So someone who has a huge advantage, and improves that advantage by orders of magnitude, becoming one of the most successful persons on planet earth, is discounted because of where they started from? I don't think that's a reasonable take, but ok.
And let's not mention this man then became one of 46 people in American history to become POTUS, despite campaigns by the FBI, DOJ, Obama, the media, academia, Hollywood, etc. Plus did an outstanding job as POTUS.
He did all this while being involved with beautiful women and has a beautiful wife. And raised three successful kids and one rising adult.
The man's life is a Hollywood movie.
In addtion to mutliple divorces, adultery, admitting to sexual harrassment on tape, under multiple inditments, including fraud, paying hush money, slander and possibly election interference and inciting the capitol riot.
Also, refusing to leave office with dignity when losing the election, being impeached, poor leadership and handling of the COVID pandemic and the riots.
Yes, even without all the crap above, he still isn't one of America's greatest success stories.
IMO having a "huge advantage" disqualifies him from any consideration as one of America's greatest success stories.
He is a success story, no doubt. But he also a degenerate bafoon... who ran against another, far worse option for us and then lost to an even worse one than her?