You don't get it. The US relies heavily on foreign interests, probably more so than any other nation. Our economy has thrived on it for decades. To pull back in would mean a huge hit to the standard of living for the avg citizen. Can you deal with that? Not many could, just look at the retards in the OWS movement as a prime example.
Not to mention the ability of terrorist organizations, rogue foreien govts, etc... to go completly unchecked. And the very reason "195 other countries in the world survive without bases" is EXACTLY because we do what we do. To think otherwise is naive. Do I think the other nations should step up and pull their fair share financially and militarily? Of course, but that is a different discussion and I've never seen RP address it. Perhaps he has.
I used to think this way. "Without stiff-arming other countries, we'd suffer..."
Then I realized that a big part of the reason WHY we have to spend $ on military to maintain this advantage - is that we allow such an insane amount of spending waste.
if we weren't funding 1000 military bases (just move it down to 300 maybe?)...
if we weren't sending hundreds of billions all over the world for paki intel and iraq reconstruction...
if we weren't spending $ on ball washing programs on the other side of the world...
if we weren't losing $60 billion CASH in iraq then sealing the records for 60 years...
and it we weren't borrowing at 40% interest from China to pay for all this -
WE WOULD BE ABLE TO SLASH TAXES IN AMERICA SIGNIFICANTLY.
The rich are crying about paying such high rates - but we woudln't need so much damn money IF we weren't spending so much.
Ron paul spend less, we tax and borrow less, and things start getting better. It's unsustainable, this current model.