Author Topic: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week  (Read 113004 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #275 on: June 03, 2019, 07:50:15 PM »
Can Trump be easily coerced by the media into making inappropriate comments about people? He's been dealing with the media all of his adult life. One would think he'd have become more savvy to their tactics.

Not all of his comments are inappropriate per se.  He just responds to every single insult, which he shouldn't do.

One of the problems is the reporting only includes his response, instead of the original insult.  Like him calling Maxine Waters low IQ, but not mentioning that she called him a scumbag and traitor (among other things).  Numerous examples of this. 

I've always had a problem with him being unable to pick his battles, and he is not going to change, but the good outweighs the bad with him by a significant margin. 

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #276 on: June 03, 2019, 08:25:34 PM »
Not all of his comments are inappropriate per se.  He just responds to every single insult, which he shouldn't do.

One of the problems is the reporting only includes his response, instead of the original insult.  Like him calling Maxine Waters low IQ, but not mentioning that she called him a scumbag and traitor (among other things).  Numerous examples of this. 

I've always had a problem with him being unable to pick his battles, and he is not going to change, but the good outweighs the bad with him by a significant margin. 

It's good to know that not all of what Trump says is inappropriate. You are right, he should not respond to everything that is said about him, especially the insulting jabs. It's partly because he seems so easily rilled that he get's setup so often. He's old enough to know better. Age does not necessarily indicate maturity and wisdom though.

My tally is different from yours as to the good, bad and the ugly produced by Trump. But then, so are our perspectives.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14992
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #277 on: June 03, 2019, 08:51:40 PM »
Trump calls Meghan Markle "nasty." 

Then lies and says he didn't. I would expect someone "best at everything ever" to respond with "what I meant was what she said was a nasty thing to say" not "I didn't call her nasty" but thats just me

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #278 on: June 04, 2019, 10:45:35 AM »
Then lies and says he didn't. I would expect someone "best at everything ever" to respond with "what I meant was what she said was a nasty thing to say" not "I didn't call her nasty" but thats just me

If you actually listened to his comments, he was saying what she said was nasty, not that she is nasty. 

In any event, another asinine outrage of the week.  You people are going to stay angry through 2020. 

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #279 on: June 04, 2019, 03:26:29 PM »
If you actually listened to his comments, he was saying what she said was nasty, not that she is nasty. 

In any event, another asinine outrage of the week.  You people are going to stay angry through 2020. 

Count me out of your "You people" anger assessment. I'm not now, nor was I ever angry with regards to Trump. I don't like him and I have no respect for him or his lifestyle. He's not worthy of my anger.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #280 on: June 04, 2019, 03:29:24 PM »
Count me out of your "You people" anger assessment. I'm not now, nor was I ever angry with regards to Trump. I don't like him and I have no respect for him or his lifestyle. He's not worthy of my anger.

You may not be angry, but you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.  And as I've said, you have plenty of company.  Some of my good friends have the same condition. 

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #281 on: June 04, 2019, 03:41:49 PM »
You may not be angry, but you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.  And as I've said, you have plenty of company.  Some of my good friends have the same condition. 

According to one Urban Dictionary definition, I am not a sufferer of Trump derangement syndrome....quite the opposite.

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their love of Donald Trump, to the point they will abandon all logic and reason. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Trump%20derangement%20syndrome


 ;D

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #282 on: June 04, 2019, 03:51:41 PM »
According to one Urban Dictionary definition, I am not a sufferer of Trump derangement syndrome....quite the opposite.

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their love of Donald Trump, to the point they will abandon all logic and reason. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Trump%20derangement%20syndrome


 ;D

lol.  Nah.  This one:  "Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) is a neologism used to describe irrational reactions to United States President Donald Trump's statements and political actions, with little regard towards Trump's actual position or action taken."  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #283 on: June 04, 2019, 05:34:14 PM »
Then lies and says he didn't. I would expect someone "best at everything ever" to respond with "what I meant was what she said was a nasty thing to say" not "I didn't call her nasty" but thats just me
Man, responses like this make me wonder how people interact with each other in life. Do they just hear one word and blow-up and tune the rest of it completely out that actually reveal what that word means in context?

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22199
  • SC è un asino
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #284 on: June 04, 2019, 06:23:08 PM »
If you actually listened to his comments, he was saying what she said was nasty, not that she is nasty. 

In any event, another asinine outrage of the week.  You people are going to stay angry through 2020. 

And even after he said that he went on to complement her and say she will be great at what she’s doing.

It’s surreal.

1. He didn’t say she was nasty

2. He didn’t say there a “fine people on both sides” when talking about white supremicists.

3. He isn’t anti immigration.  He is anti illegal immigration.

But these memes won’t go away.
Y

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #285 on: June 04, 2019, 06:44:58 PM »
And even after he said that he went on to complement her and say she will be great at what she’s doing.

It’s surreal.

1. He didn’t say she was nasty

2. He didn’t say there a “fine people on both sides” when talking about white supremicists.

3. He isn’t anti immigration.  He is anti illegal immigration.

But these memes won’t go away.

And it's not just that won't go away, it's that people in the media and in Congress keep repeating them.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14992
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #286 on: June 04, 2019, 06:54:24 PM »
And even after he said that he went on to complement her and say she will be great at what she’s doing.

It’s surreal.

1. He didn’t say she was nasty

2. He didn’t say there a “fine people on both sides” when talking about white supremicists.

3. He isn’t anti immigration.  He is anti illegal immigration.

But these memes won’t go away.

Post his comment... post his qoute

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20665
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #287 on: June 05, 2019, 03:04:49 PM »
She’s half black divorced & comes across as fucked up.
About as Royal as Dog Poo.

Not that “Royal” is anything to be Proud of.

Still Twat head married it - His Problem.

Dirty she may well be.


chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57579
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #288 on: June 05, 2019, 05:17:35 PM »
Post his comment... post his qoute
This is how you respond to a question asked to back up your point, not "read the report" ::)

Quote
The Sun: "She said she'd move to Canada if you got elected. It turned out she moved to Britain."
Trump: "Well, that'll be good. There are a lot of people moving here. So, what can I say? No, I didn't know that she was nasty."
The Sun: "Is it good having an American princess though, Mr. President?"
Trump: "I think it's nice. I think it's nice. I'm sure she'll do excellently. She'll be very good. She'll be very good. I hope she does."

Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #289 on: June 10, 2019, 10:56:57 AM »
- Trump threatens tariffs against Mexico.

- Trump works out a deal with Mexico to avoid tariffs.  

- Melania wears sunglasses.

'Disrespectful' Melania Trump criticised for leaving sunglasses on during D-Day ceremony
Francesca SpecterYahoo Style UK deputy editor,Yahoo Style UK•June 6, 2019
https://www.yahoo.com/news/melania-trump-sunglasses-d-day-092047001.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #290 on: June 10, 2019, 02:25:30 PM »
Trump wears a tiny jacket to have dinner with the queen and Twitter can't handle it
AOL.COM EDITORS
Jun 4th 2019
https://www.aol.com/article/lifestyle/2019/06/04/trump-wears-a-tiny-jacket-to-have-dinner-with-the-queen-and-twitter-cant-handle-it/23741640/

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Team Pfizer
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #291 on: June 10, 2019, 06:27:39 PM »
Trump wears a tiny jacket to have dinner with the queen and Twitter can't handle it
AOL.COM EDITORS
Jun 4th 2019
https://www.aol.com/article/lifestyle/2019/06/04/trump-wears-a-tiny-jacket-to-have-dinner-with-the-queen-and-twitter-cant-handle-it/23741640/

Fat guy in a little coat.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #292 on: June 10, 2019, 06:59:07 PM »
lol.  Nah.  This one:  "Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) is a neologism used to describe irrational reactions to United States President Donald Trump's statements and political actions, with little regard towards Trump's actual position or action taken."  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome

Who says there isn't other applications for this collection of words? Derangement syndrome was coined in 2003 by Charles Krauthammer as Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) in The Washington Post article "The Delusional Dean".
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Derangement_Syndrome

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #293 on: June 10, 2019, 07:26:11 PM »
Who says there isn't other applications for this collection of words? Derangement syndrome was coined in 2003 by Charles Krauthammer as Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) in The Washington Post article "The Delusional Dean".
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Derangement_Syndrome


I'm not talking about other applications of the word "derangement."  I'm talking about the specific condition of "Trump Derangement Syndrome."  It's real.  A plethora of examples right here:  http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=625133.0 

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #294 on: June 10, 2019, 07:30:53 PM »
I'm not talking about other applications of the word "derangement."  I'm talking about the specific condition of "Trump Derangement Syndrome."  It's real.  A plethora of examples right here:  http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=625133.0 

Of course you are not. Actually, does anybody care what you are talking about? There's been Bush derangement syndrome and Obama derangement syndrome.

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Team Pfizer
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #295 on: June 10, 2019, 07:34:49 PM »
Of course you are not. Actually, does anybody care what you are talking about? There's been Bush derangement syndrome and Obama derangement syndrome.

Sorry Prime.  Dos just cited a getbig thread therefore you've lost the argument.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #296 on: June 10, 2019, 07:42:00 PM »
Of course you are not. Actually, does anybody care what you are talking about? There's been Bush derangement syndrome and Obama derangement syndrome.

Obviously you because you're talking about it.  lol  And you can try and invent other derangement syndromes, but nothing compares to Trump Derangement Syndrome.  I doubt you will understand that because you suffer from TDS.   :)

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40739
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #297 on: June 10, 2019, 09:23:07 PM »
Obviously you because you're talking about it.  lol  And you can try and invent other derangement syndromes, but nothing compares to Trump Derangement Syndrome.  I doubt you will understand that because you suffer from TDS.   :)

You know me too well!  ::) ...or so you think.

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5868
  • a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #298 on: June 11, 2019, 07:58:05 PM »
https://pjmedia.com/trending/new-york-times-thinks-nobel-laureate-milton-friedman-is-the-gateway-to-the-alt-right/

New York Times Thinks Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman Is the Gateway to the Alt-Right

In the Sunday edition of The New York Times, an above-the-fold, front-page article examined
the journey of a young man they refer to as a "YouTube Radical" who "was pulled into a far-right
universe, watching thousands of videos filled with conspiracy theories, misogyny and racism."

The prominent photo montage accompanying the article was most curious:




Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The Liberal Outrage Of The Week
« Reply #299 on: June 13, 2019, 06:38:58 PM »
CNN, MSNBC Spend 72 Percent of Prime Time FREAKING OUT Over Trump Interview
By Nicholas Fondacaro and Curtis Houck | June 13, 2019

President Trump made more headlines Wednesday night after he told ABC chief anchor George Stephanopoulos that he would be fine with taking “oppo research” on his 2020 opponent from foreign countries. This comment drew criticism. But during their almost two hours and 30 minutes of prime time coverage, or hair-on-fire panic, neither CNN nor MSNBC cared to mention that that’s exactly what the Clinton campaign did in 2016 with the now-infamous dossier.

According to the numbers gathered by NewsBusters, CNN and MSNBC programs from 8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Eastern fetched a whopping 148 minutes and 33 seconds on the President’s comments, which totaled 72 percent of their entire live programming (minus commercials and teases).

For CNN, their prime time lineup (AC360, Cuomo Prime Time, and the first hour of CNN Tonight) spent almost 84 minutes (1:23:47) getting worked up over the President’s comments.

As for coverage not pertaining to the interview, CNN offered 32 minutes and 50 seconds, including over 12 minutes of coverage dedicated to letting presidential candidate Bernie Sanders make “his case for democratic socialism,” during AC360.

In all, CNN had almost two hours of airtime dedicated to reporting this story. This means that the so-called “Facts First” network spent 72 percent (71.8%) of their time on one story, saying basically the same thing over and over. Inversely, that’s only 28 percent for other stories.

Meanwhile, the Trump count on MSNBC’s prime time (All In, The Rachel Maddow Show, and The Last Word) was 64 minutes and 46 seconds versus 40 minutes and 24 seconds for all other matters, which ironically breaks down to the same percentages as CNN (72 percent to 28 percent). It’s like they sing from the same sheet music.

CNN’s coverage of Trump’s interview grew more encompassing as the night dragged on. AC360 had 24 minutes and 11 seconds, Cuomo Prime Time went with 27 minutes and 38 seconds, and CNN Tonight topped off at 31 minutes and 58 seconds.

Over on MSNBC, the worst offender in this three-hour block was The Last Word, which spent a whopping 45 minutes and 38 seconds melting down over the President’s comments versus a mere two minutes and 45 seconds on other matters.

On that front, the only other two topics were Hope Hicks’s decision to testify before the House Judiciary Committee and new reporting concerning bailout money meant for U.S. farmers landing in the hands of a Brazilian meatpacking company.

Maddow was second in Trump time at 34 minutes and 25 seconds while All In was the most balanced at 24 minutes and 43 seconds on Trump (which was guest-hosted by Stephanie Ruhle).

While these networks spent all this time railing against President Trump, they failed to decry the Clinton campaign’s use of former British spy Christopher Steele to obtain dirt on Trump from Russian sources.

During CNN Tonight, CNN national security analyst Matthew Rosenberg tried to take a swipe at Trump by discrediting the President’s suggestion it was “oppo research”. But in doing so, he basically condemned what the Clinton campaign did:

You know, look, in our campaigns, candidates go out, they collect information about each other, that's opposition research. A foreign government coming in saying we know this about your rival, maybe we hacked it out of their emails, maybe we bribed people to get it, I don’t know how they got it, that's interference. And I think, you know, there’s very little doubt about that.

Likewise, the feverishness was flowing on MSNBC. Returning to The Last Word, here are two separate cries of panic from host Lawrence O’Donnell and former Time editor/former Kerry official Richard Stengel (click “expand”):

O’DONNELL: Well tonight, the President of the United States said he would break the law to win re-election. That is the essential headline of the night. The President of the United States is willing to violate the law to win his re-election.

(....)

STENGEL: This was a signal to Russia because you know who would have opposition research on the Democratic candidates and Joe Biden in particular? Russia. What Trump was saying is look, I will welcome this information. I will suborn the law, I would undermine the law to defeat my opponent and work with a hostile foreign power trying to undermine our democracy. That's what I'm going to do.

There’s a whole wide world of news to share with the viewers, but these two cable networks decided to dedicate a vast majority of their prime time programming venting about one story. Talk about falling down on their jobs to inform the public.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/curtis-houck/2019/06/13/cnn-msnbc-spend-72-percent-prime-time-freaking-out-over-trump