I don't quite think this is correct, I think there was a time in the last few years where they were both doing it at the same time.  I even think there may have been another thread similar to this one back then but more like who was most hated or annoying and Bhanky lost or it was a lot closer.

Nope. Prime example is March last year when Brian told choas "Band me then bitch" and he was gone for like a month.

DJ then proceeds to try become the main character with multiple threads requesting advice and just general garbage topics. He started like 30 threads whilst brian was gone. Brian returns and only like 5 new threads from dj in the next month 

5.  Did you have some form of accident or nervous breakdown or drug/alcohol problem or something to take you from your claimed normal OSU grad/trainer background to what you are now, and if so what was it?

6.  Why don't you just post pictures that prove what you say, especially when it would be so easy?  (the pictures Van cites above helped some (mops) actually believe you Russia claims)

What's pretty amusing is that it's only when bhanky is banned or gone from here, that dj returns and starts has BS across multiple threads. This has happened multiple times now.

He won't go head to head with Bhanky for getbigs attention cos he knows he'd lose as happened when he returned a year or 2 back.

I don't quite think this is correct, I think there was a time in the last few years where they were both doing it at the same time.  I even think there may have been another thread similar to this one back then but more like who was most hated or annoying and Bhanky lost or it was a lot closer.

Had not thought of that combination. I am convinced a “socialist” at top of the ticket will definitely deliver the 2026 presidency to the Republicans. But something is weird thinking about Gavin/A0C. Something tells me that combo would beat Vance, who has deep baggage.

Can't wait to see who wins the Presidency in 2026, then again in 2028.

That would be completely centralized. Ethereum's decentralization goals means validators with 1 Gbps internet connections or less should be able to participate via solo staking.

Each transaction might be 250–500 bytes (including metadata, signatures, etc.). At 11 million TPS, that’s ~2.75–5.5 GB per second of bandwidth just to transmit the raw data. A 1 Gbps connection = ~125 MB/sec, meaning it’s ~40–80x too slow to handle that load.

Keeta’s claim of 11 million TPS is likely misleading unless it's highly centralized. A validator with a 1 Gbps internet connection couldn’t realistically keep up with that volume — it would need 40–80× more bandwidth. If Keeta requires enterprise-grade hardware and a few trusted validators, it’s not a true blockchain — just a fast, centralized system.

The blockchain trilemma says you can only optimize for two of three:

1. Decentralization
2. Security
3. Scalability

Keeta likely sacrifices decentralization to boost scalability and security — unlike Ethereum, which prioritizes decentralization and security at the cost of throughput.

It's centralized in the sense that it relies on aws, google cloud etc.

The 11m TPS was to demonstrate the technology, scalability and ability to meet global demand (all independently verified) It can even ramp up to beyond 50m TPS. Nothing in crypto and more importantly in currently used tradfi technology comes close

It all comes down to how cheap they can make it.

Oh did I mention Eric Schmidt is an investor. It's the only crypto project he's endorsed aside from chainlink where he was an advisor.