Again you did not address the point. In 95 Ray was competitive (will avoid the argument of whether he was at his best but you can't claim he was off or far from his best)...point is he was a top pro, in good shape, had a better back than Nasser, but lost to him. So this (+ other examples) shows you can't dismiss Nasser vs. others like Cormier or Francois simply based on the back.
The master of not addressing my points wants his answered
I already explained this to you , these guys would beat Nasser the same reason Dorian did , they would accumulate more mandatory poses , Nasser is very competitive from the front , from the sides he's not the same and from the back he sucks
This is how it works , against a career best Chris , Nasser would win the ab-thigh , maybe the front double biceps , I don't see him having a better standing relaxed than Chris , 1/4 turns , Nasser isn't the dominate force from the sides , he would lose the 1/4 turns , maybe win the side triceps , Chris has a better side chest in my opinion , from the back forget it
Pay attention because this is how it works , Nasser would give Chris a run for his money in some shots but Chris would rack up more poses than Nasser for the win , the same reason Dorian beat him , Kevin beat him , Flex beat him , etc
Nasser happened to beat them Yippeeee they were usually off when he did , doesn't mean he could replicate that when they were dead on the money