Getbig Main Boards > Gossip & Opinions
Legal question: getting search warrants based upon message board posts
240 is Back:
Suppose someone made the statement:
--- Quote from: LooseLipsSinkShips on July 05, 2006, 03:34:39 PM ---As far as the year is concerned, it is 1986 to me...when steroids were legal.... ;D Except this time there won't be no raids from the DEA. I'm hooking people up now with the realest shit out there. People respect the fact that I'm willing to go commando to get what they need. I'm shipping stuff in from different countries so people don't have to pay overseas fees and other B.S.
IFBB & NPC Bodybuilding couldn't even function right without folks like me. Otherwise, all you would see on-stage would be some toothpicks. I may need to perfect my own physique but I'm like "New Kids on The Block". I alway have "The Right Stuff"
--- End quote ---
Given the current political situation and recent legislature, the 4th amendment NO LONGER REQUIRES "probable cause". Only "reasonable suspicion" is now required.
Is the statement above considered "reasonable suspicion"?
I'm a libertarian and I"m no snitch - i believe everything should be legalized, period. But as a hypothetical, is such a statement enough to get one searched? And if so, is there precedent for this happeneing?
I remember when RockyIII posted his home kitchen tren setup, and people freaked out. They said he could very easily be investigated, from only message board posts. Anyone have any insight on this?
ether:
--- Quote from: 240 is Back on July 05, 2006, 03:47:36 PM ---Suppose someone made the statement:
Given the current political situation and recent legislature, the 4th amendment NO LONGER REQUIRES "probable cause". Only "reasonable suspicion" is now required.
Is the statement above considered "reasonable suspicion"?
I'm a libertarian and I"m no snitch - i believe everything should be legalized, period. But as a hypothetical, is such a statement enough to get one searched?
--- End quote ---
This post should last about 30 seconds...
If Milos or Dennis James have anything to say about it that is.
Going....
Going...
Gone.
ribonucleic:
--- Quote from: 240 is Back on July 05, 2006, 03:47:36 PM ---Suppose someone made the statement:
Given the current political situation and recent legislature, the 4th amendment NO LONGER REQUIRES "probable cause". Only "reasonable suspicion" is now required.
Is the statement above considered "reasonable suspicion"?
I'm a libertarian and I"m no snitch - i believe everything should be legalized, period. But as a hypothetical, is such a statement enough to get one searched? And if so, is there precedent for this happeneing?
I remember when RockyIII posted his home kitchen tren setup, and people freaked out. They said he could very easily be investigated, from only message board posts. Anyone have any insight on this?
--- End quote ---
G o a t b o y:
DEA's gonna raid Vince's shack in the Appalachian foothills and find nothing but bee pollen! ;D
bigdumbbell:
--- Quote from: 240 is Back on July 05, 2006, 03:47:36 PM ---Suppose someone made the statement:
Given the current political situation and recent legislature, the 4th amendment NO LONGER REQUIRES "probable cause". Only "reasonable suspicion" is now required.
Is the statement above considered "reasonable suspicion"?
I'm a libertarian and I"m no snitch - i believe everything should be legalized, period. But as a hypothetical, is such a statement enough to get one searched? And if so, is there precedent for this happeneing?
I remember when RockyIII posted his home kitchen tren setup, and people freaked out. They said he could very easily be investigated, from only message board posts. Anyone have any insight on this?
--- End quote ---
what recent legislative enactments are you specifically referring to?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version