He would most likely beat bhanks in ann open bb contest because he's in proper condition. You can't really beat anyone on unless you are in "proper" condition, no matter what becausee there is a certain amount of condition required nowadays and bhanks is not quite there, might take even 20lbs weight reduction or more depending on where the weight loss comes from.

Again, I've seen a lot of shows, both in person and pics over decades, in all of them a really superior specimen WILL be beat in a show if they are not in proper shape. Like we've all seen shows where a superior "athlete" with superior muscle size, superior proportions and superior everything is relegated to outside top 10 because he just isn't there wrt conditioning. In open bbing you simply go nowhere, in a lineup where the others don't have the conditioning either, sure.

Some say the following:

Black clad "protesters" appeared. These are Antifa. Antifa works with the government, see BLM and how they were allowed to riot during BLM. See picture. For some reason they were held  back during these riots until now. "Leftists" don't really know how to act here as there are large factions on both sides. Now that Js are the target Antifa were put in. This is serious business because this can and will become worldwide. This can affect Biden's reelection, but also Trump's campaign, so a very delicate matter. Trump has been called "the first Jewish president." He now called for the protests to be shut down. Israel is in a huge bind, they say they will be going into Rafa no matter what happens with these negotiations with Hamas. The whole world has turned on Js and Israel in a big way, this can affect the whole of Israel's propaganda effort after WWII on how the Js are the eternal victim (though Js rule the world, US government etc ).

I don't know What do you think?

That's preposterous! BHanks looks better than a prime Flex, because he is 5lbs heavier.

"An ETH ETF approval would definitely be positive for Eth and alts. Not so sure for BTC - lets see. But in any case, I very much doubt we would see such approval soon. Those who are so confident it will happen on May 23 are unfortunately in for a big disappointment."

Why would it be a negative for BTC? Cryptos all rise and fall with each other. Have you ever seen a bull run where only one token goes up and nothing else?

I could be a negative to BTC in that alts, at least initially, were promoted as being an alternative to Bitcoin  - hence the term "alts". That being the case, and given that alts are unlimited in number and supply vs total inflows into "crypto" which are inherently finite, opening up flows to alts are arguably dilutive to BTC. So, that's how an ETF (which potentially encourages dilutive flows into shitcoins), could be harmful to BTC (at least in the short term).

As for why "cryptos rise and fall with each other", actually, over time, most simply fall. However it is correct, that when BTC rises, various shitcoins and "alts" rise. But we must understand - its BTC market cap which drives some inflows into shitcoins seeking to cannibalize BTC's market cap, and not the other way around...

Interesting. Thank you thank you for the suggestions and responses. Much appreciated.