
aaahhhhaaaa,

  240 is just what I figured he'd be, A COMPUTER GEEK!!  So that's why you have no date tonight.  Yo, just get in the gym about 3 times a week, get some contacts, and stop snortin' when you laugh.  You should have a girl in about a month.  
  I see Chick everytime I go to the gym, he's cool.  You should stop the hatin' bro.  Have you ever met him?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: 240 is Back on May 07, 2006, 12:28:47 AM
aaahhhhaaaa,

  240 is just what I figured he'd be, A COMPUTER GEEK!!  So that's why you have no date tonight.  Yo, just get in the gym about 3 times a week, get some contacts, and stop snortin' when you laugh.  You should have a girl in about a month.  
  I see Chick everytime I go to the gym, he's cool.  You should stop the hatin' bro.  Have you ever met him?

please craig, tell us all about your BETTER job that has you working against your will at 12 am on a sat night.  Do tell!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 12:45:48 AM
     From 1993-2001 I served in the United States Marine Corps whith an honorable discharge.  Being that I was 18yrs old when I joined, I obviously had to forgo university.  Now, I am on the G.I. Bill earning a B.A. in Television and Radio Broadcasting at Cal State Los Angeles.  Instead of leeching off my family, I hold a full time night gig at a downtown lawer firm-Paul Hastings. 
     What do I do for a living, you ask--HOMEWORK!!!  'Cause most business is completed by 9 p.m. 

Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 12:46:05 AM
please craig, tell us all about your BETTER job that has you working against your will at 12 am on a sat night.  Do tell!

Yeah, but you've gotta admit:  Chik looks cooler in a ballcap when you really do think about it.  
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 12:46:54 AM
     From 1993-2001 I served in the United States Marine Corps whith an honorable discharge.  Being that I was 18yrs old when I joined, I obviously had to forgo university.  Now, I am on the G.I. Bill earning a B.A. in Television and Radio Broadcasting at Cal State Los Angeles.  Instead of leeching off my family, I hold a full time night gig at a downtown lawer firm-Paul Hastings. 
     What do I do for a living, you ask--HOMEWORK!!!  'Cause most business is completed by 9 p.m. 



(woosh)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 12:49:53 AM
8)

I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Watch you weave
Then breathe your story lines
And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Keep track of the visions in my eyes

While she's deceiving me
It cuts my security
Has she got control of me
I turn to her and say

Don't switch the blade
On the guy in shades, oh-no
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
I can't believe it
'Cause you got it made
With the guy in shades, oh-no

And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Forget my name while you collect your claim
And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
See the light that's right before my eyes

While she's deceiving me
She cuts my security
Has she got control of me
I turn to her and say

Don't switch the blade
On the guy in shades, oh-no
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
I can't believe it
Don't be afraid
Of the guy in shades, oh-no
It kinda scared you
'Cause you got it made
With the guy in shades, oh-no

Oh, I say I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I say it to you now
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I cry to you
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night








AHHHHHHHHHHH the 80's!!!!!!!!!!!

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 01:03:29 AM
    I know this isnt the photo boards but for some reason I feel some are doubting my authenticity of being a real COMPETITIVE bodybuilder, forgive me:
    240 if you want to finally see a real bb show, be in Miami on June 23-24 Musclemania Superbody.  Light-Heavy weight,  what is your competitive weight class????  (You don't compete, do you!)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 01:06:08 AM
    I know this isnt the photo boards but for some reason I feel some are doubting my authenticity of being a real COMPETITIVE bodybuilder, forgive me:
    240 if you want to finally see a real bb show, be in Miami on June 23-24 Musclemania Superbody.  Light-Heavy weight,  what is your competitive weight class????  (You don't compete, do you!)

Yeah that qualifies. (whoosh whoosh with a . dotta in the middle)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 01:08:18 AM
McNasty your not making any sense.

  Go to bed!!!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 01:08:42 AM
i have a bigger penis than mcfarland. hahahaa

No, you are mistaken.  (whoosh to the 10-hundredth power)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:08:59 AM
    I know this isnt the photo boards but for some reason I feel some are doubting my authenticity of being a real COMPETITIVE bodybuilder, forgive me:
    240 if you want to finally see a real bb show, be in Miami on June 23-24 Musclemania Superbody.  Light-Heavy weight,  what is your competitive weight class????  (You don't compete, do you!)

That's Venice, huh?

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 01:10:48 AM
yep, its the weight pen.  This was on Labor day 2005.  If you in L.A. we have shows Memorial day, 4th of July and Labor day every year.  visit www.musclebeachvenice.co m

p.s: I won the LtHvy Class.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:14:17 AM
yep, its the weight pen.  This was on Labor day 2005.  If you in L.A. we have shows Memorial day, 4th of July and Labor day every year.  visit www.musclebeachvenice.co m

p.s: I won the LtHvy Class.

I've been there...i do live in the area...when did you win the LtHvy?

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 01:14:36 AM
McNasty your not making any sense.

  Go to bed!!!

You assume I intend to make sense to you.  

hahahaha oh brother who's he think I'm talking to here oh brother why me
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: craig213 on May 07, 2006, 01:17:28 AM
Wow-McNasty.

 Hey Lisa, that was on Sept. 6 2005.  I'll be competing at the Memorial Day show this year in preparation for the Superbody in Miami.  You should come through!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:18:19 AM
yep, its the weight pen.  This was on Labor day 2005.  If you in L.A. we have shows Memorial day, 4th of July and Labor day every year.  visit www.musclebeachvenice.co m

p.s: I won the LtHvy Class.

Actually clicked on the site...nothin' really important came up.

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 01:18:53 AM
Wow-McNasty.

 Hey Lisa, that was on Sept. 6 2005.  I'll be competing at the Memorial Day show this year in preparation for the Superbody in Miami.  You should come through!

Yeah you got that sewed up ha?   ::)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:19:39 AM
Wow-McNasty.

 Hey Lisa, that was on Sept. 6 2005.  I'll be competing at the Memorial Day show this year in preparation for the Superbody in Miami.  You should come through!

That really is a fun day to be down there.

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:20:50 AM
Yeah you got that sewed up ha?   ::)

Honey, honey, honey...what does the above read?


Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Bast175 on May 07, 2006, 01:23:16 AM
lisa did you like my penis?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:25:08 AM
lisa did you like my penis?

It was nice.


lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Bast175 on May 07, 2006, 01:26:06 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 01:27:54 AM
Honey, honey, honey...what does the above read?


Lisa

Nevermind...I'm done. 
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Bast175 on May 07, 2006, 01:29:18 AM
McFarland you better post a pic of your dick, otherwise i beat you.

lol
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Mydavid on May 07, 2006, 01:30:37 AM
:)



 >:(

Lisa
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: McFarland on May 07, 2006, 01:31:30 AM
McFarland you better post a pic of your dick, otherwise i beat you.

lol

I think it'd be more accurate to say that you were already beaten when you posted yours.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Bast175 on May 07, 2006, 01:33:42 AM


 >:(

Lisa

why are you angry?
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: Bast175 on May 07, 2006, 01:52:39 AM
I think it'd be more accurate to say that you were already beaten when you posted yours.

hahah nice dude.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: gtbro1 on May 07, 2006, 03:49:01 AM
That right there is why no one on either side of this can say with a straight face that 240 did anything wrong.

Bob told him to do it!  If Bob didn't think his bluff would get called, that's on him.




Well I can't believe Bob was that stupid...I mean I don't know 240 the man...just his internet persona...but that is enough.Anyone who has spent any amount of time on getbig should not have had any doubt whatsoever that 240 would write that email...NONE!...he is far from stupid,and he sure isn't afraid to step on some toes if he thinks he is in the right....Just plain stupid for Chic to try and bluff him on something like that.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: gtbro1 on May 07, 2006, 03:53:16 AM
Until you take the mutt out to the barn and blow it's head off with a shotgum paw...

hahahahahahaha ;D
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: gtbro1 on May 07, 2006, 05:14:00 AM
Yo i as been keepin up wif dis chat hea and i was laughin me azz off at the owning of chick HAHAHAAAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAH AHAHAHHAAHHAHAAHHAH Yo 240 wif busts you is a cool cat!

Yo dis was almost as wicked as da time i fingered this bitch called Ruth Jones on da school bus den let me mates sniff me fingas for 10 cents a piece. Yo i was like rollin in dough from dat innit.

I bet it was almost as much work to write that crap as it was to make an attempt at reading it.
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: LuciusFox on May 07, 2006, 05:20:15 AM
8)

I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Watch you weave
Then breathe your story lines
And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Keep track of the visions in my eyes

While she's deceiving me
It cuts my security
Has she got control of me
I turn to her and say

Don't switch the blade
On the guy in shades, oh-no
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
I can't believe it
'Cause you got it made
With the guy in shades, oh-no

And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
Forget my name while you collect your claim
And I wear my sunglasses at night
So I can, so I can
See the light that's right before my eyes

While she's deceiving me
She cuts my security
Has she got control of me
I turn to her and say

Don't switch the blade
On the guy in shades, oh-no
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
I can't believe it
Don't be afraid
Of the guy in shades, oh-no
It kinda scared you
'Cause you got it made
With the guy in shades, oh-no

Oh, I say I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I say it to you now
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night
I cry to you
I wear my sunglasses at night
I wear my sunglasses at night


 OMFG....awesome song!
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: WOOO on May 07, 2006, 05:22:39 AM
Dear Ron,

Bast175 has posted his penis all over the board.

Thought you should know.
Getbig membership
Title: Re: Why 240 was wrong
Post by: mikediesel on March 22, 2008, 11:02:02 PM
bump