To be intellectually honest, just because something is reported it doesn't mean whatever postulated was the cause of it. If someone reports astral travel after the jab, is that now a real thing? I didn't pull up any studies but I would be very surprised if the scientists involved here drew a certain cause-effect relationship.
Regarding "studies," how many people here have been trained to read and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of studies? I can almost guarantee that no one here has, few have any training in evaluating statistics either.
Well, your guarantee is absolutely worthless then. I have written several peer reviewed papers in the realm of solid state physics. These statistics you describe are pure boiler plate- most of us just plug our data into Wolfram Mathematica and poof- it's done- all the cute statistical terms you want. But that still doesn't mean they are right- because garbage in- garbage out. I hate to scare you but most scientists cherry pick data anyways.
You seem to have some mystical belief in scientific research papers and the scientists who write them. A lot of research articles end up being pure shit- they are only written because of the "publish or perish" environment in research institutions. Ever notice how some papers have about 10 authors? One wrote the paper and everyone else was tacked on to give a citation - meaning hardly anyone actually contributed.
To this day papers I wrote are still being cited in ResearchGate for work I did 20 years ago- and rarely does anyone call me up to verify the work. they take what i wrote as gospel, lol
Recent Posts
