Read the Copenhagen Agreement? U.N. plans for a new 'government'

[James]

Because based on his post he thought i was saying the WSJ article was a CT.

Not trying to sound condecending here, or meaning to.  But that's how conversation works sometimes.

You got 2 issues here, from what i can see:

1.  I never directly said the WSJ article was a CT
2.  When asked about it, i attempted to clarify it.

Com on, James.  The WSJ is a credible news source.  It's not prison planet.  But i think the article is designed somewhat to freak people out a bit and you got Samson over here fanning the fires.  That's why i've taken the attitude about i have.  I even posted a current article tempering the supposed "threat".

Also i did come off as a smart ass initially with your post.  I apologize.  I was just getting testy with your eye roll because i thought i had clarified myself.  

Apology accepted.

have a good weekend.

[SAMSON123]

Because based on his post he thought i was saying the WSJ article was a CT.  

Not trying to sound condecending here, or meaning to.  But that's how conversation works sometimes.  

You got 2 issues here, from what i can see:

1.  I never directly said the WSJ article was a CT
2.  When asked about it, i attempted to clarify it.

Com on, James.  The WSJ is a credible news source.  It's not prison planet.  But i think the article is designed somewhat to freak people out a bit and you got Samson over here fanning the fires.  That's why i've taken the attitude about it I have.  I even posted a current article tempering the supposed "threat".

Also i did come off as a smart ass initially with your post.  I apologize.  I was just getting testy with your eye roll because i thought i had clarified myself.    

*GASP* 

You are now on top of HUGO'S SHIT LIST..... Prepare for him to rain down fire and brimstone on your ass..

[OzmO]

Apology accepted.

have a good weekend.

You too James.

[OzmO]

Bump for one last look at the USA.