Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great  (Read 27255 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #50 on: February 17, 2006, 03:50:03 PM »
ps- don't even start this Yates was better than Coleman crap.
It has been done so many times and Yates lost everytime.
He had better abs, calves and...ummm..uh.....thats it.
no wonder yates always lost in those debates.
Flower Boy Ran Away

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #51 on: February 17, 2006, 07:01:44 PM »
ps- don't even start this Yates was better than Coleman crap.
It has been done so many times and Yates lost everytime.
He had better abs, calves and...ummm..uh.....thats it.
no wonder yates always lost in those debates.

  Dude, throughout his career, Dorian IGNORED Ronnie. Coleman was INSIGNIFICANT.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #52 on: February 17, 2006, 08:38:07 PM »

and he(ronnnie) is healthy.

Well, that's speaking in a relative sense.  Just because he's not on dialysis (yet) doesn't mean he's right on pace to live to a ripe old age of 70. 

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #53 on: February 17, 2006, 08:41:12 PM »
Yates had a better side tricep pose - no doubt.
Better ab thighs - no doubt.
Better front lat spread - no doubt

These can't be disputed.
"Shut the F up and train"

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #54 on: February 17, 2006, 08:53:03 PM »
  Dude, throughout his career, Dorian IGNORED Ronnie. Coleman was INSIGNIFICANT.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
of course he was. he was 12 at the time ;)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #55 on: February 17, 2006, 08:54:34 PM »
Yates had a better side tricep pose - no doubt.
Better ab thighs - no doubt.
Better front lat spread - no doubt
These can't be disputed.
but Ronnie takes the other 5! and taper. and vascularity. and striations. and.. 8)
oh.. lets not go there again.
yates has been beaten enough! :)
Flower Boy Ran Away

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #56 on: February 17, 2006, 09:27:20 PM »
of course he was. he was 12 at the time ;)

  Not really, dumbass. Dorian is only one year older than Ronnie. ::)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #57 on: February 17, 2006, 09:38:04 PM »
Yates' usually won over Lavrone, Dillet & Flex thanks to politics rife within a very commerical Weider realm.

Enough of the comparisons already, Yates was a bigger Franco Columbo with the same overpowering, unbalanced powerlifter's torso and wide hips.  :P

The comparisons always conclude that Yates will always be Ron's dog and knows it himself. End of story.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #58 on: February 17, 2006, 10:33:52 PM »
Yates' usually won over Lavrone, Dillet & Flex thanks to politics rife within a very commerical Weider realm.
Enough of the comparisons already, Yates was a bigger Franco Columbo with the same overpowering, unbalanced powerlifter's torso and wide hips.  :P
The comparisons always conclude that Yates will always be Ron's dog and knows it himself. End of story.

  Yeah, 'cause the dog is the male of the species. Dorian, the dog; Ronnie, the bitch. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

SUCKMYMUSCLE

rufjunk

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #59 on: February 18, 2006, 11:08:21 AM »
The only good old pics I can find are in black and white. I wonder if any pro's would comment on the type of chemicals guys have to turn to in order to compete at this level.

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #60 on: February 18, 2006, 07:02:59 PM »
ND posted these excellent comparison pics before.

"Shut the F up and train"

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #61 on: February 18, 2006, 07:03:37 PM »
"Shut the F up and train"

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #62 on: February 18, 2006, 07:04:21 PM »
"Shut the F up and train"

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #63 on: February 18, 2006, 07:34:31 PM »
Not more comparison shotz..BTW find one of Dorian that looks like this..

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #64 on: February 18, 2006, 07:52:32 PM »
All bodybuilders look good by themselves. But I agree - Ronnie has a better most muscular because of his vascularity and biceps. But that's it.
"Shut the F up and train"

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #65 on: February 18, 2006, 10:29:39 PM »


  Greater density, dryness and...fullness! :o In this picture, Dorian rapes Ronnie even when it comes to fullness, the only thing he is usually better than The Shadow. Ronnie sucks Yates dick big time. :-[ :-\ ;D

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #66 on: February 18, 2006, 11:03:47 PM »
Obviously Ron's not in top shape in that shot. Next.

rufjunk

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #67 on: February 19, 2006, 07:42:16 AM »
sergio and ronnie

kaylos

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #68 on: February 19, 2006, 10:24:55 AM »
ND posted these excellent comparison pics before.

Totally absurd : They are not at the same distance  ::)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #69 on: February 19, 2006, 11:39:56 AM »
Quote
Totally absurd : They are not at the same distance

Post anything, then compare.  ;D

GMCtrk

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #70 on: February 19, 2006, 12:29:53 PM »
dorian is f*cking ronnie up in those pictures :o

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #71 on: February 19, 2006, 12:32:43 PM »
Quote
dorian is f*cking ronnie up in those pictures

If that's the case, obviously they're weak pics.

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #72 on: February 19, 2006, 06:28:46 PM »
dorian is f*cking ronnie up in those pictures :o

Yes he is. Some people forgot just how amazing the Dorian was.
"Shut the F up and train"

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #73 on: February 19, 2006, 07:22:21 PM »
Yes he is. Some people forgot just how amazing the Dorian was.
  "The Yates". ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman - from great to not-as-great
« Reply #74 on: February 19, 2006, 07:31:47 PM »
All bodybuilders look good by themselves. But I agree - Ronnie has a better most muscular because of his vascularity and biceps. But that's it.
you forgot quads and chest ;)
seriously, Dorian's quads when viewed from the front were a HUGE weakness. You could never clearly see the seperation between all the muscle groups.


note the difference: dorian's quad's were just another reason that could be add to a LONG list of reasons why Dorian was "The Supreme Ruler of All Overratedness"
Flower Boy Ran Away