Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Training Q&A => Topic started by: ManBearPig... on September 05, 2006, 01:08:46 PM

Title: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: ManBearPig... on September 05, 2006, 01:08:46 PM
these two are pretty much exactly opposite.

eating a ton with low reps and stretching vs.

"low" calories (bbing terms wise) and high reps, etc.

How do you think Doggcrapp and his legion will feel about these groundbreaking new ideas?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: The True Adonis on September 05, 2006, 01:18:51 PM
They are stuck eating Rinsed, unsalted ground beef by the lb and drinking Olive oil with carb cutoffs,

While we are eating Ice Cream,Pizza and Hamburgers and Peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches and laughing all the way.

hahahahahahahahahahah
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: shiftedShapes on September 05, 2006, 01:20:12 PM
How do you think Doggcrapp and his legion will feel about these groundbreaking new ideas?

I think they will feel a distinct fascial stretch in their anal sphincters as they are gang banged by the TRUTH
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: The True Adonis on September 05, 2006, 01:22:46 PM
TA, are you saying that Dante knows as much about this game as a sweaty swimming pool full of old mincers, each with a penchant for washing 'meaty treats' just prior to guzzling down a hot mouthful of steaming freshly 'rinsed' protein?
ROFLMAO.

I remember him getting requests to make the protein jugs bigger because the DC trainees hands were getting too big to reach in their protein jugs. hahhahahhahahahahah

I say throw away your protein jug today!

You aren`t going to need that anymore.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: jmt1 on September 05, 2006, 01:31:08 PM
these two are pretty much exactly opposite.

eating a ton with low reps and stretching vs.

"low" calories (bbing terms wise) and high reps, etc.

How do you think Doggcrapp and his legion will feel about these groundbreaking new ideas?

groundbreaking new ideas...lol

dieting with pizza, ice cream, fruit...low protein...training with bitch weights for lots of reps and sets...lol

that is so ridiculous its comical.

we already know that training heavy with basic movements, 6-8 reps is best for building muscle.

we already know that atleast 1-2 grams of protein is needed to maintain or build lean muscle tissue.

we already know that shit like ice cream, pizza, potato chips, and whatever else he said, is easily converted to fat.

those are the facts in the real world....lol
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: wood on September 05, 2006, 01:33:36 PM
MONSTER DISBELIEF ;D
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: dorkeroo on September 05, 2006, 01:36:09 PM
This place isn't about bodybuilding anymore  :-\
I know this place isn't meant to be taken seriously, but, I mean this kind of garbage really shouldn't be tolerated, even on here. The stupidity on this board is often really funny and entertaining, but, in this case it is staggering and annoying. Adonis, you have too much free time.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Hedgehog on September 05, 2006, 01:37:42 PM
ROFLMAO.

I remember him getting requests to make the protein jugs bigger because the DC trainees hands were getting too big to reach in their protein jugs. hahhahahhahahahahah

I say throw away your protein jug today!

You aren`t going to need that anymore.

I actually think you have a lot of things right (caloric deficit, moderate protein, et al)

But I also believe you're wrong when a lot of the food, although having a good carb:protein:fat ratio, simply aren't the healthiest choice out there.

We disagree in some matters, but I ain't gonna argue with you. Just curious as why you don't think one should get the best possible nutrition value from those X amount of daily calories eaten every day?


Still, I think you make a few good points, although in your usual hysterical style. 8)

YIP
Zack
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: johnnynoname on September 05, 2006, 01:38:39 PM
eating a ton and low reps (quality low reps) is good when your a teen and need to build that foundation
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: jmt1 on September 05, 2006, 01:40:02 PM
This place isn't about bodybuilding anymore  :-\
I know this place isn't meant to be taken seriously, but, I mean this kind of garbage really shouldn't be tolerated, even on here. The stupidity on this board is often really funny and entertaining, but, in this case it is staggering and annoying. Adonis, you have too much free time.

at first i thought it was someones gimmick account...actually pretty funny.

but i think he really believes some of this nonsense...lol
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: WiseGuy on September 05, 2006, 01:40:43 PM
They are stuck eating Rinsed, unsalted ground beef by the lb and drinking Olive oil with carb cutoffs,

While we are eating Ice Cream,Pizza and Hamburgers and Peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches and laughing all the way.

hahahahahahahahahahah


 ::)
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: dorkeroo on September 05, 2006, 01:45:14 PM
at first i thought it was someones gimmick account...actually pretty funny.

but i think he really believes some of this nonsense...lol

Personally I can't tell, and I wouldn't take Adonis' advice ever. I guess he thinks he is funny, and that is all that counts  :-X However, some people on here might take it seriously, and well, I guess they will get what they ask for.  :-X
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: The True Adonis on September 05, 2006, 01:54:47 PM
I`m serious.

Trust me. I have done the traditional thing for years and you know what.

It is all lies,myths and nonsense fueled by hysteria and rarely any science.

Simply put, Ice Cream/Frozen Yogurt has a higher nutrient content and mineral content and lower GI than Oatmeal and Brown Rice.

It barely even registers an insulin response.  Brown Rice And oatmeal are far less nutritional and will cause blood sugar levels rise way way more.

Add that to the fact that new studies have proven that Dairy products specifically release fat stored in the abdominal region.


You can look this shit up yourself or you can just listen.

Now tell me I am wrong. hahhahah
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: ManBearPig... on September 05, 2006, 02:12:15 PM
I`m serious.

Trust me. I have done the traditional thing for years and you know what.

It is all lies,myths and nonsense fueled by hysteria and rarely any science.

Simply put, Ice Cream/Frozen Yogurt has a higher nutrient content and mineral content and lower GI than Oatmeal and Brown Rice.

It barely even registers an insulin response.  Brown Rice And oatmeal are far less nutritional and will cause blood sugar levels rise way way more.

Add that to the fact that new studies have proven that Dairy products specifically release fat stored in the abdominal region.


You can look this shit up yourself or you can just listen.

Now tell me I am wrong. hahhahah

but what about success stories like Dave Henry and getbig's very own natural al?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Captain Equipoise on September 05, 2006, 02:30:20 PM
I've always followed a different aproach, I eat like Adonis, and train (recently) like Doggcrapp, it's working pretty well :)
I've never been able to eat completely bodybuilding food, love food too much. As long as you train your ass off in the gym you'll stay lean.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: alexxx on September 05, 2006, 02:51:07 PM
these two are pretty much exactly opposite.

eating a ton with low reps and stretching vs.

"low" calories (bbing terms wise) and high reps, etc.

How do you think Doggcrapp and his legion will feel about these groundbreaking new ideas?

I think before you put down either one you should try them first. But do them 100% or don't bother doing them.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on September 05, 2006, 02:54:36 PM
the important thing is to just keep experimenting and trying shit out whenever you level off. theres no 'right way'...everyone responds to different approaches. as long as you are not afraid to try new methods you will always be one step ahead of the sheep who follow the magazine info their whole life as if its gospel.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: davidpaul on September 05, 2006, 02:55:20 PM
all the dogshitters just got fat, plain and simple, the ones that didn't could metabolise all the protein, cos they were juiced to the gills.

Adonis talks a lot of sense when it comes to natural nutrition.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: sarcasm on September 05, 2006, 02:56:49 PM
all the dogshitters just got fat, plain and simple, the ones that didn't could metabolise all the protein, cos they were juiced to the gills.

Adonis talks a lot of sense when it comes to natural nutrition.
yes!!!!!!!!! you get it, Adonis is singlehandedly revolutionizing the bodybuilding world with these methods, IT'S TOO F.UCKING EASY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: alexxx on September 05, 2006, 02:57:07 PM
When it comes to traning I think it is pretty obvious that the heavier you go with proper form the bigger your muscles are going to get. So choose wichever program will help you become your strongest fastest for optimal muscle growth.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: leland000 on September 05, 2006, 02:58:37 PM
The True Adonis "While we are eating Ice Cream,Pizza and Hamburgers and Peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches and laughing all the way.
hahahahahahahahahahah"


Adonis.....Where exactly are you laughing too?

As an outsider looking in it seems DC is laughing his way to the bank  and notoriety selling his services and owning his own business and his clients seem to be laughing their way to competitive success.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: davidpaul on September 05, 2006, 03:03:56 PM
Show me one natural dogshitter who looks good eating 1kg of protein a day ::).

Simple principle, If you eat too much  (calories ) compared to what you burn, YOU GET FAT - But the unknowing natural thinks hes getting "big".

Adonis before used eat fukloads get to 240 plus, be relatively weak for his bodyweight (proportionality), after he dieted on low calories didnt lose much strenght, and was actually stronger proportionally (compareed to his bodyweight).

To all the natural morons out there, go and eat 1kg  of protein a day, ull get like ronnie. ::)
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: doison on September 05, 2006, 03:22:31 PM
Adonis knows he needs Dogcrapp.  Without dogcrapp to bitch about he's just another guy with a mushroom top hair cut.

Therefore he is less than dogcrapp. 
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: ManBearPig... on September 05, 2006, 05:28:18 PM


As an outsider looking in it seems DC is laughing his way to the bank  and notoriety selling his services and owning his own business and his clients seem to be laughing their way to competitive success.

i'm sure he is by selilng protein made in his mother's basement bath tub.

The Adonis Principles require no money, no special supps, no rinsing of your food, and no penis in mouth requirements.

The man is a myth buster, plain and simple.  Is he wrong to try to get all of us to have those "ironage" type bodies and be lean and good looking year round, not a fat tub of shit 11.5 months out of the year?

and what about dante's "succesful clients"?  The only I can think of is Dave Henry...who's, well, not exactly taking the bbing world by storm.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: IFBBwannaB on September 05, 2006, 05:34:39 PM
these two are pretty much exactly opposite.

eating a ton with low reps and stretching vs.

"low" calories (bbing terms wise) and high reps, etc.

How do you think Doggcrapp and his legion will feel about these groundbreaking new ideas?

Fagdonis do smell like dog crap.First correct post you ever post.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: natural al on September 05, 2006, 06:06:01 PM
The True Adonis "While we are eating Ice Cream,Pizza and Hamburgers and Peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches and laughing all the way.
hahahahahahahahahahah"


Adonis.....Where exactly are you laughing too?

As an outsider looking in it seems DC is laughing his way to the bank  and notoriety selling his services and owning his own business and his clients seem to be laughing their way to competitive success.

excactly.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: El_Spiko on September 05, 2006, 06:37:30 PM
David Henry got big on DC. Mentzer, Viator, Dugdale, and Dorian on HIT variations. Arnold on volume, but his best on volume with intensity. Johnny Jackson and Eric Bui by powerlifting. Serge on lots of volume. They all found what worked best for them. They all tried various styles of training, saw the results that they got, and eventually found what their body responded best to, in both ecercise and diet. Dorian carefully logged and measured everything about his diet, Darrem plays it by ear.

There is no "one" method to getting big. There is what works for you the best, which may not be what works for someone else the best. Adonis isn't revolutionizing bodybuilding, he's just presenting his variation on it. Which is pretty close to a lot of other guys' variation. Same with Dante. Though he hates having it categorized as HIT, it's very similar (I think it's actually remarkably similar to a hardcore version of the Body for Life program). You can argue how much better one system is over another till the end of time, but there will never be a resolution. For every person who got awesome results training one way, there's someone who didn't get any.

Adonis's principles work for him. Awesome. DC's work for Dave Henry. Awesome. Each and every one of us has what works for us. Talking about different systems can be educational and rewarding, and certainly trying out different things is the best way to find what works for you. But argueing about what system works best is just retarded. There is no best, just different.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Palpatine Q on September 05, 2006, 06:49:07 PM
David Henry got big on DC. Mentzer, Viator, Dugdale, and Dorian on HIT variations. Arnold on volume, but his best on volume with intensity. Johnny Jackson and Eric Bui by powerlifting. Serge on lots of volume. They all found what worked best for them. They all tried various styles of training, saw the results that they got, and eventually found what their body responded best to, in both ecercise and diet. Dorian carefully logged and measured everything about his diet, Darrem plays it by ear.

There is no "one" method to getting big. There is what works for you the best, which may not be what works for someone else the best. Adonis isn't revolutionizing bodybuilding, he's just presenting his variation on it. Which is pretty close to a lot of other guys' variation. Same with Dante. Though he hates having it categorized as HIT, it's very similar (I think it's actually remarkably similar to a hardcore version of the Body for Life program). You can argue how much better one system is over another till the end of time, but there will never be a resolution. For every person who got awesome results training one way, there's someone who didn't get any.

Adonis's principles work for him. Awesome. DC's work for Dave Henry. Awesome. Each and every one of us has what works for us. Talking about different systems can be educational and rewarding, and certainly trying out different things is the best way to find what works for you. But argueing about what system works best is just retarded. There is no best, just different.

True Shit brother, Iv'e been saying that for years.....glad to see someone else sees the light. Actually a lot of people do,but they get shouted down by the retards who think they know something.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: dorkeroo on September 05, 2006, 06:53:26 PM
David Henry got big on DC. Mentzer, Viator, Dugdale, and Dorian on HIT variations. Arnold on volume, but his best on volume with intensity. Johnny Jackson and Eric Bui by powerlifting. Serge on lots of volume. They all found what worked best for them. They all tried various styles of training, saw the results that they got, and eventually found what their body responded best to, in both ecercise and diet. Dorian carefully logged and measured everything about his diet, Darrem plays it by ear.

There is no "one" method to getting big. There is what works for you the best, which may not be what works for someone else the best. Adonis isn't revolutionizing bodybuilding, he's just presenting his variation on it. Which is pretty close to a lot of other guys' variation. Same with Dante. Though he hates having it categorized as HIT, it's very similar (I think it's actually remarkably similar to a hardcore version of the Body for Life program). You can argue how much better one system is over another till the end of time, but there will never be a resolution. For every person who got awesome results training one way, there's someone who didn't get any.

Adonis's principles work for him. Awesome. DC's work for Dave Henry. Awesome. Each and every one of us has what works for us. Talking about different systems can be educational and rewarding, and certainly trying out different things is the best way to find what works for you. But argueing about what system works best is just retarded. There is no best, just different.

Very good post.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: El_Spiko on September 05, 2006, 07:21:13 PM
Hey guys, here's my bodybuilding "theory":

Eat a good diet, train with intensity, get adequate rest and try to maintain a balanced lifestyle and you will gain muscle mass.

Discuss.

You obviously don't know a thing about bodybuilding. Take it from me, I live on a diet of bubble gum and spam, I only work out 1 3/4 times a week, and I benchpress 7 thousand pounds for reps. I call my system the "T(ea-time) system, my secret is having my pinky up on all my lifts and drinking 30 bags of earl gray every day. Everything else is wrong, the great conspiracy has lied to you, my method is the only way you will get big!


 :P
I guess spewing bullshit is kinda fun afterall ;D
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: ManBearPig... on September 05, 2006, 07:29:38 PM
You obviously don't know a thing about bodybuilding. Take it from me, I live on a diet of bubble gum and spam, I only work out 1 3/4 times a week, and I benchpress 7 thousand pounds for reps. I call my system the "T(ea-time) system, my secret is having my pinky up on all my lifts and drinking 30 bags of earl gray every day. Everything else is wrong, the great conspiracy has lied to you, my method is the only way you will get big!


 :P
I guess spewing bullshit is kinda fun afterall ;D

i'll giave this a try if the adonis principles fail!!
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: brianX on September 05, 2006, 08:13:17 PM
I've developed a revolutionary training system that I like to call "5x5". You do 5 sets of 5 reps on the basic compound movements. It will shake the world of bodybuilding to its very core.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Count Grishnackh on September 05, 2006, 09:30:32 PM
There is no best, just different.

DC training is Mentzer's HIT training, there is no difference. It is a scam plain and simple.

Only difference is Dante has these idiots doing "rack chins" in the gym to improve back width, lmao, like they will improve someones back superior to regular chins.

Dante, it's all genetic, moving your hands out wider, doesn't make your back wider...hahaha

Anyone who has paid Dante to train them is a scam artists wet dream. Take a $20 Mentzer book and charge people $500 to adhere to the principles. hahahahah  smooth work DC, I must admit.

Dante, any other studies on extreme stretching working, or just the old bird wing study you have laying around?    ::)

Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 05, 2006, 10:17:30 PM
Mike Mentzer was one of the few philosophers in bodybuilding. He claimed there is only one true theory about any phenomenon and I agree with him. So, what is the true theory of maximum hypertrophy? What others are discussing here are various theories and methods that have believers and followers. Now, either a theory works or it does not work. If it fails to generate hypertrophy and the trainee did everything optimally then there is something wrong with the theory.

Let us do a thought experiment. Suppose we reverse engineer the training of all the guys who got huge. If we could subtract the contribution of drugs then we could determine what exactly caused the growth. Since most bodybuilders take years to get huge it becomes too complicated to determine what exactly is causing the growth. It might be this or that or a lot of factors. There have been no lab studies done to generate significant levels of hypertrophy in humans.

Okay, the thought experiment is this. Is it not possible, in principle, to grow maximally everyday? If so, then it must be possible to find a way to grow maximally everyday. Reverse engineering programs from most professionals is not going to be profitable because they contaminate results with drug use. It may well be that some programs work up to a point but cannot transcend thresholds and so progress stagnates. Clearly if growth stops then something is wrong with the program and something different has to be done.

I believe it is possible to grow maximally every day. I doubt HIT or HST will do it. I would bet neither can come close. Not the way they are formulated at the moment. Until someone can demonstrate daily rapid growth we are never going to find the best program. In the meantime bodybuilders clash in gyms and discussion boards about which method is right. Most methods overlap with the true theory of hypertrophy but none are the true theory. The complete theory will have to explain all non-growth as well and that is something that is difficult to explain to those who are not making gains in the gym. I would guess that that vast majority of bodybuilders are not growing today. Those who are growing are doing so at a very slow rate. The sport has been reduced into a basic training enterprise which requires drugs to get really big. That is what almost everyone believes at the moment and I wonder if that will ever change. There is hardly anyone out there looking for the ultimate hypertrophy method because they simply do not believe one exists.

Yes, we do differ from each other. I wonder by how much and if particular personal theories are required for each of us. If that is true then there can be no science of hypertrophy. I cannot believe we are that different. There is so much nonsense that bodybuilders believe that I wonder if most can ever try to be scientific.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: IFBBwannaB on September 05, 2006, 10:58:36 PM
Mike Mentzer was one of the few philosophers in bodybuilding. He claimed there is only one true theory about any phenomenon and I agree with him. So, what is the true theory of maximum hypertrophy? What others are discussing here are various theories and methods that have believers and followers. Now, either a theory works or it does not work. If it fails to generate hypertrophy and the trainee did everything optimally then there is something wrong with the theory.

Let us do a thought experiment. Suppose we reverse engineer the training of all the guys who got huge. If we could subtract the contribution of drugs then we could determine what exactly caused the growth. Since most bodybuilders take years to get huge it becomes too complicated to determine what exactly is causing the growth. It might be this or that or a lot of factors. There have been no lab studies done to generate significant levels of hypertrophy in humans.

Okay, the thought experiment is this. Is it not possible, in principle, to grow maximally everyday? If so, then it must be possible to find a way to grow maximally everyday. Reverse engineering programs from most professionals is not going to be profitable because they contaminate results with drug use. It may well be that some programs work up to a point but cannot transcend thresholds and so progress stagnates. Clearly if growth stops then something is wrong with the program and something different has to be done.

I believe it is possible to grow maximally every day. I doubt HIT or HST will do it. I would bet neither can come close. Not the way they are formulated at the moment. Until someone can demonstrate daily rapid growth we are never going to find the best program. In the meantime bodybuilders clash in gyms and discussion boards about which method is right. Most methods overlap with the true theory of hypertrophy but none are the true theory. The complete theory will have to explain all non-growth as well and that is something that is difficult to explain to those who are not making gains in the gym. I would guess that that vast majority of bodybuilders are not growing today. Those who are growing are doing so at a very slow rate. The sport has been reduced into a basic training enterprise which requires drugs to get really big. That is what almost everyone believes at the moment and I wonder if that will ever change. There is hardly anyone out there looking for the ultimate hypertrophy method because they simply do not believe one exists.

Yes, we do differ from each other. I wonder by how much and if particular personal theories are required for each of us. If that is true then there can be no science of hypertrophy. I cannot believe we are that different. There is so much nonsense that bodybuilders believe that I wonder if most can ever try to be scientific.

You should write a book,so you would stop wasting getbig storage space.
Next time just operate a random charcther generetor.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 05, 2006, 11:50:19 PM
Yeah, no point posting when everyone is already an expert.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: AVBG on September 05, 2006, 11:53:35 PM
Yeah, no point posting when everyone is already an expert.
that's right.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 12:47:48 AM
I wish I knew then what I know now. Would have made a huge difference. I suppose as soon as bodybuilders get 16 inch arms they feel they know something about training. I wish it were that easy.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: airrick on September 06, 2006, 12:52:24 AM
You obviously don't know a thing about bodybuilding. Take it from me, I live on a diet of bubble gum and spam, I only work out 1 3/4 times a week, and I benchpress 7 thousand pounds for reps. I call my system the "T(ea-time) system, my secret is having my pinky up on all my lifts and drinking 30 bags of earl gray every day. Everything else is wrong, the great conspiracy has lied to you, my method is the only way you will get big!


 :P
I guess spewing bullshit is kinda fun afterall ;D

WOW, can i try ur method?????
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: IFBBwannaB on September 06, 2006, 01:15:44 AM
I wish I knew then what I know now. Would have made a huge difference. I suppose as soon as bodybuilders get 16 inch arms they feel they know something about training. I wish it were that easy.


Bodybuilding aint that hard,at least at the level 99% of the training population do it.
Including juicers,only a handfull of people actualy need sophisticated methods and drug reigmes.
And I you have yet to show any knowlege in those subjects.

You usualy just write alot without any real content.Must be because of your philosophy degree or something.
Lots of talk and no work  ;D
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 01:21:32 AM
You guys have no theories here whatsoever. It is like the blind leading the blind.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Hedgehog on September 06, 2006, 02:33:54 AM
You guys have no theories here whatsoever. It is like the blind leading the blind.

We all have theories, ideas.

But not one of us, not Poliquin, not you, not Haycock, not Arthur Jones, not Milos, not Charles Glass, knows JACK SHIT.

We know nothing.

YIP
Zack
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 03:06:43 AM
Knowing that we know nothing is progress but, alas, it is a contradiction.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 03:24:58 AM
Everyone has thousands of theories about lots of things. We have beliefs, opinions, ideas and lots of other things such as values and feelings, etc.

In science most theories in history have turned out to be false. Even the theories of the great Sir Isaac Newtown were false when Einstein's equations explained more phenomena. Some theories are useful because they are approximations to the truth. What helps progress is having a critical nature and asking questions then trying to answer those questions. In bodybuilding there haven't been too many training theories proposed over the years. I am sure outsiders would be perplexed at the uncertainty of the art. What we do know is that most human males who lift weights and train in gyms can generate some hypertrophy in their muscles if given enough time and as long as they do other things right such as get the nutrients into their bodies, etc.

Everyone who trains experiences periods of stagnation. Most guys train really hard just to keep the muscles that has taken years to develop. When most guys get to a certain size and find progress slow or non-existent they conclude they have reached their natural limits and believe they need drugs to get any bigger. This is believed like people embrace religions. There is no proof that drugs are required but that is what just about everyone believes and I imagine every professional bodybuilder would concur.

The combined cynicism of Getbig should be a wonderful platform to forge a true theory of hypertrophy.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: IFBBwannaB on September 06, 2006, 03:28:32 AM
You guys have no theories here whatsoever. It is like the blind leading the blind.

Since when having theories mean we have to post each and every one of them at every post we do?
I know that most here are plain stupid so why bother?
If I have something really intresting then I hit the hardcore/steroid board ,thats where the more serious people at.

Do you really think some retard like Bast or Adonis and others can actually comprehend anything with any real depth?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 03:32:46 AM
Are there a populations of trainees called hardgainers? I doubt it, but perhaps some people are genetically deficient then it comes to hypertrophy capacity. If we could identify those individuals then they would make a perfect test for the various training methods out there. Send 20 hardgainers to Stuart McRobert, 20 to Ellington Darden, 20 to Bryan Haycock, 20 to some German to do volume training, 20 to Poliquin to see what he can do and 20 to each person like Dante who claim they can make people bigger. Let us give those trainers 3 months to affect a change. If any trainer can generate significant gains in all 20 subjects and the gains are better than obtained by all the others then that system would be the best and the trainer would be acknowledged as being superior. At the moment there are no such studies and that is a mystery especially when you have a governor in California who used to lift weights.  
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 03:35:55 AM
Adonis represents everyone who believes it is possible to get bigger without drugs. I am on his side. Those who need drugs have little to gain from reading about training theories. I mean, don't most bodybuilders believe drugs make all the difference and training doesn't matter much and anyway, drugs make you stronger and that will make you grown?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: gatrainer on September 06, 2006, 03:59:12 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v88/dobydog/thisthreadsucks2.gif)
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Your MAAAAaaaa on September 06, 2006, 04:14:08 AM
DC training is Mentzer's HIT training, there is no difference. It is a scam plain and simple.

Only difference is Dante has these idiots doing "rack chins" in the gym to improve back width, lmao, like they will improve someones back superior to regular chins.

Dante, it's all genetic, moving your hands out wider, doesn't make your back wider...hahaha

Anyone who has paid Dante to train them is a scam artists wet dream. Take a $20 Mentzer book and charge people $500 to adhere to the principles. hahahahah  smooth work DC, I must admit.

Dante, any other studies on extreme stretching working, or just the old bird wing study you have laying around?    ::)



Word Mentzers theories worked for me i tweaked them so they were a bit more like Dorians training and got amazing results.


Fatty (Dante) is a marketing genius though, he as you say basically copied HIT added some bullshit for a hook for the imbeciles out there who are too lazy to see what works for them. This draws them in and once they have listened to he sermon they are ready to be raped for the protein etc, fatty is a genius.

Now they think he is a god!!! Fuck me was there no mass monsters before Dante??? Whatever he has done he has pulled the wool over some peoples eyes and made a pretty penny for that i salute the beer bellied fuck.

ta ta




 
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: natural al on September 06, 2006, 04:29:57 AM
DC training is Mentzer's HIT training, there is no difference. It is a scam plain and simple.

Only difference is Dante has these idiots doing "rack chins" in the gym to improve back width, lmao, like they will improve someones back superior to regular chins.

Dante, it's all genetic, moving your hands out wider, doesn't make your back wider...hahaha

Anyone who has paid Dante to train them is a scam artists wet dream. Take a $20 Mentzer book and charge people $500 to adhere to the principles. hahahahah  smooth work DC, I must admit.

Dante, any other studies on extreme stretching working, or just the old bird wing study you have laying around?    ::)



see, here's the problem with the majority of the posts that rip DC.  You guys take something out of context and run with it.  Dante doesn't MAKE people do rack chins.  It's offered as a variation or an option.  No where does it say "you have to do rack chins", I've never done them and my back is fine.  Now if I max out on front pulldowns or another movement it's there as an option.  If you've been working out for 5+ years and you still have substandard lats will it hurt to do rack chins?  I don't think so, might not help but at least there's a chance that it could work and if it doesn't then what the hell, at least you tried something different.  Sorry, but Dante never, ever said you can change you're genetic shape of a muscle in fact that's one of the things that he preaches.  That's why he doesn't have guys spending hours on end in the gym doing concentration curls, either you have a peak or you don't.

Have you ever read a Metzer book?  Some concepts are similar but to make that statement makes me think you've never read a thing by metzer.  How did Mike want you to rest pause?  It's not the same as how Dante suggests and Dante never says that you have to RP either, if you don't have the recovery ability you can use straight sets.  There are alot of techniques that mike had out there that Dante does not use and alot of things that dante has people doing that mike never used.  Bottom line, if Joe Average trained the way Metzer wanted he'd be dead in a month or totally burned out, Dc is much more practical to the average trainer.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: natural al on September 06, 2006, 04:41:19 AM
David Henry got big on DC. Mentzer, Viator, Dugdale, and Dorian on HIT variations. Arnold on volume, but his best on volume with intensity. Johnny Jackson and Eric Bui by powerlifting. Serge on lots of volume. They all found what worked best for them. They all tried various styles of training, saw the results that they got, and eventually found what their body responded best to, in both ecercise and diet. Dorian carefully logged and measured everything about his diet, Darrem plays it by ear.

There is no "one" method to getting big. There is what works for you the best, which may not be what works for someone else the best. Adonis isn't revolutionizing bodybuilding, he's just presenting his variation on it. Which is pretty close to a lot of other guys' variation. Same with Dante. Though he hates having it categorized as HIT, it's very similar (I think it's actually remarkably similar to a hardcore version of the Body for Life program). You can argue how much better one system is over another till the end of time, but there will never be a resolution. For every person who got awesome results training one way, there's someone who didn't get any.

Adonis's principles work for him. Awesome. DC's work for Dave Henry. Awesome. Each and every one of us has what works for us. Talking about different systems can be educational and rewarding, and certainly trying out different things is the best way to find what works for you. But argueing about what system works best is just retarded. There is no best, just different.

see, this is probably the best post on this thread, my minds a little scattered so mine might not have been that great but if more people thought  like this guy this place would be much better off.....
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: mikethedon on September 06, 2006, 04:46:00 AM
LOL all of this comming from someone under 200lbs LOL man your my favorite character on this board TA. keep eating your girly diet and looking like a girl scout.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 09:51:40 AM
El Spiko's words sound reasonable but they explain nothing at all.

Dante might be controversial but he is using principles that work. Progression, heavy resistance, volume, intensity, novelty, and super nutrition in the sense of eating like crazy.

Larry Scott and Vince Gironda invented new training methods that worked, too. So did Arthur Jones who got the great Sergio at his biggest in a short time personally training him. Some people know more about training than others and if we can synthesize a method out of all the successful ones then we might be close to understanding hypertrophy. While we argue about which is best and use rationalizations about individualization we are never going to find the best method. Clearly, if you are not growing then you have to try something different. Novelty could be one of the most important factors after resistance that leads to more growth.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: El_Spiko on September 06, 2006, 02:32:48 PM
El Spiko's words sound reasonable but they explain nothing at all.

Dante might be controversial but he is using principles that work. Progression, heavy resistance, volume, intensity, novelty, and super nutrition in the sense of eating like crazy.

Larry Scott and Vince Gironda invented new training methods that worked, too. So did Arthur Jones who got the great Sergio at his biggest in a short time personally training him. Some people know more about training than others and if we can synthesize a method out of all the successful ones then we might be close to understanding hypertrophy. While we argue about which is best and use rationalizations about individualization we are never going to find the best method. Clearly, if you are not growing then you have to try something different. Novelty could be one of the most important factors after resistance that leads to more growth.


I think that the human body and the process of altering it is too complex for there to be one true method. I do think there are some fundamental truths to changing your physique, but I just do not see it being possible to have one system that applies to everyone with equal success. One day we may be able to measure every process of the human body and be able to decode it's secrets, and from that knowledge develope a method to determine the best way for an individual person to change their body. But it will not be the same for everyone. One person might be best suited to doing high volume with light weights. One person might be better suited to something with super heavy weights and straight sets. Another, high intensity. Indeed some people know more about training than others, but ask any of those people if they apply the same training and nutrition program to everyone and they will tell you they don't. And everyone who has trained for a long time and has gotten to know their body makes whatever program they are doing their own. Take two people doing the same program with the same nutrition and training, and they will both get different results and you will see that they have individualized their program to work best for them, whether it's a difference in grip or an extra twist of the wrist or the rest between exercises. In the end, what you get out of a program is not determined by how well it works for everybody else, but how well you can make it work for you.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 06:40:29 PM
I have discussed the methods problems with my son who is an exercise physiologist and he tells me that there are too many factors involved in exercise and individuals to actually pin down what is causing what. We say that two people are following the same program but how would we know that what they are doing is identical? Some people do exercises strictly and others swing. Leverages and length of limbs are important and so are insertions and origings. We have no way of knowing if internal states of effort are equivalent. It really becomes quite difficult to set up scientific experiments using subjects who move because it is unlikely all the factors will be identified and controlled. If you do not know what is causing what you cannot call what you are doing science.

Conceptually it must be possible to state a theory of hypertrophy that would apply to everyone. Sub-sections of the theory would deal with various populations such as women and older people. However, the same principles would apply to everyone but perhaps not in the same way. We can state that the components of exercise programs are the same. Namely subjects do exercises where a certain amount of mechanical tension is applied to target muscles. What then has to be determined is how much tension and for how long and how frequently. Nutrition needs are also important and so are the hormone levels in individuals. It should be possible to come up with recipes from the main hypertrophy theory that trainees follow to get results. There should be feedback that will indicate any progress and what to do about either growing or not growing.

We could start by describing and listing the various things that we do know about hypertrophy and physiology. Go to HST and read the accumulated information acquired from exercise science. It is quite a lot that is already known yet we still find just about everyone who is a bodybuilder having trouble growing. That is what is difficult to explain. How come all those intermediate and advanced bodybuilders cannot make themselves grow any more?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: El_Spiko on September 06, 2006, 07:14:33 PM
A creatures structure can only support so much. I think that as you push your bodies growth potential to its limits, you start to see a diminishing return for the amount of fuel required versus what you get out of it. Dante of DC fame seems to think that it's just because people change their workout style and dieting to conform to what they think they are supposed to be doing at that stage. And there is probably some truth to that. And some of it is that they're not seeking the maximal growth possible, but a controlled growth in only certain areas of their body. And they may have just pushed their body as far as it will go. On the other hand, it may be possible to find out what it is that is limiting them in their growth at that stage and neutralize it, whether with a different protocol or supplementation/"sports technology".

I think we do have some basic principles of hypertrophy. You break down the muscle and build it up. You fuel your body with protein. The more intense, the better your results. Get enough rest to let your body recover. Every workout has worked wonders for someone and totally failed someone. I don't think that the specific details of a workout program are as important as the work you put and the intensity you bring. Whether you are making a workout intense by doing lots of rep, lots of sets, heavy weights or forced reps or rest-pause or whatever, it is that intensity, that will to push your body beyond muscular failure that counts. Arnold always said that it was those last few reps that count, those ones that you can only get when you push through the pain barrier. In any style of workout, that is always the goal, to push through pain and failure.

Of course there is more to learn about how the body grows and how to optimize that growth. It's a continueing never ending process. But no matter what you're eating or what training program you're doing or what kind of supplements or drugs you're taking, none of it will matter if you cannot push through that pain barrier in your workouts and get a truly intense workout. Many people have found the way that best allows them to do that. And by following in their footsteps, you may discover the way that allows you to do that as well. Or you might not, and so you try something else. And once you do find what works for you, then you can apply that to every workout, to every training regimen. Arnold and Sergio both got big no matter how they were training, no matter what style, because they could bring their focus and willpower to bear every workout.

I love learning more about bodybuilding and the physiology and science behind it. I try to apply everything I learn, and then learn how to make it work best for me. But without the ability to apply that knowledge to ones own body, it does nothing. And I think that that ability is one that is learned through experience, through trial and error. If there were ever "True" principles to hypertrophy, I think they would be knowledge, instinct and will.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Count Grishnackh on September 06, 2006, 07:34:28 PM
Word Mentzers theories worked for me i tweaked them so they were a bit more like Dorians training and got amazing results.


Fatty (Dante) is a marketing genius though, he as you say basically copied HIT added some bullshit for a hook for the imbeciles out there who are too lazy to see what works for them.

 

good post, Dante preys on people with no self esteem and then stokes them with b/s gym jargon like becoming a human blast furnace.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 07:39:00 PM
Okay, we have a dialogue. It seems to me that the biggest obstacle to growth is the repeated bout effect. Somehow you have to overcome that adaptation and still cause more hypertrophy. So I would question the process in the first place. When is it optimum to train the same muscle again? That is the crucial element in hypertrophy. You and others believe you need to recover to grow. Is that true and how do you know this? It is my conjecture that you should not let the muscle recover but hit it again while it is still growing. That way there is little or no repeated bout effect. If you let the muscle recover how then are you going to trigger more and more hypertrophy? I would bet that just about everyone got this process wrong and it is a huge mistake.

For example, how do we explain swimmers, throwers, runners and weight lifters all training daily and still making progress? How is that possible? How can anyone swim twice a day and improve? Where is the recovery? So these athletes must know something that bodybuilders don't know. Perhaps bodybuilders would train athletes with more rest periods and days off but that is not what we find works. Well, I don't know of anyone who trains only twice a week and holds world records in running or swimming.  
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Count Grishnackh on September 06, 2006, 07:40:37 PM
How did Mike want you to rest pause?  It's not the same as how Dante suggests

ya, mentzer said about 10-15 seconds, dante says 15 deep breaths.

wow, where does dante come up with these groundbreaking variations that he calls "his". hhahahahaha

natural al, re-read  Your MA's post.

Dante is word for word tweaked HIT training that ANYONE with any common sense could've figured out on their own.

Want to know how to eat, just read a couple of TA's threads, it's not rocket science and most of these fat ass bodybuilders over eat, and they over eat with protein

Dante's got a good scam going no 2 ways about it. Most people just don't have the balls to rip off someone else's work, pass it as their own and then charge $500.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: El_Spiko on September 06, 2006, 08:06:46 PM
Okay, we have a dialogue. It seems to me that the biggest obstacle to growth is the repeated bout effect. Somehow you have to overcome that adaptation and still cause more hypertrophy. So I would question the process in the first place. When is it optimum to train the same muscle again? That is the crucial element in hypertrophy. You and others believe you need to recover to grow. Is that true and how do you know this? It is my conjecture that you should not let the muscle recover but hit it again while it is still growing. That way there is little or no repeated bout effect. If you let the muscle recover how then are you going to trigger more and more hypertrophy? I would bet that just about everyone got this process wrong and it is a huge mistake.

For example, how do we explain swimmers, throwers, runners and weight lifters all training daily and still making progress? How is that possible? How can anyone swim twice a day and improve? Where is the recovery? So these athletes must know something that bodybuilders don't know. Perhaps bodybuilders would train athletes with more rest periods and days off but that is not what we find works. Well, I don't know of anyone who trains only twice a week and holds world records in running or swimming.  
A swimmers physique is not a bodybuilders. A throwers physique is not a bodybuilders. None of them are. They are training their body to do a repetitive action, honing a skill. Bodybuilding is different. To quote Charles Gaines, "Bodybuilding is athletic training for artistic competition". You can hone your skills in the gym, allowing you to get the most out of a workout. You can hone your posing skills, learning how to make yourelf look as good as possible. You can train your muscles to endure flexing and posing for long periods of time, because it is a repetitive action. Our bodies are always seeking equilibrium. If you repeat an action everyday, then your body will adapt to best be able to handle that. But sports coaches don't have their athlete's do intense practices the night before a game. Fatigue is a very real thing. The body needs rest to recover, to heal itself. Powerlifters don't train everyday. They have learned, through trial and error, that they need time to let their bodies rest and recuperate, time to heal and grow stronger. Bodybuilders know that you can overtrain. There comes a time when the muscle no longer responds, no longer gets a pump or grows. It has adapted to the activity, learning how to most efficiently perfomr the exercise while expending the least amount of energy possible. Which is what you want in an athletic competition, to do the most with the least amount of effort. It is because of that adaptability of the body that bodybuilders change exercises, change routines, change weights and anything else they can think of. Muscles grow because you challenge them and get as much effort as you can out of them.

An example. When I was first interested in working out, I had no equipment and no gym membership. So I did crunches and pushups every night. And at first I saw results. But after doing that for a bit, I stagnated. So I did more of everything. And I kept having to do more and more until I was doing hundreds and hundreds of crunches and pushups. And I was getting no where. I was never feeling it, never sore. When I finally did start going to a gym, I again saw great results. I did weighted ab exercises every day. And very quickly, I was never sore, never making any progress with my abs. When I finally started giving my body time to rest, only doing abs a couple times a week, I started to see progress again. I'm sure most of us have had a similar experience during our early days of working out. You learn that as much as you want to train everyday, more does not necessarily mean better. Now how long a muscle needs to recover is open to debate. But it does need to recover if you want it to grow. It needs that time to rest and become open to new stimulus. Otherwise, it will adapt, not by becoming hypertrophic, but by having greater endurance and expending less effort in the process.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 08:39:50 PM
I wonder about athletes and bodybuilders. Seems to me we are both trying to make progress. How can they make progress training as frequently as they do? Some bodybuilders train calves daily and experience growth. How is that possible?

So what we need to do is completely understand the growth process in muscles and see when hypertrophy occurs. We might be able to stimulate more growth while the window of hypertrophy is still open instead of closing it for a while 'to recover'. If growth is our aim then we might have to abandon accepted beliefs about things like rest and recovery. It is clear from anecdotal reports from grip enthusiasts that diminishing returns occur if you train too frequently. If you get those hand grips you will find you will eventually stop improving and might even injure yourself. I found that doing pinch gripping every 4th day gave me the optimum improvement in strength.

Strength and hypertrophy are related but not 100%. As we get bigger we usually get stronger. Some people get stronger but do not get much bigger.

Getting back to hypertrophy how do we determine what frequency and volume and intensity are optimum? We could keep journals or train others and see what makes a difference. From my 46 years in the Irongame I am inclined to conjecture that more frequent training might be the best for maximum hypertrophy. Rest days might be a good idea but it remains to be seen if they help. Anecdotal reports suggest that most bodybuilders train bodyparts about twice a week. The way to find out how frequently to train a muscle would be to stop all other training and concentrate on one body part such as arms. Train only the arms for a month and see what happens. Do whatever it takes to make them grow every training day. You should be able to measure the growth the next day first thing in the morning. We will consider any swelling as growth as a practical way to measure progress. The next thing to determine is how heavy and for how long.  
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Miss Karen on September 06, 2006, 08:52:01 PM
Was that great Sergio training with great gains without Steroids???Mmmmmm thought not.What works for one doesn't work for all. The Real Life Theory.IMO.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Vince B on September 06, 2006, 09:07:01 PM
Steroids and other drugs contaminate bodybuilding theory because it becomes rather pointless trying to determine what is responsible for growth. If we work with drug free trainees we might have a better opportunity to discover what the requirements are.

One thing that has not been mentioned is that the required stimulus to trigger hypertrophy might be geometrically related to size. In other words you have to train incrementally harder the bigger you get. Exactly how much harder is not known. Anecdotal reports suggest that most people are unable to train hard enough to generate anything more than intermediate results. When growth stops how does anyone determine why that has happened? If you do not know why you are not growing you will hardly know what to do to start growing again. Some theorists suggest that androgen receptors get saturated and what is required is time off so that upon resumption of training the body has the capacity to grow more muscle again. I am not convinced that these rest periods are necessary. However, no one has been able to keep a muscle growing indefinitely or even until maximum size has been reached.

We were always told that hypertrophy involved having cells and fibers increase in size. Can we also generate more cells and new fibers? If so then that might explain why a few people can get huge but most do not attain huge size. That process is of course hyperplasia. There are conflicting reports about whether hyperplasia occurs in humans.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: natural al on September 07, 2006, 06:25:31 AM
ya, mentzer said about 10-15 seconds, dante says 15 deep breaths.

wow, where does dante come up with these groundbreaking variations that he calls "his". hhahahahaha

natural al, re-read  Your MA's post.

Dante is word for word tweaked HIT training that ANYONE with any common sense could've figured out on their own.

Want to know how to eat, just read a couple of TA's threads, it's not rocket science and most of these fat ass bodybuilders over eat, and they over eat with protein

Dante's got a good scam going no 2 ways about it. Most people just don't have the balls to rip off someone else's work, pass it as their own and then charge $500.

metzer's way of rping was way more different than you're saying here.  He basically had you load up the bar with as much weight as you could handle rep, rack, rest rep again, rest....fail, lower the weight and start over.  Not really the same thing.

what's my MA's post?  I honestly don't know what you mean....like I said I've got alot going on so I'm a little scatterbrained right now...I really don't have the energy to get into a big debate, you sound like you have your mind made up and that's fine.  Go ahead and do what TA tells you to do, it's not like his stuff he's saying is all that different than ellington darden said about 20 years ago...or metzer for that fact with the whole a calorie is a calorie....

Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on September 07, 2006, 06:28:19 AM
metzer's way of rping was way more different than you're saying here.  He basically had you load up the bar with as much weight as you could handle rep, rack, rest rep again, rest....fail, lower the weight and start over.  Not really the same thing.

what's my MA's post?  I honestly don't know what you mean....like I said I've got alot going on so I'm a little scatterbrained right now...I really don't have the energy to get into a big debate, you sound like you have your mind made up and that's fine.  Go ahead and do what TA tells you to do, it's not like his stuff he's saying is all that different than ellington darden said about 20 years ago...or metzer for that fact with the whole a calorie is a calorie....



It may have been lost in the shuffle but TA's way is just the way it was before supplement company's and drug user started brainwashing everybody for financial gain. He'll admit that.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: natural al on September 07, 2006, 06:35:07 AM
It may have been lost in the shuffle but TA's way is just the way it was before supplement company's and drug user started brainwashing everybody for financial gain. He'll admit that.

he made a comment on another thread that was almost word for word out of one of Dardens books, I'd have to dig out the book and look it up but I swear it was copied out of it.  I think it's 10 weeks to massive muscles or something like that...I'm not saying what he says is wrong, right or anything else, I'm not saying what anybody says is wrong, I'm saying you have to find what works for you.  I have no problem training DC and I have no problem eating like I do, I don't carry dried chicken breasts around I eat like a normal person just more protien and I tend to function better this way so it's not an issue.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: MAXX on September 07, 2006, 07:30:10 AM
Sorry to break this to you, but at least 90% of the juicers on mayhem would be under 200 pounds if they stopped with their gear use.

Any juicer on here doesn't believe me?  THEN JUST FUCKING DO IT AND WATCH YOURSELF SHRINK TO NOTHING.  In the meantime stop acting like you are genetically superior.
??? ???

im 250 pounds naturally.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: sarcasm on September 07, 2006, 07:30:52 AM
??? ???

im 250 pounds naturally.
of course you are. ::)
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: MAXX on September 07, 2006, 07:34:03 AM
of course you are. ::)
yes i am but im tall to. 190 cm.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: buffbodz on September 07, 2006, 08:58:40 AM
True about potato chips having the same GI as a sweet potato, they recommend eating foods with an * sparingly, as they are loaded with empty calories.  I'll stick to the old school way of eating.  www.nutritionaledge.org  I'll admit I'm no competitor, but eating clean made a new man out of me.  Also remember all processed foods must be unprocessed before you can get at any nutrients out of them.  If you can get away with ice cream, pizza and all the good stuff fine.  It doesn't work for me. Your Guide to the GI Index
 
 
   
 
 
 
Low-GI Foods: Less Than 55
* Eat foods printed in red sparingly; these are high in empty calories.

   
 Artichoke <15 
 
 Asparagus <15 
 
 Broccoli <15 
 
 Cauliflower <15 
 
 Celery <15 
 
 Cucumber <15 
 
 Eggplant <15 
 
 Green beans <15 
 
 Lettuce, all varieties <15 
 
 Low-fat yogurt, artificially sweetened <15 
 
 Peanuts <15 
 
 Peppers, all varieties <15 
 
 Snow peas <15 
 
 Spinach <15 
 
 Young summer squash <15 
 
 Zucchini <15 
 
 Tomatoes 15 
 
 Cherries 22 
 
 Peas, dried 22 
 
 Plum 24 
 
 Grapefruit 25 
 
 Pearled barley 25 
 
 Peach 28 
 
 Canned peaches, natural juice 30 
 
 Dried apricots 31 
 
 Soy milk 30 
 
 Baby lima beans, frozen 32 
 
 Fat-free milk 32 
 
 Fettuccine 32 
 
* M&M's Chocolate Candies, Peanut 32 
 
 Low-fat yogurt, sugar sweetened 33 
 
 Apple 36 
 
 Pear 36 
 
 Whole wheat spaghetti 37 
 
 Tomato soup 38 
 
 Carrots, cooked 39 
 
* Mars Snickers Bar 40 
 
 Apple juice 41 
 
 Spaghetti 41 
 
 All-Bran 42 
 
 Canned chickpeas 42 
 
 Custard 43 
 
 Grapes 43 
 
 Orange 43 
 
 Canned lentil soup 44 
 
 Canned pinto beans 45 
 
 Macaroni 45 
 
 Pineapple juice 46 
 
 Banana bread 47 
 
 Long-grain rice 47 
 
 Parboiled rice 47 
 
 Bulgur 48 
 
 Canned baked beans 48 
 
 Grapefruit juice 48 
 
 Green peas 48 
 
 Oat bran bread 48 
 
* Chocolate bar, 1.5 oz 49 
 
 Old-fashioned oatmeal 49 
 
 Cheese tortellini 50 
 
* Low-fat ice cream 50 
 
 Canned kidney beans 52 
 
 Kiwifruit 52 
 
 Orange juice, not from concentrate 52 
 
 Banana 53 
 
* Potato chips 54 
 
* Pound cake 54 
 
 Special K 54 
 
 Sweet potato 54 
 
 

* Eat foods printed in red sparingly; these are high in empty calories.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: natural al on September 07, 2006, 09:10:59 AM
yes i am but im tall to. 190 cm.

c'mon don't you know by now that unless you say you're 115lbs and 5'9" tall sarcasm is gonna call you a liar?  Get with the program around here.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: tallgerman on September 10, 2010, 07:35:17 PM
I think they will feel a distinct fascial stretch in their anal sphincters as they are gang banged by the TRUTH

lol
first post that cracked me the fuck up in a while

http://gangbang.vidz.com/ (http://gangbang.vidz.com/)
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: magikusar on November 29, 2012, 02:28:59 AM
I`m serious.

Trust me. I have done the traditional thing for years and you know what.

It is all lies,myths and nonsense fueled by hysteria and rarely any science.

Simply put, Ice Cream/Frozen Yogurt has a higher nutrient content and mineral content and lower GI than Oatmeal and Brown Rice.

It barely even registers an insulin response.  Brown Rice And oatmeal are far less nutritional and will cause blood sugar levels rise way way more.

Add that to the fact that new studies have proven that Dairy products specifically release fat stored in the abdominal region.


You can look this shit up yourself or you can just listen.

Now tell me I am wrong. hahhahah

adonis can you point me at a summary of the principles?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: WOOO on November 29, 2012, 04:02:40 AM
adonis can you point me at a summary of the principles?


can we not resurrect ancient garbage please?

adonis is a tool
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Roger Bacon on November 29, 2012, 10:16:14 AM
adonis can you point me at a summary of the principles?

Adonis Principles are definitely the way to go.  I'd point you in the right direction if I could.

Basically, you need to find out how much calories and protein you need in a day.  To Gain Weight, Maintain, or Lose Weight.  Find out how much protein you need.

Get your protein and calories (as long as you stick to the daily allowances, and focus on getting your protein) from a variety of sources (even McDonald's).

You actually find that "normal" non bbing foods have more nutrients/protein, you just have to keep your calories on track.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Roger Bacon on November 29, 2012, 10:25:16 AM
This is how you eat using Adonis Principles, True Adonis and Wavelength both proved that it works by posting photos.  It worked amazingly for me (after a lot of wasted time).

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/7cc1d3ea.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/4fc13a7b.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/825bc425.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/69684111.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/fc2d33ed.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/a996dcdf.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/98a01f78.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/1481ad72.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/a288a6f8.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/9a7b03b2.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/1fd6f81f.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/b66f4c37.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/492caa9d.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/85211e3f.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/88fd971a.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/964066f8.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/e17baf72.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/1dc31e92.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/5988b61a.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/0ee515ef.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/1831a919.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/23c5ee46.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/f6ac360b.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/86598d0e.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/63bd18b3.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/2449fa40.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/38b77eda.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/98e15f0e.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/2a151c21.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/2f30de3f.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/a75963d7.jpg)

(http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv350/wave_length/aad50d92.jpg)



Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: magikusar on November 29, 2012, 10:26:35 AM
so the 1 rule is just 1800 calories a day?
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: Roger Bacon on November 29, 2012, 11:37:32 AM
so the 1 rule is just 1800 calories a day?

It is for me, because that's right around where I steadily lose fat. That's my goal right now.


You need to calculate what's right for you.  Are you cutting? Bulking?  Just trying to maintain?

???

I like this because it practically works the same as a traditional bbing diet, you end up getting more nutrition and better variety, and you end up enjoying yourself like you should.
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: magikusar on November 29, 2012, 07:33:57 PM
I am 300 so cutting for sure.

I get hungery a lot and cant get to sleep when i starve..
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: magikusar on December 10, 2012, 04:37:57 AM
They are stuck eating Rinsed, unsalted ground beef by the lb and drinking Olive oil with carb cutoffs,

While we are eating Ice Cream,Pizza and Hamburgers and Peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches and laughing all the way.

hahahahahahahahahahah

adonis where is a summary of your howto, and a torso pic?

no homo
Title: Re: The Adonis Principles vs. Doggcrapp
Post by: anabolichalo on December 10, 2012, 05:14:25 AM
pictures of this doggcrapp leader and adonis principles leader


by their fruits we shall know them