'
In 2009, the $ is going to create jobs. Full accountability.
In 2008, it went to bankers to use as they wished. Zero accountability.
Bump for this tidbit of fact.
Serious question here... Why is it all of a sudden a bad thing to spend 750 billion to stimulate the economy in 2009 when it's got actual things it's going to do... but giving away 750 billion dollars in 2008 was an ok thing to do.
Why are things different now when it comes to the money? Why didn't the Republicans jump up and down then? At least now, they actually have some items and groups that will directly receive the money to do something and won't just "get lost" like a few billion did when it went to the banks just to "prop up" their credit markets.
Which one is more worthwhile?