Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Religious Debates & Threads => Topic started by: Butterbean on April 15, 2006, 01:52:42 PM

Title: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 15, 2006, 01:52:42 PM
Hi Johnny,
I just saw your post in reply to me on the GT board re: you used to be a Christian.  I thought I'd continue that conversation over here on the proper board if you don't mind.

When I asked you if you had (earlier in your life) believed you were a sinner and accepted Jesus as your Lord and Savior your response was that you "used to be a big Jesus Freak."

So my first question is:  Back then, did you believe that you were a sinner in need of a savior, and did you accept what Jesus did by dying on the cross for your sins and rising again?  Did you indeed accept Him as your savior?





****please only answer what you are comfortable with, and if you would prefer, we could PM****




Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 15, 2006, 02:45:22 PM
I went through the whole "accepting jesus as your savior" phase. At the time I didn't think twice about it so I never realized how it made absolutely no sense. I always thought I was a sinner everytime I lied or cheated or what have you. I always felt guilty whenever i'd do the most trivial things that hurt no one.

Then I realized christianity is bullshit and felt guilty no longer for victimless acts.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 15, 2006, 05:10:39 PM


Then I realized christianity is bullshit and felt guilty no longer for victimless acts.

Is there a course of events that made you change your mind?  If so, would you please share them? 



Did you attend a Catholic church?



Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oliver Klaushof on April 15, 2006, 09:36:54 PM
Shut up Stella.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 16, 2006, 07:54:23 AM
Is there a course of events that made you change your mind?  If so, would you please share them? 



Did you attend a Catholic church?


I don't remember since It was so long ago. I went to catholic church for a short time then baptist then methodist. I don't remember the exact chain of events that led me to realizing religion is nonsense.
Do you remember the exact chain of events that led you to realizing santa claus doesn't exist?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 16, 2006, 05:30:57 PM
Shut up Stella.

Hey mansolivier!  I thought we were buddies! 
 :)




BTW, it looks like "our other buddy" has been quite active recently.....I guess it's pretty hard to stay away from here :D

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 16, 2006, 05:40:21 PM

I don't remember since It was so long ago. I went to catholic church for a short time then baptist then methodist. I don't remember the exact chain of events that led me to realizing religion is nonsense.
Do you remember the exact chain of events that led you to realizing santa claus doesn't exist?

Do you mind if I ask the number of years between your "realizing religion is nonsense" and now?

How old are you (only if you wish to share)?  (we can always PM)


As for Santa and I....I was quite a young child when Santa was really mentioned.....I never really believed in him as a person.  My mom thought to tell us he was a real living person would be a lie.  She told us he "represented the spirit of Christmas" or something....such as people giving gifts freely...etc.

In fact I asked her about my feelings about Santa today (while thinking of your post) and she said I thought he was mean because I would see kids crying on his lap in the mall.  I guess I thought people dressed up as him were being mean to them to make them cry ???
It could probably have just his breath! :P....... :)
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 16, 2006, 06:35:54 PM
Do you remember the exact chain of events that led you to realizing santa claus doesn't exist?
Actually he did, but not in the pagan American sense.

http://www.stnicholascenter.org/Brix?pageID=35
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 17, 2006, 05:38:33 AM
Do you mind if I ask the number of years between your "realizing religion is nonsense" and now?

How old are you (only if you wish to share)?  (we can always PM)

25 now and was around 15 when I realized religion was nonsense.


As for Santa and I....I was quite a young child when Santa was really mentioned.....I never really believed in him as a person.  My mom thought to tell us he was a real living person would be a lie.  She told us he "represented the spirit of Christmas" or something....such as people giving gifts freely...etc.

In fact I asked her about my feelings about Santa today (while thinking of your post) and she said I thought he was mean because I would see kids crying on his lap in the mall.  I guess I thought people dressed up as him were being mean to them to make them cry ???
It could probably have just his breath! :P....... :)

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: freespirit on April 17, 2006, 05:55:24 AM
25 now and was around 15 when I realized religion was nonsense.



But is religion the same as spirituality?

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 17, 2006, 06:22:34 AM
But is religion the same as spirituality?




Not really. Spirituality is just belief in supernatural and what not I suppose. Religion is organized.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 17, 2006, 10:04:18 AM
I went through the whole "accepting jesus as your savior" phase. At the time I didn't think twice about it so I never realized how it made absolutely no sense. I always thought I was a sinner everytime I lied or cheated or what have you. I always felt guilty whenever i'd do the most trivial things that hurt no one.

Then I realized christianity is bullshit and felt guilty no longer for victimless acts.

So you took the easy way out? If you WERE believer then you realize that walking with the Lord is the hardest thing a Christian can do!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 17, 2006, 10:07:52 AM
So you took the easy way out? If you WERE believer then you realize that walking with the Lord is the hardest thing a Christian can do!


Admiting your beliefs are wrong and you wasted years in those beliefs isn't easy. ::)
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 17, 2006, 10:12:26 AM

Admiting your beliefs are wrong and you wasted years in those beliefs isn't easy. ::)

what a miserable way to live life.   :(
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 17, 2006, 10:47:22 AM
what a miserable way to live life.   :(


Ending an illogical belief is miserable? ::)
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 17, 2006, 11:15:21 AM
The thing is, if Johnny truly accepted Jesus as Savior, Johnny is saved :D
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 17, 2006, 11:18:49 AM
The thing is, if Johnny truly accepted Jesus as Savior, Johnny is saved :D

The only ultimate sin is turning your back on Him!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 17, 2006, 11:26:41 AM
Jesus isn't saviour of anything. He(Assuming he existed) was a jew who lived about 2,000 years ago and was a preacher. That's it.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 17, 2006, 12:06:22 PM
Jesus isn't saviour of anything. He(Assuming he existed) was a jew who lived about 2,000 years ago and was a preacher. That's it.

Wrong again, JA. 
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: GET_BIGGER on April 17, 2006, 12:14:46 PM
The thing is, if Johnny truly accepted Jesus as Savior, Johnny is saved :D

Ahhh geez.  Once saved always saved?  I think thats a whole nother debate in itself.....
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 17, 2006, 12:28:10 PM
Wrong again, JA. 



Really? Prove it.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 17, 2006, 02:34:01 PM


Really? Prove it.

You prove it.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 17, 2006, 02:54:03 PM
Ahhh geez.  Once saved always saved?  I think thats a whole nother debate in itself.....

I know!  Can of worms ;D
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: w8tlftr on April 17, 2006, 07:45:19 PM
I keep waiting for Johnny to fall to the ground, start stomping his feet,  and hold his breath until his face turns blue and he passes out.  ::)

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 18, 2006, 07:07:12 AM
You prove it.


Burden on him. He said I'm "wrong" so the burden of proof is on him not me.

Look up "Burden of proof".
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: snatch_clean on April 18, 2006, 09:56:41 AM
The thing is, if Johnny truly accepted Jesus as Savior, Johnny is saved :D

Now that is a nice grandgfather clause right there. So now if Johhny goes on a murdering rampage killing at will, having sex with cows and horses and stealing lying hurting everything and everyone would he still be saved because he has already checked into the airplane taking him to heaven?

What if someone has taken Jesus into his heart and then goes about killing and murdering in the name of Jesus is he let in?
What about another man who is a philanthropist who does not believe in JC but lives an honest life, pays his taxes, helps his employees is a good father and husband. Someone like Sri Vivekananda whose whole life is one charity and who is a transcendentalist, is he doomed to hell?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: GET_BIGGER on April 18, 2006, 10:03:27 AM
How could we possibly know the way God judges his own people?  We don't.  We have no idea what his criteria is and what he will truly see when he looks into our heart on judgement day.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 18, 2006, 02:21:59 PM
Quote from: snatch_clean
Now that is a nice grandgfather clause right there. So now if Johhny goes on a murdering rampage killing at will, having sex with cows and horses and stealing lying hurting everything and everyone would he still be saved because he has already checked into the airplane taking him to heaven?

What if someone has taken Jesus into his as$ and then goes about killing and murdering in the name of Jesus is he let in?
What about another man who is a philanthropist who does not believe in JFC but lives an honest life, pays his taxes, helps his employees is a good father and husband. Someone like Sri Vivekananda whose whole life is one charity and who is a transcendentalist, is he doomed to hell?

Yeah, I have issues with stuff like that too, SC.  But I know that's the "fleshly" side of who I am and not the spiritual person that God asks us to be.  The fallable human side of me thinks it's totally unfair that people someone could go on a crazy killing spree (Ted Bundy for example) yet if he truly repents for his ways, God is gracious enough to forgive him and could even do a work in his heart to bring others to Christ.  But it's not that hard to conceive when you read in the Bible that Saul/later to be name Paul the Apostle would do this very thing.  He persecuted Christians like you and Johnny Apollo love to do verbally.  Yet Paul goes on to be the greatest advocate for Christ.  He was the "been there, done that, got the t-shirt" kinda guy.  Still, the mortal aspect of who I am things it SUCKS that people with crackpipe ideologies like you and Johnny Apollo get to go to heaven should you ultimately come to know and accept Christ as your Lord and Savior.  But thankfully, I don't get to choose who goes to heaven.  God does not want anyone to condemn themselves ('cause that's what you're doing if you don't choose Himm) to hell. 

The parable of the worker in Matthew 20 is another good example of how gracious God is towards all.  And I hear you when you speak of the man who does good things all his life, yet is condemned to hell should he not accept Christ.  Matthew 19 has a great parable of a rich man who had followed all the laws, was a good person, yet he had not accepted Christ fully.  He was too proud (JA- I'm thinking of you right now, bro) to let go of his money (or knowledge in yours or JA's case) and walked away, because he didn't want to give up everything. 
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: w8tlftr on April 18, 2006, 06:34:19 PM
Where you place your treasures is where you will find your heart.

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 18, 2006, 06:39:35 PM
Hi Johnny.  Thanks for answering questions.

I have another for you that I asked before but didn't see your response if you did answer my question.

You implied that Christianity and religion are nonsense on another thread.

My question is:

Why do you spend so much time thinking about and posting about Christianity and religion if you believe they are nonsense?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: GET_BIGGER on April 19, 2006, 08:07:19 AM
I think he was hurt....
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 19, 2006, 08:46:03 PM
My question is:

Why do you spend so much time thinking about and posting about Christianity and religion if you believe they are nonsense?

STella it's like this:
I used to sell expensive vacuums door to door. A lot of people bought them. But every once in awhile you get a customer who got bad service and will do ANYTHING to make sure other people don't have the same thing happen. Of course there are others that have gotten great service and recommend the cleaner.

Johnny is the guy who got BAD SERVICE! ;D
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 20, 2006, 08:23:09 AM
Hi Johnny.  Thanks for answering questions.

I have another for you that I asked before but didn't see your response if you did answer my question.

You implied that Christianity and religion are nonsense on another thread.

My question is:

Why do you spend so much time thinking about and posting about Christianity and religion if you believe they are nonsense?


Because religion is dangerous. Case in point September 11th 2001. This was due to religion. Over 2,000 people died because of religion and it's nonsense.

Religion isn't based on a foundation of logic and reason so the people who believe in it by definition aren't logical or reasonable. You could even say they are mentaly ill. Religion is like neurosis. Anyone who believes in some magical being who made the world and watches over us all and believes some old book which is actually composed of dozens of books by various random authors is the "word of God" CAN'T be sane!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 20, 2006, 08:28:06 AM
So really, your issue is with Religion, and not GOD. 
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 20, 2006, 08:40:25 AM
So really, your issue is with Religion, and not GOD. 


By definition belief in a GOD is defined as religion.

Any belief in a supernatural power which controls human destiny is a religion. A "God" would be such a belief. Well the Christian,Jewish,Muslim God atleast.
Deism probably isn't a religion since the God in deism doesn't interfere with humans.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 20, 2006, 10:53:04 AM

By definition belief in a GOD is defined as religion.

Any belief in a supernatural power which controls human destiny is a religion. A "God" would be such a belief. Well the Christian,Jewish,Muslim God atleast.
Deism probably isn't a religion since the God in deism doesn't interfere with humans.
Okay, if that's true why isn't Witchery a "religion"? It's considered more of a CULT. Just my 2 cents.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 20, 2006, 11:05:00 AM
Okay, if that's true why isn't Witchery a "religion"? It's considered more of a CULT. Just my 2 cents.


It is. It's called "Wicca".
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 20, 2006, 11:18:31 AM
Sorry, JA, but you keep trying to put God in a box.  Can't be done, bro.  Try as you might, you can't do it. 

And I think we're finally getting somewhere.  You've just got some serious hang-ups about religion, which tells me the source of your anger probably starts there.  Again, so what happened?  You've conveniently said that you don't remember when you "finally figured that this was all bull."  Have you just tried to block it all out in your crusade against Christianity? 
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 20, 2006, 11:26:08 AM
Sorry, JA, but you keep trying to put God in a box.  Can't be done, bro.  Try as you might, you can't do it. 

And I think we're finally getting somewhere.  You've just got some serious hang-ups about religion, which tells me the source of your anger probably starts there.  Again, so what happened?  You've conveniently said that you don't remember when you "finally figured that this was all bull."  Have you just tried to block it all out in your crusade against Christianity? 


The only one putting an omnipotent being in a "Box" is you with your illogical mumbo jumbo trying to get out of the fallacies of christianity.

You state that starvation and pain and suffering exist in this world because 2 people 6,000 years ago "sinned"? And God can't fix that? If THAT isn't putting "God in a box" I don't know what the fuck is.

You state that "God works in mysterious ways" when you see bad things happening to good people. THAT isn't putting "God in a box"?

The only one putting "God in a box" would be YOU. I on the other hand realize that a "God" if such a thing existed could do ANYTHING to make the world better and if it were moral WOULD do everything to make the world better. In short if a god exists and it were a moral god,The world would not be anything like it is today.

You're limiting the power of omnipotent beings by trying to make them fit into the description in some ancient manuscripts written by goat herders 2,000 years ago! Don't talk to me about "putting god in a box" when I put absolutely no limits on the potential power of omnipotent beings.


Secondly my "hang ups" about religion stem from study into religion. I KNOW alot about religion therefor I realize it's dangerous. Christianity=Religion wether you like it or not. You are so blinded by your dogma you can't see how absurd and illogical and potentially dangerous religion actually is.
I don't know the exact date I realized religion is nonsense as I stated before. It was a gradual process. Detailed investigation into theology and history and science led me to realize religion/spiritual beliefs are absurd.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 20, 2006, 11:32:29 AM
Quote from: Johnny Apollo

The only one putting an omnipotent being in a "Box" is you with your illogical mumbo jumbo trying to get out of the fallacies of christianity.

You state that starvation and pain and suffering exist in this world because 2 people 6,000 years ago "sinned"? And God can't fix that? If THAT isn't putting "God in a box" I don't know what the f**k is.

You state that "God works in mysterious ways" when you see bad things happening to good people. THAT isn't putting "God in a box"?

The only one putting "God in a box" would be YOU. I on the other hand realize that a "God" if such a thing existed could do ANYTHING to make the world better and if it were moral WOULD do everything to make the world better. In short if a god exists and it were a moral god,The world would not be anything like it is today.

You're limiting the power of omnipotent beings by trying to make them fit into the description in some ancient manuscripts written by goat herders 2,000 years ago! Don't talk to me about "putting god in a box" when I put absolutely no limits on the potential power of omnipotent beings.


Secondly my "hang ups" about religion stem from study into religion. I KNOW alot about religion therefor I realize it's dangerous. Christianity=Religion wether you like it or not. You are so blinded by your dogma you can't see how absurd and illogical and potentially dangerous religion actually is.
I don't know the exact date I realized religion is nonsense as I stated before. It was a gradual process. Detailed investigation into theology and history and science led me to realize religion/spiritual beliefs are absurd.

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AWWWWWWWWWWWWWN  ::)

yada yada yada

Yes, JA, you are correct.  Christianity=Religion.  But your genius-like mind still doesn't comprehend that Religion<>God.  Nice try, bro.   ;)

<> means not equal....
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 20, 2006, 11:37:35 AM

It is. It's called "Wicca".
So it's a "religion" by your definition?


Any belief in a supernatural power which controls human destiny is a religion.
Thoughts?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 20, 2006, 11:41:00 AM
So it's a "religion" by your definition?
 Thoughts?

Wicca n. A polytheistic Neo-Pagan nature religion inspired by various pre-Christian western European beliefs, whose central deity is a mother.

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 20, 2006, 11:47:48 AM
Wicca n. A polytheistic Neo-Pagan nature religion inspired by various pre-Christian western European beliefs, whose central deity is a mother.


Maybe I meant WITCHCRAFT. :)
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 20, 2006, 11:59:08 AM
Maybe I meant WITCHCRAFT. :)


Witches practice Witchcraft.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 20, 2006, 01:27:11 PM
Any belief in a supernatural power which controls human destiny is a religion.
Witchcraft!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: w8tlftr on April 20, 2006, 01:50:29 PM
Tell me, what do you do with witches?  :)

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Butterbean on April 20, 2006, 04:41:06 PM


You're limiting the power of omnipotent beings by trying to make them fit into the description in some ancient manuscripts written by goat herders 2,000 years ago!


Hmmm.  Do you think every book of the bible was written by goatherders?

I don't think your "detailed investigation into theology and history" was very thorough :-\
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 21, 2006, 09:20:50 AM
Tell me, what do you do with witches?  :)




Exodus 22:18 "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."


Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: w8tlftr on April 21, 2006, 09:58:03 AM

Exodus 22:18 "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."




*Sigh*

The proper reply is burn them, Nazi-Bot.

I guess you have never watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail since you were to busy attending Hitler Youth Group meetings.



Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 21, 2006, 11:49:21 AM
Quote from: w8tlftr
*Sigh*

The proper reply is burn them, Nazi-Bot.

I guess you have never watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail since you were to busy attending Hitler Youth Group meetings.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA   
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 21, 2006, 12:09:00 PM
*Sigh*

The proper reply is burn them, Nazi-Bot.

I guess you have never watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail since you were to busy attending Hitler Youth Group meetings.




Dude, THAT WAS FUNNY! ;D
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Colossus_500 on April 24, 2006, 10:20:55 AM
JA, when you said you were once a Jesus freak, does it mean that you confessed yourself to be a sinner, you accepted Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior over your life, and that you believe God to be the true deity?  Did you share this with others? 
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 24, 2006, 01:05:52 PM
JA, when you said you were once a Jesus freak, does it mean that you confessed yourself to be a sinner, you accepted Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior over your life, and that you believe God to be the true deity?  Did you share this with others? 

Yes for everything except past tense.


I no longer believe in any God's.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 24, 2006, 03:34:27 PM


I no longer believe in any God's.

Why? Is there anyone you look up too as a role model (besides Hitler :-\)?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Oldschool Flip on April 25, 2006, 05:41:55 AM
Why? Is there anyone you look up too as a role model (besides Hitler :-\)?
Ummm........Grand Dragon of the KKK? :P
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: CC3 on April 25, 2006, 07:56:36 AM

Hmmm.  Do you think every book of the bible was written by goatherders?

I don't think your "detailed investigation into theology and history" was very thorough :-\

Note: I will be using the word "spirituality" and not "religion" in this post, as I seriously dislike the negative connotations that come with that word.

Please do not misunderstand me to think that I am "jumping on Johnny's side" here.  I disagree with the kid about many things (specifically his political beliefs and lack of respect for humanity as a whole).

But I have to respond to this...do you believe the Bible was written as an exact account of the way things were and are supposed to be? 

Do you belive the Bible was written by true contemporaries of Jesus?  Are you aware that Luke, the first book detailing aspects of Jesus' life, was not even written until 80 years after his death?  Do you know how much a story can change by word of mouth over 80 years?

Are you aware that the current Bible was not even formed until the Council of Nicea, 323 years after Jesus' death?  Are you aware that many books that were part of early Christian doctrine were deemed "heretical" and ordered to be destroyed, yet some survived that seriously challenge many of the things said in the King James Bible?  Do a search on the Nag Hammadi texts.

Are you aware that the original books of the New Testament were written in Aramaic, a dead language so commonly mistranslated and misunderstood that even Bible scholars can tell you many of the things written in the contemporary Bible may be different than they were originally intended to be? 

These are things that I believe are worthy of exploration, especially by Christians.  If you are going to be something, don't you want to understand it for what it truly is and where it really came from?  Blindly accepting something just because someone told you that's the way it is or was is very dangerous, IMO.

So that I am not being misunderstood, I will say this.  I am a spiritual person.  I believe in God.

But, growing up, I found it too hard to accept many of the things I was being told.  I believe, by "trying to make sense of it all" I am stronger in my belief now than I was growing up and going to Sunday School every week.  I understand that we cannot find the answers to everything.  Some things are just the will of a higher power in my opinion. 

But the same thing can be said for science, math, biology, etc.  Why does F=ma?  Why does e=mc^2?  Why does 1+1=2?  I mean, can anyone really explain those things, at the very core of what they are?  No, they just are what they are.  I don't know...whoever made this all happen just decided that's how it's going to be, and that's the way it is...

Spiritualists need not be so scared of science, science need not be so scared of spirituality.  After some of the things I've learned and studied, I honestly believe there is a very spiritual side to science.  There are just too many things in this world that are so perfectly alligned (from a scientific and/or mathematical point of view) for me to believe that the universe "just happened".  I touched on that in another thread...
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: 24KT on April 25, 2006, 11:15:20 AM
STella it's like this:
I used to sell expensive vacuums door to door. A lot of people bought them. But every once in awhile you get a customer who got bad service and will do ANYTHING to make sure other people don't have the same thing happen. Of course there are others that have gotten great service and recommend the cleaner.

Johnny is the guy who got BAD SERVICE! ;D

I love this guy!

Oldschool, you've just summed up in a nutshell why Goatboy & Havenbull so vehemently detest network mtkg.

Because religion is dangerous. Case in point September 11th 2001. This was due to religion. Over 2,000 people died because of religion and it's nonsense.

Are you sure 911 was about religion? I'm surprised that someone who places as much value as you do on logic and reason, could so easily dismiss a mountain of evidence that suggests something other than religion was behind 911

Religion isn't based on a foundation of logic and reason so the people who believe in it by definition aren't logical or reasonable. You could even say they are mentaly ill. Religion is like neurosis. Anyone who believes in some magical being who made the world and watches over us all and believes some old book which is actually composed of dozens of books by various random authors is the "word of God" CAN'T be sane!

"Man must work with his intellect. He must develop his mental body so that he can express himself as an autonomous individual and gain mastery over the material world. But at the same time he must see to it that his intellect does not gain ascendancy to the detriment of all his other faculties and possibilities for exploration, something which is happening more and more these days. Based on what we see manifesting in most of our contemporaries, we could say the intellect is becoming an instrument of destruction. The more people rely on it, on the way in which it addresses questions and draws conclusions, the more they cut themselves off from other beings, both visible and invisible, for the subtle life of the universe, of the soul and spirit, escapes their investigations." --Omraam Mikhaël Aïvanhov
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: 24KT on April 25, 2006, 11:18:04 AM
Note: I will be using the word "spirituality" and not "religion" in this post, as I seriously dislike the negative connotations that come with that word.

Please do not misunderstand me to think that I am "jumping on Johnny's side" here.  I disagree with the kid about many things (specifically his political beliefs and lack of respect for humanity as a whole).

But I have to respond to this...do you believe the Bible was written as an exact account of the way things were and are supposed to be? 

Do you belive the Bible was written by true contemporaries of Jesus?  Are you aware that Luke, the first book detailing aspects of Jesus' life, was not even written until 80 years after his death?  Do you know how much a story can change by word of mouth over 80 years?

Are you aware that the current Bible was not even formed until the Council of Nicea, 323 years after Jesus' death?  Are you aware that many books that were part of early Christian doctrine were deemed "heretical" and ordered to be destroyed, yet some survived that seriously challenge many of the things said in the King James Bible?  Do a search on the Nag Hammadi texts.

Are you aware that the original books of the New Testament were written in Aramaic, a dead language so commonly mistranslated and misunderstood that even Bible scholars can tell you many of the things written in the contemporary Bible may be different than they were originally intended to be? 

These are things that I believe are worthy of exploration, especially by Christians.  If you are going to be something, don't you want to understand it for what it truly is and where it really came from?  Blindly accepting something just because someone told you that's the way it is or was is very dangerous, IMO.

So that I am not being misunderstood, I will say this.  I am a spiritual person.  I believe in God.

But, growing up, I found it too hard to accept many of the things I was being told.  I believe, by "trying to make sense of it all" I am stronger in my belief now than I was growing up and going to Sunday School every week.  I understand that we cannot find the answers to everything.  Some things are just the will of a higher power in my opinion. 

But the same thing can be said for science, math, biology, etc.  Why does F=ma?  Why does e=mc^2?  Why does 1+1=2?  I mean, can anyone really explain those things, at the very core of what they are?  No, they just are what they are.  I don't know...whoever made this all happen just decided that's how it's going to be, and that's the way it is...

Spiritualists need not be so scared of science, science need not be so scared of spirituality.  After some of the things I've learned and studied, I honestly believe there is a very spiritual side to science.  There are just too many things in this world that are so perfectly alligned (from a scientific and/or mathematical point of view) for me to believe that the universe "just happened".  I touched on that in another thread...

BRAVO!!!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 25, 2006, 05:48:14 PM
Why? Is there anyone you look up too as a role model (besides Hitler :-\)?


Of course....I look up to alot of people but I don't have any "role models".

Carl Sagan.

Charles Darwin

Albert Einstein

Issac Newton

Stephen Hawking

ect..

ect...
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 25, 2006, 06:08:27 PM

Of course....I look up to alot of people but I don't have any "role models".

Carl Sagan.

Charles Darwin

Albert Einstein

Issac Newton

Stephen Hawking

ect..

ect...

I used to do Carl Sagans landscaping when I was younger. Dude was a nice guy but very reclusive and weird, he couldn't look me straight in the eye when I or anyone else talked to him!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 25, 2006, 06:11:37 PM
But the same thing can be said for science, math, biology, etc.  Why does F=ma?  Why does e=mc^2?  Why does 1+1=2?  I mean, can anyone really explain those things, at the very core of what they are?  No, they just are what they are.  I don't know...whoever made this all happen just decided that's how it's going to be, and that's the way it is...

Explaining why the universe is the way it is, is being discovered everyday in new physics. Look into M-Theory or String Theory as far as to why our physical laws are the way they are in this universe. Nothing "spiritual" or "Godly" about that.


need not be so scared of science, science need not be so scared of spirituality.  After some of the things I've learned and studied, I honestly believe there is a very spiritual side to science.  There are just too many things in this world that are so perfectly alligned (from a scientific and/or mathematical point of view) for me to believe that the universe "just happened".  I touched on that in another thread...


"Spirituality" is by definition unscientific. Science is about tests and observations and figuring observable things out. "Spirituality" is about mumbo jumbo and nonsense.

Secondly you brought up "perfectly alligned"? This is the "fine tuning argument" for a God. It's flawed. Since you like looking things up yourself look that up also to spare me explaining it to you.

Science doesn't say the "Universe just happened" anymore than it says "things go up must just go down!" Science does it's best to explain them all with the resources it has. It doesn't say "it just happened." RELIGION says that!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 25, 2006, 06:16:16 PM
I used to do Carl Sagans landscaping when I was younger. Dude was a nice guy but very reclusive and weird, he couldn't look me straight in the eye when I or anyone else talked to him!


Sagan suffered from myelodysplasia later in his life(why he died) and he was on medical watch during that time, Which is why he stayed at home alot.

However I find it hard to believe what you say about him since I met him prior to his death and he was very upright and polite and intelligent.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: CC3 on April 25, 2006, 07:55:39 PM
Explaining why the universe is the way it is, is being discovered everyday in new physics. Look into M-Theory or String Theory as far as to why our physical laws are the way they are in this universe.

Hmm, I looked M-theory up but couldn't really find anything that directly relates it to explaining the origins of physical laws.  Perhaps you could provide a link?

I also see that it is highly disputed even in the scientific community, as it's purely theoretical and not backed by any experimental evidence.  I'm not necessarily using this as an argument for my case; it's mostly just an observation.  Even the relativity equation is disputed in many circles, so that was probably a bad example to use for the point I was trying to make in my previous post.  However, I guess the point I'm making now is that even science relies on "faith" to a certain extent. 

[Just an interesting tidbit, Ed Witten apparently stated that the M stands for "Magic, mystery, or matrix according to taste."]

Quote
Secondly you brought up "perfectly alligned"? This is the "fine tuning argument" for a God. It's flawed. Since you like looking things up yourself look that up also to spare me explaining it to you.

I was never aware of the "fine-tuning argument" (at least, not the term); thanks for the heads up.  I did find some very interesting stuff on that, notably the essays by Theodore Drange.  The problem I see with his rebuttal (and many others to fine-tuning) is that it relies on, for lack of a better term, "maybe/maybe not" arguments, which again conjures up thoughts of arguments based on "faith", which I really have a problem with.  For example, he says that, in answer to the fixation of the physical constanst, "Other Values for Physical Constants May Not Be Physically Possible", "Other Values for Physical Constants May Be Highly Improbable", "There May Be an Ensemble of Other Worlds", and so on and so forth.   

Also, his argument for the possibility of existence of other worlds (or other dimensions of reality in the writings of some) is something I found common to many arguments against fine-tuning.  I guess my answer is, why is it so hard to believe that if God made this universe he wouldn't create others?  I'm hardly conceited or ignorant enough to believe that we are the only form of life that could possibly exist.  And even so, accepting the idea that other worlds exist, how does that prove that whatever created this universe wasn't behind those, as well?  I don't really see how that refutes the idea that something created this world and all of the others out there.

Please understand that I am not trying to be close-minded here.  I just don't personally believe that existence as we know it came from nothingness.  No amount of science has ever been able to back up such a claim.

Let me ask you this: what is your explanation for how the universe began?  Can you actually comprehend the idea that something came from absolutely nothing (I mean really thinking about that concept very hard) and still believe that that's possible?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 25, 2006, 09:45:53 PM

Sagan suffered from myelodysplasia later in his life(why he died) and he was on medical watch during that time, Which is why he stayed at home alot.

However I find it hard to believe what you say about him since I met him prior to his death and he was very upright and polite and intelligent.

I worked for Mr. Sagen for 2 1/2 years and known him just as long (a working relationship only) and saw him on a fairly regular basis. I never said he wasn't those things you mentioned, he a VERY nice man, extremely intelligent (to the point I was nervous and intimidated) he was generous as well. At that time i was not a Christian, but even if he was alive now and knowing what I have researched, I would have never wanted to get into a debate with him even though we would not agree. I had much respect for the man!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 26, 2006, 10:57:45 AM
Hmm, I looked M-theory up but couldn't really find anything that directly relates it to explaining the origins of physical laws.  Perhaps you could provide a link?

I also see that it is highly disputed even in the scientific community, as it's purely theoretical and not backed by any experimental evidence.  I'm not necessarily using this as an argument for my case; it's mostly just an observation.  Even the relativity equation is disputed in many circles, so that was probably a bad example to use for the point I was trying to make in my previous post.  However, I guess the point I'm making now is that even science relies on "faith" to a certain extent. 

[Just an interesting tidbit, Ed Witten apparently stated that the M stands for "Magic, mystery, or matrix according to taste."]


Faith is defined as a BELIEF not supported by evidence.

What science relies on "faith"?

Also, his argument for the possibility of existence of other worlds (or other dimensions of reality in the writings of some) is something I found common to many arguments against fine-tuning.  I guess my answer is, why is it so hard to believe that if God made this universe he wouldn't create others?  I'm hardly conceited or ignorant enough to believe that we are the only form of life that could possibly exist.  And even so, accepting the idea that other worlds exist, how does that prove that whatever created this universe wasn't behind those, as well?  I don't really see how that refutes the idea that something created this world and all of the others out there.

The idea of fine tuning is that this universe's physical constants are just right for life to evolve in them or for matter to exist in them.

The rebuttal that this may not be the only universe and there could be many more explains that problem.

If this is the ONLY universe it would be very odd that it had it's physical laws just so matter could form and life could evolve.

The fine tuning argument really doesn't work because in effect all it proves is this universe as it is is fit for matter and life to form. That's it. It doesn't prove a "God" did it or any such thing like that.

If there are an unlimited number of universes we just got delt the better hand in however universes form.

Please understand that I am not trying to be close-minded here.  I just don't personally believe that existence as we know it came from nothingness.  No amount of science has ever been able to back up such a claim.

1.No science says our universe came from "nothing".

2.You didn't even know what the M-Theory was so how could you claim no Science has backed up the claim that our universe has came from nothing? THAT would be close-minded.

Let me ask you this: what is your explanation for how the universe began?  Can you actually comprehend the idea that something came from absolutely nothing (I mean really thinking about that concept very hard) and still believe that that's possible?

I don't know what the cause of our universe was or exactly how it began. I have no idea.

Not knowing how doesn't mean a "God" did it.

Inorder to establish a "God" did it you'd need evidence a God did not not a fallacy of argument from ignorance.


If our universe must of had to of had a cause...Then what caused that cause? If everything needs a cause then what caused the cause of our universe? And caused that cause? so on and so forth?


Secondly...You can't comprehend our universe coming from "nothing"? Why not? What's stopping something from coming from nothing? NOTHING!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2006, 09:30:01 AM
Johnny,

Did "time" have a point of origin?  (this is not some loaded question,  i really do want to read your answer)
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 27, 2006, 10:16:38 AM
Johnny,

Did "time" have a point of origin?  (this is not some loaded question,  i really do want to read your answer)



Yes
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2006, 10:20:08 AM
Please explain.

How?  why?  etc.   

thank you.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 27, 2006, 10:27:10 AM
Please explain.

How?  why?  etc.   

thank you.

He's "googling" as we speak!
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on April 27, 2006, 10:30:38 AM



What science relies on "faith"?

 

You have "Faith" is scientists to find answers don't you?

Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 27, 2006, 10:37:23 AM
Please explain.

How?  why?  etc.   

thank you.


Don't know.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 27, 2006, 10:38:47 AM
You have "Faith" is scientists to find answers don't you?




That sentence made no sense.


I don't have "faith" science can answer the questions I have.

I might have "hope" that science can but "faith"? No.

"Faith" is a belief. "Hope" is a desire. Big difference.

I don't believe anything unless it's supported by facts and evidence. Therefor "faith" is an oxymoron as far as science is concerned.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2006, 11:31:44 AM
Quote
Don't know.

Then how do you know it did?
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 27, 2006, 02:25:40 PM
Then how do you know it did?


Don't know for sure it was just an educated guess.


I haven't done any real research into the physics of the Big Bang so I don't know much about it.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2006, 02:39:40 PM
I would think that there had to be time before the BIG bang.

I heard someone say time is infinite in both directions, past and future. 

That's kind of what i was eluding to earlier in the evolution post about the linier conecpt of time and the posibility of God's creations outside the traditional framework of time.  If time wasn't real before the Big bang then some thing's creation might not  be influfnced by time even  through there was a sequence to it's development.  And yah yah yah yah,  no need to go into the whole facts, evidence blah blah blah.   this is about time not evolution. 
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: Johnny Apollo on April 27, 2006, 03:00:11 PM
Infact I lied about not knowing about not knowing if time had a beginning just to bait you into letting your defense down so I could get something constructive out of you.


I would think that there had to be time before the BIG bang.

I heard someone say time is infinite in both directions, past and future.



In reality this is false. The big bang was the origin of everything in this universe including time. Einstein showed us that "time" is actually a product of this universe. It's a part of the universe linked to space itself. Thus the term "space time" came into being. Time isn't some abstract measurment but is an actuall thing that is part of our universe as einstein showed in his theory of relativity.

Time can be distorted and contorted and dialated by bending space-time itself. This can be done by extreme amounts of speed or gravity. When space-time is bent it dialates time's flow. For instance when someone is traveling at high speeds time from their relative point of view flows slower than that of an outside observer who is stationary.

Numerous studies support this. Studies done on high energy particles with a steady decay rate can be shown to decay slower when their speed is increased than particles that are going slower. Stop watches that are identical in time, One can be left on earth and another in a jet for hours and then when compaired the one on the jet would be a few micro seconds behind the one on earth. This shows time can itself be dialated. It isn't some straight abstract line as newton thought(as you think).

Prior to the big bang "time" can't even be defined. It doesn't make sense to postulate about time existing prior to our universe when the only time as we humans know is the time that we experience within our universe which abides by the laws of our universe. We can't say anything yet about the possibility of any sorts of "time" existing outside of this universe. Not that "outside of this universe" makes anymore sense than "before the universe" in astro-physics.



That's kind of what i was eluding to earlier in the evolution post about the linier conecpt of time and the posibility of God's creations outside the traditional framework of time.  If time wasn't real before the Big bang then some thing's creation might not  be influfnced by time even  through there was a sequence to it's development.  And yah yah yah yah,  no need to go into the whole facts, evidence blah blah blah.   this is about time not evolution. 


Time is far from linear. In reality it's anything but. Time can be twisted and contorted depending on the speed you're moving relative to outside observers. So time isn't some set linear thing. It's an attribute of our universe alot like gravity is. Gravity isn't the same for all things just like time isn't the same for all things. Gravity is stronger for object with more mass just as time moves slower relative to outside observers with higher speeds.
Title: Re: Question(s) for Johnny Apollo
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2006, 03:14:11 PM
Quote
Infact I lied about not knowing about not knowing if time had a beginning just to bait you into letting your defense down so I could get something constructive out of you.

LMAO   :)

I already said it wasn't a "loaded" question.  It wasn't about defense or offense.  That would be cheap trickery.  I really did want to know your view on it.  Not so i could debate it.  You can find this sort of thing you just wrote about at a book store, but finding someone who actually knows something about it,  can explain it, and repsond to your questions is not easy for a person, like me,  who doesn't travel with in the networks of scientists.  So i appreciate it.     

I'll read and think about what you just wrote a little later and then i might have some questions for you.