Author Topic: Creepy Porn Lawyer  (Read 65966 times)

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #50 on: September 26, 2018, 10:38:49 PM »
So if I'm tracking, she knew there was spiked punch and gang rapes, kept going to these parties, got drugged and gang raped herself, went back to the parties after she was drugged gang raped for a total of about ten parties, and did this while she was a college student attending high school parties. 

Sounds legit. 

you're not wrong

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59594
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #51 on: September 26, 2018, 10:40:14 PM »
Dude clearly liked his alcohol. IF he was a virgin into his college years, it was because he was too wasted. Just my opinion

Lmao  ::)

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #52 on: September 26, 2018, 10:43:41 PM »
The 5th amendment kicks in when someone is arrested, not applying for a job? Is that correct?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #53 on: September 27, 2018, 12:18:18 AM »
The 5th amendment kicks in when someone is arrested, not applying for a job? Is that correct?

Oh look a talking point embraced by liberals in the past couple days.  

We don't turn due process on its head because someone isn't in a courtroom.  No, we don't force people going through Senate confirmation have to prove their innocence when a ridiculous, uncorroborated, politically motivated allegation is made.  Absurd logic.  

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #54 on: September 27, 2018, 09:08:37 PM »
Oh look a talking point embraced by liberals in the past couple days.  

We don't turn due process on its head because someone isn't in a courtroom.  No, we don't force people going through Senate confirmation have to prove their innocence when a ridiculous, uncorroborated, politically motivated allegation is made.  Absurd logic.  

we also don't allow FBI investigations either. Pick your poison

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15864
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #55 on: September 27, 2018, 09:40:32 PM »
Avenatti is toast. Not even the Dems wanted him this time around. The timing makes even Gloria Allred look more reputable...

Kwon3

  • Guest
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #56 on: September 27, 2018, 10:47:21 PM »
we also don't allow FBI investigations either. Pick your poison
We allow 6 of them. When the 7th is at the request of a private citizen who has no further details to offer to her claims than what I can claim about your whereabouts last night, the government draws the line for the sake of decorum and respect for our institutions not being playdoh in the hands of every crank, liar, fanatic, and man-hating nut in the country. So sorry about that.

Kwon3

  • Guest
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #57 on: September 27, 2018, 10:48:46 PM »
Avenatti is toast. Not even the Dems wanted him this time around. The timing makes even Gloria Allred look more reputable...
He's not done milking this or any number of his other scams to stay relevant in the liberal news and make money he didn't earn through practicing his profession, since lawyers typically don't hold interviews on TV or organize open-air rallies for themselves unless they plan to, you know
become politicians

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #58 on: September 27, 2018, 11:01:05 PM »
We allow 6 of them. When the 7th is at the request of a private citizen who has no further details to offer to her claims than what I can claim about your whereabouts last night, the government draws the line for the sake of decorum and respect for our institutions not being playdoh in the hands of every crank, liar, fanatic, and man-hating nut in the country. So sorry about that.

Do you really believe that? I mean really

Kwon3

  • Guest
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #59 on: September 27, 2018, 11:02:46 PM »
Do you really believe that? I mean really
I believe the FBI is the most definitive and prestigious law enforcement branch in the United States, and should only be activated at the behest of the executive or prompted by crimes so serious they supersede the resources of local and state police, or fall outside their jurisdiction.

A girl who thinks some guy touched her whether yesterday or 40 years ago, regardless of how high up he is, does not have the right or power to demand an investigation by this venerable institution unless it's to become a farce of what it is today.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #60 on: September 27, 2018, 11:08:18 PM »
we also don't allow FBI investigations either. Pick your poison

Who is "we"? 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #61 on: September 27, 2018, 11:09:46 PM »
Avenatti is toast. Not even the Dems wanted him this time around. The timing makes even Gloria Allred look more reputable...

The most irritating woman in America.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #62 on: September 27, 2018, 11:10:31 PM »

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #63 on: September 27, 2018, 11:11:18 PM »
Oh look a talking point embraced by liberals in the past couple days.  

We don't turn due process on its head because someone isn't in a courtroom.  No, we don't force people going through Senate confirmation have to prove their innocence when a ridiculous, uncorroborated, politically motivated allegation is made.  Absurd logic.  

Its really not a talking point.. it's a FACT. Should he be read his miranda rights as well?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #64 on: September 27, 2018, 11:19:50 PM »
Republican senate

Do you know what would happen with a 7th FBI investigation? 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #65 on: September 27, 2018, 11:22:31 PM »
Its really not a talking point.. it's a FACT. Should he be read his miranda rights as well?

It's a talking point repeated by darn near every Democrat near a microphone. 

No, he doesn't need to be read his Miranda rights.  But in front of a U.S. Senate committee that has investigatory powers, someone accused of a crime should not have to prove the crime didn't happen.  Unless you're a leftwing boob, in which case someone can make an uncorroborated 36 year old allegation and have it presumed to be true. 

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #66 on: September 27, 2018, 11:26:10 PM »
It's a talking point repeated by darn near every Democrat near a microphone.  

No, he doesn't need to be read his Miranda rights.  But in front of a U.S. Senate committee that has investigatory powers, someone accused of a crime should not have to prove the crime didn't happen.  Unless you're a leftwing boob, in which case someone can make an uncorroborated 36 year old allegation and have it presumed to be true.  
 

We should all agree that because WE know the FBI is charged with doing background investigations on Supreme court nominees, that after the investigation "closes" if new info comes to light, it only stands to reason that an FBI investigation into the claims should be warranted. Especially if 3 people are claiming an issue. What is the harm? Whats the hurry? Facts should matter

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15864
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #67 on: September 27, 2018, 11:37:50 PM »
 

We should all agree that because WE know the FBI is charged with doing background investigations on Supreme court nominees, that after the investigation "closes" if new info comes to light, it only stands to reason that an FBI investigation into the claims should be warranted. Especially if 3 people are claiming an issue. What is the harm? Whats the hurry? Facts should matter


Translation = when the left loses they want a do-over.

The losing is just starting.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14984
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #68 on: September 27, 2018, 11:39:09 PM »

Translation = when the left loses they want a do-over.

The losing is just starting.

That is a sad translation.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #69 on: September 27, 2018, 11:54:02 PM »
 

We should all agree that because WE know the FBI is charged with doing background investigations on Supreme court nominees, that after the investigation "closes" if new info comes to light, it only stands to reason that an FBI investigation into the claims should be warranted. Especially if 3 people are claiming an issue. What is the harm? Whats the hurry? Facts should matter

Again, do you know what happens during and after an FBI investigation? 

Kwon3

  • Guest
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #70 on: September 28, 2018, 12:02:29 AM »
That is a sad translation.
You guys are a sad group.

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21140
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #71 on: September 28, 2018, 04:02:11 AM »
So according to the freshman roommate, he calls what he allegedly did to Ramirez and attack? The guy clearly has an axe to grind. If you’re playing spin the bottle drunk with a dildo, don’t be pissed when one of the dudes pulls his dick out. That is not an attack or assault.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22198
  • SC è un asino
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #72 on: September 28, 2018, 05:50:49 AM »
 

We should all agree that because WE know the FBI is charged with doing background investigations on Supreme court nominees, that after the investigation "closes" if new info comes to light, it only stands to reason that an FBI investigation into the claims should be warranted. Especially if 3 people are claiming an issue. What is the harm? Whats the hurry? Facts should matter

The hurry is the whole thing.  Stall tactics to wait until the midterms?

Is this not obvious?

Without the hurry, the democrats entire motive comes to fruition.
Y

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #73 on: September 28, 2018, 08:24:23 AM »
The hurry is the whole thing.  Stall tactics to wait until the midterms?

Is this not obvious?

Without the hurry, the democrats entire motive comes to fruition.


And how is it hurrying when they obtained a ton of documents, were able to read all of his over 300 opinions he wrote as a judge, question him privately, and question him during over 30 hours of confirmation hearings, plus yesterday's circus? 

Kwon3

  • Guest
Re: Avenatti?
« Reply #74 on: September 28, 2018, 08:32:14 AM »
And how is it hurrying when they obtained a ton of documents, were able to read all of his over 300 opinions he wrote as a judge, question him privately, and question him during over 30 hours of confirmation hearings, plus yesterday's circus? 
the circus is ongoing. Half the democrats left the hearing in the middle of the chairman's speech to go hold a publicity stunt press conference outside. If they really have something to say about the witness or the judge, shouldn't they have stayed inside and made their cases? No, they ran outside and whined like children who didn't get what they wanted. Typical liberals.