Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

my f*cking god, it's pointless arguing with a numbers and quotes whore. You post a comparison between Dorian and Ronnie for others to see. Then when somebody makes a valid critique from the pics, you revert back to numbers and quotes to defend your position. What was the point of the comparison then? I mean, shit let's just get rid of any visual evidence all together. Let's only compare them on paper. If a guy weighed more, then he must be bigger and better.

excellent, no GREAT post!

ND is a numbers whore who is scared of real visual evidence - the essence of bodybuilding in the first place.

he is also a part time asshologist

[NarcissisticDeity]

but he looks soft and doughy onstage too..

retard statement , Yates was NEVER soft & doughy like Coleman , Dorian's problem wasn't conditioning it was muscle tears even at his worse his conditioning was outstanding

[NarcissisticDeity]

excellent, no GREAT post!

ND is a numbers whore who is scared of real visual evidence - the essence of bodybuilding in the first place.

he is also a part time asshologist

Visual evidence?  you're deathly afraid the the criteria because you know you don't have much to work with.

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian crushing Ronnie

[ether]

Traps - Dorian
Shoulders - Even
Arms - Ronnie
Chest - Very Slight Edge to Dorian/Even
Midsection - Dorian
Quads - Ronnie
Calves - Dorian

It isn't a fair comparison, Dorian is still holding water (not dried out to the bone like Coleman is) and the lighting is way off.

Dorian can never compare to Ronnies arms and quads....but, overall he was better at his best.

[NeoSeminole]

No numbers don't mean anything  thats why you think Ronnie at 244 pounds looks the same at 257 pounds

indeed. His quads may have been slightly larger in 99, but he wasn't noticably bigger overall.

[Hulkster]

I think ronnie looks better in both of these shots, except for the calves in the back db of course.

but ronnie's back is a lot better.

[NarcissisticDeity]

indeed

You think Craig Titus would compare as well as this to Ronnie 99? not quite

[ether]

I think ronnie looks better in both of these shots, except for the calves in the back db of course.

but ronnie's back is a lot better.

Dorian takes the front clasped pose, his chest and midsection are overpowering.

He can't ever compete with ronnie's arms and quads, just too big, separated and detailed.

The back shot is pretty much even.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I think ronnie looks better in both of these shots, except for the calves in the back db of course.

but ronnie's back is a lot better.

His back is a LOT better LMMFAO explain how so I can laugh at you and the correct you and then finally own you

[NarcissisticDeity]

Chris making Ronnie look small

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again

[Hulkster]

His back is a LOT better LMMFAO explain how so I can laugh at you and the correct you and then finally own you

easy:

better V-taper
better arms
better back symmetry and flow thanks to non-stubby looking arms (from a lack of bis)
not as flat looking
thicker lower back muscles - check out the deep recess  in the lower back -that how thick Ronnie's back muscles are. Dorians are flat by comparison.
better glutes
better hams.

dorian has better calves. whoopie.

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie still beats Dorian. I suppose now you're going to say that Dorian weighed 260 lbs in that pic while Ronnie was only 257 lbs, therefore Dorian was bigger.

[Hulkster]

comparing dorian's arms to ronnie's is like comparing horse shit to ice cream.

ronnie's arms are that much better.

same with his quads.

[NeoSeminole]

Chris making Ronnie look small

maybe b/c he's standing closer to the camera. Chris isn't taller than Ronnie in person.

[NarcissisticDeity]

easy:

better V-taper
better arms
better back symmetry and flow thanks to non-stubby looking arms (from a lack of bis)
not as flat looking
thicker lower back muscles - check out the deep recess  in the lower back -that how thick Ronnie's back muscles are. Dorians are flat by comparison.
better glutes
better hams.

dorian has better calves. whoopie.

LMFAO absolutely pathetic

Lets use the IFBB criteria and NOT the Hulkster-Nutt-Licker Criteria

Yates better balance , density , bulk ! conditioning a push

Dorian has much bigger & thicker traps period end of sentence
Dorian has equal development & detail in the teres major and minor
Dorian has better sweep to his lats they insert lower near his waist and they're thicker , and show more detail & development
Dorian's spinae erector , thicker , better detail & development

Dorian's back is better than Colemans !

both have striated glutes YOU love Ronnie's ass so you're biased Dorian's aren't overdeveloped and don't compromise his balance & proportion - Yates
Hams - push
Calves - LMFAO get serious
Delts - push
Triceps - Ronnies are bigger Dorian's are just as detailed and seprated - push
Biceps - Ronnie
Forearms - Yates

entire pose using the Official Criteria - Dorian Yates

[NeoSeminole]

anyone know how much Chris weighed at both contests?

[IceCold]

I think ronnie looks better in both of these shots, except for the calves in the back db of course.

but ronnie's back is a lot better.

why are you comparing an offseason shot of yates vs. a contest pic from ronnie.

ronnie has used diuretics and oil, not to mention lighting.

yates has no oil and is in the fucking gym.  

i do beleive that ronnie's mm is better, but you chose bad comparison of photos to proove your point.  

[IceCold]

comparing dorian's arms to ronnie's is like comparing horse shit to ice cream.

ronnie's arms are that much better.

same with his quads.

you mean biceps.

yates has better triceps AND forearms. 

[Hulkster]

you mean biceps.

yates has better triceps AND forearms. 

sure he does - thats why his arms look like shit in comparison

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie still beats Dorian. I suppose now you're going to say that Dorian weighed 260 lbs in that pic while Ronnie was only 257 lbs, therefore Dorian was bigger.

Where arms? lol Dorian's whole midsection , abdominals , serratus , intercostals , destroys Ronnies not to mention its much tighter , again balance & proportion , he's not even contest shape and he's actually smaller than usual ( if I'm not mistaken ) lighting , tan , oil , etc Yates looks much better and he's not even in contest shape.

[NeoSeminole]

why are you comparing an offseason shot of yates vs. a contest pic from ronnie.

ND made that comparison.

[NarcissisticDeity]

sure he does - thats why his arms look like shit in comparison

1996 post tear and a crappy pic to begin with , lets fight fair kid