Ahh I did step away from the computer but was checking for updates on my phone and after reading this I came back to another post lol, couldn't resist.
It's not much more than speculation that the GTR that did 7:08 or whatever the time was will be the actual production car that people can buy. For one the car isn't available, and secondly even for the 2013 and prior GTR's no third party is confirming that these cars Nissan sends to the Ring are even stock. They could be, but it makes me wonder why the GTR is relatively slower at other tracks like the VIR or Laguna Seca than Nissan's claimed nurburgring versions.
The GTR was improved almost every subsequent production year, so I'm not sure what you mean by comparing a vette to a 6 year old GTR. The 6 year old one was 485 hp. One can also say the Z6 ZR1 is 5-6 years old since it was intro'd as a 2009 model.
Off of a dig you're right, but off of a roll its not so cut and dry.
Sorry if I sounded confrontational earlier, I can tell now you're just having fun 
Re: "shit naturally aspirated though" - so is the C7 stingray, again making it a fair comparison 
Ahh the Nismo GTR is available to the public starting now for 150K price
Those times are LEGIT, go look it up there are vids of it and no one is doubting the 7:08 claim
The GTR is still a 6 yr old car that weighs 3800 Ibs with a 6 yr old chassis, transmission, etc...
It's best to compare it to the c6, doesn't matter how much improvement it makes
U can't change the fact that AWD auto/paddle shift is the way to go if u looking for straight speed
Vettes are still rwd, manual
Wait for the new GTR around the corner and it will obliterate the vettes
Frankly I could care less like I said about speed or who has he most HP blah blah blah
Give me the new M3 or cayman S
U can keep that c7 vette and pound your chest and argue how much Hp or how fast it is
