« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Why Nasser could never come close..  (Read 5055 times)

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2009, 07:54:33 AM »
Logged

ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
  • Getbig!
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2009, 08:10:02 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 04:44:32 AM
:-*

hi nasshuggers! :P
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #27 on: September 06, 2009, 08:11:54 AM »
 ;D
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #28 on: September 06, 2009, 08:15:52 AM »
Quote from: BigBuehl on September 06, 2009, 08:10:02 AM
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?

post the best mm pic. of ronnie to answer you with proofs :P
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #29 on: September 06, 2009, 01:16:18 PM »
Quote from: BigBuehl on September 06, 2009, 08:10:02 AM
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?

Sorry kid, but this guy shits all over Coleman and everyone else in the history of BB:

Logged

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #30 on: September 06, 2009, 01:55:19 PM »
Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:31:58 AM
:-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\

who's the 130 lb. aids victim in the middle with 11 inch arms?
Logged

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #31 on: September 06, 2009, 01:59:21 PM »
Quote from: BigBuehl on September 06, 2009, 08:10:02 AM
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?
Ronnie's MM is the most impressive ever. Wolf has to be up there as well as Victor. 
Logged

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #32 on: September 06, 2009, 03:09:01 PM »

Logged

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #33 on: September 06, 2009, 03:09:42 PM »

Logged

FlexGuns

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #34 on: September 06, 2009, 03:22:57 PM »
Something NASSER never had.


Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #35 on: September 06, 2009, 03:59:44 PM »
Quote from: Groink on September 06, 2009, 01:55:19 PM
who's the 130 132 lb. aids victim in the middle with 11 11.5 inch arms?

fixed for truth >:(
Logged

The ChemistV2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2008
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #36 on: September 06, 2009, 04:05:54 PM »
Quote from: kiwiol on September 06, 2009, 07:52:22 AM
LOL! I'm not the biggest Nasser fan, but Hulkster is nuts if he thinks Nasser never came close to Ronnie. From the front, Nasser looked better than Ronnie from 1995 - early 98 IMO.As much as I like to troll here, I still have to make a post here and there about men in thongs, Chaos. Remember, it's only gay if you want it to be ;D


Have to agree here. Pretty unbeatable in those years. With a bit more back separaration and detail, he would have been Mr. O.
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #37 on: September 06, 2009, 04:20:15 PM »
Quote from: The ChemistV2 on September 06, 2009, 04:05:54 PM
Have to agree here. Pretty unbeatable in those years. With a bit more back separaration and detail, he would have been Mr. O.

even with his back as it was he deserved to be mr. olympia 2-3 times (AT LEAST)..
Logged

The ChemistV2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2008
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #38 on: September 06, 2009, 04:59:13 PM »
Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 04:20:15 PM
even with his back as it was he deserved to be mr. olympia 2-3 times (AT LEAST)..
Well, at least once maybe..but it seems since the Lee haney era, all the Mr. Olympias usually had a back that was their best bodypart. Haney, Yates, Coleman all have that. Now is it fair that someone should beat Nasser when they have terrible biceps, or weak calves or a bloated stomach ?...Maybe not. But apparently the judges deemed the back more important.
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #39 on: September 06, 2009, 05:07:51 PM »
Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 04:20:15 PM
even with his back as it was he deserved to be mr. olympia 2-3 times (AT LEAST)..
Well Sheriff I would say one dont go overboard here ;)
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #40 on: September 06, 2009, 05:30:15 PM »
Quote from: The ChemistV2 on September 06, 2009, 04:59:13 PM
Well, at least once maybe..but it seems since the Lee haney era, all the Mr. Olympias usually had a back that was their best bodypart. Haney, Yates, Coleman all have that. Now is it fair that someone should beat Nasser when they have terrible biceps, or weak calves or a bloated stomach ?...Maybe not. But apparently the judges deemed the back more important.

although the rear double biceps or the rear lat spread both dont mean the back only,.. these 2 poses include other muscles like calves, hams, shoulders, arms!!.. nasser was better than dorian in all these other muscles except calves and was better than ronnie in calves and hams and was equal to him or may be better in shoulders and arms!!.. i am not saying that nasser was better than dorian or ronnie in these poses but as a whole he was comparable while from the front he was better than both of them specially dorian in 96 and 97 who was much weaker then nasser in nearly all areas except his back!!.. from the front dorian was not comparable to nasser specially in 97 while nasser was comparable to him from the back!
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #41 on: September 06, 2009, 06:17:51 PM »
Quote from: Danimal77 on September 06, 2009, 01:16:18 PM
Sorry kid, but this guy shits all over Coleman and everyone else in the history of BB:



no, Ronnie beats it.

but its close. BeefitBeetle is amazing in the mm shot.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30296
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #42 on: September 06, 2009, 06:28:32 PM »
In 2000, Ronnie himself said that Nasser was always a major threat at the Olympia.
Logged

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3532
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #43 on: September 06, 2009, 06:35:14 PM »
Wolfs most muscular is a whole different pose to coleman, coleman is mainly focusing on flexing his chest and arms, whereas wolf is leaning more forward, raises his shoulders forward with his traps.. I like wolfs and ronnies. Ruhls is horrible, gunter does the arnold type, don't really like it. Dexter does the hammer dirt most muscular, he should try one with his palms facing up.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #44 on: September 06, 2009, 06:50:50 PM »
true, but Wolf's pose is like Ruhl's and Gunter's: it needs triceps badly
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #45 on: September 06, 2009, 08:17:28 PM »
Logged

ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
  • Getbig!
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #46 on: September 06, 2009, 08:39:47 PM »
Quote from: bigbobs on September 06, 2009, 03:09:01 PM


The width on Nasser in that shot is pretty amazing. Great pix posted, keep them coming. I have never really liked the hands clasps most muscular as much as the crab though.
Logged

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #47 on: September 06, 2009, 11:49:32 PM »
because he didn't compared to better bbers.
Logged
A

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #48 on: September 07, 2009, 12:16:31 AM »
Quote from: Royalty on September 06, 2009, 06:28:32 PM
In 2000, Ronnie himself said that Nasser was always a major threat at the Olympia.

also after nasser's 6th place at the olympia 99 ronnie said something like "forget about nasser's 6th place, i am sure he will return again next year at his normal great shape to be a major threat"..
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
« Reply #49 on: September 07, 2009, 12:22:25 AM »
Quote from: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 05:07:51 PM
Well Sheriff I would say one dont go overboard here ;)

no man 96 too.. he was much better than dorian and the others.. dont tell me he was disqualified because my answer as you know will be jay 2001 :-X
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »