So? It's hard to find rare pics of Arnold. It's about celebrating what bodybuilding was supposed to be, a tiny waist, vacuum pose, huge arms, huge chest, huge biceps and great V taper
That response could be used for just about anything: "huge arms, V-taper..."
So?
I was just making an observation and not to blast on your blind allegiance to your hero. Arnold, all things are taken into account, was the greatest bodybuilder that ever lived. But to claim that he had more pure muscle mass than, say, Coleman, is objectively and factually wrong. At his biggest and best shape, Arnold was 6'2", 240 lbs. Coleman in 2003 was 5'11" 295 lbs and in leaner condition. That's a 55-pound difference.
