Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on December 06, 2012, 06:51:25 AM
-
Thousands Of US Troops Arrive Near Syrian Shore On USS Eisenhower
Russia Today ^ | December 6, 2012
Posted on Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:34:30
The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention.
While the Obama administration has not announced any sort of American-led military intervention in the war-torn country, the US is now ready to launch such action "within days" if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad decides to use chemical weapons against the opposition, the Times reports.
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
-
Link plz
-
http://rt.com/usa/news/us-eisenhower-syria-military-369/
-
why isn't fox news reporting it?
www.foxnews.com has more important stories like:
DRIVEN BY FEAR:
Gun Sales Soaring
On Obama Ban Jitters
-
why isn't fox news reporting it?
www.foxnews.com has more important stories like:
DRIVEN BY FEAR:
Gun Sales Soaring
On Obama Ban Jitters
Seriously?
-
(http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_diefordollarbill.jpg)
-
why isn't fox news reporting it?
www.foxnews.com has more important stories like:
DRIVEN BY FEAR:
Gun Sales Soaring
On Obama Ban Jitters
Has MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS or any other network reported it? No? Shut the fuck up then.
-
why isn't fox news reporting it?
www.foxnews.com has more important stories like:
DRIVEN BY FEAR:
Gun Sales Soaring
On Obama Ban Jitters
shut up commy
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/06/demint-leaving-senate-to-head-heritage-foundation/?test=latestnews (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/06/demint-leaving-senate-to-head-heritage-foundation/?test=latestnews)
-
(http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_diefordollarbill.jpg)
Do you get that USA is the best?
no1?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States)
-
Do you get that USA is the best?
no1?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States)
-
Do you get that USA is the best?
no1?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States)
No just broke as *#@( LOLLLLLLLLL
ahhaahaha 17 trillions dollars in debt
I heard iran is trading oil in gold aaah y'all must be pissed even more.
First Saddam traded in euros, then Gadaffi oil for gold and silver, now Iran in gold. Yup I know you're craving with your bloodthirst bloodlust to start world war 3 because you are all sick in the head.
I heard China's doing real well.
(http://www.defence.pk/gallery/uploads/6995/215.jpg)
Yes yes yes I heard it before, everywhere else is crap, everywhere be dragons, everyone is evil, the USA is great, #1, hero of the world.
Mhmmm :)
-
Americans' understanding of the world:
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2784/4151253316_5f98e4cf84_o.gif)
Wait this one's more accurate:
(http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/world-accordign-to-USA.jpg)
-
No just broke as *#@( LOLLLLLLLLL
ahhaahaha 17 trillions dollars in debt
I heard iran is trading oil in gold aaah y'all must be pissed even more.
First Saddam traded in euros, then Gadaffi oil for gold and silver, now Iran in gold. Yup I know you're craving with your bloodthirst bloodlust to start world war 3 because you are all sick in the head.
I heard China's doing real well.
(http://www.defence.pk/gallery/uploads/6995/215.jpg)
Yes yes yes I heard it before, everywhere else is crap, everywhere be dragons, everyone is evil, the USA is great, #1, hero of the world.
Mhmmm :)
You respond to facts and figures with photos... haha
-
^Ah yes, hollywood posters/screens/advertisments to make the illusion more grandeur :D I get it!
New York is garbage lol. Filled with crime and elitist bizatches. Old, falling apart, people with attitude, rude, etc...
One just needs to whip out detroit pix, katrina pix, this recent storm that happened, and you realize quickly how much turmoil there is on your own soil, ghettos, abandoned homes, etc... etc... all falling apart.
The infrastructure in north america is pretty crappy.
Oh yes and screwed economically. Of course it's all the fault of them evil mozzlems :) Clearly starting 10 some wars and invading foreign lands was beneficial for you.
Yellow cab taxis... the success of America ;D You also invented rush hour, I am sure the world thanks you for this grandeur invention.
-
It's the Turks that want us there the most.
Where's Andre to tell us what a heroic fight we would be engaged in?
Or is that just apply to Libya?
-
Thousands Of US Troops Arrive Near Syrian Shore On USS Eisenhower
Russia Today ^ | December 6, 2012
Posted on Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:34:30
The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention.
While the Obama administration has not announced any sort of American-led military intervention in the war-torn country, the US is now ready to launch such action "within days" if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad decides to use chemical weapons against the opposition, the Times reports.
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
RT? Oh brother....this article is pretty sensationalist.
The U.S.S. Eisenhower has "8,000 troops on it"....oh man...
It's an aircraft carrier, it has sailors and Marines on board. It isn't a Marine amphibious assault ship and besides helicopters it doesn't have anyway of getting those "8,000 soldiers" onto any beach head.
What a horrible article.
What a crock. It's RT, though, so it is to be expected.
-
I'm crossing my fingers that Hezbollah finally steps in so we can watch the two biggest Shia/Sunni terrorist dipshit groups kill each other.
-
RT? Oh brother....this article is pretty sensationalist.
The U.S.S. Eisenhower has "8,000 troops on it"....oh man...
It's an aircraft carrier, it has sailors and Marines on board. It isn't a Marine amphibious assault ship and besides helicopters it doesn't have anyway of getting those "8,000 soldiers" onto any beach head.
What a horrible article.
What a crock. It's RT, though, so it is to be expected.
Reason.com also was reporting on this today.
-
It's not a crock, carriers don't travel alone...plenty of other ships with it.
But, I highly highly doubt Barry will send in ground forces. Highly doubt it.
I'm crossing my fingers that Hezbollah finally steps in so we can watch the two biggest Shia/Sunni terrorist dipshit groups kill each other.
A dream [we hope]comes true.
-
It's not a crock, carriers don't travel alone...plenty of other ships with it.
But, I highly highly doubt Barry will send in ground forces. Highly doubt it.
A dream [we hope]comes true.
I'm curious, actually. There are reports that Assad has loaded sarin gas into both artillery shells and missiles and that the Syria army is just waiting on his command. The US/EU/other assholes have said that chemical weapons are a red line. Do you think we get involved if he starts using them? I think it's all talk but it'll be interesting.
I'm surprised Hezbollah hasn't outright entered the war yet. They've got divisions and clandestine operatives fighting on the ground but they haven't fully committed. They're going to be completely isolated should Assad fall.
-
I'm curious, actually. There are reports that Assad has loaded sarin gas into both artillery shells and missiles and that the Syria army is just waiting on his command. The US/EU/other assholes have said that chemical weapons are a red line. Do you think we get involved if he starts using them? I think it's all talk but it'll be interesting.
I'm surprised Hezbollah hasn't outright entered the war yet. They've got divisions and clandestine operatives fighting on the ground but they haven't fully committed. They're going to be completely isolated should Assad fall.
My opinion is yes, especially if the Turks want it. Even though I don't care for Obama's politics, he doesn't fuck around with these things.
He's more interested in keeping Turkey happy and trying to remain on good terms and we need them as allies (well...we'll say *cough* allies *cough*) from a strategic point of view.
Probably air strikes.
And probably under the guise of NATO - which is basically us, lol. Maybe AL too, don't know where they stand.
-
It's not a crock, carriers don't travel alone...plenty of other ships with it.
But, I highly highly doubt Barry will send in ground forces. Highly doubt it.
A dream [we hope]comes true.
Unless there are a few amphibious assault ships in that carrier battle group the strike force won't be putting down any Marines anytime soon. Plus the Ike only has about 5000, with about 1/2 being the air wing, on board. The entire CGS has around 8000. And it doesn't carry 8 fighter/bomber squadrons, maybe 4-5 for strike aircraft with the rest (90-100 total fixed wing) being support/EW etc.
I'm not saying shit won't go down if Syria cooks of nerve agents but that strike force isn't going to be the one to put boots on the ground.
And it looks like Ike is on its way home for maintenance, repairs and some downtime. Just in time for Christmas.
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=70781 (http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=70781)
-
33, RT is one of those 911 CT websites, aren't they?
Are they credible just some of the time? Like being sorta pregnant?
-
Unless there are a few amphibious assault ships in that carrier battle group the strike force won't be putting down any Marines anytime soon. Plus the Ike only has about 5000, with about 1/2 being the air wing, on board. The entire CGS has around 8000. And it doesn't carry 8 fighter/bomber squadrons, maybe 4-5 for strike aircraft with the rest (90-100 total fixed wing) being support/EW etc.
I'm not saying shit won't go down if Syria cooks of nerve agents but that strike force isn't going to be the one to put boots on the ground.
And it looks like Ike is on its way home for maintenance, repairs and some downtime. Just in time for Christmas.
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=70781 (http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=70781)
You don't need amphibious assault ships to put troops on the ground. You've been watching too many movies.
And I assure you that neither you or I have knowledge of their full transport capability. But we've seen more than 8k on humanitarian missions. No way I'm gonna buy we couldn't do it for a military assault.
I agree...we won't go in via the ground, or highly doubt it. And 8k wouldn't do much anyway.
Hell, for all I know Eisenhower may not even hang around. Could just be a show.
But it's far from a crock to think we couldn't drop 8k without much of a problem.
-
You don't need amphibious assault ships to put troops on the ground. You've been watching too many movies.
And I assure you that neither you or I have knowledge of their full transport capability. But we've seen more than 8k on humanitarian missions. No way I'm gonna buy we couldn't do it for a military assault.
I agree...we won't go in via the ground, or highly doubt it. And 8k wouldn't do much anyway.
Hell, for all I know Eisenhower may not even hang around. Could just be a show.
But it's far from a crock to think we couldn't drop 8k without much of a problem.
Those much vaunted "8 thousand soldiers" are the personnel manning the CSG. Not an entire brigade waiting to make landfall. Those "8 thousand soldiers" aren't going drop anchor, leave their posts on the bridge, maintenance and such to pick up a rifle and swim to shore or catch a helicopter...and those humanitarian missions didn't have to worry about bringing along Abrams, Bradley IFV's and the like.
And no shit you don't need amphibious assault ships to put down troops, but if you're looking to put down any number that would make a difference what are you going to be using? Helicopters? From where? How long would that take? Using what soldiers? Airlift them in? Again, from where? How are you going to get armor/light wheeled transport/heavy weapons etc on the beach quickly without seaborne transport? Those troops have to be stowed away somewhere and you won't be stuffing a combat brigade on an already loaded aircraft carrier. Dropping 8k can be done relatively easily, it just won't be from this strike group.
I'm not arguing that boots will be put on the ground and airstrikes will be carried out if Syria starts using chemical/biological agents in this conflict, it just seems that RT is jumping the gun a bit on this one.
This story is full of sensationalist BS. It took a few minutes worth of poking around on the internet to figure that out.
-
hahaahaaa were going to send everyone from the ship on to land to fight :D you don't need personal on the ship they're going to just set the burglar alarm before they leave :D :D :D :D :D
-
when you use foreign newspapers - from a nation called our #1 strategic enemy - this is what you get.
-
Those much vaunted "8 thousand soldiers" are the personnel manning the CSG. Not an entire brigade waiting to make landfall. Those "8 thousand soldiers" aren't going drop anchor, leave their posts on the bridge, maintenance and such to pick up a rifle and swim to shore or catch a helicopter...and those humanitarian missions didn't have to worry about bringing along Abrams, Bradley IFV's and the like.
I'm not saying that and neither is the article. I guess your thinking that.
Again...looking at everything, it's every bit possible that they have 8k around the area with all the other ships to put in there (obviously not the crew...since you can't seem to pick that up).
And again, you don't know what that carrier is loaded with. You don't know if they have all their squads, you don't know if they're running full squads.
You don't know shit about the current compliment and like typical GB'r you start making shit up, claiming it's already loaded.
Hell...I don't even buy the 8k number as being all that accurate...and the Navy isn't going to release exact compliments.
Is it probable? For the 3rd time I highly doubt it. Is it that far beyond the realm of possible...hell no.
And no shit you don't need amphibious assault ships to put down troops, but if you're looking to put down any number that would make a difference what are you going to be using? Helicopters? From where? How long would that take? Using what soldiers? Airlift them in? Again, from where? How are you going to get armor/light wheeled transport/heavy weapons etc on the beach quickly without seaborne transport? Those troops have to be stowed away somewhere and you won't be stuffing a combat brigade on an already loaded aircraft carrier. Dropping 8k can be done relatively easily, it just won't be from this strike group.
Do you even know the basic geography?
They've got like what...a 120 miles along the med. To the north is Turkey, to the south is Israel.
Even if the carrier and other ships are smack in the mid point, they could just go either way and dock - quickly.
Imagine that....DOCK the ship, and let the soldiers walk and drive their equipment off!!!
Wow...that's sophisticated, huh?
But, no according to you it's gotta be some Rambo operation with helo's going into the middle of a gun fight...and for some reason you think it has to be on a beach. ::)
Like I said...too much television.
I'm not arguing that boots will be put on the ground and airstrikes will be carried out if Syria starts using chemical/biological agents in this conflict, it just seems that RT is jumping the gun a bit on this one.
This story is full of sensationalist BS. It took a few minutes worth of poking around on the internet to figure that out.
Yeah...and I just don't see any sensationalism.
I suppose since you're thinking that the crew has to go in too, no equipment, Rambo style...and for whatever reason you think other people are thinking that stupidly.....well I guess that would be sensational.
Porting at Haifa and simply unloading...man you didn't get that from the internet...I can't imagine lol.
-
hahaahaaa were going to send everyone from the ship on to land to fight :D you don't need personal on the ship they're going to just set the burglar alarm before they leave :D :D :D :D :D
I know right! Can't just dock the fucking ship and have the regular crew stay aboard. Gotta be some elaborate plan. ::)
Hell, I'll join in:
So all the crew swims in to fight the Syrians. While gone, the Israeli's start stealing all the shit on our ships. We call the Turks for help and they come down to chase off the Israeli's.
But, when we get our ships back, we realize we can't move them until we buy back all our stolen equipment from the Israeli's.
Obama and congress pass a "foreign aid" bill to Israel and we get our shit back.
Ahmed gets pissed about the aid, Syria has now been conquered by our sailors, and the ships head home.
A few minutes on the internet enabled me to see all this. :D
-
I'm not saying that and neither is the article. I guess your thinking that.
Again...looking at everything, it's every bit possible that they have 8k around the area with all the other ships to put in there (obviously not the crew...since you can't seem to pick that up).
And again, you don't know what that carrier is loaded with. You don't know if they have all their squads, you don't know if they're running full squads.
You don't know shit about the current compliment and like typical GB'r you start making shit up, claiming it's already loaded.
Hell...I don't even buy the 8k number as being all that accurate...and the Navy isn't going to release exact compliments.
Is it probable? For the 3rd time I highly doubt it. Is it that far beyond the realm of possible...hell no.
Do you even know the basic geography?
They've got like what...a 120 miles along the med. To the north is Turkey, to the south is Israel.
Even if the carrier and other ships are smack in the mid point, they could just go either way and dock - quickly.
Imagine that....DOCK the ship, and let the soldiers walk and drive their equipment off!!!
Wow...that's sophisticated, huh?
But, no according to you it's gotta be some Rambo operation with helo's going into the middle of a gun fight...and for some reason you think it has to be on a beach. ::)
Like I said...too much television.
Yeah...and I just don't see any sensationalism.
I suppose since you're thinking that the crew has to go in too, no equipment, Rambo style...and for whatever reason you think other people are thinking that stupidly.....well I guess that would be sensational.
Porting at Haifa and simply unloading...man you didn't get that from the internet...I can't imagine lol.
That's a whole load of shit from someone who doesn't know anything.
Substituting insults for substance. Talk about a typical GB'r.
Carry on.
-
Do you even know the basic geography?
They've got like what...a 120 miles along the med. To the north is Turkey, to the south is Israel.
Even if the carrier and other ships are smack in the mid point, they could just go either way and dock - quickly.
Imagine that....DOCK the ship, and let the soldiers walk and drive their equipment off!!!
Wow...that's sophisticated, huh?
But, no according to you it's gotta be some Rambo operation with helo's going into the middle of a gun fight...and for some reason you think it has to be on a beach.
Like I said...too much television.
Yeah...and I just don't see any sensationalism.
I suppose since you're thinking that the crew has to go in too, no equipment, Rambo style...and for whatever reason you think other people are thinking that stupidly.....well I guess that would be sensational.
Porting at Haifa and simply unloading...man you didn't get that from the internet...I can't imagine lol.
The above has to be some of the dumbest shit I've read in a long time. You have HUGE reading comprehension problems or simply see what you want to see.
Where did I say the sailors where going to invade Syria? Where did I say it was going to be a "Rambo" operation? I never said that they would be jumping in helicopters either, those words had "?" after them if you missed that. I never said it had to be an amphibious assault, either. Again, can you read? I was simply pointing out that the ENTIRE CSG has around 8,000 navy/airmen/some Marines. That is the number RT is using and bending to make it seem like there are 8,000 soldiers ready to make landfall and hit Syria. This isn't hard to understand.
If that CSG doesn't have amphibious or troop transport ships they aren't disembarking any force in Haifa or storming any beaches anywhere.
-
Those two posts of mine were kinda mean.
I'm sorry.
And high.
-
Those two posts of mine were kinda mean.
I'm sorry.
And high.
;D
-
No just broke as *#@( LOLLLLLLLLL
ahhaahaha 17 trillions dollars in debt
I heard iran is trading oil in gold aaah y'all must be pissed even more.
First Saddam traded in euros, then Gadaffi oil for gold and silver, now Iran in gold. Yup I know you're craving with your bloodthirst bloodlust to start world war 3 because you are all sick in the head.
I heard China's doing real well.
(http://www.defence.pk/gallery/uploads/6995/215.jpg)
Yes yes yes I heard it before, everywhere else is crap, everywhere be dragons, everyone is evil, the USA is great, #1, hero of the world.
Mhmmm :)
Hong Kong - looking EXACTLY the same as it did when the British handed it back to China...
Interesting choice of pictures.
-
(http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_diefordollarbill.jpg)
So you think Syrians should be left to use chemical weapons on their fellow Muslims?
-
^Ah yes, hollywood posters/screens/advertisments to make the illusion more grandeur :D I get it!
New York is garbage lol. Filled with crime and elitist bizatches. Old, falling apart, people with attitude, rude, etc...
One just needs to whip out detroit pix, katrina pix, this recent storm that happened, and you realize quickly how much turmoil there is on your own soil, ghettos, abandoned homes, etc... etc... all falling apart.
The infrastructure in north america is pretty crappy.
Oh yes and screwed economically. Of course it's all the fault of them evil mozzlems :) Clearly starting 10 some wars and invading foreign lands was beneficial for you.
Yellow cab taxis... the success of America ;D You also invented rush hour, I am sure the world thanks you for this grandeur invention.
Have you been to China?
It is filled with waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more shit than any US city.
Shanghai has a lovely harbour - but you go 20 clicks out of town & you will see people living in extreme poverty. Nothing in the US compares to the filth, poverty and oppression that these people endure daily.
China... lol...
-
Have you been to China?
It is filled with waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more shit than any US city.
Shanghai has a lovely harbour - but you go 20 clicks out of town & you will see people living in extreme poverty. Nothing in the US compares to the filth, poverty and oppression that these people endure daily.
China... lol...
Dont worry if republicans get their way soon the US will be filled with filth, povery and oppression as well.
-
The above has to be some of the dumbest shit I've read in a long time. You have HUGE reading comprehension problems or simply see what you want to see.
Where did I say the sailors where going to invade Syria? Where did I say it was going to be a "Rambo" operation? I never said that they would be jumping in helicopters either, those words had "?" after them if you missed that. I never said it had to be an amphibious assault, either. Again, can you read? I was simply pointing out that the ENTIRE CSG has around 8,000 navy/airmen/some Marines. That is the number RT is using and bending to make it seem like there are 8,000 soldiers ready to make landfall and hit Syria. This isn't hard to understand.
If that CSG doesn't have amphibious or troop transport ships they aren't disembarking any force in Haifa or storming any beaches anywhere.
Haha, haven't seen this kind of backtracking since my tour through the Catepillar plant.
Yeah...ok dude. That's what people are thinking...all 8K jumping ship and going into Syria. ::)
Yep...you knew all about SIMPLY docking the ship.
Those were just questions, lololol. ;)
Goddamn I love this board.
-
Dont worry if republicans get their way soon the US will be filled with filth, povery and oppression as well.
And the Dems are going to save us?
-
And the Dems are going to save us?
So far. Yes.
Unemployment dropping. Consumer spending rising. House sales up. Dow at ridiculous levels. Chrysler and gm innovating new cars and sales up.....
Is there any anti-american things you want to say, skip? Is good news for america bad news for you? Are you a communist or muslim skip? They enjoy bad news for america....do you share that?
-
So far. Yes.
Unemployment dropping. Consumer spending rising. House sales up. Dow at ridiculous levels. Chrysler and gm innovating new cars and sales up.....
Is there any anti-american things you want to say, skip? Is good news for america bad news for you? Are you a communist or muslim skip? They enjoy bad news for america....do you share that?
None of these have an overall trend.
Are you an idiot?
Do you understand long term trending as opposed to temp spikes in either direction?
I don't jump into these threads normally to claim success or victory for either side on short term spikes. I'll leave that for you to cry about.
If we've got a long term changes that are statistically significant, then let's see them.
-
None of these have an overall trend.
Are you an idiot?
Do you understand long term trending as opposed to temp spikes in either direction?
I don't jump into these threads normally to claim success or victory for either side on short term spikes. I'll leave that for you to cry about.
If we've got a long term changes that are statistically significant, then let's see them.
Temp spikes is an improvement over 2008 where your guy left office so i dont get your complaints?
-
So far. Yes.
Unemployment dropping. Consumer spending rising. House sales up. Dow at ridiculous levels. Chrysler and gm innovating new cars and sales up.....
Is there any anti-american things you want to say, skip? Is good news for america bad news for you? Are you a communist or muslim skip? They enjoy bad news for america....do you share that?
Re-read skippy. Im giving you another chance.
-
Haha, haven't seen this kind of backtracking since my tour through the Catepillar plant.
Yeah...ok dude. That's what people are thinking...all 8K jumping ship and going into Syria. ::)
Yep...you knew all about SIMPLY docking the ship.
Those were just questions, lololol. ;)
Goddamn I love this board.
Lack of comprehension skills are on full display from Skippy, it seems.
When you are unable to make your point I guess ignoring context and such can help.
Sad.
-
Temp spikes is an improvement over 2008 where your guy left office so i dont get your complaints?
How so? These aren't just upward spikes,
-
Re-read skippy. Im giving you another chance.
You've either got the data or you don't. Hit me with it!
-
How so? These aren't just upward spikes,
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
Looks like unemployment has fallen from 9,9 in nov 2009 to 7,7 this nov.
Im a little high so might have read it wrong.
-
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
Looks like unemployment has fallen from 9,9 in nov 2009 to 7,7 this nov.
Im a little high so might have read it wrong.
Yeah, this is what I mean. Don't just take a month out. look overall.
You can see from 2009 to now the up and back down, and even now we're sitting about a point or so off with the beginning of the year a little higher...then moving back down.
So, if it continues, then I think you may have some argument.
If 2013 and on, doesn't show a continuance, then you're hard pressed to make the claim.
-
Yeah, this is what I mean. Don't just take a month out. look overall.
You can see from 2009 to now the up and back down, and even now we're sitting about a point or so off with the beginning of the year a little higher...then moving back down.
So, if it continues, then I think you may have some argument.
If 2013 and on, doesn't show a continuance, then you're hard pressed to make the claim.
I think the farther we got from 2008 the better the economy will get.
Until the next crash of course.
-
I think the farther we got from 2008 the better the economy will get.
Until the next crash of course.
Things are not getting better. Go back to bed
-
Things are not getting better. Go back to bed
Im pretty sure the economy is better now than in 08.
-
Im pretty sure the economy is better now than in 08.
I can see 33333 laying in his bed with arms and legs flailing....."NO ITS NOT, NO ITS NOT, NO ITS NOT"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
I can see 33333 laying in his bed with arms and legs flailing....."NO ITS NOT, NO ITS NOT, NO ITS NOT"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Its a little weird.
His business should be getting better as well as the rest of the economy but maybe he runs his business the way he posts.
Calling people commies, Thugs etc.
Imagine he is in a court where the judge is black and holds him in contemt or something. Thug!
Or a private citizen is suing a corporation. Communist!
-
Good thing your opinion means jack shit.
Ask the tens of millions of Americans without jobs and who can't find work if the economy is better now.
Yes, the economy and the job market are doing so well that the Federal Reserve is going to introduce a FOURTH round of Q.E.!
8-12 months from now, maybe earlier, the Fed will begin another propaganda campaign for Q.E. 5. It will be exactly the same rationale for Q.E. 1-4.
-
Good thing your opinion means jack shit.
Ask the tens of millions of Americans without jobs and who can't find work if the economy is better now.
How is the economy Fury?
-
BREAKING NEWS Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:18 PM EST
Syrian Forces Have Fired Scud Missiles at Insurgents, U.S. Says
Syrian forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad have fired Scud missiles at rebel fighters in recent days, Obama administration officials said on Wednesday.
The move represents a significant escalation in the fighting, which has already killed more than 40,000 civilians in a nearly two-year-old conflict that has threatened to destabilize the Middle East.
One American official, who asked not to be identified because he was discussing classified information, said that missiles had been fired from the Damascus area at targets in northern Syria.
“The total is number is probably north of six now,” said another American official, and that the targets were in areas controlled by the Free Syrian Army, the main armed insurgent group.
READ MORE »
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/world/middleeast/syria-war-developments-assad.html?emc=na
-
I dont believe it until I've read it on infowars AND RT.
-
3333 are you hoping for another war so it puts the U.S. in more debt???
And another thing...Its the idea of loading chemical gas in those scuds that will cause action......not just more civil fighting.
-
3333 are you hoping for another war so it puts the U.S. in more debt???
And another thing...Its the idea of loading chemical gas in those scuds that will cause action......not just more civil fighting.
Yes - muslims killing each other off is a good thing