Author Topic: In defense of Branch Warren's NY win  (Read 2488 times)

SirTraps

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1603
Re: In defense of Branch Warren's NY win
« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2007, 06:26:59 PM »
The argument that Branch won because he had more mass is bullshit, Branch won because these contests are fixed and corrupt.

      Branch looked like shit.

Iraclese

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 185
Re: In defense of Branch Warren's NY win
« Reply #26 on: May 15, 2007, 06:43:26 PM »
Agreed!! ;D

HowieW

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3785
  • Getbig!
Re: In defense of Branch Warren's NY win
« Reply #27 on: May 15, 2007, 07:08:55 PM »
One of Branch's flaws: he is just TOO muscular.

Sounds weird, but it is true.  Even pro bodybuilders who are 5'6 are not meant to be THAT big.  Muscularity is a flaw in and of itself sometimes.  Lee Haney himself would not look good at 300 pounds.

Sadly, not too many in the modern era of bodybuilding "get that". A physique that is too big and thick, even if it is all lean muscle is not a great physique . Overall flow and body line is a key trait to a great physique. Having said that at least Branch did have a bloated, "pregnant" waist and legs that are the best overall in the pros. He is impressive when seen in person.    Howard
Kelly Ryan married well!  Free Titus!