I would a agree with this but put it in different words `Levrone`s best is better then Phil`s best`but Phil can beat many versions of Levrone, just not Levrone`s best.,
Kevin had wider structure with a similar built but more hardness to the muscle, not talking condition cause Phil is peeled but Phil`s Muscle looks more bloofy and Kevin`s looks more dense, Phil has him on Hamstring though, in fact best Hams in bodybuilding
pretty much spot on,,, heath's legs overall top to bottom are better than kev's best,leverone had great legs in early yrs 91-97 heaths legs have more volume ,thickness to them and like u said hams,heaths back is better thicker and bands of muscle midway and up and lower back too,kev looked long from the back and narrow a bit,from the front delts are kev's and due to structure/width there and kev had great traps,arms in most muscular is same both great.kev was awesome i like him better but heath is just as good if not better now.