Author Topic: Seth Feroce Photoshoot  (Read 1146 times)

Sir Humphrey

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1288
  • It's only gay if you want it to be.
Seth Feroce Photoshoot
« on: December 09, 2009, 06:30:06 AM »

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Seth Feroce Photoshoot
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2009, 07:34:18 AM »

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Seth Feroce Photoshoot
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2009, 07:40:03 AM »
he should be a solid pro, no doubt.

myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Seth Feroce Photoshoot
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2009, 12:01:07 PM »
he should be a solid pro, no doubt.

At least now I know who you were talking about in the top ten stories thread.  Is he going to be a 202 guy in the pros?  I agree with you that he has potential, but when I see his front poses I see the potential for a big waist if he decides to play the size game....looks great now though.  I'm curious as to why you pick him in your top ten when the black guy that won has IMO a lot more potential to go far in the pros?  I think his physique has the potential to be damn near the ideal for BB.  Sorry I don't know the names, but I haven't really followed the amateur shows since ESPN quit covering them.  I hate to only see contests in pics vs streaming vid or tv cuz it isn't as impressive to me.  I've always been most impressed by competitors that look "really good" when standing there, but then they just explode and come to life when they flex vs. those that just look huge.  i.e. Flex, Dex, Ronnie(even though he looked huge standing there too), and I hate to say it, but Shawno too :(

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40860
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Seth Feroce Photoshoot
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2009, 03:51:00 PM »
BTW Bob...he didn't have the best physique in the show...Cedric McMillan did.
7