Author Topic: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna  (Read 5430 times)

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
and junk dna meaning that it has no function

this is the mindset ...

just because you dont understand something dont assume it isnt worth a shit

this video is great 80 percent of "junk dna" has atleast one biological function theyve figured out thus far

this junk dna is NON-Protien-coded . regular genes are protein coded.

the "junk dna/ non protein coded dna" is inbetween the regular protein coded dna/genes.

anyways the junkdna act like switches to the genes, interesting stuff not all new but alot of it is new

A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2013, 05:02:14 PM »
and junk dna meaning that it has no function

this is the mindset ...

just because you dont understand something dont assume it isnt worth a shit

this video is great 80 percent of "junk dna" has atleast one biological function theyve figured out thus far

this junk dna is NON-Protien-coded . regular genes are protein coded.

the "junk dna/ non protein coded dna" is inbetween the regular protein coded dna/genes.

anyways the junkdna act like switches to the genes, interesting stuff not all new but alot of it is new



my point is these mainstream scientists experts always get shit wrong on purpose. it seems to be on purpose because it doesnt make sense to assume such things that can make you look like a fool....but still somehow manage to never be a fool in the eyes of the mainstream puppeteers
A

_aj_

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17641
  • The Return of the OG
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2013, 05:02:47 PM »
The "junk" DNA is where the wisdom of the ancients is encoded.

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2013, 05:03:58 PM »
everyone has something to sell ...

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2013, 05:11:59 PM »
The "junk" DNA is where the wisdom of the ancients is encoded.
its all coded, in code

some dna is protein and attached to that is the non-protien coded but still "coded" dna

the seperation of the protien coded part and the non protien part is key in other words where does the seperation lie to discern one gene-and its switch (non protein coded)

and another gene and its non protien coded junk dna

its all about mapping it out for the public but when will they do that

because

we would just alter switches and codes on our own dna while still alive

A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2013, 05:15:41 PM »
everyone has something to sell ...
ok thats a familiar cliche  but where do you stand on this
A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2013, 05:21:30 PM »
from a darwinian perspective we expect alot of useless dna

the creationists point of view is that all dna has a function wich actually encourages scientific endeavors of peace
A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2013, 05:27:03 PM »
everytime we eat something and that food is assimilated and signals go to our genes/dna wich are located at billions if not trillions of parts on the human body!

now the key is to map this out with many types of diets, and timings of foods ect ect

A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2013, 03:16:59 AM »
everytime we eat something and that food is assimilated and signals go to our genes/dna wich are located at billions if not trillions of parts on the human body!

now the key is to map this out with many types of diets, and timings of foods ect ect



each organ after a meal or all day long is sending signals to genes/dna based on what you do or dont eat at any given time
A

Viking11

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2002
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2013, 04:18:57 AM »
from a darwinian perspective we expect alot of useless dna

the creationists point of view is that all dna has a function wich actually encourages scientific endeavors of peace
You answered your own question. Well done.

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2013, 04:26:29 AM »
You answered your own question. Well done.

im more interested in everyone catching up to me since dna isnt discussed on a bodybuilding board
A

NordicNerd

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 921
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2013, 04:33:33 AM »
and junk dna meaning that it has no function

this is the mindset ...

just because you dont understand something dont assume it isnt worth a shit

...

Congrats, an interesting topic. I agree with you that Dawkins has an unfortunate tendency to interpret lack of positive evidence as positive evidence for what evidence is lacking for. He is to me actually quite unscientific in this regard. I admire people who admit what is unknown.

This being said- epigenetics is on the rise and it will be interesting to follow this field in the coming years.

NN

Thick Nick

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2621
  • "Some want to look good, others want to do good."
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2013, 06:21:12 AM »
I think you missed his point you crazy bastard. He doesn't mean junk as in useless. I take it as junk... Shared DNA... all life shares a crapload of DNA. It's the non junk DNA that makes you a pot smoking cookaloo and a dog mans best friend. The part that makes these differences is very small... Ie the non junk.

Shared = junk (should have called it standard instead of junk)
$

NordicNerd

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 921
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2013, 06:28:34 AM »
I think you missed his point you crazy bastard. He doesn't mean junk as in useless. I take it as junk... Shared DNA... all life shares a crapload of DNA. It's the non junk DNA that makes you a pot smoking cookaloo and a dog mans best friend. The part that makes these differences is very small... Ie the non junk.

Shared = junk (should have called it standard instead of junk)


Not true. Shared DNA may well code for protein synthesis. Junk DNA refers to DNA that does not code for proteins. Recent recearch shows that such DNA, at least to some extent, has other functions.

NN

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2013, 09:45:07 AM »
the only people who know less about existence than scientists are the faithful

arrogant, small minded, fools...

we're all worm meat, life is an instant, nothing has meaning

be happy

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2013, 11:35:36 AM »
I figure if you are breathing you are ok.

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2013, 11:43:37 AM »
ok thats a familiar cliche  but where do you stand on this
I think he is a depressed man who wants to subtly depress other people in order to make them as miserable as he is. A passive aggressive dude who pretends to create and be positive, while he's mostly destroying and nihilistic. Like that dude in a wheelchair. But most scientists and medics are cold hearted, blooded weirdos who are fascinated by death and morbidity, and found a way to sublimate themselves and be part of society by making a profession of it.

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2013, 03:05:02 PM »
I figure if you are breathing you are ok.


wise

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36439
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2013, 04:16:20 PM »
the only people who know less about existence than scientists are the faithful

arrogant, small minded, fools...

we're all worm meat, life is an instant, nothing has meaning

be happy
why do you even try to post idiot
A

falco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18338
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2013, 08:21:57 AM »
The junk DNA is the leftover anunnaki cum inside our veins.

the trainer

  • Guest
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #20 on: November 13, 2013, 08:36:28 AM »
Richard dawkings knowledge is shit when you compare it to the great johnny falcon, i am just happy to be on the same board where the new albert einstein of the 21 century posts,

doison

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3448
  • Rum Ham
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #21 on: November 13, 2013, 09:04:39 AM »
How come every forum I go to knows that scientists are dumb, but scientists never realize that us forum posters are right? 

Makes no sense. 
Y

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: why would Richard Dawkings go on record to say 97% of dna is junk dna
« Reply #22 on: November 13, 2013, 09:05:04 AM »
 8)  Dawson > Dawkins