Author Topic: ranking the best to worst Mr. O winners (Read 2041 times)

Moosejay · « **on:** July 07, 2008, 07:46:33 PM »

.....

11. Franco
10. Dickerson
9. Scott
8. Cutler
7. Haney
6. Oliva
5. Bannout
4. Coleman
3. Zane
2. Yates
1. 'Numero Uno'

mass 04 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 07, 2008, 07:49:08 PM »

Ronnie
Arnold
Dorian
Oliva
Haney
Samir
Cutler
Zane
Scott
Franco
Dickerson

candidizzle · « **Reply #2 on:** July 07, 2008, 07:50:30 PM »

11. Franco
10. Dickerson
9. zane
8. scott
7. arnold
6. bannout
5. yates
4. cutler
3. Oliva
2. haney
1. Coleman

Lion666 · « **Reply #3 on:** July 07, 2008, 10:24:13 PM »

1 of course arnold
2 ronnie early mr o's 1 -5
3 bannout
4 oliva
5 haney
6 scott
7 zane
8 cutler
9 franco
10 dickerson
11 yates

benchthis · « **Reply #4 on:** July 07, 2008, 10:25:27 PM »

Ronnie everyone else was second place

calfzilla · « **Reply #5 on:** July 08, 2008, 12:36:38 AM »

Quote from: Moosejay on July 07, 2008, 07:46:33 PM

.....

11. Franco
10. Dickerson
9. Scott
8. Cutler
7. Haney
6. Oliva
5. Bannout
4. Coleman
3. Zane
2. Yates
1. 'Numero Uno'

I agree Franco was probably the worst.

calfzilla · « **Reply #6 on:** July 08, 2008, 12:37:42 AM »

1. Yates
2. Haney
3. Zane

marcus · « **Reply #7 on:** July 08, 2008, 01:54:34 AM »

Ronnie
Arnold
Jay

LatsMcGee · « **Reply #8 on:** July 08, 2008, 02:01:15 AM »

Kenny Jones
King Kamali
Jeff Long

RZA · « **Reply #9 on:** July 08, 2008, 02:18:47 AM »

It would be better to judge each Mr.O's edition. Thinking that there's only been 11 Mr.Os in 43 years just shows how biased is this show.
Franco and Dickerson were the worse by far, then '80 Arnold was a disgrace also. Haney in '89 and '90 was undeserving. Yates in '97 was not great either, Cutler in '07 and so on and so on...

Most impressive wins:
-Probably Coleman in '98 (and '99 was almost as good)
-Yates in '92 and '93
-Bannout: just showed up great that year
-Haney's 83-85
-Zane deserved all his Sandows, except maybe the '79 edition.

And Oliva just have never lost to Arnold.

Moosejay · « **Reply #10 on:** July 08, 2008, 05:40:50 AM »

Quote from: RZA on July 08, 2008, 02:18:47 AM

It would be better to judge each Mr.O's edition. Thinking that there's only been 11 Mr.Os in 43 years just shows how biased is this show.
Franco and Dickerson were the worse by far, then '80 Arnold was a disgrace also. Haney in '89 and '90 was undeserving. Yates in '97 was not great either, Cutler in '07 and so on and so on...

Most impressive wins:
-Probably Coleman in '98 (and '99 was almost as good)
-Yates in '92 and '93
-Bannout: just showed up great that year
-Haney's 83-85
-Zane deserved all his Sandows, except maybe the '79 edition.

And Oliva just have never lost to Arnold.

godd assessment

hipolito mejia · « **Reply #11 on:** July 08, 2008, 06:00:51 AM »

Quote from: Moosejay on July 07, 2008, 07:46:33 PM

.....

11. Franco
10. Dickerson
9. Scott
8. Cutler
7. Haney
6. Oliva
5. Bannout
4. Coleman
3. Zane
2. Yates
1. 'Numero Uno'

Having Zane over Ronnie 1998?
Are you out of your mind?

Sorry amigo, cant let that one go.

hipolito mejia · « **Reply #12 on:** July 08, 2008, 06:08:51 AM »

Quote from: RZA on July 08, 2008, 02:18:47 AM

It would be better to judge each Mr.O's edition. Thinking that there's only been 11 Mr.Os in 43 years just shows how biased is this show.
Franco and Dickerson were the worse by far, then '80 Arnold was a disgrace also. Haney in '89 and '90 was undeserving. Yates in '97 was not great either, Cutler in '07 and so on and so on...

Most impressive wins:
-Probably Coleman in '98 (and '99 was almost as good)
-Yates in '92 and '93
-Bannout: just showed up great that year
-Haney's 83-85
-Zane deserved all his Sandows, except maybe the '79 edition.

And Oliva just have never lost to Arnold.

Point taken...

1-Arnold 73 & 74
2-Ronnie 98
3-Sergio 72 (didn't win but was better than previous years! 71 wasnt allowed to compete also better than Arnold that year)
4-Haney- 85
5-Bannout-83
6-Franco 76
7-Scott-66
8-Cutler-06
9-Dickerson-82,ZAne And YAtes any year as their physiques wont do it for me.

RZA · « **Reply #13 on:** July 08, 2008, 06:16:58 AM »

Quote from: hipolito mejia on July 08, 2008, 06:08:51 AM

Point taken...

1-Arnold 73 & 74
2-Ronnie 98
3-Sergio 72 (didn't win but was better than previous years! 71 wasnt allowed to compete also better than Arnold that year)
4-Haney- 85
5-Bannout-83
6-Franco 76
7-Scott-66
8-Cutler-06
9-Dickerson-82,ZAne And YAtes any year as their physiques wont do it for me.

I think that now that most people have grown acustomed to the mass monsters, they don't realize how Zane was perceived at the time. The guy had a tremendous impact as far as definition and conditioning were concerned.

knny187 · « **Reply #14 on:** July 08, 2008, 09:49:43 AM »

Quote from: Moosejay on July 07, 2008, 07:46:33 PM

.....

11. Franco
10. Dickerson
9. Scott
8. Cutler
7. Haney
6. Oliva
5. Bannout
4. Coleman
3. Zane
2. Yates
1. 'Numero Uno'

This is where I have them.....period

11. Dickerson
10. Scott
9. Zane
8. Bannout
7. Oliva
6. Franco
5. Cutler
4. Haney
3. Yates
2. Coleman
1. 'Numero Uno'

Pollux · « **Reply #15 on:** July 08, 2008, 10:13:41 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on July 08, 2008, 12:36:38 AM

I agree Franco was probably the worst.

Dorian Yates for me.

Jeffro · « **Reply #16 on:** July 08, 2008, 12:15:40 PM »

11. Franco
10. Dickerson
9. Scott
8. Zane
7. Bannout
6. Cutler
5. Oliva
4. Yates
3. Haney
2. Coleman
1. Arnold

Moosejay · « **Reply #17 on:** July 08, 2008, 02:19:32 PM »

Quote from: hipolito mejia on July 08, 2008, 06:00:51 AM

Having Zane over Ronnie 1998?
Are you out of your mind?

Sorry amigo, cant let that one go.

entertainment ideation=you imagine yourself as your hero...you identify with him..

i indentify with Zane...i'd rather look like him than any other...which is why i rank him higher than the fellows of recent history