Author Topic: Why Does BayGBM's Threads Get Far More Views? (Read 17647 times)

io856 · « **Reply #100 on:** October 18, 2009, 02:24:11 PM »

Quote from: BayGBM on October 18, 2009, 01:57:26 PM

As I have said before: labels do not matter; actions do. Spending years and money to collect BB magazines & videos, attend shows, and admiring another man's shredded glutes--especially when you do not even work out--is gay! Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Bay... from my personal experience anyway... although I don't "admire man's shredded glutes" etc... I do really really appreciate bodybuilding... never ever wanted to be sexual with a man... but I have noticed that I do like things to excess and bodybuilding is like that..

ARMZ · « **Reply #101 on:** October 18, 2009, 02:48:37 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on October 17, 2009, 04:01:09 PM

Interesting fact: I was browsing through the sex board, and I noticed that all the gay threads with gay pictures and videos posted by BayGBM get lots more attention than the threads with hetero content. It's either perverted curisosity or most of Getbiggers are a bunch of fags.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

your biggest thread so far.. Maybe the trick is putting "BayGBM" in your thread title for maximum views..

bigbobs · « **Reply #102 on:** October 18, 2009, 05:14:57 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on October 17, 2009, 04:01:09 PM

Interesting fact: I was browsing through the sex board, and I noticed that all the gay threads with gay pictures and videos posted by BayGBM get lots more attention than the threads with hetero content. It's either perverted curisosity or most of Getbiggers are a bunch of fags.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Not sure if it was mentioned already and I'm too lazy to read 5 pages, but I think this is because a great portion of the gay populace search on bodybuilding sites for porn or material to get off, whereas heteros leave that for hetero porn sites. In other words, most heteros don't come on getbig to view sex content, whereas more gays who come on getbig are coming to view sexual stuff.

polychronopolous · « **Reply #103 on:** October 18, 2009, 05:16:48 PM »

Evidently there is alot of people out there who are interested in watching two men having sex.

BayGBM · « **Reply #104 on:** October 18, 2009, 08:27:32 PM »

Quote from: ARMZ on October 18, 2009, 02:48:37 PM

your biggest thread so far.. Maybe the trick is putting "BayGBM" in your thread title for maximum views..

LOL You may be right. I'm starting to feel like a celebrity around here; every couple of months someone starts a thread with my name in it!

jtsunami · « **Reply #105 on:** October 18, 2009, 09:35:35 PM »

clearly when the straight men saw your name in the thread title on the main board they had an excuse to click on it and see if there were any muscle daddy or punk pictures in here.

io856 · « **Reply #106 on:** October 18, 2009, 09:37:55 PM »

everyone likes a little scandal, something a little risque, something a bit adventurous.. viewing those threads are appealing to curiosity BayGBM is pretty good at what he does imo

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #107 on:** October 18, 2009, 09:44:00 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on October 18, 2009, 05:14:57 PM

Not sure if it was mentioned already and I'm too lazy to read 5 pages, but I think this is because a great portion of the gay populace search on bodybuilding sites for porn or material to get off, whereas heteros leave that for hetero porn sites. In other words, most heteros don't come on getbig to view sex content, whereas more gays who come on getbig are coming to view sexual stuff.

X2

HTexan · « **Reply #108 on:** October 18, 2009, 10:10:17 PM »

So you're saying that bay checks his own threads hundreds of times a day?

kiwiol · « **Reply #109 on:** October 18, 2009, 10:20:44 PM »

Quote from: HTexan on October 18, 2009, 10:10:17 PM

So you're saying that bay checks his own threads hundreds of times a day?

Hahahaha Bay is so gay he invented a new sign language with a lisp

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #110 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:40:00 AM »

Quote from: kiwiol on October 18, 2009, 10:20:44 PM

Hahahaha Bay is so gay he invented a new sign language with a lisp

LMAO

rocket · « **Reply #111 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:42:44 AM »

There are a massive amount of guests viewing this board. I don't see a lot of latent homosexuality in those who post but it stands to reason, bodybuilding being a homosexually oriented pageant, that much of the lurking community are infact gay.

Mars · « **Reply #112 on:** October 19, 2009, 04:50:16 AM »

baygbm is so gay hes straight again.

ManBearPig... · « **Reply #113 on:** October 19, 2009, 04:59:10 AM »

baygay's a homosexual who loves the cock, no doubt about it.

but just like most other posters here, if you don't like what "he" has to say, just don't view it. it's not that hard.

if you're gay and posting on here, odds are he's fucked you anyways. so, if bay didn't fuck you, don't worry, you're not gay.

BayGBM · « **Reply #114 on:** October 19, 2009, 07:34:47 AM »

Quote from: ManBearPig... on October 19, 2009, 04:59:10 AM

baygay's a homosexual who loves the cock, no doubt about it.

but just like most other posters here, if you don't like what "he" has to say, just don't view it. it's not that hard.

if you're gay and posting on here, odds are he's fucked you anyways. so, if bay didn't fuck you, don't worry, you're not gay.

Apparently that is easier said than done. The readers who think I am way off base and/or hate me can’t seem to stop reading my gay posts and they can't seem to stop sending me private messages. What’s more, they want photos of me… and some even want to meet me in person, presumably to tell me how much they dislike me. Yeah, that's it.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=300327.msg4296458#msg4296458

Of course, these guys are not interested in reading or responding to my many posts on nongay subjects (religion, astronomy, politics, education, entertainment, etc.). Why that is, is a question only they can answer, but I think we can all connect the dots . . .

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #115 on:** October 19, 2009, 07:59:50 AM »

One thing about Bay he dont hide anything you got to give him that

haider · « **Reply #116 on:** October 19, 2009, 11:48:49 AM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on October 18, 2009, 02:19:03 PM

Your argument is idiot. I can use it against you: there are only a handful of straight men making all those posts and views on the straight threads. Conversely, all the views the gay threads get are by different homosexual Getbiggers who are in the closet and thus won't post there. Now prove me wrong. You can't. See what I mean, dumby? Since we can't know the number of different people that make all the views on threads, we must assume that that the greater number of total views on the gay threads indicate a greater number of posters viewing them which is truer on average than the same posters viewing the same thread over and over again. A more direct indicator is the number of replies because we can know exactly how many are from different posters, and Bay's threads have a much greater number of different posters replying in them than all straight threads except for one. And by the way, retard, "ad hominem" means " to the man", and it involves attacks on character and not general insults. I insulted you, but I didn't make any attacks on characters, meaning that you saying I've made ad hominem attacks is incorrect. Even when you try to appear smart, you end up looking stupid.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I didn't read any of that you prick. You keep looking at absolute number of views when in actuality they don't mean shit. For some one dumber than I you might be able to argue that, but as is typical with megalomaniac such as yourself you think people would let a dumbass argument like that pass.

Lets see how your so-called intelligence holds up here:

THE ONLY WAY TO COMPARE INTEREST IN THREADS IS BY RATE OF THREAD VIEWING, NOT ABSOLUTE VIEWS YOU FUCKING IDIOT! (we are comparing number of views here, not replies)

THE NUMBER OF REPLIES HAS NO BEARING ON INTEREST, AS THE POSTS CAN BE MADE BY THE SAME PERSON UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE YOU DIMWIT (this can be proven, just check the thread you queer eyed asswipe)

You can NOT get beyond these facts. Occams razor can only be used once you have understood the situation, which seems to be beyond your grasp, genius.

Another thing to add: Most views on threads are by guests, because as was pointed out before the ratio of guests to members is very high, in the range of 7-10. So the number of views on a thread don't tell us aanything about the trends of getbig member viewrship, NONE.

Take these arguments and shove them up your ass you fucking ####. I'm done wasting my time on you.

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #117 on:** October 19, 2009, 11:54:42 AM »

Quote from: haider on October 19, 2009, 11:48:49 AM

I didn't read any of that you prick. You keep looking at absolute number of views when in actuality they don't mean shit. For some one dumber than I you might be able to argue that, but as is typical with megalomaniac such as yourself you think people would let a dumbass argument like that pass.

Lets see how your so-called intelligence holds up here:

THE ONLY WAY TO COMPARE INTEREST IN THREADS IS BY RATE OF THREAD VIEWING, NOT ABSOLUTE VIEWS YOU FUCKING IDIOT! (we are comparing number of views here, not replies)

THE NUMBER OF REPLIES HAS NO BEARING ON INTEREST, AS THE POSTS CAN BE MADE BY THE SAME PERSON UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE YOU DIMWIT (this can be proven, just check the thread you queer eyed asswipe)

You can NOT get beyond these facts. Occams razor can only be used once you have understood the situation, which seems to be beyond your grasp, genius.

Another thing to add: Most views on threads are by guests, because as was pointed out before the ratio of guests to members is very high, in the range of 7-10. So the number of views on a thread don't tell us aanything about the trends of getbig member viewrship, NONE.

Take these arguments and shove them up your ass you fucking ####. I'm done wasting my time on you.

Yes I hate SuckingMeatMuscles as well....it would be great if he died

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #118 on:** October 19, 2009, 04:48:08 PM »

Quote from: haider on October 19, 2009, 11:48:49 AM

I didn't read any of that you prick. You keep looking at absolute number of views when in actuality they don't mean shit. For some one dumber than I you might be able to argue that, but as is typical with megalomaniac such as yourself you think people would let a dumbass argument like that pass.

Lets see how your so-called intelligence holds up here:

THE ONLY WAY TO COMPARE INTEREST IN THREADS IS BY RATE OF THREAD VIEWING, NOT ABSOLUTE VIEWS YOU FUCKING IDIOT! (we are comparing number of views here, not replies)

THE NUMBER OF REPLIES HAS NO BEARING ON INTEREST, AS THE POSTS CAN BE MADE BY THE SAME PERSON UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE YOU DIMWIT (this can be proven, just check the thread you queer eyed asswipe)

You can NOT get beyond these facts. Occams razor can only be used once you have understood the situation, which seems to be beyond your grasp, genius.

Another thing to add: Most views on threads are by guests, because as was pointed out before the ratio of guests to members is very high, in the range of 7-10. So the number of views on a thread don't tell us aanything about the trends of getbig member viewrship, NONE.

Take these arguments and shove them up your ass you fucking ####. I'm done wasting my time on you.

All of the views and replies on the straight threads are by the same few straight men or by guests who are straight. Conversely, all the views on Bay's threads are each by a different member of this board. See what I mean, dumby?

Your argument is redundant because it can go either way and no one can prove who is watching what, so we must assume that the greater number of views of the gay threads denote a higher general interest in these threads from both members and guests. And please, my dog that was run over by a car last year sustaining brain damage is smarter than you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

2Thick · « **Reply #119 on:** October 19, 2009, 06:26:24 PM »

Quote from: Mars on October 19, 2009, 04:50:16 AM

baygbm is so gay hes straight again.

Are you suggesting that BayGM is to homosexuality what Ronald "Billions and Billions served" McDonald is to hamburgers?

Obvious Gimmick · « **Reply #120 on:** October 19, 2009, 07:03:16 PM »

you dont want to look but you have to. like a car crash. but this car is full of hunky guys with giant weeners.

BayGBM · « **Reply #121 on:** October 19, 2009, 08:03:42 PM »

Quote from: airosol on October 19, 2009, 07:03:16 PM

you dont want to look but you have to. like a car crash. but this car is full of hunky guys with giant weeners.

I've heard that line before.
"I don't want to buy bodybuilder lifestyle videos, but I have to"
"I don't want to buy another useless BB magazine with glossy photos of shirtless muscle men, but I have to."
"I don't want to do G4P, I swear! But I have to!"

ManBearPig... · « **Reply #122 on:** October 19, 2009, 08:07:28 PM »

Quote from: BayGBM on October 19, 2009, 08:03:42 PM

I've heard that line before.
"I don't want to buy bodybuilder lifestyle videos, but I have to"
"I don't want to buy another useless BB magazine with glossy photos of shirtless muscle men, but I have to."
"I don't want to do G4P, I swear! But I have to!"

I WANT to do all of those things, you sticky stud, you (no homo!).

evandatp · « **Reply #123 on:** October 19, 2009, 10:06:54 PM »

Is it because we're all Bay-curious?

2Thick · « **Reply #124 on:** October 20, 2009, 08:35:07 PM »

Quote from: BayGBM on October 19, 2009, 08:03:42 PM

I've heard that line before.
"I don't want to buy bodybuilder lifestyle videos, but I have to"
"I don't want to buy another useless BB magazine with glossy photos of shirtless muscle men, but I have to."
"I don't want to do G4P, I swear! But I have to!"

Sounds like a slippery slope - no homo.

Author Topic: Why Does BayGBM's Threads Get Far More Views? (Read 17647 times)

io856

io856

suckmymuscle