You're comparing super cars by their interiors?
Wow. Good job.
Who cares about le mans & nurburing? You rate & drool over vehicles that you see in magazines that you'll never drive or probably see in real life. Everything I comment on is first or second hand experience.
I'm talking real life applications. The v10 motors in the last generation vipers sucked & very problematic. Especially when compared to the bulletproof LS platform engines.
Don't get butthurt that you like the viper based on looks only.
Many of the owners of Vipers and Corvettes have complained about the interiors, and so have the testers. And in fact the Corvette team for this yr step up it's interors.
Many people care about Le Mans and The Ring, especillay the manufacturers which is why they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on development cars and race cars. Check Audi's Le Man's winning cars, that have hybrid tech, or Nissan's Delta wing, or their LEAF electric race car. There is a ton of tech that is developed for these races, and Lexus used the 2r Hours of Nurburgring to develop the LFA.
You have no notion that I'll never see or drive these vehicles in my life. Right down the street from me a man owns a Ford GT and a Viper GTS, and if you go to cars and coffee events, you see these and Ferraris
The Viper's engines are based on a truck engine, and chances are they have sorted out a lot of issues
I never said that I liked the Viper based on looks alone, you make the assumption...the viper looks good, and has character. Hopefully, it will have the goods in the ALMS to back it up.
As far as Corvette---if they really wanted to actually be serious about the Vette, they would turn Corvette into a brand, and they could get at least 4 diff models out of it. GS---base with a I6 or v6,
Sting Ray- small block V8 or TT V6, Z06-V8, ZR1--TTV8. all with distinct styling, and fit diff markets. The ZR1 would be the equivalent to the Enzo or other special non-series make from Ferrari.