Author Topic: G.O.A.T.  (Read 912 times)

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39938
  • Getbig!
G.O.A.T.
« on: March 26, 2024, 12:48:17 PM »
   
     
   
&t=19s   
&t=30s   When in shape.
F

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33403
  • The only constant in life is change. – Heraclitus
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2024, 12:55:22 PM »
Built like a brick shithouse.

GymnJuice

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5205
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2024, 02:04:45 PM »
Built like a brick shithouse.

Is this a Kwon thread?

 ;D

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25365
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2024, 03:28:44 PM »
Built like a brick shithouse.
Columbo was build like a shit brickhouse.

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33403
  • The only constant in life is change. – Heraclitus
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2024, 05:08:37 PM »
Columbo was build like a shit brickhouse.

Yep.

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17191
  • Getbig!
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2024, 05:24:38 PM »
Franco's legs were off and he had bad gyno.  Padilla was perfection.

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10973
  • Getbig!
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2024, 10:20:39 PM »
He did have perfect proportions.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27873
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2024, 01:22:03 AM »
He did have perfect proportions.
For a smurf.

Marvin Martian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2024, 01:48:25 PM »
Franco's legs were off and he had bad gyno.  Padilla was perfection.

Even though in your opinion there was nothing to admire about his temporary, fake, DRUG physique-  right???

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10973
  • Getbig!
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2024, 09:44:46 PM »
For a smurf.
Excatly.  Imagine if he had those same proportions  at 6 foot.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27873
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2024, 12:15:16 AM »
Excatly.  Imagine if he had those same proportions  at 6 foot.
Would be almost impossible to beat.

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17191
  • Getbig!
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2024, 04:44:50 AM »
Even though in your opinion there was nothing to admire about his temporary, fake, DRUG physique-  right???

I'm in awe of what drugs, genetics and hard work will accomplish. I never for one minute forget it's a temporary illusion. All the champs would be a shadow of what they show in pictures and on stage if they had zero drugs. I assume by what you wrote you're a fan of looking like a man through drugs.

Prior to smart phones I've run into so many former drug users that pull a folded crumpled up picture of them self out of a wallet when they were juicing to show me.  They were standing right in front of me looking like they never did a push up showing me a buff body they had while juicing somehow wanting me to give them accolades.

Am I a hypocrite being in awe of drug physiques. Maybe a valid point. Again, I know how the illusion works. 

Gym Rat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11858
  • Libturdz Love The Caulk
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2024, 07:06:25 AM »
Padilla was always a favorite of mine reading the Mags as a kid.
Always though he was much better than Franco..

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27873
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2024, 12:20:05 AM »
Padilla was always a favorite of mine reading the Mags as a kid.
Always though he was much better than Franco..
Much better, not even close. Still looked pretty good in the WBF.

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17191
  • Getbig!
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2024, 10:34:14 AM »
Franco in his prime could handle anyone but he was off for that Olympia.  If Arnold was 80% for 1980 then Franco was about 85% for his second Olympia win.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27873
Re: G.O.A.T.
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2024, 12:33:17 AM »
Franco in his prime could handle anyone but he was off for that Olympia.  If Arnold was 80% for 1980 then Franco was about 85% for his second Olympia win.
Yeah, he was really good in '76. The accident on WSM contest messed him up enough to never fully recovering.